Intro
In a recent True Islam UK livestream wherein Bro Imtiaz was able to ask a few questions. Bro Imtiaz asked if it were possible, per the Ahmadiyya understanding, for a 3rd coming of Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah), or was MGA only the second coming of Muhammad (saw)(naozobillah) and no one else? After being confused and arguing amongst themselves for about 10 mins, Maulvi Razi finally admitted that only MGA was the second coming of Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah) and no one else could do so (via Buruz), however, they all have the potential. Maulvi Razi even argued that Mirza Masroor Ahmad was also a Buruzi of Muhammad (Saw)(Naozobillah)(See the clip on Tiktok and Twitter).

Bro Imtiaz also asked about MGA’s comment on female prophets from the Al-Hakam, dated April-17-1903 (Number 14). Bro Imtiaz asked about why MGA said NO men can be prophets in this specific quotation.

On 5-17-2025 (via TikTok live, 2:05:55 time stamp), Bro Imtiaz commented on the reference about the possibility of female prophets. Bro Imtiaz explained how Maulvi Razi was quoting Malfuzat for allegedly April-16th, 1903 (however, this was published on May-1903) whereas Bro Imtiaz was quoting an incident on April-15-1903, which was published in the Al-Hakam, dated April-17-1903 (Number 14).

______________________________________________________________________________________________Malfuzat-5, Urdu edition, pages 65-66

Transliteration
“”Aikh naya nukhta, abad a namaz e maghrib, hazrat aqdas nay is taqreer ka irada farmaya…. 

is vaqt mein, ummat-e-musvi kee tara jo mamur or mujadide aiya, unka naam nabi rakha gaya.  tau ismay yay hikmat tee, kay anh hazrat salalah ho wa salam, kee shaan khatme nubuwwat may furq na auta. (jiska mufassir zikr qabla…) aur, agar koy nabi nah auta, pir mumasat may furq na auta islee-ay allah talla nay, Adam, Ibrahim, aur musa vagayra 
maray naam rakhay gay, khatak kay akhir kar, Jerry ullah fee khulil anbiya, a kab, 
goya, iskay sab aitraz raffa au gai, aur apkee ummat mein, aikh akhree Khalifa aya jo musa kee tamam khulafa ka jamad tha”””. 

Translation
“”A new point, after the prayer of maghrib, Hazrat Aqdis (MGA), gave additional information on this utterance….

In this time, like the followers of Musa (as), the Mamur’s and Mujadid’s who came, were given the name prophet. The wisdom in this was that the “shine” of khatme nubuwwat wouldn’t be contradictory (as mufassirs have written). And, if NO prophet would have came, then likenesss would not be established, this is why Allah added the names of Adam, Ibrahim, Musa and etc. to my name, in the end, I am also Jerry Ullah fee khulil anbiya, and then lifts all of the questions, and in your ummah, the last Khalifa came, who is like all the khulafar of Musa”. 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________Kalimatul Fasl, pg 116

“Kalimatal Fasl” by Mirza Bashir Ahmad (1916) quotes and background info – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Listen to Bro Imtiaz’s explanation herein (42:12 timestamp).

Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1903, April 14-15
Malfuzat, v-5, pages 344-345, 349-351

“””thousands of persons in the Umma of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Saw) received the rank of prophethood, and the effects and blessings of prophethood were found in them, but they were not openly given the title nabi only because the dignity of the prophethood of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Saw) and because of the ending of prophethood…”””.

“””for 1300 hundred years the word ‘prophet’ was not applied because of respect for the dignity of the Holy Prophet’s prophethood, and after this, because a long time had now passed and people were firmly established on the belief that the Holy Prophet Muhammad (saw) is the Khatam-ul-Anbiya, so if someone is given the title ‘prophet’ it does not go against the dignity of the Holy Prophet (saw)….”””.

“””…although the attribute of prophethood and the lights of prophethood existed, and it was right that these person should be called ‘prophet’ but that title was not given to them out of respect for the greatness of the prophethood of the Khatam-ul-Anbiya. But now, in the last days, this fear did not remain, so the Promised Messiah was nabi-ullah..”””.

Scan

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Hadaiq e Bakhshish by Ahmad Rida Khan
Hadaaiq E Bakshish English : Imam Ahmed Rida Khan : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Hadaiq e Bakhshish – Imam Ahmad Raza Khan : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

Razi alleges that Ahmad Rida Khan called Abdul Qadir Jilani as the zill of Muhammad (Saw). Razi also alleges that Ahmad Rida Khan called Muhammad (Saw) as the zill of Allah.

Scans
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

The concept of Buruz in the books of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad

The concept of Buruz in the books of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP86s1nfy/

https://x.com/ahmadiyyafacts/status/1923927517305635271?s=46&t=HTqZKquoOvKbgoBAF2aQcg

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was presented as the second coming of Muhammad (saw)(naozobillah) in 1902 by Ahmadi Maulvi’s at Qadian to the “Nadwatul Ulama” of Lucknow – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was presented as the second coming of Muhammad (saw)(naozobillah) in 1902 by Ahmadi Maulvi’s at Qadian to the “Nadwatul Ulama” of Lucknow

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad on the possibility of female prophets (1903) – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2024/12/22/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-on-the-possibility-of-female-prophets/
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #mirzaghulamahmad