Intro
On 1-24-2025, Bro Imtiaz debated Azim Saifi in terms of Maulvi Sanaullah and his death prophecy vs. MGA. Specifically about the death prophecy/mubahila in 1907 which led to MGA‘s death via cholera. Azim Saifi was arguing that since Maulvi Sanaullah denied the Mubahila challenge, the death of MGA in 11-12 months was not a valid counter-argument by Muslims. However, Bro Imtiaz brought many new references about the death prophecy/mubahila vs. Maulvi Sanaullah, which proved that MGA prayed for one of the 2 to die and his prayer was accepted by MGA’s god after the famous “Akhree Faisala” of April 15, 1907. Bro Imtiaz kept telling Azim Saifi about a report from the Al-Badr of May-9-1907, wherein Mufti Muhammad Sadiq published about this death prophecy and told the world that MGA’s god had accepted the prayer by MGA. Bro Imtiaz then showed references from the Urdu ROR of June-July-1908 wherein it was written that MGA’s dua was not answered and even prayers of Muhammad (Saw) weren’t answered (naozobillah). Also, a few years later, via Anwar ul Uloom v.1, p. 136, the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi essentially agreed that it was a failed prophecy.
Bro Imtiaz also explained the Mubahila of MGA vs. Dowie and Qasuri. In both of these cases, the respondents never accepted any Mubahila, however, Ahmadi’s still count them as Mubahila’s and victories by MGA. In the case of Sanaullah, however, they refuse to use the same rules.
Bro Imtiaz also explained how the current Ahmadi position has changed. In 2025, Ahmadi’s believe that it was a Mubahila challenge vs. Sanaullah, however, since Sanullah didn’t accept it, it is null and void. However, in 1908, after MGA died, it was called a one-sided prayer by MGA.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Refs by Bro Imtiaz
1—Review of religion June-July 1908 (Urdu edition) p. 238
MGA wanted the decision to be made based on dua but his prayer wasn’t answered… “many prayers of the prophet SAW also were not accepted” (astaghfirullah).
2—Then on 295-296
So what if one, two did not die (from MGA’s death duels)?
Also read 298
3—25 April 1907, page 7 Al Badar
God has told me that the prayer is about Sanaullah dying in my life has been accepted.
4—Anwar ul Uloom v.1, p. 136
It is objected that when MGA had a revelation that your dua has been heard (regarding Sanaullah) then why did MGA die first? I have already answered that a prophet’s purpose isn’t that some people die but that he reforms his people. K2 acknowledged that MGA’s revelation and accepted prayer on Sanaullah dying in his lifetime was falsified but it didn’t matter to k2.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
Who is Azim Saifi? Qadiani-Ahmadi TikTok-er living in India – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Who is Maulana Sanaullah Amritsari (1868-1948)? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #mirzaghulamahmad
2 Pingback