Intro
Razi is spending his life re-paying the Mirza family for helping his parents move out via asylum from Pakistan. Razi’s parents were worthless in Pakistan and even with the massive Ahmadiyya jobs network, still couldn’t work 40 hours a week.
Yesterday Fikran wrote this tweet:
I don’t believe in Qadian-Ahmadiyya, but if I played devil’s advocate and took the Qadian-Ahmadiyya perspective, I could probably beat 99.99% of Muslims in a debate. That isn’t a sign of its truth, it’s that most people like this two don’t spend their lives studying debate. I used to too!
Heck, your average Qadian-Ahmadi would lose a debate on Imamat versus an Imami Shia, that doesn’t mean Imamat is right!
I am speaking of a dynamic between Majority and Minority groups, where the minority is typically aware of the majority, but not vice versa. I gave a “neutral” example related to the Shi’i concept of Imamat.
This is what Razi from Ahmadi Answers quoted (Italics is his commentary).
Fikran, a well known anti-Ahmadi destroyed all Sunni Ulama who were humiliated today
He accepts that 99.9% of Muslims would lose to Ahmadi Muslims in debates
I don’t believe in Qadian-Ahmadiyya, but if I played devil’s advocate and took the Qadian-Ahmadiyya perspective, I could probably beat 99.99% of Muslims in a debate. That isn’t a sign of its truth, it’s that most people like this two don’t spend their lives studying debate. I used to too!
Notice that he cut off the latter part of my tweet. If you look closely, you can even see the part he cut off on the bottom of his screenshot 😊.
Three quick points:
- He cut off a part of my tweat provides critical context and an example of what I was referring to. I specifically say “Heck, your average Qadian-Ahmadi would lose a debate on Imamat versus an Imami Shia”.
- He rephrases what I said from “I could probably beat…Muslims in a debate” to “Muslims would lose to Ahmadi Muslims…”
- As I said here, I don’t even watch the debates or streams, they’re typically very long and way too heated for me.
This is clear dishonesty. Dear Ahmadi readers, just because someone is on “your side” does not mean you are obligated to agree with everything. Recognize the distortion at play here.
On a related note, whenever the Qadian-Ahmadiyya literature cites a historic scholar/authority to justify a doctrine, this is exactly what is happening: A distortion of what the historic scholar/authority actually said. Feel free to ask me for examples, but I don’t want to go too far out of the scope of this post.
Continue reading “Razi purposely misquotes Fikran” →
