Intro
In 1891, as MGA began arguing for the death of Esa (as), he quoted a verse that no one had ever quoted before in terms of Esa (as), that is 3:145, which is as follows:
MGA added the word ALL
In the above verse it is obvious that Allah is telling Muslims that Messengers have died and been killed before. Rumors had spread that Muhammad (saw) might have been killed, so Allah gave Muslims this clarifying message, that even if Muhammad (saw) had been killed, it doesn’t matter, Islam would continue.
Nonetheless, MGA continued to argue
Sir Syed didn’t use this argument, in fact, in the entire history of Islam, only MGA has added this extra word, and he did this simply to prove that he was a messiah. MGA then went on to quote the hadith that happened on the death of Muhammad (saw) and how Abu Bakr (ra) quoted this verse of the quran. Nonetheless, even in this hadith, the word ALL doesn’t exist and it was inserted by MGA as he continued to cause communal strife in the Punjab under the context of capitalism and non-profit business.
Conclusions
MGA was ready to twist any verse of the Quran as he attempted to manage his non-profit and live a luxurious life. We know that he never led Salaat or a Khutbah Juma and never an eid speech.
May 12, 2018 at 1:02 am
All right, and word of all could not be added because it’s means that all of Prophets passed before Muhammad PBUH, so he could not be a true Prophet, because all of Prophets already passed before him. So there are proved that the word of “All” is wrong.
May 12, 2018 at 4:37 pm
I agree. Thanks for this argument. We seem to have overlooked it.
ADMIN