Introduction
This short essay will cover MGA and his use of 69:44 in terms of his new theory that a false prophet never lives 23-years, whilst claiming to receive communications from Allah. MGA began using this argument in 1897, in Anjam e Athim. Watch my video explanation here. We will also show 2:61, 2:87, 2:91, 3;21, 3:112, 3:144, 3:181, 3:183, 4:155, 5:70 (That’s 10 verses) to prove how prophets had been killed in the past, it wasn’t a new thing, in fact, 3;144 of the Quran tells us that even if Muhammad (saw) was killed, it wouldn’t mean Islam is false. Furthermore, we all know how Yahya (As) was killed early on during his mission, MGA even admitted to it. In fact, in TUHFA-E-GOLARHVIYYAH, MGA admitted that the killing of a prophet is not a sign that any given prophet was a liar.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
69:40–69:48
These are the verse of the Quran wherein MGA claims that any claimant to prophethood that is false would surely be killed by Allah. However, this is incorrect, this verse was only for Muhammad (saw).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1897
[Anjam-e-Atham, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 11, pp. 49-51](Essence of Islam, online english edition, Vol. 2).
“”””Our opposing Maulavis are well aware that God Almighty has expressed in the Holy Qur’an His disgust of one who fabricates lies against God, so much so that He has said concerning the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) that if he had fabricated any lies against Him, He would have severed his large artery ((The reference is to the Quran, 69:45-47)).
______________________________________________________________________________________________1900 in “Arbaeen”
[RK, v 17, p. 393; starts at 6th line from bottom; Arba`een Number 3](Via Nuzhat Haneef)
“Thousands of Muslim Savants and spiritual leaders have always advances this argument before the infidels, and no Christian or Jew has yet to come forward to identify or point out one such person who having fabricated a claim to be an Appointee of Allah (as per prophecy), had then passed 23 years of his remaining life”
_______________________________________________________________________________________________1901 in Al-Hakam
[Al Hakm Vol.5 – 24 July 1901]
‘‘If a person can bring forth an example of a man who claimed to be a recipient of divine revelation and lived for more than 23 years, I will burn all my books myself.”
_______________________________________________________________________________________________The scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Background on Chapter 69
Per the official Ahmadiyya commentary on the Quran, Chapter 69 was revealed very early on during the meccan period. This is when Muhammad (saw) had newly claimed to be a prophet, and Allah had assured Muhammad (saw) that he was in fact a prophet, and if he wasn’t, Allah would have already ended his life for lying. This is exactly what Ibn Kathir wrote in his famous tafsir. Further, at the time when this Ayah was revealed, Muhammad (Saw) had barely claimed prophethood, 23 years hadn’t elapsed. Moreover, this ayah was for Muhammad (saw), to clear his doubts.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________The Quran on the killing of Prophets
The Quran repeatedley refers to how the Jews killed true prophets of Allah. In fact, Yahya (As) was assassinated. A whopping 10 verses of the Quran prove that prophets were killed, 2:61, 2:87, 2:91, 3;21, 3:112, 3:144, 3:181, 3:183, 4:155, 5:70 it wasn’t a new thing.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Nevertheless, even MGA wrote about Yahya as follows:
1891— Izala Auham, RK volume 3 page 314, he calls yahya (AS) to be Shaheed
______________________________________________________________________________________________
MGA contradicts himself
Obviously, we see MGA making the argument that if any prophet lasts 23-years, he must be true, nonetheless, MGA contradicts himself just a few years later, in a book that is backdated to 1900, however, published in 1902, i.e. Tofa Gulariva. Why did MGA always make opposing arguments? The answer is….to create wiggle room and in this case..they created it in case of the murder of MGA.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________The Quran on the killing of prophets, Part-2
So remember, the Ahmadi-mullah will do anything for job security. So Malik Ghulam Fareed, the author of the 5-volume commentary by the Qadiani branch, when it came to 2:91 (see page 150_, and 2:62, they purposely re-interpretted a clear verse of the quran only to promote the idea that prophets cannot be killed. Malik Ghulam Farid writes that the phrase “would kill the prophets”, doesn’t actually mean to kill the prophets, but to attempt to kill the prophets (See page 125 of the 1988 5 volume commentary.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Even if Muhammad (Saw) was killed, we would still believe in Islam
The Ahmadis seem to forget how in 3:144, Allah categorically tells us that if Muhammad (SAW) is killed in battle…its nothing new. Prophets have been killed in the past. Here is the quotation:
“”””With regard to their being routed, when it was rumoured that the Prophet had been killed and the hypocrites had said to the believers, ‘If he has been killed, go back to your [previous] religion’, the following was revealed: Muhammad is only a messenger; messengers have passed away before him. Why, if he should die or is slain, like others, will you turn back on your heels, will you return to unbelief (the last statement is the locus of the interrogative of denial, in other words, ‘he was not a worshipped being, so that [if he were to die] you should turn back [to your previous religion]’). If any man should turn back on his heels, he will not harm God in any way, but will be harming himself, and God will requite those that are thankful, for His graces by staying firm.”””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Conclusions
Even the most novice Ahmadis in the world will make these ridiculous arguments:
- If we are not from Allah, why are we growing?
- Why didnt Allah kill MGA if he was false?
- Allah just doesnt allow false prophets to live, and MGA lived 28 years after claiming divine communication.
Answers: We are living in the era of free markets. And religion is also a free market. Ahmadiyya has grown just like Sikhism, Mormonism, JW’s, 7th day adventist and many many others. Ahmadiyya has benefited immensely from Capitalism, as have these other non-profit corporations. Allah doesnt kill false prophets as Ahmadis believe, many false prophets lived long lives, in fact, Musailma Kazzab outlived Muhammad (saw). MGA claimed prophethood in 1901, he died 6 1/2 years later, so, he didnt even last as long as he should have. The funny thing here is that the qadiani branch backdates MGA’s prophethood to 1880.
Furthermore, since MGA claimed prophethood in 1901, his prophethood only lasted 6 1/2 years and thus he disproved himself with his own argument.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/06/anjam-e-athim-1897-quotes/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/06/05/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-yahya-as/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/13/mgas-tirade-against-esa-as-was-too-much/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/06/30/tuhfa-e-golarhviyyah-by-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1902/
https://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/jews_killed_prophets.html
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian
September 23, 2016 at 8:35 am
As much as Ahmadis rely on metaphoric meaning when it comes to running away from arguments, they have failed to realise that this verse of the Quran (denoting killing of liars onto Allah) is metaphoric.
Let’s say a prophet comes and he’s killed, but he’s made a martyr and people mourn his death for centuries, what’s the point of his death then? If his dawah carries on as a false prophet, then it doesn’t make a difference.
Just like Paul was killed and his dawah spread, Hussain (as) was also martyred, and his death still mourned to this very day.
So to put it in short, the dawah of MGA is dead, it has always been dead, and it will remain dead. Allah killed his dawah, and he may await a punishment in the hereafter
wassalam
LikeLike
September 23, 2016 at 3:31 pm
Exactly!
LikeLike
March 20, 2017 at 6:15 pm
bash Good …….
LikeLike