Intro
This is quite possibly the most controversial book in Ahmadiyya. It was written by the only (alleged) college educated son of MGA, Mirza Bashir Ahmad. Mirza Bashir Ahmad was a son of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad who was named Qamrul Anbiyaa (the moon of the prophets) by his father. He was born in 1893 and died on September 2, 1963, at the age of 71. He helped his brother through the latter’s period as head of the Qadiani Ahmadiyya. This help came in the form of managing properties in Qadian and writing books and essays in the jamaat periodicals that ultimately proved to be quite controversial. His role and his works are now greatly minimized by the Qadiani establishment. Very few Ahmadis know know much about him and his writings. The picture in the above is from the 1924 edition of the Moslem Sunrise.
It should be noted that this book, Kalimatul Fasl was written in the Urdu-Review of Religions of 1915 (March and April) and serialized into book form afterwards. The second edition of Kalimatal Fasl was published again in 1941, per the below. 61:6 is also discussed in this book, in fact, it is alleged that MGA = 61:6.
On page 104, Mirza Bashir Ahmad argued that if one who denies Mirza, was born 1300 years ago, would he have been less than abu jahl. And if abdul hakeem was born then, wouldn’t he go against Muhammad ﷺ like musailma. (O ahmadis) When you have accepted MGA as complete shadow of Muhammad ﷺ, what stops you from accepting the people of deny MGA, complete shadow of those who denied Muhammad.
On page 105, Mirza Bashir Ahmad argued that in this case, can there remain any doubt that Allah sent Muhammad (peace be upon him) again to Qadian to fulfil His promise?
On page 113, Mirza Bashir Ahmad argued that every messenger was granted accomplishments and perfections according to his capacity and performance in varying degrees, but the Promised Messiah (Mirza Ghulam) was granted prophethood when he had attained all the accomplishments of the Prophethood of Muhammad (SAW) and was qualified to be called a shadow prophet. Thus, this shadow prophethood did not make the steps of the Promised Messiah lag behind, but it pushed them forward to such an extent that it brought him on equal footing with the holy Prophet (SAW).
On page 117, Mirza Bashir Ahmad argued that in the revelations of MGA, Allah has never used the words Zilli and Buruzi, instead, Allah only said Nabi or Rasul (See Bro Imtiaz explaining this at 55:20)(See Bro Imtiaz on 5-8-26 with Ak Shaikh, 44:59 time stamp).
On page 125, in July-2025, at 1:11:19, Bro Imtiaz explains how Mirza Bashir Ahmad quoted the letter to Dr. Abdul Hakim Khan Patialvi wherein it is written that every such individual who has heard MGA’s message and has not accepted MGA, they are not a Muslim. Mirza Bashir Ahmad says that this quote of MGAQ solves many problems, firstly, MGAQ was told via ilham that those who reject you is not a Muslim and this is an order that MGA should consider those who reject him as Non-Muslim.
This was repeated again in Dec-2025. There are 6 points (48:00 time stamp):
1–via ilham, MGA was told that whomever denies him is not a Muslim.
2–MGA kicked out Abdul Hakim Khan because he considered non-Ahmadi’s as Muslims.
3–Calling non-Ahmadi’s as Muslim is a dirty belief (habees)
4–whomever holds this aqida his chance at “Rahmat elahee” is closed.
5–whomever denies MGA is denying clear cut verses of the Quran, he turns his face away from the Quran.
6–whomever says that the deniers of MGA are good people, his heart is in the hand of Satan.
On page 126-127, Mirza Bashir Ahmad argued that let nobody be deceived by the “Promised Messiah” referring to his opponents as Muslims. The reason he called them Muslim was because that’s what they are known by. What he meant was those who claim to be Muslim, otherwise he did not consider them Muslim.
On page 129, Mirza Bashir Ahmad argued that when this issue is very clear, namely that there is no salvation without believing in the Maseeh-e-Maud, why is an effort made to deem non-Ahmadi’s as Muslims, just for the sake of it?
On page 143, Mirza Bashir Ahmad argued that it is “Yaqeenee and Quttay” that MGA is Ahmad Rasul as mentioned in 61:6.
On page 147, Mirza Bashir Ahmad argued that since MGA is not separate from Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah), in fact, MGA is exactly Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah), thus, if the denier of MGA is not a Kafir, then the denier of Muhammad (Saw) is consequently not a Kafir. How is it that in the first coming someone can deny Muhammad (SAW) and become Kafir, but in the second coming (referring to MGA), they don’t? Especially, if MGA’s coming is “Aqwa (stronger), Akmal (complete) and Ashad” (more powerful). How is it thus possible that this isn’t Kufr? Furthermore, In response to the Lahori-Ahmadi’s saying that MGA didn’t declare his deniers as Non-Muslim, Mirza Bashir Ahmad alleges:
–It’s true, at one point, MGA did say that his deniers aren’t Kafir.
–However, after some time, and via ilham, Allah caused MGA to change his Aqida.
–This was done via MGA writing to Abdul Hakim Khan and telling him that people who have received MGA’s message and still reject him are non-Muslims.
On page 158, Mirza Bashir Ahmad argued that MGA is Muhammad Rasulullah HIMSELF who came to earth a 2ND TIME to spread Islam.
On page 173, Mirza Bashir Ahmad argued that the quran was lifted up…MGA brought it back.
In Dec-2025, Bro Imtiaz quoted this book in terms of Ahmadiyya Takfir.
In 2026 (May-8)(18:15 time stamp), Bro Imtiaz streamed with Ak Shaikh and discussed the concept of Buruz. Bro Imtiaz explained how Mirza Bashir Ahmad wrote in the Review of Religions-Urdu of 1915-1916, (later called Kalimatul Fasl) that MGA used the words “zilli” and “buruzi” interchangeably. Mirza Bashir Ahmad argued that this “zilli-nubuwwat” didn’t hold MGA back in terms of rank, in fact, it pushed MGA forward (in-rank), it pushed MGA forward so much so that it brought MGA on equal footing with Muhammad (Saw)(Naozobillah)(Kalimat-ul-Fasl, P. 113).
Continue reading ““Kalimatal Fasl” by Mirza Bashir Ahmad (1915-1916) quotes and background info”
