Dr. Abdul Hakeem Khan is a very controversial figure in the world of Ahmadiyya, especially in terms of how MGA began calling Muslims as Kafirs in 1906. Abdul Hakeem Khan was a follower of MGA since at least 1886 (See Haqiqatul Wahi), since MGA himself admitted to this fact. Abdul Hakeem Khan was most likely a follower of Noorudin and thus followed Noorudin to MGA in 1889.
He left Ahmadiyya publicly in 1906 and later predicted that MGA would die in 1908. His main beef with MGA was on 2:62 on Salvation. In 1906, he wrote a series of books vs. MGA entitled, Zikrul-Hakim, in one of these he discussed the death of Maulvi Abdul Karim. Further, he caused MGA to begin to do open Takfir of the Muslim world. Dr. ‘Abdul-Hakim Khan, also wrote a booklet “al-Masihud-Dajjal”, which refers to MGA. Dr. Khan accuses MGA of telling lies, he calls MGA a dajjal [deceiver], corrupt, and an embezzler. In his booklet, al-Masihud-Dajjal, he has listed a number of my ‘vices’. He calls MGA as selfish, egotistical, arrogant, Antichrist, Satan, ignorant, insane, great liar, lazy, corrupt, one who breaks his word, and an embezzler. Dr. Khan then toured the major cities of the Punjab like Lahore, Amritsar, and the rest, delivering public lectures and invariably ascribing all kinds of misdeeds to MGA, ridiculing MGA, and declaring
MGA to be dangerous to the world; more dangerous than even the Devil. This was not all, he also publicly announced in each lecture, in the presence of hundreds of people that God had revealed to him: ‘During the next three years, this man [i.e. me] would die on account of his being a liar and an impostor.’ On 14 August 1906, Maulawi Nur-ud-Din received another letter from Dr. Khan, wherein he says that God Almighty had informed him on 12 July 1906 about MGA’s demise to the effect that MGA shall die within a period of three years from this date (by 1909).
Haqiqatul Wahi is written in the summer of 1906, with just small portions written in 1907, Abdul-Hakim Khan is 64 times.
However, after MGA died, in 1911, his son, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad confirmed them.
He is mentioned in MGA’s famous list of 313 companions of MGA of 1896 (See Dard). He is listed as number 159, his name is written as Dr. Abdul Hakim Khan of Patiala.
MGA mentions Abdul Hakeem Khan on page 69 of the online english edition of “”A Gift for the Queen”” (Tohfa-e-Qaisariyyah). Abdul Hakeem Khan donated 2 rupees towards the Diamond Jubilee of the Queen.
Some new information has emerged in terms of Dr. Khan of Patiala. In this video, Mirza Masroor tells the world that Noorudin supervised this Tafsir by Dr. Khan, nonetheless, they threw the book out since it might make their library filthy. MGA on 2:62.
His Urdu Tafsir—Tafseerul Quran BilQuran
His Urdu Tafsir was published in 1900
pdf page 123/316
Narration no. 665
” Dr M Ismail narrated to me that Dr Abdul Hakeem Khan Murtadd used to see many dreams. The structure of his skull was such that he will get Ilham or dreams everytime he gets a nap or sleep. He used to come to qadian from the age when he was a student. Once he came to qadian after a long time on a long leave. Here he used to narrate his tafseer to mgaq everyday between maghrib and isha prayers, and expected parises.
The reasons and beleifs that he mentioned at the time he became murtad are now part of “ghair Mubaeen” (lahori group). ……….Once they proposed that there should be no mention of mgaq and ahmadiyyat in “review” (the magazine) instead, there should be general islamic essays to have more publication. Upon this mgaq showed his anger and said BY LEAVING ME OUT, DO YOU WANT TO PRESENT DEAD ISLAM? Abdul Hakim Khan wrote to mgaq that you’r servent of Islam not Islam itself but mgaq differed with this statement (and said) that his existence is the spirit of islam itself. ”
He donated towards the building of the Minaret ul Masih. He is listed as #33, his name is spelled out as Doctor Abdul Hakim Khan, Narnaul (Patiala State)[See Dard].
See page 44 of the ROR of 1905 to see the announcement of the english commentary of the Quran.
He writes an english commentary of the Quran, it seems to be the first ever by an Ahmadi.
His english Tafsir was published in 1905. The Holy Quran with a Commentary by Dr Abdul Hakim
On page 112 of this Tafsir, the Ahmadi author argues that Esa (As) was born from biological parents, this seems to confirm what MGA and his team wrote in 1891, in Izala Auham, i.e. that Esa (As) was raised by his father, Joseph. Muhammad Ali split in 1914 and his Tafsir was published in 1917 wherein he made the same argument, i.e. that Esa (As) was fathered biologically by Joseph and the Qadianis never objected.
He quits Ahmadiyya and MGA writes private letters to him which are published by Dr. Khan the following year. In these private letters, MGA writes that all of those who reject him are non-Muslim, per Allah, even those Muslims who haven’t heard of MGA. His main beef with MGA is on the salvation of Non-Muslims. Dr. Khan argued that Christians and Jews didn’t have to follow Allah and were still allowed to get to heaven, if they were good people.
Dr. ‘Abdul-Hakim Khan, writes a booklet “al-Masihud-Dajjal”, which refers to MGA. Dr. Khan accuses MGA of telling lies, he calls MGA a dajjal [deceiver], corrupt, and an embezzler. In his booklet, al-Masihud-Dajjal, he has listed a number of my ‘vices’. He calls MGA as selfish, egotistical, arrogant, Antichrist, Satan, ignorant, insane, great liar, lazy, corrupt, one who breaks his word, and an embezzler. Dr. ‘Abdul-Hakim Khan also writes his series, Zikr ul Hakim.
Dr. Khan gets another book published, Zikr-ul Hakim, wherein he writes that Ahmadi’s are worshipping MGA. He also explains that he was a follower of MGA for 25 years, which takes us to 1881.
See ‘Abdul-Hakim’s booklet Dhikrul-Hakim, page 12, VIA Haqiqatul Wahi
“”There was one Maulawi, Muhammad Hasan Baig, a maternal cousin of mine who was bitterly opposed to your gracious self. I was informed concerning him, in a dream, that if he persisted in his opposition of the Messiah of the Age, he would die of plague. His residence was outside the city in a well-ventilated and commodious house. I had related this dream to his real brother, uncle, and other relatives. A year later, he did die of plague. “”
Zikrul Hakim No 4.pdf
Zikrul Hakim No 4
Zikrul Hakim no 4 exclusively consist of the letters written between Dr and Mirza Ghulam – the reason for the Dr abdul Hakim to write, collate this book was to let the world know -as to what happen between them. There was no internet/emails or telephones -that is how we communicate with people -and in those days the normal way of communication in that time was to write letters and the general understanding was that each party will publish those letters to let the world know “the facts” – as Mirza ghulam did not publish letters which were written to him by Dr Abdul Hakim – Dr took upon himself to publish them.
MIRZA AND AHKP-4
Qadiyanis published ISHTIHAR against me in and Albadar and did not publish my letters to MGA, so i published them. On 13th May, on the basis of a dream, I published that I take my BAIAT back till Mirza Qadiyani correct his mistakes. The articles about him in my tafsir would be termed as doubtful and if Mirza did not correct and announce his apology, I will break his BAIAT and would remove him from my tafseer. Since there is no chance of his correction and announcement of apology so I have removed articles mentioning him from my tafseers. These corrected pages have been sent to buyers for correction of tafseer with them.
I have repented from Allah s.wt. for accepting the claims of Masih e Maoud, Mehdi and Mujaddid by Mirza Qadiyani for the following reasons in brief.
1st: Excommunication of all muslims who do not believe in mirza, declaring them to be hell bound and saying that maintaining relationship with them is HARAM.He further says that Allah swt informed me that it is HARAM for u to offer prayer behind a denier, falsifier and a hesitant . Then He published in Alhakam dated 24th May, 1905, that he who marries his sons or daughters to non Ahmadi are out of my Jamaat.
In recent correspondence he expunged the condition of denier, falsifier and hesitant he kept writing to me that 1.3 billion muslims who do not believe in him are out of pail of Islam and are hell bound irrespective of fact whether Ahmadi tabligh reached to them or not. I Wrote to him that we may not excommunicate to those of Ummat e Muhammadia who do not excommunicate us.Ahmadis may be allowed to offer prayer with them. He got so infuriated on this that he declared me a MURTAD. (Heretic). And reply to me senselessly.
Second : The faith that deliverance depend only on accepting Mirza is a cursed theory. It not only negate the whole world but it also pose a challenge to the powers of Allah. Because the item most needed in world has been created in abundance by Allah s.wt.like air, water, so if deliverance depended on faith in mirza then Allah s.w.t. Would have created love. of Mirza in the human nature. : Demanding such iman was against Allah s.w.t ,s characteristic of Rahman
Third: This iman is against the characteristic of RAHIMIYAT Because deliverance would not be granted to one who does not believe in Mirza , means Allah is not Raheem
Fourth. It is also against the powers of Allah as Maliki Youmiddin .it suspends this power as deliverance not possible without acceptance of Mirza.
Fifth : This theory of Mirza is against all powers of Allah . So if u believe in above instructions of Mirza Your Kalima would be like this :
“LA ILAHA ILLALL MIRZA” because per Mirza basis of deliverance is not obeying Allah Swt but obeying Mirza Qadiyani.
TO MIRZA GHULAM QADIYANI
FROM DR ABDUL HAKIM KHAN PATIALVI.
LETTER NO 7.
Zikrul Hakim page 40-42
Last night before going to bed, I called my God and made my humble prayers and said O my God you say in Quraan that i would forgive every thing except shirk whereas your Masih e Maoud (mirza) says Allah will not forgive disbelieving in me and will forgive everything else. Now should i deny your words or the words of your Masih?
I said to my God O my Sustainer you have always ignored my weaknesses and forgave my mistakes. U also know that what ever good deeds I do are only for your sake and to please U. U always answered my prayers, assisted me sympathised to me. U r not cruel, harsh and ungrateful like Mirza Ghulam Qadyani.
To the core of my heart i am ever ready to accept truth but it is self praising, self worshipping and harsh Mirza who did not reply to me. So what should I do. After this submission i saw a dream that Colonel Fateh Muhammad Khan came to me Abdul Ghani khan is also seen and asking for treatment of his father,s appendicitis. He showed me a prescription containing many anti gastric medicines and told me that these medicines did not work. Then I told Fateh Muhammad Khan that Mirza had removed me from his Jamaat. It has been good for me that i have been removed from Jamaat for the sake of truth. Then in the dream I say who is mirza in front of Allah and say very soon thunderbolt might fall from sky on this jamaat and kill them all.
On the basis of this dream I am writing to you again that Moosa a.s ordered murder of those who committed shirk whereas you support such peoples of your Jamaat. Now I present comparison of your revelations with Quraan.
* In Your ilham you say, may God give me authority over fire. Quraan says Allah has the authority on everything and the rule on the day of judgement.
* Your ilham says about yourself Ya Shamsu wa Ya Qamaru. (Sun and moon) But i say your light has not illuminated even Qadiyan and your family.
* Quraan says All praise to Allah, whereas your ilham says Allah praises you in the heavens.
* You say people in France Italy and Columbia killed by earthquake due to my disobedience. On the contrary, your worst enemies and opponents like Molvi Muhaammad Hussain, Sanaullah Amritsari, Owner of Paisa Akhbar and Peshawari Group have not been killed despite their worst opposition.
For God sake you test yourself and your jamaat on this standrad as to how much u and jamaat worship Allah and how much do u worship a man. I request you to return my first letter as i want to publish this correspondence so that good natured peoples could benefit from this. If u do not return it, i will publish it with the help of my memory because i dont have its copy.
Was the tragic death of Molvi Abdul Karim not a sufficient cause for u to avoid making mockery of others agonies? but regretfully the childish attitude prevalent on u all the time has made u much proud, ignorant and heartless. It was you who used to make mockery of the miracles of Hazrat Essa a.s, now with excessive ilham and prophesies u have made a joke of yourself . The taste of Quraanic knowledge is absolutely missing from u and Jamaat. U could not present a single academic miracle which was the need of the hour. U could have written a miraculous commentary of holy Quraan that could have decided the differences and could have reformed peoples and provide guidance to the masses.
Abdul Hakim Khan
From Tarauri, District Karnal India.
TO MIRZA GHULAM QADIYANI
BY DR ABDUL HAKIM KHAN PATIALVI.
Zikrul Hakim NO. 4 page-28
IT IS VERY STRANGE THAT I WRITE TO U WITH UNAMBIGUOUS VERSES REFERENCE FROM QURAN BUT U DONT ADDRESS THEM IN YOUR REPLY RATHER SAY THAT ACTING UPON THESE QURAANIC COMMANDS IS PROHIBITED. I HAVE BEEN REQUESTING U TIME AND AGAIN THAT I MAY BE INFORMED OF THE VERSES OF QURAAN THROUGH WHICH WHOLE UMMAT E MUHAMMADIA HAS BECOME OUT OF THE PAIL OF ISLAM IRRESPECTIVE OF THE FACT WHETHER OR NOT THEY HAVE BEEN PREACHED UPON. DOES THE OBLIGATION OF TABLIGH TO THE WHOLE MUSLIMIS FULFILLED BY SITTING IDLY IN QADIYAN AND PUBLISHING FEW ISHTIHARS ?. NOW THEY HAVE BECOME INFIDEL AND LIABLE TO BE CHARGE SHEETED? EVEN ALLAH SWT DECLARE THE KILLING OF INNOCENT MOMIN AS KUFR. AT THE MOMENT U R TURNING UR FACE AWAY NOT ANLY FROM QURAAN BUT FROM LOGIC AND COMMON SENSE. WHAT A TIME IT WAS WHEN U CRITICISE MOLVIS FOR EXCOMMUNICATION OF MUSLIMS AND USED TO QUOT THE SAYING OF IMAM THAT DONT EXCOMMUNICATE ONE WITH 99 REASONS OF KUFR AND ONE REASON OF IMAN. I AM ACTING ON THESE TEACHINGS BUT U HAVE DEFECTED. IT WAS YOUR SAYING THAT I GIVE PRAYERS IN RESPONSE TO ABUSES. I AM STILL ON THIS RELIGION BUT U DECLARE ME KAFIR AND MURTAD EVEN AFTER LISTENING TO MY PRAYERS AND SALAM. U ORDER MY EXIT FROM JAMAAT. U DO EXCOMMUNICATION OF UMMAT E MUHAMMADI WITHOUT REASON BUT I DONT DO THAT.
MIRZA CHARGE SHEETED BY DR ABDUL HAKIM KHAN PATIALVI.
LETTER TO MOLVI NOORUDDIN FROM DR ABDUL HAKIM KHAN PATIALVI.
ZIKRUL HAKIM PAGE 368-378
Dr. Abdul Hakim Khan Patialvi was a keen follower of MGAQ, remained in his jamaat for 20 years. Then he found wrongdoings of Mirza and violation of Quraanic teachings and commandments of Allah Swt by MGAQ and his Jamaat. He made correspondence with MGAQ and Molvi Nooruddin for reform and correction but both MGAQ and Nooruddin rejected his criticism. This correspondence is very lengthy contains heavy Arabic and Persian idioms and phrases, studded with Quraanic verses and ahadis. So it is not easy to be translated in english word to word in a short time. However, I have tried to present central idea of the correspondence as under:-
Subhanallah what a logic is this, Quraan teaches us to say salam but u deny and do not say salam to me in your letter. U termed my word of Basis of salvation (madar e nijat) as vague whereas your whole letter is vague.
I have always been the truth seeker. I am the same Abdul Hakim whose translation and commentary of Quraan has been greatly admired by Mirza Qadiyani. Whenever i read my tafseer to mgaq he could not advise a valuable points, he only said admiration. However i got valuable correction addition of points and advise from you whenever I read it over to u. He could not advise on the debate of Hazrat Suleman a.s and said I will explain it to u after consulting a book, WHICH WAS never found by him ever.
I took allegiance of Mirza in the hope of my spiritual and knowledge uplift which could not be achieved. Unfortunately, after my reform request, this very tafseer and my other books have been returned stuffed in gunny bag reached to me in a bad shape.
In the beginning Mirza sb used to say that I am only Maseel e Masih then a masih mehdi, sub ordinate prophet, better than all prophets and then Allah s son then Allah states his praise in the heavens thus committing shirk. Not only this he went to the extent of insulting other prophets and chosen persons.
His claim that earthquake in other parts of world have come due to my rejection, is also a foolish idea, how can Allah punish those with earthquake who have not even heard of MGAQ and his claims. It did not happen in the time of Harat Muhammad s.a.w that He was rejected and victimised by peoples of Makkah but peoples of other areas are killed.So Noorddin sb support of this argument of mirza does not suit to a person of your calibre.
I believe in Allah and his prophets alike as Quraan says کل امن با اللہ وملائکتہ وکتبہ ورسلہ لا نفرق بین احد من الرسلہ
But Mirza denied this verse when he said ” believing in Allah and prophets is of no use unless one does not believe in me. He published that God Says O Ahmed if u were not there I wouldn,t have created skies. He did hundreds of such things against Islam and Quraan. Few of which are described here as under:-
UNENDING BREACHES OF COMMITMENTS.
Donations were asked for, and mostly received for publishing baraheen and other books but books were not published as per commitment nor the money received as charity or Zakat was returned. Such money is being eaten up.
When there was no funds for publishing of baraheen why Reward Ishtihar of thousands of Rs were published. Why peoples were abused with Haramzada without Devine knowledge.
Abusive and obnoxious Language
Molvis who were opposing for the sake of Islam were called as waladul haram, (illegitimate), swine , cursed, satan, blind, etc etc
COMFORT LOVING AND MAN OF STOMACH
What Mirza do is that collect Chanda upto 700 or 800 per month arranged best food for himself and others, amber musk. Kewra, tonics, dry fruits and kernels are made available and used abundantly.
I to 1.5 mound was supplied daily from Lahore during the illness of Molvi Abdul Karim. Bivi sahiba had so much jewellery that Mirza has mortgaged his garden to her for a loan of Rs. 1000 cash and jewellery worth Rs. 4000, Traveled upto Dehli in upper class of train for the sake of Bivi sahiba only. Whereas Hazrat Muhammad s.A.w. Has spent a simple life in a small house, had food after 3 days mostly. Now tell me should I follow Hazrat Muhammad s.a.w or the comfortable life of Mirza Qadiyani.
Hazrat Muhammad s.a.w made the arabs pagan as brother to each others Today with his abusive language and false claims created a divide and schism that can not be repaired.
Should we follow mirza on the issue of Hajj or the Quraan which instruct the rich men to perform Hajj.
ASKING FOR ZAKAT FOR HIS BOOKS.
He asked for zakat money for his books and sold them on highest price.
SHOULD WE FOLLOW THIS SUNNAH OF MIRZA.
FALSE CLAIMS FOR SELF GREATNESS
HE SAID GOD SAYS TO ME THAT U r from me and Iam from u. To me u r like my son.
CONSTRUCTION OF MINARAT.
Construction minarat in Qadiyan is useless and waste of money and against ahadis.
It is absolutely against islam and Quraan and an insult to the prophets and quraam.o hadis.
INSULT OF JESUS CHRIST PBUH.
MIRZA HAS INSULTED HAZRAT ESSA A.S AND TERMED HIS MIRCLE AS JOKE.
MIRZA IMPOSED MONTHLY CHANDA FOR EACH MEMBER in case of non payment his name will be struck down from bayaat.
I am ready to accept any true advise but cant tolerate with above mentioned ideas of mirza which are against Quraan o sunnah.
Humble self Abdul Hakim Khan
Now residing at Trouri District Karnal.
Below is almost a word for word translation of “”3 pages in two episodes page no 381-383″”
MIRZA AND AHKP-2
More so they declared 1.3 billion muslims, who were muslims since last 13 centuries, as kafir without doing tabligh. When only 3 to 4 lectures on toheed and greatness of Allah swt were delivered, ahmadis got disturbed. One namely Abdul Ghani Khan said to me from Jamaat side as to why I do not mention the name of Ghulam Qadiyani in my lectures. I said i have been describing the Hamd e bari which is the tafseer of surah Al hamd and haven,t come to the Rabbul Alameen, AlRahman iraheem maliki yomiddin as yet as only after that I would come to the praise of Muhammad s.a.w. Then i would present praise of Mirza Qadiyani. Some people said the praise of Allah and His Toheed was the mission of Mirza too, but this did not satisfy hard liner of jamaat and they increased hue and cry on the issue. One day Abdul ghani said while describing touheed e bari taala , u consider mentioning of Mirza Ghulam Qadiyani as shirk but i consider it a shirk if u describe praise of Allah and do not mention Mirza Qadiyani. This attitude made me sad.
I kept emphasising on the point that no body can be perfect until he follows all orders and injunctions of Quraan. To be stuck and remain adamant on one issue and leave the other is extreme ignorance. Quraan also supports this view point. Quraan says.” People chopped of Quraan into pieces” it says on other place” behold Allah,s rope and dont be divided”. Quraan says arrogance is the basis of Fasad. But the crazy followers of Mirza would not listen to the voice of Quraan.
By chance Molvi Mubarak Ali of Sialkot visited Patiala and started his Waaz. I requested him to stress on the points of greatness of Quraan, need for Quraanic teachings and following all Quraanic commands, in his sermons. It was my opinion that If we could succeed in creating love of Quraan in our Jamaat, that would resolve many problems. Or at least make Quraanic teachings as much popular in our jamaat as the Ishtahar of Mirza Qadiyani published in Akhbar Al badar and Alhakam. Molvi Mubarak Ali stressed the above points in his lectures. Qadiyanis immediately realised that these lectures were being delivered on my wish so they prevailed upon Him and soon Molvi sb started his lectures on same old pattern containing justifications of Mirza ,s prophethood from Qur’an and in all of lectures he proved Mirza to be a complete reincarnation of Muhammad S.A.W. This increased my displeasure and hopelessness.
Then khawaja Kamaluddin and Molvi Muhammad Ali sb, on the recommendations of Molvi Inshaullah Khan decided that from now on, only general islamic Articles would be published in Review of Religion Qadiyan and those containing special debates on Mirza Qadiyani would be published as special supplements for only qadiyanis or for those who request for such supplements. I felt great comfort on this decision and said to my self that there are high calibre intellectuals amongst the ahmadies. Now everything will be done according to Quraanic teachings and our message would spread all over world in a good manner. But this happiness could not last longer. Mirza,s fast lovers and hard liner created fuss and opposed the decision by making remarks about 1300 hundred old islam in AlBadar and Alhakam that should we present the dead islam to the world.
May i ask them as to how come there is nothing like Mari fat, or life present in Quraan? Do islam and Allah swt were given new life today by Mirza Qadiyani and were dead earlier. To cool of the fire of opposition by hard liners, Molvi Muhammad Ali has to re announce his belief and faith in Ahmadiyya انا للاہ و انا الیہ راجعون
In those days I applied for 3 months optional leave with the intention to move to Qadiyan and start my lectures on the Quranic topics according to its sequence. I was hoping to create Quraanic understanding amongst Ahmadis. But i could not remain patient and started correspondence on some important proposals with MGAQ. As a result of which Mirza Qadiyani ordered my IKHRAJ from his Jamaat.
This correspondence has been published separately under the title AZZIKRUL HAKIM NO 4. This book can be obtained from Manager Matba Azizi Tarouri District Karnal by sending money order of 1 anna. Mare Reading of this correspondence would reveal to the reader as to of what knowledge, vision and character is Mirza Ghulam Qadiyani.
I write to him something, he understands other, on each issue I present Quranic evidence and he rejects it holding it to be my personal opinion. He declares Muslims as kafir and the whole world to be hell bound without any reason. Declares Allah and Quraan as dead until it is without mirza ,s association. He urges that all calamities ie earth quakes, volcanic ruptures, accidents, epidemics, be that in Italy or Ecuador, or any where in the world, are happening due to my falsification and rejection by the inhabitants may they be aware of Mirza or not.
He does not considers the calamities as a result of disobedience of Allah and his prophet Muhammad s.a.w. He thinks Allah to be his orderly or a lunatic. (Nauzubillah) that is bent upon destroying the world out of the love of Mirza without thinking as to who are His actual falsifiers. Whenever there is a destruction anywhere in the world happens, Mirza and his followers feel pleasures saying this is another sign of Mirza’s truthfulness. They anxiously wait for the destruction of the world and death of opponents. The more is the destruction the more they enjoy.
MGA publishes Haqiqatul Wahi, 1907, Abdul-Hakim Khan is 64 times. MGA denies calling his deniers as non-Muslims in any books of his or announcement. However, MGA cleverly doesn’t add private letters.
______________________________________________________________________________________________The highlighted part shows that on May 19, 1908 MGA was asked about Abdul Hakim Patialvi’s prophecy about MGA’s death. MGA said that God would manifest who is on the truth.
Ahmadi’s try to show that this was MGA’s final response because the Badr publishing date says 24 May, 1908; however the highlighted portion shows that it was actually stated by MGA on May 19, 1908.
MGA’s final statement was signed on May 20, 1908 in Chashma e Maarifat where he said Abdul Hakim had promised MGA’s death by August 1908 but himself would die.
MIRZA AND DR ABDUL HAKIM KHAN PATIALVI.
BOOK CHASHMA E MARIFAT PAGE NO 336-337
MIRZA WRITES :-
“””SIMILARLY MANY ENEMIES AMONG MUSLIMS STOOD AGAINST ME AND WERE KILLED. NOW THERE APPEARED ONE LAST ENEMY KNOWN AS DR ABDUL HAKIM KHAN PATIALVI. HE IS A DOCTOR FROM PATIALA HE CLAIMS THAT I WOULD BE KILLED IN HIS LIFE UPTO 4TH AUGUST 1908, AND THIS WOULD BE A SIGN OF HIS TRUTH FULLNESS AND HE CLAIMS IT IS A REVELATION TO ME FROM ALLAH SWT. HE DECLARES ME AS KAZZAB, DAJJAL AND KAFIR.
HE TOOK MY ALLEGIANCE AND REMAINED MY FOLLOWER FOR 20 YEARS.BUT WHEN I GAVE HIM AN ADVISE HE DEVIATED. THE ADVISE WAS GIVEN JUST FOR ALLAH,S SAKE WHICH WAS THAT HE WAS OF THE FAITH THAT ONE CAN GET DELIVERANCE IN THE WORLD HEREAFTER WITHOUT ACCEPTING HAZRAT MUHAMMAD S.A.W. I TOLD HIM THAT THIS BELIEF IS AGAINST ISLAM AND MAJORITY OF THE ELDERS OF ISLAM.BUT HE TURNED A DEAF EAR TO IT, FINALLY I REMOVED HIM FROM MY JAMMAT.THEN HE PROPHESIED THAT I WOULD BE KILLED BY 4TH AUGUST 1908 IN HIS LIFE TIME. BUT COUNTERING HIS PROPHESY, GOD HAS INFORMED ME THAT HE HIMSELF WOULD RECEIVE AZAB AND GOD WOULD KILL HIM AND WILL PROTECT ME FROM HIS EVIL.SO THIS IS THE CASE WHICH IS NOW IN THE COURT OF ALLAH FOR DECISION.”””
MGA signing off
Ahle Hadith, 12 June 1908
“But, we expected this to happen soon, as had been announced by Dr. Abdul Hakim of Patiala. The doctor had stated, ‘My revelation concerning Mirza of Qadian, which may kindly be published, is that: (1) The Mirza will die on the 21st day of Saavan, 1965 (4th August, 1908) of a fatal disease. (2) A distinguished woman of the family of Mirza shall also die.’ [Weekly Ahle Hadith: 15.5.1908]. However, we cannot refrain from saying what is true. Had the doctor stopped at what he had stated before, that is, his prediction of Mirza’s death within fourteen months and not fixed a specific date as he has done then those objections could have never been raised as are being raised today by the Paisa Akhbar of the 27th, wherein it is stated that had the prophecy been left as, ‘up to the 21st of Saavan’ and not altered to, ‘on the 21st of Saavan’ it would have, indeed, been wonderful. But alas, his revelation that Mirza will die on the 21st of Saavan, that is 4th of August, has been published in the Ahle Hadith issue of 15th May, 1908. We wish that he would have left his earlier revelations unaltered, without giving a specific date. Then there could have been no excuse.”
Seth Abdullah Alladin wrote “The Claims and Teachings of Ahmad, the Promised Messiah and Mahdi” published as a second edition in 1917, from Secunderabad, India, which is central India. This proves that Ahmadiyya had spread to deep South Central India by 1917. The title of this book also lists how there is an Ahmadiyya Jamaat book depot in Ceylon (slave island), which is modern day Sri Lanka. His father devoted a large part of his wealth to the Mirza family (see page 53), he seems to have converted to Ahmadiyya in the 1910’s. In 1922, he wrote a translation of the Quran in english, a sort of translation with hadith, however, he only picked certain verses of the Quran. His PDF version of the same book, republished in 1918 can be downloaded here. The Imam Of the Age by Seth Abdullah Allah Din (1918). In this book, he even quotes MGA’s letter of Takfir to Dr. Abdul Hakim Khan. A 1916 version of the same book can be found here: Claims and Teachings of Ahmad (1916).
His apostacy is mentioned in the Aug-Sep-1918 edition of the ROR.
The Jan-Feb-March edition of the ROR mentions the apostacy of Dr. Khan.
He is mentioned by Maulvi Sanaullah in his famous book, “Tahreek-e-Mirza”.
He is mentioned in the ROR of Jan-1940.
In the ROR of March-1943, Sayyid Zayn al ‘Abidin Waliullah Shah explains how he freely moved into and outside of the house of MGA (1904-1907 era). He remembers when the plague hit Qadian and how MGA would use different chemicals to clear his house and the boarding house where all the students slept. He recalls how his father (Dr. Abdul Sattar Shah) asked MGA if he could visit a town that has already been hit with plague (in 1905) and MGA refused and cited the famous hadith wherein Muhammad (Saw) clearly said to never a visit a place where plague was raging. Sayyid Zayn al ‘Abidin Waliullah Shah alleges that the plague at Qadian only hit the Non-Ahmadi homes and Hindu’s (this is a lie, the editor of the Al-Badr Muhammad Afazl, died of plague). Sayyid Zayn al ‘Abidin Waliullah Shah then alleges that his parents had came to Qadian and were given a room in MGA’s house (the room is used in 1943 by a wife of the 2nd Khalifa). He alleges that the next door neighbor was a non-Ahmadi and someone died of plague in their house, which was only separated by MGA’s house by a wall. He also alleges that MGA gave a short speech. He mentions MGA’s beef with Maulvi Sanaullah, as well the famous Ahmadi apostate Dr. Abdul Hakim Khan.
From Mirza Masroor Ahmad’s Friday Sermon of 22-Jul-2016
“”When Abdul Hakeem announced his renunciation of Ahmadiyyat, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih I called upon his students and asked them to take out Abdul Hakeems’s commentary from his library so that Allah Almighty be not unhappy or angry to me because of that. Although it was the commentary of the Holy Quran and the commentary of several verses were written in consultation with Hazrat Khalifatul Masih I but still he ordered such an action because he had left the religion and so the wrath of Allah is on him. Some people make an objection that when there is sort of a punishment from the Jama’at towards someone or some action has been taken, then that person says that the action taken against me is wrong and presents a comparative situation where other people have not been penalized.This objection is not something new. In every era, such objections have arisen. People do it today and have been doing it in the past too. Therefore, mentioning such people Hazrat Musleh Maud(ra) says that the fact of the truth is that in order to keep the system right there is one circle of unity and oneness. Hazrat Musleh Maud(ra) says that certain things due to their particular trial (fitna) are considered very significant due to the specific situation. Due to the trial which is instantly there, sometimes the actions are taken in a very different way. But the people who criticize the decisions they do not consider this and are simply very fond of criticizing. Many people say like this and then they gather supporters, thus these punished people are not aware. What methods should be adopted for spreading the word of God (tabligh) and how shall this be done? Regarding this Hazrat Musleh Maud(ra) has mentioned that at this time the preaching work is done through distribution of pamphlets and brochures but these pamphlets cannot be carried for long due to their weight. ……”””””””””””””
Links and Related Essay’s
Dr. Abdul Hakeem Khan (the famous Ahmadi apostate), wrote an english translation of the quran in 1905
DR ABDUL HAKIM KHAN PATIALVI mentions the death of Maulvi Abdul Karim in his correspondence with MGA
“A Muslim is only he who accepts all those appointed by God” by Mirza Bashir-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, April 1911
“My beliefs about non-Ahmadi Muslims”, dated 18 August 1911 by Khwaja Kamal-uddin
“”Prophethood among the Followers of Muhammad”” by Maulana Sayyid Muhammad Ahsan of Amroha, Oct-1913, in Tashhizul Azhan
Tashhiz al-Azhan was a Magazine founded by Mahmud Ahmad in 1906, quotes and background info
In 1923, Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, the Ahmadi Khalifa, ordered Ahmadis to stop doing Takfir on Muslims
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 2:62, the “Salvation” or “status” of Non-Muslim’s in an islamic state?
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam