Intro
In a recent stream, Khurram Shah admitted that “Salaboo-hoo” in 4:157 means simply being hung (death is not implied). Per MGA and his Kufri beliefs, Eisa (as) was on the cross for 2 hours and sometimes MGA said a few mins. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad stole the “Swoon-theory” in roughly 1899, and never commented on the grammatical prose of “Shubbiha Lahum” in 4:157. Salaaboo in 20:71 proves the Substitution theory for Esa (As).

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
On yesterday's stream, @khurramshah74 conceded in a u-turn that a person can still be described as crucified even if they don't die.
So now, even by the Ghulaamist distortion on this verse, it still means Eesaa AS was never crucified.
(I am steedsofwar in the chat, with Omar) pic.twitter.com/tGW6jEh2gH
— IslaamAlwaysWins (@IslaamWins) January 25, 2024
Salaaboo in 20:71 proves the Substitution theory for Esa (As) – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism
1 Pingback