Ahmadis normally play dumb and stupid, either that or they really are dumb and stupid. After countless twitter and FB battles, all Ahmadis will act as-if they have never heard of the “substitution-theory” in terms of the escape of Esa (as). 4:157–4:159 vaguely describes how Esa (as) was never even put on any cross….however, allah never revealed the exact method of escape. Todd Lawson’s book, “christ and the Crucifixtion gives many early references which confirm that Muslims always believed that Esa (as) was never even on the cross. Further, all of the mujadids of the past endorsed the idea that Esa (as) was never “hung” on any cross. Sir Syed was the first Muslim who ever began to assert that Esa (as) was on the cross and in the state of swoon….obviously, MGA and Noorudin copied their mentor, i.e. Sir Syed and began selling the same idea.
Salabooo has different meanings based on context
Just like all arabic words, the meanings change easily based on context. Salaboo can mean “crucify” or basically “hung”. In 4:157, Allah told Muslims that Esa (As) was never hung, so he was never crucified. All the Mujadids and scholars have explained it using the “substitution-theory”.
Salaboo in 20:71 from Suyuti