Intro
#Ahmadis are all over social media begging Muslims to discuss the death of Eisa (as), however, in 1891, MGA was arguing that the physical descent of Eisa (as) wasn’t a major part of Islam. MGA said it was just one of 100’s of prophecies, and thus, not a big deal. Why was MGA doing this? Easy….he was called a Kafir for his claims and he responded as such. It should also be noted that MGA was calling his rejector’s as Kafir.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
The quote
p. 140
https://wiki.qern.org/mirza-ghulam-ahmad/publications/roohani-khazain/izala-e-auham
“First, it should be known that belief in the descent of the Messiah is not a belief which is one of our fundamentals of faith or one of the pillars of the religion. In fact, it is a prophecy among hundreds of prophecies, which has nothing to do with the basis of Islam. Islam was not an incomplete religion till the time this prophecy was explained, nor did it become more complete when this prophecy was explained. It is not necessary that prophecies should be fulfilled in the literal sense.”
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/28/izaala-auham-quotes-1891/
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
Leave a Reply