Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, founder of the Ahmadiyya movement, was in a category all by himself in Imam Ahmad Raza Khan’s (may Allah be pleased with him) Husam al-Haramain. Condemned as the Antichrist [dajjal] inspired by Satan, his kufr was believed to be greater than the other ulema mentioned. His name is also spelled as Ahmad Rida Khan.
In Fatawa Rizwiya Volume 15, page 612:
“The Qadiani has rejected the Zarooriyat of Deen (minimum requirement for belief) and has sparked the debate on the life and death of our Sayyiduna Isa Rasul Allah, our prophet upon who be the peace and blessings of Allah, which is a minor concern. Muslims have a dispute over this, for which to affirm or reject is not even misguidance, let alone Kufr.”
In 2025 (Jun), Maulvi Razi and his team of paid Maulvi’s got caught lying by Adnan Rashid (2:44:40 timestamp) and Bro Imtiaz about many things (see the clips on TikTok and twitter). Maulvi Razi got caught mispresenting Ahmad Reza Khan and Shah Wali Ullah.
In 2026 (Mar), Bro Imtiaz debated Azim Saifi and Saifi and alleged that Ahmad Rida Khan (37:22 time stamp) called himself a dog (kuta). At 2:17:17, Azim Saifi alleged that the Dog of Ahmad Rida Khan was in the chat and causing trouble.
In 2026 (Jun), in the debate between Sheikh Asrar Rashid and Maulvi Razi, Maulvi Razi alleged that Ahmad Rida Khan had violated many teachings of Islam (27:12 time stamp). Maulvi Razi went further and alleged that in the book, “Anwar-e-Shariat”, it was written that Eisa (As) failed and this was why he would physically descend in the latter days. However, Sheikh Israr Ahmad pointed out that this book was not written by Ahmad Rida Khan. At 20:30, Maulvi Razi alleged that Ahmadi’s are against practices like “Istigatha“. At 26:53, Maulvi Razi confesses that Ahmadi’s do takfeer of “Barelvi’s” over “Istigatha”. Maulvi Razi quoted a writing of Ahmad Rida Khan, wherein Rida Khan praised Abdul Qadir Jilani.
In 2026 (Jun-27), Zia Rasool Ameeni explained how MGA accused Eisa (as), Musa (as) and Idris (as) of failing in their missions (nakaam)(22:09 time stamp and 23:02). Zia Rasool Ameeni quoted Malfuzat-2, page 98, Zia Rasool also quoted RK-21, page 58, Rk-10, page 248, Malfuzat-2, page 106, RK-5, page 200, in RK-3, page 300, MGA alleged that Idris (as) also failed (nakaam). In some of these quotes, MGA famously quoted the line “Eli, Eli lama sabachthan” (My God, my God..”) and alleged that the prayer of Eisa (as) was rejected.
In 2026 (Jun-27), Sheikh Israr Rashid explains how he represents Ahmad Rida Khan, Pir Mehr Ali Shah, Rahmatullah Kairanawi, Imam Nawawi and others (33:27 time stamp).
Imam Ahmad Raza’s opinion was based on a large number of claims made by Ghulam Ahmad, among them the fact that he was ‘like the Messiah’ [Jesus Christ], and that, having received revelations from Almighty Allah, he was a kind of prophet:
In the beginning, he claimed to be ‘like a Messiah’. Allah, in this he spoke the truth, because he is like the Antichrist, the lair. Then he began to elevate himself still more, and claimed to have received revelation. And Allah, in this too he is truthful, because Allah says that in the assembly of devils there is one among them who is inspired by Satan, whose inspiration is false and deceptive…Then he made an unambiguous claim to prophecy [nabuwwat] and messengership [risalat], writing that Allah is He who sent His messenger to Qadiyan, and asserted that a verse had been revealed to him that says, ‘We sent him to Qadiyan, and sent him with the truth.’ He also asserted that he was the Ahmad whom Jesus had predicted would come [after him as the next prophet]…Then he began to say that he was better than all other prophets and messengers: forget about Ibn-e Maryam [Jesus], Ghulam Ahmad is better than he. [Ahmad Raza Khan, Husam al-Haramain, p.12]
Of all the claims made by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad [and there were others, such as his declaration that he was the Mujaddid or renewer of the 14th Hijri century], the one that infuriated Imam Ahmad Raza Khan Qadiri (may Allah be pleased with him) and other Indian ulama the most was his assertion that he was a ‘shadowy’ [zilli] prophet. This appeared to a large number of Sunni ulama to directly deny the Muslim belief that Muhammad Mustapha (Allah bless him and give him peace) was the ‘seal of prophets’ [khatm al-nabiyyin]. Much later, it was on the basis of this alleged denial that under the terms of a constitutional amendment in Pakistan in 1973, Ahmadis were declared as non-Muslims.
In addition to his prophetic claim, Ghulam Ahmad had also angered Imam Ahmad Raza [and other ulama] by offering an interpretation of Jesus, which was at variance with Sunni mainstream. He denied the prevailing belief Islamic belief that Jesus was alive in heaven and would return to earth at the end of days to assist Mahdi to defeat the Antichrist [dajjal], thereby inaugurating a kingdom of justice on earth. Against this Ghulam Ahmad maintained that Jesus was dead, and that it was he, Ghulam Ahmad, who had been sent by Allah and Jesus’ spirit to restore the Muslim community to its former glory. [Friedman, pp. 111-18]
For Ghulam Ahmad, to believe in Jesus’ second coming was to comply in Christianity’s claimed superiority to Islam, which it was one of his principal aims to deny. Ironically, the image he evoked to describe Christianity – ‘the most perfect manifestation of Satan’ – was the same one called up by Imam Ahmad Raza in Husam al-Haramain to describe Ghulam Ahmad: the Antichrist inspired by Satan.
______________________________________________________________________________________________Maulvi Razi then quotes Imam Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi aka Ahmad Rida Khan
Maulvi Razi alleges that Ahmad Rida Khan wrote in terms of 62:3 (62:4 in the Kadiani Koran) that this verse was about one Persian man who will attain the deen even if it went to the heavens. Razi alleges that Ahmad Rida Khan then said that the children of Persians would attain the deen. Razi alleges that Ahmad Rida Khan then said that this hadith and Quranic verse refer to Imam Abu Hanifa.
Scans
______________________________________________________________________________________________Ahmad Rida Khan
Maulvi Razi then quotes Ahmad Raza Khan again and alleges that Ahmad Raza Khan said that ALL the “Kamalat” (perfection, completeness, or excellence) of Muhammad (Saw) were also inside of him (a total lie by Razi) Jamali and Jalali. Maulvi Razi then quotes Ahmad Raza Khan and alleges that he mentioned all of this about Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani and that all the qualities of Allah are in Muhammad (saw).
Scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Fatawa Rizwiya Volume 15, page 612:
“The Qadiani has rejected the Zarooriyat of Deen (minimum requirement for belief) and has sparked the debate on the life and death of our Sayyiduna Isa Rasul Allah, our prophet upon who be the peace and blessings of Allah, which is a minor concern. Muslims have a dispute over this, for which to affirm or reject is not even misguidance, let alone Kufr.”
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
sunnirazvi.net/topics/ahmadiyya.htm
Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi – Wikipedia
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism
6 Pingback