Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Thorough research work on the Ahmadiyya Movement, #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome

Month

July 2024

MGA attacked Muslims in the Barahin too (1979-1884)

Intro
It should be noted that MGA set out to attack the Arya Samaj Hindu’s (starting in 1879) and then added the Christians. However, he also attacked Muslims and specifically, a man named Maulavi Abu Abdullah Qasuri (See BA-3, page 195). In 2024, we have no idea who Maulavi Abu Abdullah Qasuri was. MGA alleges to have read a book by Maulavi Abu Abdullah Qasuri wherein he delineated ilham from wahi. Maulavi Abu Abdullah Qasuri never appeared in Ahmadiyya literature again, however, there was someone from Kasur (Qasur) who beefed with MGA, his name was Maulawi Ghulam Dastagir of Qasur, not sure if they are connected.

Continue reading “MGA attacked Muslims in the Barahin too (1979-1884)”

Mirza Engineer Declared Qadyanis as Ahle Qibla and Part of Ummah

Intro
Mirza Engineer is a plant, just like the Qadiani’s, he is getting funding to cause communal strife in Pakistan. In this video he is basically calling Ahmadi’s as Muslims.

Continue reading “Mirza Engineer Declared Qadyanis as Ahle Qibla and Part of Ummah”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Kun Fa Ya Kun

Intro
In the Quran, Allah mentions the phraseology “Kun Fa Ya Kun” about 8 times (See all the verses in the below). This is in terms of Allah creating and how easy it is for Allah to create.

In 1892-1893 (A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, Arabic edition, page number 64), MGA argued that when a person attains the rank of(liqa’), he inevitably performs Divine actions. – Often, this person, WITHOUT DU’A’, says to a thing “Be”, and it is. – Just as Allah’s ﷻ command “Be” brings about an inevitable result without delay, his command “Be” also doesn’t fail (See the 2025 English official mistranslation of the book (See page 521), this is also related to the theory of “wilayatـe takwini”.

In 1906-1907, via Haqiqatul Wahi, (RK-22, page 108 in Urdu, page 125 in the 2023 online English edition, in a section wherein MGA was giving his revelations and some commentary. In this, MGA seems to be calling himself God. Nevertheless, in these revelations, MGA seems to have received a revelation wherein MGA was given the power of “kun fa ya kun” (when He wills something ˹to be˺, is simply to say to it: “Be!” And it is!, see 36:82). Bro Imtiaz has explained this too, see herein.

Again, after MGA died, in BA-5 (See page 153), MGA claimed to have received a similar verse as revelation. In this specific instance, MGA seems to be applying the action of creation upon himself, which is clear Kufr. MGA got a revelation, “”Ina Ma Am raKa, Iza Ira da ta, Shay-in, ina, Ta Qoo la, kun fa ya kun”. This is slightly different from Quran usage, “Ina Maaaa Am run izaaaa irada shay-un aye, ya koola lahoo, kun fa ya kun”. This also explains how MGA was claiming to be God himself (naozobillah). MGA and his team of writers seem to have stolen this revelation from Shaikh ‘Abdul-Qadir al-Jilani from one of his books, which must have been available in British-India (see the full ref in the below).

Verses of the Quran wherein Kun Fayakun appear
2:117 (2:118 in the Qadiani-Quran), 3:47 (3:48 in the Qadiani Quran), 3:59 (3:60 in the Qadiani-Quran), 6:73 (6:74 in the Qadiani Quran), 16:40 (16:41 in the Qadiani Quran), 19:35 (19:36 in the Qadiani Quran), 36:82 (36:83 in the Qadiani Quran) and 40:68 (40:69 in the Qadiani Quran).

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Kun Fa Ya Kun”

Razi alleges that Khatim is a metaphor and that Daud Nasir is ignorant

Intro
On a recent livestream (see the clips on tik tok and twitter), Razi alleged that “Khatim” can be used as “Majazi” (metaphorical) only. He also said that Ahmadi’s accept all the Qira’at of the Quran in 2024, however, this is in contradiction to what Maulvi Farhan Iqbal (See pages 27-28) wrote in his book in 2014. Maulvi Farhan Iqbal clearly said that Hadhrat Uthman (ra) abrogated the order of Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah) that it was OK to use different Qira’at. To be clear, Maulvi Farhan Iqbal alleged that all other Qira’at were abrogated and not valid to use after Uthman (ra) gave this strange order. However, MGA quoted rare Qira’at in BA-4 (1882-1884 era) from Ibn Abbas and quoted other Qira’at in other books in terms of 4:159 and his own revelations (See BA-5, pages 540-541) and about MGA’s own prophethood (See Correction of an Error, page 2).

Furthermore, just today, a Qadiani-Ahmadi named Azeem Butt confessed that Ahmadi’s don’t believe in the 9 out 10 Qira’at‘s (23:40 time stamp)(the clip is also on tik tok and twitter).

Lastly, Khatim also means “Seal”, not just LAST, see 42:24, 36:65. Is there a Cover-Up in an Invitation to Ahmadiyyat?

In June of 2025, Maulvi Razi discussed Khatim on the True Islam Uk Urdu stream vs. Bro Imtiaz.
Also in June of 2025, Dr. Shah interviewed a new former-Ahmadi (Omair Malik) and discussed the issue of Khatam vs. Khatim and Ahmadiyya editing.

In 1900-1902 (Tohfa Golarvia, RK Vol-17, page 186), MGA called Muhammad (Saw) as the “Khatim un Nabiyeen”. There is similar usage in “Tiryaq ul Qulub” (1899-1902)(See RK-15, p. 478).

Continue reading “Razi alleges that Khatim is a metaphor and that Daud Nasir is ignorant”

Chak Mangla, Sarghoda, the Ahmadiyya Community calls their town as “mini-Rabwah”

Intro
In Pakistan, there is an area that the Qadiani’s have bought in unison which is at Chak Mangla, Sarghoda (See the testimony of Muhammad Arshad herein).

Continue reading “Chak Mangla, Sarghoda, the Ahmadiyya Community calls their town as “mini-Rabwah””

Muhammad Arshad Ijaz is an Ex-Qadiani Maulvi and now a Muslim

Intro
His family lineage is from Gujranwala, Pakistan, he was born in roughly 1977. He is currently working in a factory as a supervisor in Faisalabad. His great-grandfather Muhammad Ramadhan (Ramzan) converted to Ahmadiyya over 100+ years ago. His grand-father was thus born an Ahmadi, his father was also a born Ahmadi and was he.

In 1992, he matriculated and was enrolled into Jamia-Rabwah by his parents. He graduated from Jamia-Rabwah in 5 years (1997) and began working as a Qadiani-Ahmadi Maulvi. He mostly worked out of the Sarghoda area and with a jamaat at village Chak Mangla (aka Mini-Rabwah). He worked there for 2 years and then 2 years in Takht Hazara. While in Takht Hazara, he went to jail for 5 years. This was based on a fight with Muslims that he was named in (in Sarghoda).

He got out of jail in 2008 and continued to work as a Qadiani-Ahmadi Maulvi in a town called “Jahran-Walla”. He kept asking questions about Ahmadiyya and finally left Ahmadiyya in 2013. The Ahmadiyya Jamaat took his wife and kids and are controlling them ever since.

Continue reading “Muhammad Arshad Ijaz is an Ex-Qadiani Maulvi and now a Muslim”

Shaikh ‘Abdul-Qadir al-Jilani (also spelled as Abdul Qadir Jilaani) in Ahmadiyya literature–a study

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad mentioned Shaikh ‘Abdul-Qadir al-Jilani in 1883-1884 in “Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya V-4 (see page 426) as he purposely masked his claim of prophethood as Wahy-e-i‘lam (see page 428). He quoted him again over the years, most of the English quotes are posted in the below. Furthermore, it should be noted that Imam Abdul Qadir Jilaani mentioned Eesa Ibn Maryam عليه السلام was raised up to the sky physically. Further, Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani believed that raising the dead physically is possible as a miracle, that it was one of ’Isa’s ﷺ miracles. Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani also stated that Allah ﷻ discloses to the Awliya’ (not just Prophets and Messengers) the knowledge of the unseen and every great news (see the scans in the below).

In 1893, via “Tohfa-Baghdad” (see page 51 of the online English edition)(originally an Arabic only book)(page 22 of the Arabic only edition, see the scan work), MGA called Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani as his “Master” and quoted in agreement his “Futuh al-Ghaib” [Revelations of the Unseen] and argued that:

“”Verily, Allah speaks to His Auliya’ in the most eloquent and delightful manner, reveals unto them secrets, and informs them of future events. He bestows upon them the knowledge of Prophets, their light, their insight, and their miracles, but as a heritage and not as the owner. Allah gives his Auliya control of the Earth and heavens and the entire kingdom of God”””.

However, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s purposely mistranslated it to mean “Allah makes awliya as representatives in the earth and the heavens and in the entire kingdom of God” (see page 51 of the online English edition).

In May of 1908, while in Lahore, MGA alleged that almost 200 ulema of his time issued a fatwa [religious verdict] of apostasy against Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani, may Allah have mercy upon him. Ibn Jawzi, who was a scholar of Hadith of his time, wrote a book and titled it Talbis Iblis, and used much bitter and unseemly words against him. (See Al-Hakam, vol. 12, no. 33, p. 1–7, dated 14 May 1908, via Malfuzat-10, page 373).

After MGA died, in the BA-5, MGA reported to have gotten an altered version of the famous Quranic phraseology “Kun Fa Ya Kun” and alleged that Shaikh ‘Abdul-Qadir al-Jilani had also gotten the same revelation.

In June of 2025, Maulvi Razi discussed Shaikh ‘Abdul-Qadir al-Jilani on the True Islam Uk Urdu stream vs. Bro Imtiaz. —At 2:10:33, Maulvi Razi starts to speak and accuses Bro Imtiaz of not answering the question. Maulvi Razi admitted that MGA called himself “Khatam un Nabiyeen” (naozobillah), via Buruz in “Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” (1901)(see page 12). Maulvi Razi then challenges Bro Imtiaz to put a fatwa on anyone who calls himself the “Khatam un Nabiyeen” (naozobillah), via Buruz. Maulvi Razi argues that MGA didn’t mean in reality (haqiqat), thus, only metaphoric. Maulvi Razi argues that many Islamic scholars have claimed the same in the past. Maulvi Razi then accuses of Shah Wali Ullah of claiming to be “Khatam un Nabiyeen” (naozobillah), via Buruz. Maulvi Razi then accuses Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani of the same crime. Maulvi Razi then quotes “Tafheemat Ilaheyyah” by Shah Wali Ullah, (In a recent livestream (2024), Maulvi Razi argued that Shah Wali Ullah had called himself the Khatam-un-Nabiyeen. However, Adnan Rashid disproved it quickly, this was a from a book called “Anfas-ul-Arifeen”, Razi was reading the Urdu translation, not the original Persian) and alleges that MGA did the same. Maulvi Razi then calls Bro Imtiaz a liar and says that he accused MGA of called “Nuzul-e-Maseeh” (as) a secret (raaz). Maulvi Razi alleges that MGA wrote in almost every single book that it is the ijma of the sahaba that Eisa (as) died, and this was also the belief of Muhammad (Saw)(this is a lie). Maulvi Razi then accused Bro Imtiaz of not knowing Arabic. Maulvi Razi alleged that Hadi Ali Chaudhary quoted Muhammad (Saw) and it was called a mistranslation or a misrepresentation or a lie. However, Maulvi Razi is purposely misunderstanding with Bro Imtiaz said, which was that Hadi Ali Chaudhary misrepresented Muhammad (Saw), this was in terms of the sahaba being alive when Eisa (As) returns. Maulvi Razi then says that in terms of 3:81 of the Quran (3:82 in the Qadiani Quran), Ahmadi’s also believe that this is about Muhammad (Saw). Maulvi Razi then accused Bro Imtiaz of saying that if anyone says that 3:81 of the Quran (3:82 in the Qadiani Quran) is not about Muhammad (Saw) then they are the friend of Satan. Bro Imtiaz immediately waved his finger NO. Maulvi Razi quoted Maulvi Abdul Karim Sialkoti from 1902 and made some unintelligible argument.

On June-27-2025, on a True Islam UK livestream (3:56:10 time stamp), Adnan Rashid explained how Ahmadi’s twist Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani in terms of “wujood”, this is not what MGA was arguing, MGA argued that he had become Muhammad (saw)(naozobillah). Furthermore, Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani never claimed to be the second coming of Muhammad (Saw) and MGA did, which takes MGA out of Islam, it is Kufr of the greatest level (akber).


Continue reading “Shaikh ‘Abdul-Qadir al-Jilani (also spelled as Abdul Qadir Jilaani) in Ahmadiyya literature–a study”

Siddik Salis vs. the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s in #Ghana

Intro
A Muslim named Siddik Salis has been responding (via FB) to the #Qadianis in #Ghana. He was responding to a famous Qadiani in Ghana named Abubakar Zakaria (who also alleges to be a comedian). Siddik Salis is debating him soon (see this tik tok clip)

We have worked with UTI Dawaah in the past and herein.

Continue reading “Siddik Salis vs. the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s in #Ghana”

The history of #Ahmadiyya in the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.)

Intro
It seems that in the 1970’s-1980’s, some Pakistani-Ahmadi came to the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.) as workers. They met in secret meetings and organized in each other’s homes. I knew a Pakistani-Ahmadi who went to the U.A.E. (Sohail) and then refused to go back to Pakistan and converted to Ahmadiyya and claimed persecution and was sent to the USA (See the Muslim Sunrise of July-1976).

In 2025, at the UK Jalsa, there is a photo of the Sadr of MKA-Nigeria represented by Bro Ridwanullah Yusuf joins Amir Ahmadiyya Dubai and Canadian delegate at the International Tabligh Seminar.

Qadiani-Ahmadi Maulvi Mansoor Ahmad Clarke flew to the UAE illegally and conducted a bookstall on behalf of the Ahmadiyya Movement in Sharjah. (see photo’s in the below).

Continue reading “The history of #Ahmadiyya in the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.)”

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑