Intro
On a recent True Islam UK live stream (Jun-20-2025), at 2:07:22, Bro Imtiaz reminds Maulvi Razi that in “Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” (1901)(see page 12), MGA called himself the “Khatam un Nabiyeen” (naozobillah), via Buruz (see the clip on TikTok and Twitter)(see the full explanation in the below).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
—At 2:06:54, Bro Imtiaz begins speaking, at 2:07:22, Bro Imtiaz reminds Maulvi Razi that in “Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” (1901), MGA called himself the “Khatam un Nabiyeen” (naozobillah), via Buruz. Hadi Ali Chaudhary had accused Bro Imtiaz of believing that the prophethood of Eisa (As) will continue, Bro Imtiaz objects to this and said that he never said as such. Bro Imtiaz reiterates that after the appointment (maboos)of prophethood of Muhammad (saw), only this prophethood is continuous until the Day of Judgement and this is the Islamic belief. Bro Imtiaz reiterates that Eisa (As) is returning to work under and support the prophethood of Muhammad (saw). Bro Imtiaz pointed out how Hadi Ali Chaudhary argued that this person or that person (flahn)(it was Ibn Arabi) had even said that a different person would return, i.e., not Eisa (As), but Hadi Ali Chaudhary doesn’t realize that by this statement, he turns MGA into a liar. Bro Imtiaz says that he has 10 references from MGA’s works wherein MGA argued that Eisa (as) had died and that someone else would come in-place of Eisa (As) was a secret that no person ever in the world knew before MGA. Bro Imtiaz explains how Hadi Ali Chaudhary falsely argued that some of the sahaba would be alive to see Eisa (As), this is a total lie! Hadi Ali Chaudhary purposely did a mistranslation. Bro Imtiaz explains how Hadi Ali Chaudhary falsely argued that an old prophet can come but a new one can’t, Bro Imtiaz never said this. Bro Imtiaz explains how Ibrahim (as) and Musa (as) are old prophets, it is not our belief that they will physically reappear, Muslim’s are only told about the physical return of Eisa (as), no one else and we only believe this since Muhammad (saw) said so. Bro Imtiaz explained how Ahmadi’s don’t even follow MGA’s comments on 3:81 of the Quran (3:82 in the Qadiani Quran). Bro Imtiaz explains how Muslims aren’t going to borrow a prophet from anyone, this is a ridiculous thing to say. In the end, MGA called himself the “Khatam un Nabiyeen” (naozobillah).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
https://new.alislam.org/library/books/misconception-removed/info
LIVESTREAM: Q&A – Prophethood in Islam – Urdu-review by Dr. Shah, June-2025 – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
LIVESTREAM: Q&A – Prophethood in Islam – Urdu–review by Dr. Shah, June-2025
https://x.com/ahmadiyyafacts/status/1937310849179471998?s=46&t=HTqZKquoOvKbgoBAF2aQcg
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8rQtKkK/
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #mirzaghulamahmad
1 Pingback