Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Ibn Arabi

Intro
In the below, we have created a page wherein we posted all the times that MGA referred to Ibn Arabi. We have also posted a document from alislam.org wherein MGA refers to Ibn Arabi in his books. It should be noted that his name is written as Ibn al-‘Arabi in some of MGA’s books.

In 1885-1886, via Surma Chashmay Arya (RK-2, pages 175-181, via Essence of Islam, V-2, page 35), MGA said that a Wali possessing the capacity for vision, using his mind, can appear to another person, at a distance of hundreds of miles in a state of complete wakefulness without his body moving from its place. MGA alleged that the author of Futuhat and Fusus (ibn Arabi)(and other great Sufi’s also experienced this, however, MGA alleges they he didn’t need their testimony, he has his own experience which taught him about this phenomenon.

In 1897-1898 (See Kitab ul Barriya), MGA and his team of writers, alleged that Ibn Arabi had written that Jesus will descend but in the sense that he will be associated with a different body (See page 19, Lahori-Ahmadi abridged translation), and that he died (see page 34, Lahori-Ahmadi abridged translation) MGA and his team referenced page 262 (see a document by the Qadiani’s) of a commentary written by Ibn Arabi, however, this seems to be Tafsir-i-Kashani by Abd al-Razzaq Kāshānī. Tafsir Kashani can also be found online at Al-Tafsir.com. Tafsir Kashani was also printed under the title “Tafseer ibn Arabi” (see online herein).

In 1902, MGA and his team quoted Nawab Siddiq Hassan Khan‘s book, “Hujaj al Kiramah” and alleged that that Ibn Arabi wrote that the Messiah would be called a Kafir (See Al-Hakam, vol. 6, no. 44, dated 10 December 1902, pp. 1-2, Via Malfuzat-4, online English edition, pages 143 and 145).

In Oct-1908, BA-5 (see page 386), after MGA died, MGA’s team of writers alleged that Ibn al-‘Arabi wrote in one of his books—which is his last book—that ‘Isa would indeed come but only in a new manifestation; that is, that some other person of this Ummah would appear in the spirit of ‘Isa. However, MGA didn’t give the name of the book.

However, the reality is that Ibn Arabi explicitly stated in Al-Futuhat that Isa (as) is in the second heaven with his body as “he has not yet died” so he cannot be used to support the Ahmadi view (See vol. 6 pg 71).

There are other references from Ibn Arabi’s works wherein he claims that Esa (as) was never even on the cross and a phantom image was crucified. Ibn Arabi also claimed to be like Esa (as) in a strange way, and thus, the islamic world doesn’t follow his teachings or take him seriously. Nevertheless, we have posted the reference and will wait for independent verification.

Did Ibn Arabi believe Isa (As) to be a half human and half an angelic spirit, different from the four types of creations: 1) Adam 2) Eve 3) Bani Adam 4) Jesus (half spirit of Gabriel and half son of Mary).? Did Imam Al-Ghazzali do Takfir of Ibn Arabi? Watch Bro Haji’s explanation herein, he alleges that Ibn Arabi was a total deviant and shouldn’t be read for Islam, some Sufi’s might have quoted him without knowing his full Aqida.

“Buruz means that the nature of some saints resembles the nature of a particular prophet. Many saints are made to travel through the achievements of the great prophets and the saints are coloured with the colour of the prophets. In other words, the image of the achievements of the prophets is transferred to them. One could also say that the special qualities of the prophets are manifested and projected (buruz) through them. But after the journey is completed, each of them remains in their original position of natural belonging. For example, the saint who supports the cause of faith is referred to as one who has the nature of Noah(as) or who stands in the footsteps of Noah(as), or as one who manifests Noah(as), or as the buruz of Noah(as). The saint who accepts the will of God is called someone who has the nature of Moses(as), the one of sincerity and self-annihilation is called someone who has the nature of Jesus(as), and the one who is a perfect servant who combines all these qualities is called someone who has the nature of Muhammad(sa). Sometimes it is said that this or that saint is the buruz of this or that prophet, just as the moon is the buruz of the sun. In short, the Prophet is the original and the saint is his copy and the original of the Prophets is Muhammad(sa).” (Muhyi d-Din ibn ‘Arabi, Urdu translation of Fusus al-Hikam , ed./trans. Muhammad ‘Abd al-Qadir Siddiqi, Hyderabad, Dar at-Tab‘-i Jami ‘ah-i ‘Uthmaniyyah, 1942, p. 24).

In 1984, Mirza Tahir Ahmad called Ibn Arabi as no less than a prophet, i.e., the like of prophets, and via 4:69 (4:70 in the Kadiani Koran).

In June of 2025, Ahmadi’s discussed Ibn Arabi on the True Islam Uk Urdu stream vs. Bro Imtiaz.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

–At 1:50:50, Hadi Ali Chaudhary starts speaking and accuses Bro Imtiaz of not answering the question. Hadi Ali Chaudhary acknowledges that Bro Imtiaz said that Eisa (as) was already a prophet and thus doesn’t need to be made a prophet again. Hadi Ali Chaudhary accidentally said that the person who comes at the end (akhr), he will be the last (akhree). Hadi Ali Chaudhary says in terms of the statement by Bro Imtiaz that the Ahmadiyya movement has created a 3rd category of prophets, is a lie! Hadi Ali Chaudhary says since in the Quran it says that now only the prophethood of Muhammad (saw) will continue. Hadi Ali Chaudhary then argues via 4:69 (4:70 in the Kadiani Koran), Muslims are promised 4 levels, of which being a Nabi is one. Hadi Ali Chaudhary then quotes Ibn Arabi and says that the person to come (the messiah) is not the one who has died. A different person (a different Messiah) would come (this is a total lie). Hadi Ali Chaudhary then says that Muslims have always believed that Eisa (as) who had died will not be coming back. He said forget about Eisa (as), he is dead and never coming back. Hadi Ali Chaudhary again argues that Muhammad (Saw) said that some of the sahaba will see Eisa (as), and this meant that MGA’s friends are the sahaba in question. Hadi Ali Chaudhary says that the Quran said that Eisa (as) died, the sahaba had ijma on this too, Muhammad (Saw) said that Eisa (as) also died. This hadith is metaphoric. Hadi Ali Chaudhary says that if Eisa (as) returns physically, Muslims will have to remove many verses of the Quran.

—At 2:06:54, Bro Imtiaz begins speaking, at 2:07:22, Bro Imtiaz reminds Maulvi Razi that in “Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” (1901), MGA called himself the “Khatam un Nabiyeen” (naozobillah), via Buruz. Hadi Ali Chaudhary had accused Bro Imtiaz of believing that the prophethood of Eisa (As) will continue, Bro Imtiaz objects to this and said that he never said as such. Bro Imtiaz reiterates that after the appointment (maboos)of prophethood of Muhammad (saw), only this prophethood is continuous until the Day of Judgement and this is the Islamic belief. Bro Imtiaz reiterates that Eisa (As) is returning to work under and support the prophethood of Muhammad (saw). Bro Imtiaz pointed out how Hadi Ali Chaudhary argued that this person or that person (flahn)(it was Ibn Arabi) had even said that a different person would return, i.e., not Eisa (As), but Hadi Ali Chaudhary doesn’t realize that by this statement, he turns MGA into a liar. Bro Imtiaz says that he has 10 references from MGA’s works wherein MGA argued that Eisa (as) had died and that someone else would come in-place of Eisa (As) was a secret that no person ever in the world knew before MGA. Bro Imtiaz explains how Hadi Ali Chaudhary falsely argued that some of the sahaba would be alive to see Eisa (As), this is a total lie! Hadi Ali Chaudhary purposely did a mistranslation. Bro Imtiaz explains how Hadi Ali Chaudhary falsely argued that an old prophet can come but a new one can’t, Bro Imtiaz never said this. Bro Imtiaz explains how Ibrahim (as) and Musa (as) are old prophets, it is not our belief that they will physically reappear, Muslim’s are only told about the physical return of Eisa (as), no one else and we only believe this since Muhammad (saw) said so. Bro Imtiaz explained how Ahmadi’s don’t even follow MGA’s comments on 3:81 of the Quran (3:82 in the Qadiani Quran). Bro Imtiaz explains how Muslims aren’t going to borrow a prophet from anyone, this is a ridiculous thing to say. In the end, MGA called himself the “Khatam un Nabiyeen” (naozobillah).

—At 2:36:56, Maulvi Razi starts talking and accuses Muslims of believing in a “Mustaqil Nabi” after Muhammad (Saw)(this is a lie) who will abrogate the Quran. Thus, Razi alleges that Muslims break the seal of prophethood with their beliefs. Maulvi Razi accused Bro Imtiaz of not answering the question that was posed to him. Maulvi Razi accuses Muslims of calling Muhammad (Saw) the last prophet, however, Muslims open the door for Eisa (as) and then close it up. Maulvi Razi then argues that MGA only claimed to be the “Akhree Mursal” (translated as Last Messenger by the Qadiani’s) in terms of being like Adam (as) and named the Messiah (this is a lie). Maulvi Razi then quotes Ibn Arabi and his prophecy.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1886
Surma Chashm Arya [Guidance for the Aryas]. Riyaz Hind, 1886. R. K. ii. 100, 179f
Microsoft Word – Ibn al-Arabi 2

Click to access Ibn-al-Arabi.pdf

Ibn-al-Arabi
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Ibn-al-Arabi-1.pdf

“”I remember that on one occasion I saw in a state of vision that I had written certain divine decrees with my own hand setting out events in the future and then presented the paper to Allah the All- Powerful, Gloried be His name, for His signature. (It should be remembered that it often happens in visions and divinely inspired dreams that some divine attribute of Beauty or Majesty are beheld by the recipient of the vision in the form of a human being and the person seeing the vision thinks, by way of symbolism, that he is actually beholding God, the Absolutely All-Powerful. Among those with experience of spiritual visions, this matter is well-recorded, known, and accepted as an established fact. It cannot be denied by anyone with experience of visions). To the same Peerless and Self Sufficient Being—Who manifested His attribute of Beauty to my mind in the state of vision and appeared to be God, the All-Powerful—I presented the document containing divine decrees for attestation and He, Who was manifesting Himself in the form of a Ruler, dipped His pen in red ink and first flicked it in my direction and with the rest of the red ink which remained at the point of the pen He put His signature to the document. 2 Thereupon, the state of vision came to an end and when I opened my eyes to look at the material world around me, I witnessed several red drops falling on my clothes. 2 or 3 of the drops also fell on the cap of one ‘Abdullah of Sanaur (Patiala State) who was at the time sitting close to me. Thus, the red ink which was part of the vision materialized externally and became visible. Many other such manifestations have been witnessed which it would take too long to relate. 3 Among the curious and wondrous marvels of such experiences is the coming into physical existence of some visionary aspects by pure application of the prescience of their nature which have no sign of existence in the external although the author of the Futûhât and the Fusûs and most of the various great Mystics have written a lot of their personal stories with relation to this subject in their compilations but because there is a great difference between seeing and hearing we cannot obtain a s certain an emotion by merely listening to the these accounts. Rather by personal experience”””.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1886

Click to access 3-Questions-by-a-Christian.pdf

See page 37

“”Hence, this ability has nothing to do with Prophethood, and it does not even require that the person practicing it should be pious. This science has been in vogue since times immemorial. Some eminent Muslim scholars—such as Mohyuddin Ibn-e-‘Arabi, author of the Fusus, and some elders of the Naqshbandi order—are known to have been great experts in this science and had no equal in their own times. Of some of them it has been said that, with perfect concentration, and with the leave of God, they could even talk to the people who had recently passed away””.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1891
Elucidation of Objectives
https://new.alislam.org/library/books/elucidation-of-objectives/info

“”I do not say, like the author of Fusus, that “God created things and He is those things. [Translator]”

but I do venture to say:

God created things and He is like those things. This universe is like a palace paved with smooth slabs of glass, beneath which strong currents of water flow. He does what He wills. Defective eyes mistake these things for God. They think that the Sun, the moon, and the stars are independently effective and functional on their own, whereas none is truly independent and effective but God.

The All-Wise God has disclosed this closely guarded secret to me that this universe and its complements are like His organs and are meant to carry out the imperatives and intentions of God Almighty, the Cause of all causes. The universe and its constituent parts are not self-existent; they derive strength and substance from the Supreme Soul—God, quite like all the bodily functions
which exist because of life…”””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1890-1891
Izala e Auham [The Removal of Misconceptions]. Riyaz Hind, 1891. R. K. iii. 176 – 178, 231,
232, 257f

“””Thus we shall inscribe some part of what Maulvi [Abu Saeed Muhammad Hussayn Batalvi] has mentioned in his magazine along with his opinion concerning the book Mizanul Qubra by Imam Abdul Wahhab Shi’rani and the Futûhât of the Shaykh Muhiyudeen for the sake of the readers.

As a gist of what the Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi has written about revelation and vision
as pretext and proof [for a claim] in the Futûhât is that the saintly people enquire of the
commandments of the Holy Prophet (on whom be salutations) through vision and when any from among them require [guidance from] a Hadith in any situation he is honoured with an [visionary] audience of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and Gabriel (peace be upon him) descends and the Holy Prophet asks Gabriel concerning the dilemma about which the saint is perturbed and reveals it to the saint so that the question is answered to the saint through the mediation of Gabriel. Then the Shaykh ibn ‘Arabi states that the Traditions are Authorised in this manner by the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) [himself and] there are several Traditions which are Authentic in the opinion of the Scholars of Hadith and they are not Authentic according to us and there are many Traditions which are [considered] fabricated and [they] are made Authentic by the word of the Holy Prophet through vision. That is all.

Ibn ‘Arabi also states in the Futûhât al-Makkiya that such an abundance of mystical knowledge is disclosed to those who invoke [God and His Messengers] and ascetics which people of notion and inference do not possess and these points of mysticism and [these] secrets and points of gnosis are exclusive to the prophets and saints …

Yes it was not denied then and is not denied now that perhaps as a literal fulfilment of the
prophecies another Promised Messiah be born some time in future but the difference between this statement and the one in Baraheen e Ahmadiyya is merely that at that time that was written as a summary of the revelation and of not knowing its every aspect and is now written in full detail anyhow the said Maulvi has placed great emphasis upon this humble one resembling the messiah in order to create an affirmation of plausibility as in one place he copies the words of Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi from the Futûhât al-Makkiya chapter 223 to elucidate his meaning and that excerpt along with its translation is as follows:

People in possession of vast knowledge can affirm my saying that some thinkers of the Naqshbandi and Suhrawardi et cetera were also greatly into practicing these arts and some were such experts in this field that they would cure hundreds of patients with a mere glance of their felicity and goodwill and Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi also had expertise in this of a special degree””.
________________________________________________________________________________________________Izala-e-Auham, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 3, p.177

MGA said that Suyuti used dreams (wherein he met Muhammad {saw}) to verify hadith. He specifically says that imam suyuti does this grading for daif ahadeeth. Qadiani excuse he is quoting someone else not his belief. But that’s not true it is his belief and he is affirming his belief by quoting such examples. Next on list is ibn arabi.

Scans

______________________________________________________________________________________________
1892-1893
Aina e kamalat e Islam [The Mirror of the Excellences of Islam]. Riyaz Hind, 1893. R. K. v. 64, 65, 167).
Microsoft Word – Ibn al-Arabi 2
https://www.alislam.org/library/articles/Ibn-al-Arabi.pdf

In explaining the third of the 3 stages of spiritual gnosis Fana [Self-extinction] Baqâ’ [Continuance] and Liqa [Union], the Promised Messiah (peace be upon him) writes:

This is that same stage upon reaching which some seekers have stumbled and considered the bond of the witnessing to be a kind of bond of unison. Some mystics have named the Saints of Allah who have entered this stage or those who have been able to sip from it: Children of Allah in relation to their having wholly entered into the patronage of the Divine attributes and as the son of a person has certain traits and mannerisms of his father similarly they have also adopted some connection with the beautiful attributes of Almighty God by reason of rebirth in
the Godly mannerisms. Albeit such names are not openly used in the terminology of [religious] ethics. But the wise have in fact derived it from nowhere but The Holy Quran itself because Allah in his Supreme Glory states ‘Then praise Allah as eagerly as you praised your fathers or even more than that.’

In addition to this this humble one is not alone in translating it thus many a researchers and scholars of linguists have derived the same meaning and among these is the author of the Futûhât al-Makkiya who is also a philologist he gives the same meanings in a commentary of his which has been printed and published from a press in Egypt under the verse ‘But man undertook it. He is indeed too cruel to himself, unmindful of the consequences.’ That this cruelty and unmindfulness is in [his] praise and the meaning is that verily a believing man is so cruel to himself in fulfilling the divine commandments as to become an opponent of the emotions of the ego and the desires of the flesh and thereby diminishes and assuages their excitement”””.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1897
Malfuzat-1, online English edition, page 112
Microsoft Word – Ibn al-Arabi 2
https://www.alislam.org/library/articles/Ibn-al-Arabi.pdf

All of this aside, even mystics are compelled to accept the presence of God’s independent, overarching power and control, whether they are Wujudis or Shuhudis. Various sages and masters from among them such as Bayazid Bastamirh, Shiblirh, Dhun-Nunrh and Muhy-ud-Din Ibni Arabirh have generally expressed this view in their discourses, either explicitly or implicitly. However, I would like to state clearly that we are not at liberty to mock them or look down upon them. On the
contrary, they were wise and intelligent people. The fact of the matter is that this subject is a subtle and profound secret that relates to understanding the essence of the Divine, and so they were unable to grasp the nature of this relationship— that is all, nothing else.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1897-1898
Kitabul Bariyya [The Acquittal]. Ziyaul Islam, 1898. R. K xiii. 22ff, 23f, 48, 91, 92, 221f, 313f
Microsoft Word – Ibn al-Arabi 2

Click to access Ibn-al-Arabi.pdf

https://ahmadiyya.org/bookspdf/bar/bar16-29-frm.htm

Click to access sklife.pdf

“””I have mentioned in earlier books that Imam Bukhari and Imam ibn Hazm and Imam Malik (Allah be pleased with them) and other great Imams held exactly this belief that the Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him) has in fact died. Now let it be clear that the Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn al-‘Arabi also held the same belief. So he writes about the nature of descent on page 262 of his commentary that ‘Jesus will descend but in the sense that he will be associated with a different body’ so that his descent will be as a likeness as is believed by the eminent Sufis. Then on the same page he writes that ‘The meaning of Jesus’ ascension is that when his soul got separated from the lower world it was joined with the higher world.’ Then on page 178 he writes that the meaning of ascension is that the soul of Jesus after being taken was brought to the heaven of souls. So ponder over this.

The great authorities have accepted this. So much so that Muhiyudeen ibn al-‘Arabi has also
written in clear words in his commentary that ‘The descent of the Messiah would be in this manner that his soul will be associated with another body’ so that someone else will be born according to his qualities and nature which is a spiritual matter. So the Exalted God was ready to help these people if they were ready to accept help. But they deviated far away, out of mean-mindedness and prejudice, and did not desire that the Exalted God should enlighten their hearts.

We can conclusively and definitely prove to every seeker of truth that from the time of our master and leader the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) till the present day there have been in every century Godly persons through whom God has shown heavenly Signs to the communities to guide them. There have been in Islam persons such as Sayyid Abdul Qadir of Gilan and Abul Hassan of Kharaqan and Abu Yazid of Bustam, and Junayd of Baghdad and Muhiyudeen ibn al-‘Arabi and Zunnoon of Egypt and Moinuddin Chishti of Ajmer and Qutubuddin Bakhtiar Kaki and Fariduddin of Pakpattan and Nizamuddin of Delhi and Shah Waliullah of Delhi and Shaykh Ahmad of Sirhind (Allah be pleased with them as they were pleased with Him) and the number of such persons runs into thousands. So many wonders of these people are recorded in the books of the scholarly and the learned that even a prejudiced opponent despite his great bias has to concede in the end that these people showed extraordinary signs and wonders.

Similarly the master of the Sufis the Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn al-‘Arabi categorically expresses his belief regarding the death of the Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him) in his commentary in clear words.

The Shaykh ibn al-‘Arabi writes [the following] in the Fusûs al-Hikam about a vision he had that
he [the Promised Messiah] is the Seal of Saints and will be born a twin. A girl will be born with him and he will be Chinese meaning his forbears would have lived in Chinese countries so all these precepts were fulfilled with the intent of Almighty God. I have written that I was born a twin and there was a girl with me and our seniors lived in Samarkand which had ties with China””.

Scans

______________________________________________________________________________________________
1898-1899
Malfuzat-2, online English edition, page 98

“”In the Futuhat a subtle point has been written whilst alluding to this station. It is written that when a person reaches a rank of perfection, the Prayer becomes useless for them. The foolish have understood this to imply that one becomes excused from offering the Prayer altogether, as certain free-minded dervishes claim. Such people are unaware of this station and fail to understand this subtle point of wisdom””.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1899-1902
Taryaqul Quloob [Panacea of the Souls]. 1902. R. K. xv. 481 – 486
Microsoft Word – Ibn al-Arabi 2
https://www.alislam.org/library/articles/Ibn-al-Arabi.pdf

“””Let nobody fancy that in this discourse I have given my self precedence over the Prophet Jesus because this is a partial precedence which one who is not a prophet can have over one who is and all men of knowledge and understanding accept such precedence. That does not make a difference. Neither am I alone in believing in it for many a wise man of great wisdom that has passed before me considered the last Adam to be the seal of common sainthood. They consider him to complete the circle of reappearances of the Adamic reality and name that person the Last Adam and the Promised Mahdi and the Promised Messiah in accord with their true visions. Yet those who out of ignorance have forgone the precept of reappearance, and have forgotten this continuous and unceasing Practice of God with his creation. Having taken a peripheral thought they bring down the Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him) from the heavens and make him return to the world. Even though the Hadith of the Night Journey testifies his soul to be dwelling amidst those of his predecessors. They do not comprehend that this thought negates the precept of reappearances and to deny that is as dangerous as washing one’s hands of Islam. All Holy Books accept the concept of reappearances. Even the Prophet Jesus taught this same precept and a lot of mention is made of this in the Traditions of the Prophet. So to deny it is a great foolishness and places one’s belief in peril. This was the very mistake that caused the people of the Middle Ages to be known by the very unfortunate epithet of those of the Dark Age by the mouth of the revered Prophet of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be on him). They forgot the consensus of opinion that took place upon the words uttered by the tongue of Abu Bakr that ‘Muhammad was but a Messenger.’ 11 Objectively this prediction has been around since an age long gone that the last perfect man will follow in the footsteps of Adam. So that the circle of the Adamic reality is completed. The Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn al-‘Arabi has written this prophecy in the Fusûs al-Hikam and albeit this prediction was worthy of placement in the Ringstone [chapter] on Adam. But understanding Seth to be the verifier of ‘Like father like son’ he has included him in that Ringstone [chapter]. We deem it appropriate to quote the original excerpt of the Shaykh here and that is: ‘The last child to be born in this species of Man will be in the line of Seth. He will bear his secrets, and after him there shall be none born of this species; he is the Seal of the Begotten. With him there will be born a sister who shall come out before him, and he shall come out after her such that his head shall be adjacent to her feet. His birth shall be in China, and his language will be that of his land. Sterility will spread amongst men and women. There will be much marriage but no birth. He will call them to Allah, but will receive no reply.’ This points towards the fact that he will
be born from Turco-Mongols. It is important that he be a non-Arab (rather than an Arab). That he
will be granted the secrets and mysteries that were granted to Seth. That there will be no birth after him and that he will be the Seal of the begotten, so that no perfect child will be born after his birth. Moreover this phrase also means that he will be the last son of his father. A girl will be born with him but before him. He will follow. His head will be at the feet of that sister (that the sister will be born naturally with the head emerging before the feet). The head of that son will emerge straight after her feet (as was my birth and that of my twin sister in exact accordance with this). The remainder of the Shaykh’s excerpt means that it will be an age wherein (the disease of) sterility will spread among men and women. There will be much cohabitation. That people will not desist from intercourse but that no righteous person will result from it and that he will call the people of the time towards God. But that they will not accept. What follows is what the commentator of this passage has written by way of commentary –

Seth is the firstborn of Adam. Then there was a girl with him who was born after him. Thus God willed to verify among humanity the relation. That exists between first and last. For this purpose he had appointed right in the beginning that the Sign of the last son [may] hold similarity with that of the first son who was the Seal of Vicegerents. By reason of the prediction which the Sage has written in his book ‘Anqâ’ Mughrib that Seal of Vicegerents and Seal of the Begotten was to be born among non-Arabs (and not from among the Arabs. He was to have been the bearer of the wisdom of the Prophet Seth. The prediction also states that after him (after his death) the disease of sterility will spread among the human race so that those who will be born will be similar to animals and savages. Genuine humanity will disappear from the face of the world. They will not consider permissible that which is permissible nor forbidden that which is forbidden. So they will witness doomsday.

Now let it be clear that this prediction of the reverend Sage has not yet been proven from
any express Hadith. But it signifies towards its existence within the Quran. Firstly by mentioning
diverse parables it has inculcated the cyclical nature of the universe into our conscience.
Communities of the righteous and evil people are consistently re-emerging in the world. By teaching the prayer of ‘Not those who incurred thy displeasure’ God had pointed out that those Jews who were present at the time of the Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him. were to reappear in this Ummah as well 12.

So that they would also re-persecute this Promised Messiah, who is to reappear in this Ummah. In fact it was commanded to recite Sura Fatiha as an obligation during Prayers. This teaches that it is so that the Promised Messiah must come. Similarly the wicked of this Ummah have been affiliated with the Jews and not only that but that such a person who was to receive the Christic attribute from the Mary-like attribute through the breath of God alone. He was granted the name Son of Mary in Sura Tahrim [Prohibition]. 13 For it cites the example of the God-consciousness of Mary. Who was then breathed into by Him. This signified no exclusivity in the person of Jesus son of Mary as the Word of Allah. But that the latter messiah is also to be the Word of Allah and the Spirit of Allah. In fact in both these attributes he is to be more perfect than before as is evident from Surah Tahrim and Sura Fatiha and Sura al-Noor [The Light] and the verse ‘You are the best people raised to the benefit.’ 14

Then on top of this Allah Almighty has also stated in The Holy Quran: ‘He is the First and the
Last.’ 15 This verse clearly indicates that one person was a disclosure of God’s First. One person will be a disclosure of God’s Lastness. It was essential for both persons to be united in one attribute with regards to their particularities. So whilst Adam was born male with female. So was it ordained for Seth as the last of this race to be born [again] male with female. So it was important for that promised Caliph and Seal of Caliphs who ought to be called in other words the Promised Messiah, to be born as a twin, so that a girl preceded the boy, so that he is the Seal of the Begotten by the Quranic decree. So let it be clear that this prediction of the reverend Sage is most likely a vision of his. But it can be verified by looking at The Holy Quran because this book of the Sage is the last of his books in which the Sage has not accepted that the same Seal of Caliphs is Jesus who will [bodily] descend from the heavens. But accepts him as one who will be born. But as a twin and the commentary on the Quran authored by the Sage also reveals that he does not accept the concept of Jesus (peace be upon him) descending [bodily] from the heavens. So it is evident that if the Sage has mentioned the belief of Jesus’ descent in some previous book then the Sage has recanted from that in the end. This is to be found in abundance in the compilations of the writings of the Sufis as it was written in Baraheen e Ahmadiyya before certain knowledge from God revealed in accord with one’s own thought that Jesus himself will return. But God declared this belief to be corrupt and told me that ‘You are indeed the Promised Messiah.’

So let it be remembered that it would have been better if the Sage had compared the Promised Messiah to Adam instead of Seth. For the Quran and the Torah prove that Adam was born
as a twin. The revelation of Almighty God concerning me has been published in Baraheen e
Ahmadiyya 22 years ago from today that ‘I determined to appoint a vicegerent and so created Adam’ 16 and this signified that there was a twin in the beginning and a twin in the end. All the aged people of the village know about my being born a twin and about the birth of the girl preceding and my birth following out of the same pregnancy. I have in my possession the written testimony of the midwife who delivered me. This is the point at which we complete the book and pray to God for blessing and guidance. Amen again Amen””.

______________________________________________________________________________________________
1902
Al-Hakam, vol. 6, no. 44, dated 10 December 1902, pp. 1-2
Via Malfuzat-4, online English edition, pages 143 and 145

143
“””Meaning, this man is uprooting the Faith. I was happy to hear this because the narrations relate that these are the sorts of edicts that would be passed against the Messiah and Mahdi. This is what is recorded in Hujaj-ul-Kiramah. Ibni Arabi writes that when the Messiah descends a person will stand up and say:

Furthermore, in part two of Mujaddid Sahib’s Maktubat it is clearly written that the expositions of the Messiah will be intricate secrets that the people will not be able to comprehend. Even though he will derive his insights from the Quran, the people will still oppose him. The fact of the matter is that just as the Promised Messiah is accompanied by the sign of joining together, he will also necessarily bring change—as the common people would perceive”””.

145
“””In Hujaj-ul-Kiramah, it is written on the authority of Ibni Arabi that when the Promised Messiah appears, he will be labelled an imposter and called ignorant; it will even be said that he is changing the religion. This is what is happening at present. These are the sorts of allegations that are levelled against me. A person can only be saved from such doubts when they set aside the book of their own thinking, as it were, and instead reflect on whether the man they have accepted is true or not”””.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1902
Al-Huda, online English edition
Guidance for Perceiving Minds
https://new.alislam.org/library/books/guidance-for-perceiving-minds/info
See page 120

“””By Allah, I am that Promised Messiah, a bounty from Allah, the Compassionate and the Most Loving. I am the fulfilment of the prophecy of Fususul-Hikam ([The Seals of Wisdom] is a book written by Ibn Arabi where he mentioned the signs of the Mahdi), the guard during the raids of thieves, and the shield of religion from the Gracious when it is attacked””.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1902
Tohfa Golarrviyya [A Gift for Golarvi]. Ziyaul Islam, 1902. R. K. xvii. 127f, 157, 158, 329
Microsoft Word – Ibn al-Arabi 2
https://www.alislam.org/library/articles/Ibn-al-Arabi.pdf

“”The Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn-‘Arabi writes an indication of the Mahdi the Seal of Saints in the Fusûs that his family will be from the Chinese areas and his birth will be a rarity for a twin girl will be born with him. So that God will separate the element of femininity from him. So the birth of this humble one was in accord with this very vision and my ancestors came into the Punjab from the Chinese environs in exact accord with this vision.

Remember that these suspicions about why all those Traditions of the Six Authentic that have been written regarding the Mahdi and Promised Messiah thought inapplicable in this place are eradicated with the question as to why it is written in the journals and reports as in the letters of the Mujaddid [Reformer] Sirhindi and the Futûhât al-Makkiya and Hujjujul Karama that the clergy of the time of the Mahdi and Messiah will severely oppose him and call him a deviant and a blasphemer and a disbeliever and the Antichrist and will say that he has ruined the religion and abandoned the Traditions so he should be put to death because this clearly indicates that the coming Messiah and Mahdi will certainly abandon some Traditions which are considered Authentic by the scholars albeit he will abandon most of them which is why this havoc akin to doomsday will erupt and he will be declared a disbeliever. So these Traditions clearly reveal that the Mahdi and Messiah will appear contrary to the expectations of these clerics of the time and will speak and act in complete opposition to the track of Traditions which they have laid. Which is why he will be called a disbeliever. *

It is such a clear prophecy that unless a person deliberately chooses to be dishonest he cannot
question it and it is not the Quran alone that labels such people Jews but the Hadith also confers the same appellation on them and clearly states that the divines of this Ummah shall denounce the Promised Messiah as a disbeliever as did the Jews and the clerics of the time will be the bitterest enemies of the Promised Messiah for on account of him their prestige will decline and people will cease to have recourse to them. These Traditions are very widely known in Islam and even the Futûhât al-Makki states that on his advent the Promised Messiah will be hailed with
excommunication from Islam and one divine will exclaim at the top of his voice ‘What kind of
Promised Messiah is this who distorts our faith.’ That he does not believe in our traditional doctrines and is antagonistic to our conventional beliefs. Some Traditions go so far as to say that some divines would follow strictly in the footsteps of the Jews so much so that if a Jewish divine had committed incest with his mother so shall they and if a Jewish jurist had entered the hole of a lizard so shall they. It would also be worthwhile to remember that in all references to the degradation of the Jews in the Gospels and in The Holy Quran it is not the public and common people who are mentioned but their rabbis the jurists and the priests and chiefs that are referred to who issue the edicts of excommunication and whose sermons inflame the masses”””.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1903
Tadhkiratush Shahadatayn [The Two Martyrs]. Ziaul Islam, 1903. R. K. xx. 35
Microsoft Word – Ibn al-Arabi 2

Click to access Ibn-al-Arabi.pdf

“”The sixteenth characteristic of the Prophet Jesus was that, being born without a father, he was like the Prophet Adam. Similarly, I being born a twin have a resemblance of a sort with the Prophet Adam: according to what the sage Mohiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi has mentioned about the Seal of the Caliphs to be of Chinese ancestry that is to say of Mongol origin, to be born the second of twins, a girl being born first, I was born exactly the same way on a Friday morning. It is not known from where ibn ‘Arabi got hold of this prophecy, but it has come to pass. This prediction is to be found in his books to this day”””.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1903
Urdu-Malfuzat Vol.2, Pg. 254

”Ibn e Arabi has written that Law Bearing Prophethood has ended but Non Law bearing is still open, but I believe that all kinds of Prophet hoods have come to an end, except the one which is attained by being the resemblance of Prophet Muhammad (saw)”

They correspond this Malfuzat entry with the Al-Badr magazine (1st April 1903)
”Once a woman claimed Prophethood. When she was shown the hadith of the Prophet Muhammad (saw), where he said ”There is no Prophet after me”, she replied ”Only Prophethood for men has come to an end, women can still become Prophets”

Scan work

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1905
al-Haqq, Mubahisa Delhi [The Delhi Debate]. Ziaul Islam, 1905. R. K. iv, 499
Microsoft Word – Ibn al-Arabi 2
https://www.alislam.org/library/articles/Ibn-al-Arabi.pdf

“””The summit of union is to become identical to that through which it appears and not known in itself as I saw the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) in a dream that he embraces Abu Muhammad ibn Hazm the scholar of Hadith. Then one disappeared into the
other except that there was none other than the Prophet of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). So this is the summit of spiritual connection, which is also referred to as Union. (Futûhât al-Makkiya)”””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1905
al-Haqq, Mubahisa Ludhiana [The Ludhiana Debate]. RK.-4. 24, 25, 33, 34, 44, 122, 123
Ibn-al-Arabi
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Ibn-al-Arabi-1.pdf

“””Then you say that ‘I have copied the statement of Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi in Ishaatus Sunnah and written in the end that we do not consider revelation to be argument and proof.’ In reply to this I respectfully plead that if you were opposed to this statement why did you mention it without purpose? Your words must be extremely defective for firstly you clearly accept that for a claimant revelation is representative of a Legitimate Argument on behalf of a claimant as well as this you have openly accepted and in fact reiterated it referencing to the Hadith of Bukhari that the revelation of a scholar of Hadith is purified of Satanic intervention. Despite this I do not force you to consider revelation to be an argument but you do yourself accept in your Review that such revelation becomes an argument on behalf of the claimant. That is as much as I claim to establish. I too do not wish to force it upon you.

Then you say that it is wrong for me to ask why you had mentioned ibn ‘Arabi. If you were
opposed to him. For it is totally opposed to the purpose of your words. You stated in the beginning of your reply regarding the logicality of your statement that you are a follower of ibn ‘Arabi? If you are then may I ask why have you copied the Hadith of Sahih Bukhari which says that a scholar of Hadith is also a messenger like a prophet and why have you copied the saying of Muhammad Ismael that the revelation of a scholar of Hadith is purified of Satanic interventions as is that of a prophet. If you do not believe the Hadith of Bukhari then you ought to have said so in your previous papers that I do not consider the revelation of a scholar of Hadith to be purified from Satanic intervention! It is a surprise that on one hand you say Bukhari [this and] Bukhari [that] and on the other you act against it! Having said that if you believe that all the Traditions in Bukhari are Authentic then in this situation you will have to agree with ibn ‘Arabi because if it is revealed to a scholar of Hadith that a particular Hadith is a Fabrication and this is confirmed to him through repetitive revelation then will you not believe in accordance with the desire of Bukhari that the scholar of Hadith should consider such an Hadith to be Fabricated? Respected Maulvi why do you use such words? Why do you not inculcate the notion of God-Consciousness in your heart. Why become a liar, accursed one and devoid of faith. It is one thing to understand a precept from the point of view of estimation even if it is wrong and another to say something against an incident about which one knows the reality.

You commit a calumny from top to bottom and it is like fighting after the battle that you now
write this in your answer that ‘According to me such a scholar who calls an Authentic Hadith which is from the Canonical collections a Fabrication speaking on behalf of Satan and is Satan personified.’ You had listed in Ishaatus Sunnah the names of those respected persons who had mentioned such visions or such beliefs of theirs and never called them Satan embodied but have mentioned them as worthy recipients of praise for example in my support you copy the quote from the Futûhât of ibn ‘Arabi that some Traditions are revealed to be Fabricated through visionary experience so say truly what your intentions were at that time surely they were not to say that ibn ‘Arabi was Allah forbid an infidel or Satan personified? Does the word Great which you write here prove that those people were great infidels? You have in a letter included Muhiyudeen among the chiefest of mystics and the saints of Allah. That letter is not present at this time but there is another letter carrying the same meaning which you had written to Abdullah Ghaznavi deceased the text of which is this ‘Knowledge is of 2 kinds the first being apparent which is received through a means and endeavour and sight and demonstration the second being internal which is conveyed by the absolutely absent as stated by the Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi in the Futûhât.’ Do say why you mentioned Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi here where you ought to have referred to words of the saints of The Gracious? If that respected one was Allah forbid Satan embodied according to your liberal heart would you have referred to him in a letter which you wrote to your teacher!”””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1906-1907
Haqiqatul Wahi
Online English edition, page 254

“””Just as Adam was born in the manner of a twin—Adam first, and then Eve—similarly, the Promised Messiah would be born twin. So, Allah be praised and thanked that I am the fulfilment of this prophecy of the mystics. I, too, was born a twin at dawn on a Friday with the sole difference that the first to be born was a girl whose name was Jannat—and she went to Jannat [Paradise] after a few days—and after her I was born. Sheikh Muhy-ud-Din ibn-e-‘Arabi has recorded this prophecy in his book Fusus, and has also written that he [the Promised Messiah] would be of Chinese descent.1٭ In any case, these three prophesies reinforce one another. Because they have been fulfilled, they have acquired the status of certainty that no sensible person can deny”””.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1907
Badr, vol. 6, no. 42, p. 7, dated 17 October 1907
Malfuzat-9, online English edition, page 460

“””There was a discussion regarding the fasting of the sick and the traveller. Hadrat Maulawi Noor-ud-Deen ra said, ‘Sheikh Ibn Arabi has stated that if a person who is sick or is a travelling observes a Fast during the days of Ramadan, it is still obligatory for him to fast upon regaining health after the month of Ramadan…””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1908
Al-Hakam, vol. 12, no. 17, p. 7–8, dated 6 March 1908
Malfuzat-10, online English edition, pages 186-195
Malfuzat – Volume X
https://new.alislam.org/library/books/malfuzat-volume-x/info

Besides this, Ibn Arabi writes in his book that it is mentioned in one hadith that كَانَ فِى الْهِنْدِ نَبِىٌّ أَسْوَدُ اللَّوْنِ اسْمُهٗ كَاهِنُ In one narration, this hadith is recorded as follows: کََکانََن فِِفی اْْلھِِھنْْندِِدإِِإسْْسمُُمہٗٗہ کََکانََن ۔۔۔۔۔وََوکََکانََن
أََأسْْسوََودُُداللََّّلوْْونِِن سََسوََوادًًداشََشدِِدْْیدًًدا،قِِقیْْیلََل إِِإََّّنہٗٗہ کََکانََن نََنِِبیًًّّیا
(Dustur al-‘Ulama’ Jami‘ul-‘Ulum fi Istalahat al-Funun, by Qadi ‘Abd an-Nabi bin ‘Abd ar-Rasul, Juzw 3, p. 81, Babul-Kaf ma‘ al-Alaf, Darul-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah Beirut, Lebanon 2000 [Publisher])
meaning that there was a Prophet in India whose complexion was dark and whose name was Kahin.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1908
Badr, vol. 7, no. 16, p. 4, dated 23 April 1908
Malfuzat-10, online English edition, page 290
Malfuzat – Volume X
https://new.alislam.org/library/books/malfuzat-volume-x/info

“”Hazrat Ibn Arabi discusses the reason why God Almighty admonished Moses as to be gentle in dealing with Pharaoh. The reason in this, indeed, was that Allah the Exalted knew that he would ultimately come to believe. Accordingly, the word اٰمَنۡتُ [‘I believe’] issued forth from his own mouth. He goes to the extent to write that even his salvation is substantiated by the Holy Quran. The Holy Quran does not state that Pharaoh would enter Hell. It is only written that: . يَقْدُمُيَقْدُمُ قَوْمَهٗقَوْمَهٗ يَوْمَيَوْمَ الْقِيٰمَةِالْقِيٰمَةِ فَاَوْرَدَهُمُفَاَوْرَدَهُمُ النَّارَالنَّارَ 1″””.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
1908
Chashma e Ma’rafat [Fountain of Gnosis]. Pages, 330, 331, 334
Microsoft Word – Ibn al-Arabi 2
https://www.alislam.org/library/articles/Ibn-al-Arabi.pdf

“”It is also a Sign for me that the Muslims who are my enemies and swear at me in opposition and call me a disbeliever adhere to books which mention to this day that when the Awaited Mahdi comes he will be called a disbeliever and rejected and the clerics of Islam will come very close to killing him. Thus this is exactly what Mujaddid Alf Thani writes in one place and the Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn al-‘Arabi also writes this in one place. So there is no doubt about it that despite the many thousands of Signs which Almighty God showed for me I have been made the target of extreme hatred and they distort and change the meanings of my books like the Jews did and add many things from themselves in order to raise hundreds of objections so that I seem to be claim a continuous prophethood and seem to swear at prophets of God and blaspheme against them and as if I deny the existence of miracles. So I present all these complaints before Almighty God and I know for certain that He with his Grace will decide in my favour because I am oppressed”””.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1908
Al-Hakam, vol. 12, no. 32, p. 1–5, dated 10 May 1908
Malfuzat-10, online English edition, page 357
Malfuzat – Volume X
https://new.alislam.org/library/books/malfuzat-volume-x/info

“””Hazrat Ibn Arabi, the Chief of the Sufis, says that cessation of prophethood and death of Islam are one and the same thing. Look, in the times of Moses as, even women received revelation [from Allah]. Thus, the mother of Moses as herself spoke with God. What type of a religion is it concerning which it is said that its blessings and beneficence lie in the past and not in the future?”””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1908
Al-Hakam, vol. 12, no. 35, p. 4–7, dated 30 May 1908
Malfuzat-10, online English edition, page 551
Malfuzat – Volume X
https://new.alislam.org/library/books/malfuzat-volume-x/info

“”A saying of Hazrat Muhy-ud-Din ibn Arabi relates very much to your question. He writes [about a vision] that: ‘I went for Hajj and there I met a person who I thought was Adam. I asked him if he, indeed, was Adam? He replied, “Which Adam you are asking about? There have been thousands of Adams.”’
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1908
Badr, vol. 7, no. 23, p. 7, dated 11 June 1908
Malfuzat-10, online English edition, page 574
Malfuzat – Volume X
https://new.alislam.org/library/books/malfuzat-volume-x/info

“”Muhy-ud-Din ibn Arabi has also written the very same. Hazrat Mujaddid [Alf Sani] has also expressed the same belief. Now, would you call all of them disbelievers? Rest assured that this system of prophethood shall remain established till the Day of Judgement””.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1908-Oct
Ba-5, online English edition, page 386
Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya Part V
https://new.alislam.org/library/books/barahin-e-ahmadiyya-part-v/info

“””And Muhy-ud-Din ibn al-‘Arabi wrote in one of his books—which is his last book—that ‘Isa would indeed come but only in a new manifestation; that is, that some other person of this Ummah would appear in the spirit of ‘Isa. It is an established creed among the Sufis that some perfect people return to this world in the manner that their spirituality manifests itself in some other person, and this latter person virtually becomes as if he is the same first person. The Hindus also maintain a similar principle and they call such a person an ‘Avatar’.

As for the belief that a living human being went to heaven or disappeared, it is also an ancient concept which had a different connotation in remote times, but the ignorant later took it to mean that a person goes to heaven with his body and then returns therefrom. Somewhat similar notions regarding Sayyed Ahmad Barelvi are in vogue among his followers even to this day, as though he too will return like Hadrat ‘Isa. And they believe that though, like ‘Isa, he remained unsuccessful in his first advent, he would wield the sword with great strength the second time. The truth is that such creeds were concocted to cover up for those people who left the world in failure and frustration after making grandiose claims.

No one holds such a belief regarding our Prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, that he too would come again because in his very first advent he showed such might of his hands to the disbelievers that they remember it only too well to this day, and he died after having fully accomplished his mission.

It seems that Ibn al-‘Arabi had recanted in his later life from his previous utterances, and that is why his last statement is contrary to the earlier one. There are also other Sufi sects who openly profess the death of Hadrat ‘Isa. And I have just described that, at the time of the…””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1916
Microsoft Word – Ibn al-Arabi 2

Click to access Ibn-al-Arabi.pdf

Ibn-al-Arabi

Click to access Ibn-al-Arabi-1.pdf

“””It was the month of Ramadan on the 27th day of which was Friday. I had the honour of being in attendance upon the blessed presence. After offering the Fajr [dawn] Prayer, the Promised Messiah (peace be upon him), as was his wont, retired into the chamber (the small room to the east of Mubarak Mosque) and lay down on a cot. Sitting near him, my humble self started massaging his feet as usual. This continued till the sun came out and the chamber was lit up. The Promised Messiah (peace be upon him) was lying on his side and his forearm covered his face. I was thinking with great joy how fortunate I was and what a blessed opportunity had been afforded to me by Allah, the Holy and High, that it was the blessed month of Ramadan and it was the blessed 27th day, the blessed period of the last 10 days [of Ramadan], a blessed Friday and I was in the company of the blessed personage. I thought to myself how many blessings combined for me that day; it would not be strange if God Almighty were to show me some Sign of the Promised Messiah (peace be upon him). I was deep in these delightful thoughts as I was massaging his foot near the ankle when suddenly I perceived a slight trembling of his body, whereupon he removed his forearm from his face and looked at me. His eyes were wet and were possibly running with tears. He covered up his face again and continued in that posture. When I looked at his ankle I noticed a red drop which was round and had not spread out. I put the tip of my forefinger on the drop and it spread out and it coloured my finger also. I was surprised and the verse passed through my mind: ‘The colouring of Allah; and who is better than Allah in colouring and Him alone do we worship.’ (The Holy Quran. al-Baqarah [The Cow]. 139). Then I thought that if this was Allah’s colouring may be it had a fragrance. I smelt my finger but there was no fragrance. Then I started massaging his back and observed a few wet red stains on his shirt which made me wonder, and I got up and examined the whole chamber but did not find any red stain anywhere else. I was very puzzled, and resumed massaging his feet. The Promised Messiah (Peace be upon him) continued lying down with his face covered with his forearm. In a short while he sat up and then went to the mosque and sat there. My humble self continued massaging his back. It was then that I asked him: ‘Holiness, where did these red drops fall from?’ At first, he put me off; but on my persisting he related the whole incident as he has set out in detail in his books. Before describing the incident, he expounded to me in detail the matter of beholding God Almighty and the external materialization of elements observed in a vision. He drew upon the experiences of Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn e ‘Arabi to make me fully comprehend how perfect individuals are vouchsafed the experience of the personification of divine attributes of Beauty and Majesty. Then the Promised Messiah (peace be upon him) asked me: ‘Did any drop fall on your clothes?’ I looked at my clothes and answered: ‘There is no drop on me.’ He asked me to look at my cap (which was of white muslin.) I took off my cap and looked at it and saw that there was a drop on it also. I felt very happy that a drop of the divine ink had fallen on me too. I begged the Promised Messiah (peace be upon him) persistently to bestow upon me the shirt on which the red drops had fallen. He agreed on the condition that I should give a direction in my will that on my death it should be buried along with me. His hesitation in bestowing it upon me was due to his apprehension that after the death of both of us, people might convert it into an object of worship; and he gave it to me after a good deal of discussion between us. It is still with me and bears the red stains exactly as they were then. This is my true eye-witness testimony! Suffice to say that if I have lied, may I be subject to the warning of: ‘Curse of Allah be upon the liars.’ * Taking Allah as Ever-Present, All-Seeing, I declare on oath in the name of Allah that whatever I have stated is the truth in its entirety. If I have forged a lie I call down upon myself the curse! Curse!! Curse!!! And wrath! Wrath!! Wrath!!! Of Allah. Humbly, ‘Abdullah of Sanaur. (Tadhkirah. Second English Edition. Islam International Publications Ltd, 2009. 161, 163).

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Microsoft Word – Ibn al-Arabi 2 (alislam.org)

‘I am the Master of the Bezels’ 1
–
Writings of The Promised Messiah(peace be upon
him) about Ibn al-’Arabi
What follows is a compilation of the writings of Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1835 – 1908) – The Holy
founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, the Promised Messiah and Mahdi, concerning the saint
Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn al-‘Arabi, (1165 – 1240).
Rehan Qayoom.
18 November 2010.
Muhiyudeen ibn al-‘Arabi writes in a book of his which is his last book that Jesus will come but as a
reappearance so that a person within this Ummah will appear with the attributes of Jesus as it is an
established precept among the Sufis that certain masters reappear in the world in this way that their
spirituality manifests itself upon another being so as to unite the giver and the receiver into a single
being. This is the same dogma prevalent among the Hindus which they term an Avatar.
This thought that a living person went to the heavens or was lost is also an old concept which
in the days gone by held different connotations until some fools began thinking that some people
really go to the heavens bodily and then return.
It seems that ibn al-‘Arabi had in the latter part of his life recanted from what he had said
previously [regarding the bodily descent]. Which is why his latter statement contradicts his earlier
one. Similarly some other schools of Sufism believe in the death of the Prophet Jesus.
(Baraheen e Ahmadiyya v [Proofs of Ahmadiyya]. 1905. R. K. xxi. 291, 292).
The author of the books the Futûhât and the Fusûs who is a very learned scholar and a great master of
philosophical and mystical knowledge writes in his book the Futûhât that a philosopher was
discussing the burning properties of fire with another person at his house. In the course of the
discussion, that other person very strangely took the hand of the philosopher in his own and thrust it
upon the charcoal fire which was burning before us in a stove and kept it there a while upon the fire.
But the fire did not harm any part of either hand.

10 July 1885.
I remember that on one occasion I saw in a state of vision that I had written certain divine decrees
with my own hand setting out events in the future and then presented the paper to Allah the AllPowerful, Gloried be His name, for His signature. (It should be remembered that it often happens in
visions and divinely inspired dreams that some divine attribute of Beauty or Majesty are beheld by the
recipient of the vision in the form of a human being and the person seeing the vision thinks, by way of
symbolism, that he is actually beholding God, the Absolutely All-Powerful. Among those with
experience of spiritual visions, this matter is well-recorded, known, and accepted as an established
fact. It cannot be denied by anyone with experience of visions). To the same Peerless and Self
Sufficient Being—Who manifested His attribute of Beauty to my mind in the state of vision and
appeared to be God, the All-Powerful—I presented the document containing divine decrees for
attestation and He, Who was manifesting Himself in the form of a Ruler, dipped His pen in red ink
and first flicked it in my direction and with the rest of the red ink which remained at the point of the
pen He put His signature to the document. 2
Thereupon, the state of vision came to an end and when I
1
Ahmad, Mirza Ghulam. Al Huda [Guidance for Perceiving Minds]. (Ziaul Islam, 1902). R. K. xviii. 375.
2
As this Sign was shown in view of the opposition of Aryas, I consider that it presaged the assassination of
Pandit Lekh Ram and it also had reference to the plague.
(Nasim e Da’wat [An Invitation]. Ziyaul Islam, 1903. R. K. xix. 427f)
opened my eyes to look at the material world around me, I witnessed several red drops falling on my
clothes. 2 or 3 of the drops also fell on the cap of one ‘Abdullah of Sanaur (Patiala State) who was at
the time sitting close to me. Thus, the red ink which was part of the vision materialized externally and
became visible. Many other such manifestations have been witnessed which it would take too long to
relate. 3
Among the curious and wondrous marvels of such experiences is the coming into physical
existence of some visionary aspects by pure application of the prescience of their nature which have
3
Note by Mirza Bashir Ahmad (Allah be pleased with him): ‘Abdullah of Sanaur (Allah be
pleased with him) had the following statement published in al-Fazl, volume 4, number 24, September 26, 1916
by way of attestation of this event:

It was the month of Ramadan on the 27th day of which was Friday. I had the honour of being in attendance
upon the blessed presence. After offering the Fajr [dawn] Prayer, the Promised Messiah (peace be upon
him), as was his wont, retired into the chamber (the small room to the east of Mubarak Mosque) and lay
down on a cot. Sitting near him, my humble self started massaging his feet as usual. This continued till the
sun came out and the chamber was lit up. The Promised Messiah (peace be upon him) was lying on his side
and his forearm covered his face. I was thinking with great joy how fortunate I was and what a blessed
opportunity had been afforded to me by Allah, the Holy and High, that it was the blessed month of
Ramadan and it was the blessed 27th day, the blessed period of the last 10 days [of Ramadan], a blessed
Friday and I was in the company of the blessed personage. I thought to myself how many blessings
combined for me that day; it would not be strange if God Almighty were to show me some Sign of the
Promised Messiah (peace be upon him). I was deep in these delightful thoughts as I was massaging his foot
near the ankle when suddenly I perceived a slight trembling of his body, whereupon he removed his forearm
from his face and looked at me. His eyes were wet and were possibly running with tears. He covered up his
face again and continued in that posture. When I looked at his ankle I noticed a red drop which was round
and had not spread out. I put the tip of my forefinger on the drop and it spread out and it coloured my
finger also. I was surprised and the verse passed through my mind: ‘The colouring of Allah; and who is
better than Allah in colouring and Him alone do we worship.’ (The Holy Quran. al-Baqarah [The Cow].
139). Then I thought that if this was Allah’s colouring may be it had a fragrance. I smelt my finger but there
was no fragrance. Then I started massaging his back and observed a few wet red stains on his shirt which
made me wonder, and I got up and examined the whole chamber but did not find any red stain anywhere
else. I was very puzzled, and resumed massaging his feet. The Promised Messiah (Peace be upon him)
continued lying down with his face covered with his forearm. In a short while he sat up and then went to the
mosque and sat there. My humble self continued massaging his back. It was then that I asked him:
‘Holiness, where did these red drops fall from?’ At first, he put me off; but on my persisting he related the
whole incident as he has set out in detail in his books. Before describing the incident, he expounded to me
in detail the matter of beholding God Almighty and the external materialization of elements observed in a
vision. He drew upon the experiences of Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn e ‘Arabi to make me fully comprehend
how perfect individuals are vouchsafed the experience of the personification of divine attributes of Beauty
and Majesty. Then the Promised Messiah (peace be upon him) asked me: ‘Did any drop fall on your
clothes?’ I looked at my clothes and answered: ‘There is no drop on me.’ He asked me to look at my cap
(which was of white muslin.) I took off my cap and looked at it and saw that there was a drop on it also. I
felt very happy that a drop of the divine ink had fallen on me too. I begged the Promised Messiah (peace be
upon him) persistently to bestow upon me the shirt on which the red drops had fallen. He agreed on the
condition that I should give a direction in my will that on my death it should be buried along with me. His
hesitation in bestowing it upon me was due to his apprehension that after the death of both of us, people
might convert it into an object of worship; and he gave it to me after a good deal of discussion between us.
It is still with me and bears the red stains exactly as they were then. This is my true eye-witness testimony!
Suffice to say that if I have lied, may I be subject to the warning of: ‘Curse of Allah be upon the liars.’ *
Taking Allah as Ever-Present, All-Seeing, I declare on oath in the name of Allah that whatever I have stated
is the truth in its entirety. If I have forged a lie I call down upon myself the curse! Curse!! Curse!!! And
wrath! Wrath!! Wrath!!! Of Allah. Humbly, ‘Abdullah of Sanaur.
(Tadhkirah. Second English Edition. Islam International Publications Ltd, 2009. 161, 163).
* Whoso disputes this with thee after whatever has come to thee of Divine knowledge say to them ‘Come let us
call our sons and your sons and our women and your women and our people and your people; then let us pray
fervently and invoke the curse of Allah on those who lie.’
(The Holy Quran. Āl Imran [Progeny of Imran]. 62).
no sign of existence in the external although the author of the Futûhât and the Fusûs and most of the
various great Mystics have written a lot of their personal stories with relation to this subject in their
compilations but because there is a great difference between seeing and hearing we cannot obtain a s
certain an emotion by merely listening to the these accounts. Rather by personal experience.
(Surma Chashm Arya [Guidance for the Aryas]. Riyaz Hind, 1886. R. K. ii. 100, 179f).
Some eminent Muslim scholars—such as Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi, author of the Fusûs, and some
elders of the Naqshbandi order—are known to have been great experts in this science [of healing] and
had no equal in their own times.
(Ek Isai kei 3 sawal or un kei jawabat [3 Questions by a Christian & their Answers]. Anjuman
Himayat e Islam, 1889. R. K. iv, 450).
Concerning the Necessary Being the Ultimate One I do not say like the author of the Fusûs that ‘He
created things and He Is those things’ yet I do venture to say: ‘He created things and He is like those
things. This universe is like a palace hall paved with smooth slabs of glass, beneath which strong
currents of waters flow. He does whatever He wills. Defective eyes mistake these things for existing
by themselves. They imagine that the Sun, moon, and the stars are independently effective and
functional on their own, whereas none is truly independent and effective but He.’
(Taudhih e Maram [Elucidation of Objectives]. Riyaz Hind, 1891. R. K. iii. 89).
Thus we shall inscribe some part of what Maulvi [Abu Saeed Muhammad Hussayn Batalvi] has
mentioned in his magazine along with his opinion concerning the book Mizanul Qubra by Imam
Abdul Wahhab Shi’rani and the Futûhât of the Shaykh Muhiyudeen for the sake of the readers.
As a gist of what the Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi has written about revelation and vision
as pretext and proof [for a claim] in the Futûhât is that the saintly people enquire of the
commandments of the Holy Prophet (on whom be salutations) through vision and when any from
among them require [guidance from] a Hadith in any situation he is honoured with an [visionary]
audience of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and Gabriel (peace be upon
him) descends and the Holy Prophet asks Gabriel concerning the dilemma about which the saint is
perturbed and reveals it to the saint so that the question is answered to the saint through the mediation
of Gabriel. Then the Shaykh ibn ‘Arabi states that the Traditions are Authorised in this manner by the
Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) [himself and] there are several Traditions
which are Authentic in the opinion of the Scholars of Hadith and they are not Authentic
according to us and there are many Traditions which are [considered] fabricated and [they] are
made Authentic by the word of the Holy Prophet through vision. That is all.
Ibn ‘Arabi also states in the Futûhât al-Makkiya that such an abundance of mystical knowledge is
disclosed to those who invoke [God and His Messengers] and ascetics which people of notion and
inference do not possess and these points of mysticism and [these] secrets and points of gnosis are
exclusive to the prophets and saints …
Yes it was not denied then and is not denied now that perhaps as a literal fulfilment of the
prophecies another Promised Messiah be born some time in future but the difference between this
statement and the one in Baraheen e Ahmadiyya is merely that at that time that was written as a
summary of the revelation and of not knowing its every aspect and is now written in full detail
anyhow the said Maulvi has placed great emphasis upon this humble one resembling the messiah in
order to create an affirmation of plausibility as in one place he copies the words of Muhiyudeen ibn
‘Arabi from the Futûhât al-Makkiya chapter 223 to elucidate his meaning and that excerpt along with
its translation is as follows:

Translation: The summit of union is to become identical to that through which it appears and not
known in itself as I saw the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)
in a dream that he embraces Abu Muhammad ibn Hazm the scholar of Hadith. Then
one disappeared into the other except that there was none other than the Prophet of
Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). So this is
the summit of spiritual connection, which is also referred to as Union.
People in possession of vast knowledge can affirm my saying that some thinkers of the Naqshbandi
and Suhrawardi et cetera were also greatly into practicing these arts and some were such experts in
this field that they would cure hundreds of patients with a mere glance of their felicity and goodwill
and Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi also had expertise in this of a special degree.
(Izala e Auham [The Removal of Misconceptions]. Riyaz Hind, 1891. R. K. iii. 176 – 178, 231,
232, 257f).
In explaining the third of the 3 stages of spiritual gnosis Fanā [Self-extinction] Baqâ’
[Continuance] and Liqa [Union], the Promised Messiah (peace be upon him) writes:
This is that same stage upon reaching which some seekers have stumbled and
considered the bond of the witnessing to be a kind of bond of unison. Some
mystics have named the Saints of Allah who have entered this stage or those who
have been able to sip from it: Children of Allah in relation to their having wholly
entered into the patronage of the Divine attributes and as the son of a person has
certain traits and mannerisms of his father similarly they have also adopted some
connection with the beautiful attributes of Almighty God by reason of rebirth in
the Godly mannerisms. Albeit such names are not openly used in the terminology of
[religious] ethics. But the wise have in fact derived it from nowhere but The Holy
Quran itself because Allah in his Supreme Glory states ‘Then praise Allah as eagerly
as you praised your fathers or even more than that.’ 4
In addition to this this humble one is not alone in translating it thus many a
researchers and scholars of linguists have derived the same meaning and among
these is the author of the Futûhât al-Makkiya who is also a philologist he gives the
same meanings in a commentary of his which has been printed and published from a
press in Egypt under the verse ‘But man undertook it. He is indeed too cruel to
himself, unmindful of the consequences.’ 5
That this cruelty and unmindfulness is in
[his] praise and the meaning is that verily a believing man is so cruel to himself in
fulfilling the divine commandments as to become an opponent of the emotions of the
ego and the desires of the flesh and thereby diminishes and assuages their excitement.
(Aina e kamalat e Islam [The Mirror of the Excellences of Islam]. Riyaz Hind,
1893. R. K. v. 64, 65, 167).
Allah — there is no God but He, the Ever Living the Self-Subsisting and All-Sustaining. Slumber
seizes Him not nor sleep. To Him belongs whatsoever is in the heavens and whatsoever is in the
Earth. Who is he that dare intercede with Him except by His permission? He knows all what is before
them and all that is behind them; and they comprehend aught of His knowledge except what He wills.
His throne encompasses the heavens and the Earth; and the care of them wears Him not; and He is the
Most High the Great.
(The Holy Quran. Al Baqarah [The Cow]. 256).
It is ascertained by looking at this verse that the Panentheist creed has strayed far from truth and has
stumbled in understanding of the Divine attributes. Its followers do not know that they stumbled at
the relationship between thrall and Divinity. Those who have been visionaries from among them in
actuality and those crusaders who have wished to make discoveries. They were unable to distinguish
the relationship between thrall and Lordship and began believing the ‘He created things’ apophthegm.
4
And when you have completed the rites praise Allah as eagerly as you praised your fathers or even more
than that and among people there are some who say ‘Our Lord grant us good things in this world’ and they
shall have no share in the Hereafter.
(The Holy Quran. Al Baqarah [The Cow]. 201).
5
We offered the Trust to the heavens and the Earth and the mountains but they refused to bear it but man
undertook it. He is indeed too cruel to himself, unmindful of the consequences.
(The Holy Quran. Al Ahzab [The Coalition]. 73).
The Holy Quran first occurs in the heart and then upon the tongue and what a relationship the
heart must have for it to have come upon the tongue. They could easily have fallen in understanding
this delicate point. But the thing is that when one embarks upon a fallacy, one gets stuck in a
whirlpool of difficulties. As I have just mentioned, one’s affairs with Almighty God are
unfathomable and recondite so that no power can mention them and if this were possible then His
Lordship and Divine attributes would not have been found as they are in the Quran. Our very negation
is the proof of His existence and this is a verity that when one is helpless in every way that is indeed
one’s extinction. Not having understood this fine secret some people start saying ‘He created things
and He Is those things.’ The foremost among the Panentheists and the Apparentists are those who say
and believe that ‘He created things and He Is those things’ and then there are those who are adherents
of the notion of Fanā [self-extinction] and say that one can be so immersed in love that one can
become Fanā Fillah [self-extinguished in Allah]. For it then becomes incumbent to say
I am you and You are I – I am the body and you are the soul
So let none say evermore that I am someone and you are someone
Albeit they also have to accept the Divine workings. Be they Panentheists or be they Apparentists.
Some of the words of their elders and people of perfection from Bayazid Bastami to Shibli, Zunnoon
to Muhiyudeen ibn-‘Arabi have generally affirmed this. I want to say this openly that it is not our
right to consider them rejected, no no. They were people of discernment. The thing is that this was a
recondite and fine secret of gnosis, with which people cut off their ties. That was the only problem
and nothing else. Man is self-annihilated before the tremendous works of Almighty God. They
recognised man to be so and uttered such things from their mouths and their minds became occupied
with it. So attend your hearts towards remembering this precept. That one reaches such a platform by
definition (as our Holy Prophet on whom be peace and blessings and gratitude reached this grand
status) whereon he is granted power of dominion. But there is a marked distinction between the
Creator and the creation. One should never forget that in one’s heart.
One is not free from the confines of existence. Neither here nor there. [One] drinks and eats.
[One] sins, both great and small [ones] and similarly in the afterlife some will be in Hell and some in
the Eternal Paradise. The fact is that man can never exist outside of the cloak of thrall. So I cannot
understand what type of veil it is which can be taken off and replaced by the cloak of thrall. Many
great ascetics and crusaders partook of this thrall.
(Address to the Annual Conference of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, 30 December
1897. Malfoozat i [Discourses]. 73, 74).
I have mentioned in earlier books that Imam Bukhari and Imam ibn Hazm and Imam Malik (Allah be
pleased with them) and other great Imams held exactly this belief that the Prophet Jesus (peace be
upon him) has in fact died. Now let it be clear that the Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn al-‘Arabi also held
the same belief. So he writes about the nature of descent on page 262 of his commentary that ‘Jesus
will descend but in the sense that he will be associated with a different body’ so that his descent will
be as a likeness as is believed by the eminent Sufis. Then on the same page he writes that ‘The
meaning of Jesus’ ascension is that when his soul got separated from the lower world it was joined
with the higher world.’ Then on page 178 he writes that the meaning of ascension is that the soul of
Jesus afterbeing taken was brought to the heaven of souls. So ponder over this.
The great authorities have accepted this. So much so that Muhiyudeen ibn al-‘Arabi has also
written in clear words in his commentary that ‘The descent of the Messiah would be in this manner
that his soul will be associated with another body’ so that someone else will be born according to his
qualities and nature which is a spiritual matter. So the Exalted God was ready to help these people if
they were ready to accept help. But they deviated far away, out of mean-mindedness and prejudice,
and did not desire that the Exalted God should enlighten their hearts.
We can conclusively and definitely prove to every seeker of truth that from the time of our master
and leader the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) till the present day there have
been in every century Godly persons through whom God has shown heavenly Signs to the
communities to guide them. There have been in Islam persons such as Sayyid Abdul Qadir of Gilan
and Abul Hassan of Kharaqan and Abu Yazid of Bustam, and Junayd of Baghdad and Muhiyudeen
ibn al-‘Arabi and Zunnoon of Egypt and Moinuddin Chishti of Ajmer and Qutubuddin Bakhtiar Kaki
and Fariduddin of Pakpattan and Nizamuddin of Delhi and Shah Waliullah of Delhi and Shaykh
Ahmad of Sirhind (Allah be pleased with them as they were pleased with Him) and the number of
such persons runs into thousands. So many wonders of these people are recorded in the books of the
scholarly and the learned that even a prejudiced opponent despite his great bias has to concede in the
end that these people showed extraordinary signs and wonders.
Similarly the master of the Sufis the Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn al-‘Arabi categorically
expresses his belief regarding the death of the Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him) in his commentary
in clear words.
The Shaykh ibn al-‘Arabi writes [the following] in the Fusûs al-Hikam about a vision he had that
he [the Promised Messiah] is the Seal of Saints and will be born a twin. A girl will be born with him
and he will be Chinese meaning his forbears would have lived in Chinese countries so all these
precepts were fulfilled with the intent of Almighty God. I have written that I was born a twin and
there was a girl with me and our seniors lived in Samarkand which had ties with China.
(Kitabul Bariyya [The Acquittal]. Ziyaul Islam, 1898. R. K xiii. 22ff, 23f, 48, 91, 92, 221f,
313f).
There is a fine point written in the Futûhât in relation to this status [Witness]. That is that when one
reaches a state of perfection, the Formal Prayer becomes dysfunctional, the ignorant ones took this to
mean that Formal Prayer need not be performed. Like some disorderly ascetics say. They are
ignorant of this station and are unaware of this fine delicacy. The reality is that in the early stages of
the [spiritual] journey the Ritual Prayer and other Righteous acts seem like a type of burden and one
feels indisposed and distracted, but when one reaches this station of the Witness after having received
power from Almighty God one is granted such strength and stability that one feels no discomfort at
all. One appears to be astride those virtues and fasts, prays, gives charity, is kind towards fellow
humans, is chivalrous, is courageous, and carries out all virtuous deeds and shows good morals
through the vitality of belief. No calamity, grief or problem can stop one from proceeding towards
Almighty God. One can only be called a Witness when the strength of one’s belief shows such ease
in doing its work. The Witness practices virtue, as the water flows down from the height. The
Witness as good as sees Allah Almighty and observes His powers. When this station reaches
perfection, it is a Sign.
(Address to the Farewell Conference, November 1899. Malfoozat i [Discourses]. 254,
255).
Once I had the revelation that somebody points to me and says ‘This is the person who uproots the
faith.’ I was delighted because that is exactly how it is written in the Signs that such edicts will be
passed about the Messiah and Mahdi. This is exactly what is written in Hujjujul Karama and ibn
‘Arabi has written that when the Messiah will descend, a person will stand up and say ‘What kind of
Promised Messiah is this who distorts our faith.’
It is written in Hujjujul Karama quoting ibn ‘Arabi that when the Promised Messiah comes
he will be considered an imposter and a fool and it would be said to the extent that he innovates into
the faith. This is exactly what is happening at the moment. These sorts of blames are put upon me.
One can relinquish oneself of these suspicions, when one covers up one’s book of interpretation and
instead worries whether this person is true or not. Some aspects are indeed beyond comprehension
but those who believe in the Messengers await the time with goodly intention and patience and
steadfastness [only] then Allah Almighty reveals the truth to them. At the time of the Holy Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) the Companions did not ask questions, instead they waited
for others to question and then derived the benefits, otherwise they remained silent and kept their
heads lowered and did not venture to enquire. According to me this is the correct and best demeanour
in terms of courteousness. One is worried about someone who does not adopt such an attitude of
understanding the respect due to the prophets and does not adopt such an attitude. Lest they be
destroyed.
(3 December 1901. Malfoozat ii [Discourses]. 51, 53).
The panentheists refer to Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi that he has written that ‘Allah be praised for He
created things and He Is those things’ this is correct. Allah Almighty says ‘Do not follow what thou
dost not know.’ 6
When one has no knowledge [of anything]. Then say where is that which Is Not. It
is of a certainty that the attributes of a thing are not distinct from it. Wherever it may go. One may
take some water as far as London, it will still remain water. When one is God then how are His
attributes separate from him. In any given state.
There was no sign of this Panentheism whatsoever before the Shaykh Muhiyudeen.
Although there was Apparentism which means to conceive oneself as annihilated in the perception of
Almighty God. Apparentism required an immersion in love to the point of ‘I am you and You are I.’
The Panentheists went one step further to partake of the Godhead going the way of Doctors and
Philosophers. It has also been seen that these Panentheists are usually impious and do not care a jot
for prayer and fasting. So much so that they have relations with gypsies (and pimps). They have no
abstinence and do not excuse themselves [from anything] in any way. The truth of the matter is only
this that when for example, a metal is placed in fire it becomes so red like the fire. At that time
although the properties of fire are to be found in it, but it still cannot be called fire. Similarly that
person who is strongly and passionately connected to God and he has reached a status of Fanā Fillah
[self-extinguished in Allah], he can sometimes produce supernatural miracles which hold a
fragmentary kind of powerful force within them. People in their weak-thinking mistook it for God.
At the level of Apparentism most precepts work in accord with their desires. Just as Almighty God
has declared the actions of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) to be His
actions and he heard the voice proclaiming ‘This day have I perfected your religion for you’ and
‘When the help of Allah comes.’ 7

(1 August 1902. Malfoozat ii [Discourses]. 230, 232).
The Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn-‘Arabi writes an indication of the Mahdi the Seal of Saints in the Fusûs
that his family will be from the Chinese areas and his birth will be a rarity for a twin girl will be born
with him. 8
So that God will separate the element of femininity from him. So the birth of this humble
one was in accord with this very vision and my ancestors came into the Punjab from the Chinese
environs in exact accord with this vision.
Remember that these suspicions about why all those Traditions of the Six Authentic that have been
written regarding the Mahdi and Promised Messiah thought inapplicable in this place are eradicated
with the question as to why it is written in the journals and reports as in the letters of the Mujaddid
[Reformer] Sirhindi and the Futûhât al-Makkiya and Hujjujul Karama that the clergy of the time of
the Mahdi and Messiah will severely oppose him and call him a deviant and a blasphemer and a
disbeliever and the Antichrist and will say that he has ruined the religion and abandoned the
6
Do not follow what thou dost not know. For the ear and eye and heart shall all be called to account.
(The Holy Quran. Bani Israel [Children of Israel]. 37).
7
Forbidden to you is carrion and blood and the flesh of swine and that on which is invoked the name of one
other than Allah and that which is strangled and that which is beaten to death and that killed by a fall and that
which is gored to death and that of which a wild animal has eaten except that which you have properly
slaughtered and that which has been slaughtered at an altar and that you seek to know your share by
divining arrows: a heinous practice – Today the disbelievers lost all hope that you will give up your religion
so fear them not but fear Me. Today I have perfected your religion for you and completed My blessing upon
you and have chosen for you Islam as the religion. But whoso is forced by hunger without being wilfully
inclined to wrong, then surely Allah is Most Forgiving, Merciful.
(The Holy Quran. Al Maidah [The Banquet]. 4).

When the help of Allah comes and [manifests] the victory.
(The Holy Quran. Al Nasr [The Victory]. 2).
8
According to international statistics the common ratio of twin birth is 1/50, 60, 70 or 100. But comparatively
much less in Japan and China in that in Japan it is 1/93. In China it is 1/129 and such births amongst the
Mongol race are extremely rare and infrequent. Thus it is an extraordinary thing for the Promised Messiah
(peace be upon him) to be born a twin although he carried [an extraction of] Mongol blood.
(Dr Shah Nawaz in Shahid, Maulana Dost Muhammad. Tarikh e Ahmadiyyat i. Nazarat Nashr o Ishaat,
Qadian 2007. 59).
Traditions so he should be put to death because this clearly indicates that the coming Messiah and
Mahdi will certainly abandon some Traditions which are considered Authentic by the scholars albeit
he will abandon most of them which is why this havoc akin to doomsday will erupt and he will be
declared a disbeliever. So these Traditions clearly reveal that the Mahdi and Messiah will appear
contrary to the expectations of these clerics of the time and will speak and act in complete opposition
to the track of Traditions which they have laid. 9
Which is why he will be called a disbeliever. *
It is such a clear prophecy that unless a person deliberately chooses to be dishonest he cannot
question it and it is not the Quran alone that labels such people Jews but the Hadith also confers the
same appellation on them and clearly states that the divines of this Ummah shall denounce the
Promised Messiah as a disbeliever as did the Jews and the clerics of the time will be the bitterest
enemies of the Promised Messiah for on account of him their prestige will decline and people will
cease to have recourse to them. These Traditions are very widely known in Islam and even the
Futûhât al-Makki states that on his advent the Promised Messiah will be hailed with
excommunication from Islam and one divine will exclaim at the top of his voice ‘What kind of
Promised Messiah is this who distorts our faith.’ That he does not believe in our traditional doctrines
and is antagonistic to our conventional beliefs. Some Traditions go so far as to say that some divines
would follow strictly in the footsteps of the Jews so much so that if a Jewish divine had committed
incest with his mother so shall they and if a Jewish jurist had entered the hole of a lizard so shall they.
It would also be worthwhile to remember that in all references to the degradation of the Jews in the
Gospels and in The Holy Quran it is not the public and common people who are mentioned but their
rabbis the jurists and the priests and chiefs that are referred to who issue the edicts of
excommunication and whose sermons inflame the masses.
(Tohfa Golarrviyya [A Gift for Golarvi]. Ziyaul Islam, 1902. R. K. xvii. 127f,
157, 158, 329).
In the course of answering a question from a guest by the name of Hamid Hussayn concerning
the Panentheists and Apparentists, quoting the verse ‘He is the First and the Last, and the
Outer and the Inner, and He has full knowledge of all things’ 10 the Promised Messiah (peace be
upon him) replied:
We cannot say anything regarding some sages such as Muhiyudeen al-‘Arabi. This is because
this debate is futile. Many things will become apparent after death. There are many
things that will not even be known after death.
Muhiyudeen also believes that if one is righteous and believes in God one will
attain salvation.
(11 October 1902. Malfoozat ii [Discourses]. 336, 337).
Let nobody fancy that in this discourse I have given my self precedence over the Prophet Jesus
because this is a partial precedence which one who is not a prophet can have over one who is and all
men of knowledge and understanding accept such precedence. That does not make a difference.
Neither am I alone in believing in it for many a wise man of great wisdom that has passed before me
considered the last Adam to be the seal of common sainthood. They consider him to complete the
circle of reappearances of the Adamic reality and name that person the Last Adam and the Promised
Mahdi and the Promised Messiah in accord with their true visions. Yet those who out of ignorance
have forgone the precept of reappearance, and have forgotten this continuous and unceasing Practice
of God with his creation. Having taken a peripheral thought they bring down the Prophet Jesus (peace
be upon him) from the heavens and make him return to the world. Even though the Hadith of the
9
When the Imam Mahdi makes his appearance, none other than the Orthodox clergy and theologians would be
his most ardent and open enemies.
(Futûhât al-Makkiya [The Meccan Revelations]. Chapter 73).
*
Regarding the Mahdi being called a disbeliever and a deviant and blasphemer see Hujjujul Karama by Nawab
Muhammad Siddiq Hassan Khan and Dirasat al-Labib [by Shaykh Muhammad Muin ibn Muhammad Amin
al-Sindi] and Futûhât al-Makkiya.
10 The Holy Quran. Al Hadid [The Iron]. 4.
Night Journey testifies his soul to be dwelling amidst those of his predecessors. They do not
comprehend that this thought negates the precept of reappearances and to deny that is as dangerous as
washing one’s hands of Islam. All Holy Books accept the concept of reappearances. Even the
Prophet Jesus taught this same precept and a lot of mention is made of this in the Traditions of the
Prophet. So to deny it is a great foolishness and places one’s belief in peril. This was the very
mistake that caused the people of the Middle Ages to be known by the very unfortunate epithet of
those of the Dark Age by the mouth of the revered Prophet of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be
on him). They forgot the consensus of opinion that took place upon the words uttered by the tongue
of Abu Bakr that ‘Muhammad was but a Messenger.’ 11 Objectively this prediction has been around
since an age long gone that the last perfect man will follow in the footsteps of Adam. So that the
circle of the Adamic reality is completed. The Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn al-‘Arabi has written this
prophecy in the Fusûs al-Hikam and albeit this prediction was worthy of placement in the Ringstone
[chapter] on Adam. But understanding Seth to be the verifier of ‘Like father like son’ he has included
him in that Ringstone [chapter]. We deem it appropriate to quote the original excerpt of the Shaykh
here and that is: ‘The last child to be born in this species of Man will be in the line of Seth. He will
bear his secrets, and after him there shall be none born of this species; he is the Seal of the Begotten.
With him there will be born a sister who shall come out before him, and he shall come out after her
such that his head shall be adjacent to her feet. His birth shall be in China, and his language will be
that of his land. Sterility will spread amongst men and women. There will be much marriage but no
birth. He will call them to Allah, but will receive no reply.’ This points towards the fact that he will
be born from Turco-Mongols. It is important that he be a non-Arab (rather than an Arab). That he
will be granted the secrets and mysteries that were granted to Seth. That there will be no birth after
him and that he will be the Seal of the begotten, so that no perfect child will be born after his birth.
Moreover this phrase also means that he will be the last son of his father. A girl will be born with him
but before him. He will follow. His head will be at the feet of that sister (that the sister will be born
naturally with the head emerging before the feet). The head of that son will emerge straight after her
feet (as was my birth and that of my twin sister in exact accordance with this). The remainder of the
Shaykh’s excerpt means that it will be an age wherein (the disease of) sterility will spread among men
and women. There will be much cohabitation. That people will not desist from intercourse but that
no righteous person will result from it and that he will call the people of the time towards God. But
11 Al-Zuhrī said, and Sa’īd b. al-Musayyib from Abū Hurayra told me: When the apostle was dead ‘Umar got up
and said: ‘Some of the dis-affected will allege that the apostle is dead, but by God he is not dead: he has gone
to his Lord as Moses b. ‘Imrān went and was hidden from his people for forty days, returning to them after it
was said that he had died. By God, the apostle will return as Moses returned and will cut off the hands and
feet of men who allege that the apostle is dead.’ When Abū Bakr heard what was happening he came to the
door of the mosque as ‘Umar was speaking to the people. He paid no attention but went in to ‘Āisha’s house
to the apostle, who was lying covered by a mantle of Yamanī cloth. He went and uncovered his face and
kissed him, saying, ‘You are dearer than my father and mother. You have tasted the death which God had
decreed: a second death will never overtake you.’ Then he replaced the mantle on the apostle’s face and went
out. ‘Umar was still speaking and he said, ‘Gently, ‘Umar, be quiet.’ But ‘Umar refused and went on talking,
and when Abū Bakr saw that he would not be silent he went forward to the people who, when they heard his
words, came to him and left ‘Umar. Giving thanks and praise to God he said: ‘O men, if anyone worships
Muhammad, Muhammad is dead: if anyone worships God, God is alive, immortal.’ Then he recited the verse:
‘Muhammad is nothing but an apostle. Apostles have passed away before him. Can it be that if he were to die
or be killed you would turn back on your heels? He who turns back does no harm to God and God will reward
the grateful.’ * By God, it was as though the people did not know that this verse (T. concerning the apostle)
had come down until Abū Bakr recited it that day. The people took it from him and it was (constantly) in their
mouths. ‘Umar said, ‘By God, when I heard Abū Bakr recite these words I was dumbfounded so that my legs
would not bear me and I fell to the ground knowing that the apostle was indeed dead.’
(ibn Ishaq, Muḥammad ibn Yasār. Sirat Rasul Allah [The Life of Muhammad]. Translated by Alfred
Guillaume. Oxford University Press, 1955. 682, 683).
* And Muhammad is but a Messenger. Messengers have passed away before him. If he died or was killed will
you turn back on your heels? And he who turns back on his heels shall not harm Allah a whit and Allah will
certainly reward the grateful.
(The Holy Quran. Āl Imran [Progeny of Imran]. 145).
that they will not accept. What follows is what the commentator of this passage has written by way of
commentary –
Seth is the firstborn of Adam. Then there was a girl with him who was born after
him. Thus God willed to verify among humanity the relation. That exists between first and last. For
this purpose he had appointed right in the beginning that the Sign of the last son [may] hold similarity
with that of the first son who was the Seal of Vicegerents. By reason of the prediction which the Sage
has written in his book ‘Anqâ’ Mughrib that Seal of Vicegerents and Seal of the Begotten was to be
born among non-Arabs (and not from among the Arabs. He was to have been the bearer of the
wisdom of the Prophet Seth. The prediction also states that after him (after his death) the disease of
sterility will spread among the human race so that those who will be born will be similar to animals
and savages. Genuine humanity will disappear from the face of the world. They will not consider
permissible that which is permissible nor forbidden that which is forbidden. So they will witness
doomsday.
Now let it be clear that this prediction of the reverend Sage has not yet been proven from
any express Hadith. But it signifies towards its existence within the Quran. Firstly by mentioning
diverse parables it has inculcated the cyclical nature of the universe into our conscience.
Communities of the righteous and evil people are consistently re-emerging in the world. By teaching
the prayer of ‘Not those who incurred thy displeasure’ God had pointed out that those Jews who were
present at the time of the Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him. were to reappear in this Ummah as well.
12 So that they would also re-persecute this Promised Messiah, who is to reappear in this Ummah. In
fact it was commanded to recite Sura Fatiha as an obligation during Prayers. This teaches that it is so
that the Promised Messiah must come. Similarly the wicked of this Ummah have been affiliated with
the Jews and not only that but that such a person who was to receive the Christic attribute from the
Mary-like attribute through the breath of God alone. He was granted the name Son of Mary in Sura
Tahrim [Prohibition]. 13 For it cites the example of the God-consciousness of Mary. Who was then
breathed into by Him. This signified no exclusivity in the person of Jesus son of Mary as the Word of
Allah. But that the latter messiah is also to be the Word of Allah and the Spirit of Allah. In fact in
both these attributes he is to be more perfect than before as is evident from Surah Tahrim and Sura
Fatiha and Sura al-Noor [The Light] and the verse ‘You are the best people raised to the benefit.’ 14
Then on top of this Allah Almighty has also stated in The Holy Quran: ‘He is the First and the
Last.’ 15 This verse clearly indicates that one person was a disclosure of God’s First. One person will
be a disclosure of God’s Lastness. It was essential for both persons to be united in one attribute with
regards to their particularities. So whilst Adam was born male with female. So was it ordained for
Seth as the last of this race to be born [again] male with female. So it was important for that promised
Caliph and Seal of Caliphs who ought to be called in other words the Promised Messiah, to be born as
a twin, so that a girl preceded the boy, so that he is the Seal of the Begotten by the Quranic decree. So
let it be clear that this prediction of the reverend Sage is most likely a vision of his. But it can be
verified by looking at The Holy Quran because this book of the Sage is the last of his books in which
the Sage has not accepted that the same Seal of Caliphs is Jesus who will [bodily] descend from the
heavens. But accepts him as one who will be born. But as a twin and the commentary on the Quran
authored by the Sage also reveals that he does not accept the concept of Jesus (peace be upon him)
descending [bodily] from the heavens. So it is evident that if the Sage has mentioned the belief of
Jesus’ descent in some previous book then the Sage has recanted from that in the end. This is to be
12 The path of those bestowed thy blessings, not those who incurred thy displeasure and not those who went
astray.
(The Holy Quran. Al Fatiha [The Preface]. 7).
13 And Mary the daughter of Imran who guarded her chastity so We breathed into him of Our Spirit and she
fulfilled the words of her Lord and His Books and was of the devout.
(The Holy Quran. Al Tahrim [The Prohibition]. 66).
14 You are the best people raised to the benefit of mankind you enjoin what is right and forbid wrong and believe
in Allah and if the People of the Book had believed it would have surely been better for them. Some of
them are believers, but most of them are disobedient.
(The Holy Quran. Āl Imran [Progeny of Imran]. 111).
15 He is the First and the Last, and the Outer and the Inner, and He has full knowledge of all things.
(The Holy Quran. Al Hadid [The Iron]. 4).
found in abundance in the compilations of the writings of the Sufis as it was written in Baraheen e
Ahmadiyya before certain knowledge from God revealed in accord with one’s own thought that Jesus
himself will return. But God declared this belief to be corrupt and told me that ‘You are indeed the
Promised Messiah.’
So let it be remembered that it would have been better if the Sage had compared the
Promised Messiah to Adam instead of Seth. For the Quran and the Torah prove that Adam was born
as a twin. The revelation of Almighty God concerning me has been published in Baraheen e
Ahmadiyya 22 years ago from today that ‘I determined to appoint a vicegerent and so created Adam’
16 and this signified that there was a twin in the beginning and a twin in the end. All the aged people
of the village know about my being born a twin and about the birth of the girl preceding and my birth
following out of the same pregnancy. I have in my possession the written testimony of the midwife
who delivered me. This is the point at which we complete the book and pray to God for blessing and
guidance. Amen again Amen.
(Taryaqul Quloob [Panacea of the Souls]. 1902. R. K. xv. 481 – 486).
During his daily walk the Promised Messiah (peace be upon him) observed that:
Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi has written that it is not proven from The Holy Quran that Pharaoh
will go to Hell but it says that he led his people to it. 17 Perhaps he may be excused because
he fostered Moses (peace be upon him). Nurtured Him. Schooled him, trained him. Rather
our Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) did not receive any other
source of training. Only that of Almighty God.
(30 November 1902. Malfoozat ii [Discourses]. 551, 552).
The Christians say that the Prophet Jesus was the seal of prophethood although they also accept that a
certain John who prophesied outlived Christ and a separate book of his Revelations is always included
in the Gospels. Regarding the Finality of Prophethood it was the same belief held by Muhiyudeen ibn
‘Arabi that [only] legislative prophethood has ended otherwise he does not differentiate between
Divine converse and Prophethood. The clergy have blundered terribly on this issue. The Quran itself
uses the word prophets in the [future tense] plural. This means naught but that prophethood bearing a
new Shariah has ended and anyone claiming to bring a new law is an infidel and to deny any form of
Divine converse makes Islam a dead religion and no difference would remain between Islam and the
other religions, because there remains nothing after converse that would define prophethood. But
now that the Muslims have made it their religion to close the door of the [Divine] converse which is
the very Sign of prophethood. This proves that this Ummah rather than being the Best of Peoples has
incurred God’s extreme wrath and the prayer that ‘Guide us on the right path. The path of those
bestowed thy blessings’ would be a very pointless deception and its teaching would be futile as if God
had taught it for no reason. 18 What a surprise that this Ummah could become Jewish and yet expect a
Messiah to come from the outsiders.
(26 January 1903. Malfoozat iii [Discourses]. 52, 53).
During the morning walk Dr Muhammad Yoseph, a visitor from Lucknow expressed his
astonishment at the audacity of the Muslims and that he had found no cause for them to declare
the Promised Messiah (peace be upon him) an infidel. During his lengthy comment on this
observation the Promised Messiah said:

You should also sift my books for any words that go against the Word of Allah and the
words of the Prophet so you have no remaining doubt. I do not care for their
infidelity. It was destined to be so because it was written in the very Signs [that
they expected] that when the Promised Messiah shall come edicts would be passed
16 Tadhkirah. Second English Edition. (Islam International Publications Ltd, 2009). 360.
17 ibn –al’Arabi, Shaykh Muhiyudeen. Fusûs al-Hikam [The Ringstones of Wisdom]. Ringstone 25.
18 The path of those bestowed thy blessings, not those who incurred thy displeasure and not those who went
astray.
(The Holy Quran. Al Fatiha [The Preface]. 7).
against him. Look how these predictions were fulfilled. They are fulfilling them by
their own hands. Mujaddid [Alf Thānī] and Nawab Siddiq Hassan Khan say that when
he comes the clergy will oppose him and Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi has written that when
he comes a person will rise and say ‘This is the person who uproots the faith.’ Now
when all this was foretold we are happy that these people are fulfilling them with their
own hands. When all this was said before now then it is also a Sign of our truth so that
is why we do not care a jot about these things.
(14 February 1903. Malfoozat iii [Discourses]. 89).
During the morning walk the Promised Messiah (peace be upon him) said:
Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi has written that legislative prophethood is no longer sanctioned the
other [forms] are. But my own faith is that the door to all forms of prophethood are shut but
the prophethood which reflects the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)
is sanctioned.
(15 April 1903. Malfoozat iii [Discourses]. 254).

Then you say that ‘I have copied the statement of Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi in Ishaatus Sunnah and
written in the end that we do not consider revelation to be argument and proof.’ In reply to this I
respectfully plead that if you were opposed to this statement why did you mention it without purpose?
Your words must be extremely defective for firstly you clearly accept that for a claimant revelation is
representative of a Legitimate Argument on behalf of a claimant as well as this you have openly
accepted and in fact reiterated it referencing to the Hadith of Bukhari that the revelation of a scholar
of Hadith is purified of Satanic intervention. Despite this I do not force you to consider revelation
to be an argument but you do yourself accept in your Review that such revelation becomes an
argument on behalf of the claimant. That is as much as I claim to establish. I too do not wish to
force it upon you. 19
Then you say that it is wrong for me to ask why you had mentioned ibn ‘Arabi. If you were
opposed to him. For it is totally opposed to the purpose of your words. You stated in the beginning
of your reply regarding the logicality of your statement that you are a follower of ibn ‘Arabi? If you
19 i. Did I not express my disagreement with the statement of Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi I which have quoted in
Ishaatus Sunna in the Review on page 345 do I not say that on that page? We had intentionally wanted to
point this out as the third point and not that we too consider that revelation to be an argument and proof and
that it necessitates obedience of an ordained person (who is not a prophet) towards one who has not been
ordained. No no not at all. We only follow the book of Allah and the Sunnah and consider that alone to be
the argument and the modus operandi and the way and are not a recipient of revelation nor a follower or
disciple of someone who is not a prophet (be he from the earlier ones or the latter ones) but a visionary
recipient of revelation. So if it is not an aspersion to make me a potential believer of this statement of ibn
‘Arabi then what else is it? The verses of the Quran that you note have nothing to do with the subject under
dispute and I will mention this in detail in my answer when I have received the answers herein.
Yours, Abu Saeed.
ii. You ask why if I had been in disagreement with the statement of ibn ‘Arabi had I mentioned it without
purpose and that in doing so it reveals a defect in my words [and] your stating this is totally opposed to the
logicality of my quoting this excerpt so is not worthy of caring for and cannot exonerate you from blame
of aspersion and nor can my affirmations which I have made regarding this scholar of Hadith exonerate
you from this blame for affirmation of the statements of ibn ‘Arabi cannot be found in any of my
declarations or writings and my expressing clearly that I do not consider the revelations of one who is not
a prophet to be proofs and do follow the book and the Sunnah and not a visionary recipient of revelation.
As a clear evidence that you have made an allegation against me. Now remains the allegation of offering
excuses and expressing things I do not believe in the answer to this is in the very same page of Ishaatus
Sunnah that I have copied these quotations from ibn ‘Arabi et cetera to state that the author of Barahin is
not alone in considering revelation to be proof and this problem is not so new or eccentric that nobody else
believes it which clearly proves that I had wanted to save the author of Barahin from blunder rather than to
express my considering such revelations to be a worthy certification.
Fifthly my having said that renders my previous statement and what ensued reliable referencing ibn
‘Arabi that I affirm the statement and you oppose it.
are then may I ask why have you copied the Hadith of Sahih Bukhari which says that a scholar of
Hadith is also a messenger like a prophet and why have you copied the saying of Muhammad Ismael
that the revelation of a scholar of Hadith is purified of Satanic interventions as is that of a prophet. If
you do not believe the Hadith of Bukhari then you ought to have said so in your previous papers that I
do not consider the revelation of a scholar of Hadith to be purified from Satanic intervention! It is a
surprise that on one hand you say Bukhari [this and] Bukhari [that] and on the other you act against it!
Having said that if you believe that all the Traditions in Bukhari are Authentic then in this situation
you will have to agree with ibn ‘Arabi because if it is revealed to a scholar of Hadith that a particular
Hadith is a Fabrication and this is confirmed to him through repetitive revelation then will you not
believe in accordance with the desire of Bukhari that the scholar of Hadith should consider such an
Hadith to be Fabricated? Respected Maulvi why do you use such words? Why do you not inculcate
the notion of God-Consciousness in your heart. Why become a liar, accursed one and devoid of
faith. It is one thing to understand a precept from the point of view of estimation even if it is wrong
and another to say something against an incident about which one knows the reality.
You commit a calumny from top to bottom and it is like fighting after the battle that you now
write this in your answer that ‘According to me such a scholar who calls an Authentic Hadith which is
from the Canonical collections a Fabrication speaking on behalf of Satan and is Satan personified.’
You had listed in Ishaatus Sunnah the names of those respected persons who had mentioned such
visions or such beliefs of theirs and never called them Satan embodied but have mentioned them as
worthy recipients of praise for example in my support you copy the quote from the Futûhât of ibn
‘Arabi that some Traditions are revealed to be Fabricated through visionary experience so say truly
what your intentions were at that time surely they were not to say that ibn ‘Arabi was Allah forbid an
infidel or Satan personified? Does the word Great which you write here prove that those people were
great infidels? You have in a letter included Muhiyudeen among the chiefest of mystics and the saints
of Allah. That letter is not present at this time but there is another letter carrying the same meaning
which you had written to Abdullah Ghaznavi deceased the text of which is this ‘Knowledge is of 2
kinds the first being apparent which is received through a means and endeavour and sight and
demonstration the second being internal which is conveyed by the absolutely absent as stated by the
Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi in the Futûhât.’ Do say why you mentioned Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi
here where you ought to have referred to words of the saints of The Gracious? If that respected one
was Allah forbid Satan embodied according to your liberal heart would you have referred to him in a
letter which you wrote to your teacher!
(al-Haqq, Mubahisa Ludhiana [The Ludhiana Debate]. Ziaul Islam, 1903. R. K. iv. 24, 25,
33, 34, 44, 122, 123).
The sixteenth characteristic of the Prophet Jesus was that, being born without a father, he was like the
Prophet Adam. Similarly, I being born a twin have a resemblance of a sort with the Prophet Adam:
according to what the sage Mohiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi has mentioned about the Seal of the Caliphs to be
of Chinese ancestry that is to say of Mongol origin, to be born the second of twins, a girl being born
first, I was born exactly the same way on a Friday morning. It is not known from where ibn ‘Arabi got
hold of this prophecy, but it has come to pass. This prediction is to be found in his books to this day.
(Tadhkiratush Shahadatayn [The Two Martyrs]. Ziaul Islam, 1903. R. K. xx. 35).
So remember well that the fruits of total subordination can never go to waste. This is a mystical
precept of Sufism. If there were no such status the saints of the Ummah would have died. 20 It was
this very reflective distinction of complete immersion and of the reappearance as a reflection or a
shadow whereby Bayazid was decreed Muhammad and was thus declared an infidel for it no less than
70 times in an edict and subsequently banished from the township.
(24 September 1905. Malfoozat iv [Discourses]. 406).
From the book of the Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi:
The summit of union is to become identical to that through which it appears and not known in
20 See Futûhât al-Makkiya [The Meccan Revelations].
itself as I saw the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) in a dream that he
embraces Abu Muhammad ibn Hazm the scholar of Hadith. Then one disappeared into the
other except that there was none other than the Prophet of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah
be upon him). So this is the summit of spiritual connection, which is also referred to as Union.
(Futûhât al-Makkiya).
(al-Haqq, Mubahisa Delhi [The Delhi Debate]. Ziaul Islam, 1905. R. K. iv,
499).
And the visionaries among the people of Islam have not only declared the Promised Messiah who is
the Final Caliph and the Seal of Caliphs similar to Adam in that Adam was born at the end of the sixth
day and the Promised Messiah will be born at the end of the sixth millennium but also similar in that
like Adam he too will be born on a Friday and his birth will also be as a twin so that just as Adam was
born a twin first Adam and then Eve. Similarly the Promised Messiah will also be born a twin. So
All Praise is due to Allah and [we beseech him] that I am the fulfilment of his prophecy I too was
born a twin on a Friday morning the only difference was that the girl whose name was Jannet was
born before. She entered Paradise a few days later and I followed her birth. The Shaykh Muhiyudeen
ibn ‘Arabi has recorded this prophecy in his book the Fusûs that he will be of Chinese origin. *

(Haqiqatul Wahy [The Philosophy of Revelation]. 1907. R. K. xxii. 209).
Maulana Nooruddin said that the Shaykh ibn ‘Arabi has said that if someone who is sick or
travelling fasts during the days of Ramadhan it is still incumbent upon such a person to fast
upon recovery 21 because Allah Almighty states ‘But whoso among you is sick or is on a journey
shall fast the same number of other days’ after the month of Ramadhan. 22 Here Almighty God
has not stated that the patient or traveller who fasts during these days of his own accord or
because he wants to need not fast thereafter. Almighty God clearly commands such a person to
fast afterwards. To fast in other days are nevertheless incumbent. To fast in the middle of
one’s own free will is a surplus. This cannot avert the commandment of Almighty God to fast
on other days. The Promised Messiah (peace be upon him) said:
One who is sick or on a journey during the months of Ramadhan and observes the fast disobeys
the clear commandment of Almighty God. Almighty God has stated clearly that a sick person
and a traveller should not fast. One should fast after recovery of health and after the culmination
of the journey. One should act upon this commandment of Almighty God, because salvation is
dependent upon Grace and not upon one’s effort to attain it. Almighty God has not mentioned the
severity of the ailment or the length of the journey but has given a general commandment which
should be followed. If a patient or a traveller observes the fast they will fall under the decree of
disobeying the [Divine] command.
(1907. Malfoozat v [Discourses]. 320, 321).
Moreover ibn ‘Arabi writes in his book that it is mentioned in a Hadith that ‘A Prophet appeared in
India who was black in complexion [and that] his name was Kahin.’
(5 March 1908. Malfoozat v [Discourses]. 459).
In the course of daily walk the Promised Messiah (peace be upon him) observed that:
*
This means that his family will carry Turkish blood our family which is of Mongol ethnicity due to its fame is
So as to fulfil this prophecy because although the truth is certainly that which God has said that this family is
of Persian origin but it is certainly observable and verifiable that most of our mothers and grandmothers are
from the Mongol race who are Chinese in origin and lived in China.
21 See Futûhât al-Makkiya [The Meccan Revelations]. 71:16.
22 Fast a specific number of days, but for whoso among you is sick or is on a journey the same number of other
days; and for those who are able to fast only with extreme difficulty is in the feeding of a poor person – A
way of expiation and whoso performs a good work with eager obedience, it is better for him and fasting is
better for you if you only knew.
(The Holy Quran. Al Baqarah [The Cow]. 185).
Shaykh ibn ‘Arabi writes asking why Allah Almighty instructed the Prophet Moses to deal gently
with the Pharaoh. 23 Indeed the secret behind this was that Allah Almighty knew that he will finally
have the fortune to believe. In fact he goes as far as to say that his salvation is also proven from
The Holy Quran. It is not written in The Holy Quran that he will enter Hell. All that is written is
this: ‘He will walk in front of his people on the Day of resurrection and will lead them onto the
pit of Fire.’ 24

(11 April 1908. Malfoozat v [Discourses]. 527).
The Promised Messiah (peace be upon him) was asked ‘What is the meaning of ‘Seal of the
Prophets’? 25 In the course of his reply, he said:
This means that after the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) no prophet
bearing a new Shariah will come and it means that no prophet can come after him who does not
bear the seal of his prophethood.
The chief of the Sufis Shaykh ibn e ‘Arabi says that the cessation of prophecy would
amount to the death of Islam. At the time of the Prophet Moses even women received revelation
as Almighty God spoke even to the Prophet Moses’ mother. What religion is that whose blessings
are said not to be before them but are left behind. If God still hears as He heard in the past ages and
sees as He did in the past then what is the reason that along with hearing and seeing he used to
possess the attribute of conversing as well but that [it] has now become defunct? If this is the case
then is there not a danger that at some time Almighty God will also lose his attributes of hearing
and seeing. 26 One pities such absurd thinking. Almighty God still speaks as He spoke and
conversed before with all the prophets. Thus we are ourselves present as a proof for it. God
certainly speaks just as he sees and hears. Islam is left with no life and can never be [considered]
respectfully outside of believing that Almighty God speaks and converses continually and it leaves
Islam a damned and disfavoured and a dead religion just like the other religions.
(1 May 1908. Lahore – India. Malfoozat v [Discourses]. 565).
So however negligently this humble one may be perceived even so God has chosen this same man of
his as the Seal of Caliphs of this Ummah. It was about me that the Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn ‘Arabi
had made a prophecy which was fulfilled in me and that is that the Seal of Saints who is also named
the Promised Messiah will be of Chinese origin. That his family ties would originate in China and
also that he will be born a twin [and] a girl will accompany him and she will be born before him at the
time of labour and he will be born thereafter. So this is in exact accord with the nature of my birth
and I was born a twin on a Friday morning. It is possible that this is a vision of the Shaykh
Muhiyudeen ibn al-‘Arabi himself or a Hadith that [had] reached him. Anyhow that prophecy was
fulfilled with my birth and up till now nobody has been born in Islam except me who is of Chinese
origin and also a twin and then he has claimed to be the Seal of Caliphs.
.
This prophecy of the Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn al-‘Arabi apparently contradicts that Word of God
which was revealed to me and published in my book Barahin e Ahmadiyya because this Word
declares me to be of Persian origin as Almighty Allah states in Barahin e Ahmadiyya ‘Hold fast to
Unity, hold fast to Unity, O sons of Persia.’ * Then in another place in the same Barahin e Ahmadiyya
23 And address him both of you, with gentle words perchance that he might possibly heed or be respectful.
(The Holy Quran. Ta Ha. 45).
24 He will walk in front of his people on the Day of resurrection and will lead them onto the pit of Fire and
what a foul watering-place to be led to and those evildoers who are led to it.
(The Holy Quran. Hood. 99).
25 Muhammad is not the father of any of you men but he is the Messenger of Allah and the Seal of the Prophets;
and Allah has full knowledge of all things.
(The Holy Quran. Al Ahzab [The Coalition]. 41).
26 See Futûhât al-Makkiya [The Meccan Revelations].
he states ‘Those who have obstructed people from the way of Allah, have been refuted by a man of
Persian origin. Allah appreciates his effort.’ So those people who are enemies of Islam and block the
way of God have been frustrated by a Persian person (this humble one) and God appreciates his effort.
Then [He] states in a third place in This same Barahin e Ahmadiyya [where] it is stated ‘Had faith
ascended to the Pleiades, a man of Persian origin would have brought it down thence’ so that if faith
had risen from the Earth and ascended to the Pleiades even so a man from Persia (that is this humble
one) would reach up to there and bring it back. The answer to this conflict is that lots of Muslims had
spread across China through the missions of Islam and their preaching resulted in many millions of
Chinese converting to Islam and this is why there are over 6000000 Muslims in China even today so it
is possible that some Persians had also moved to China and preferred to be called Chinese just as
many from among the Arabs who first came to Hindustan were known as Indians as are all Syeds
and Qureshis and there is no doubt about it that our family is commonly believed to be a Mongol
family which is doubtless of Chinese origin although whatever God has disclosed is correct without a doubt.
* Almighty God has appended an A and an L to the word Persia [al meaning ‘The’ in Arabic] when
according to the rules of syntax it ought to have been just Persia. The Word of God does not
conform to human syntax in every single instance such phrases and pronouns that are against human
grammar are also found in The Holy Quran.
.
It is also a Sign for me that the Muslims who are my enemies and swear at me in opposition and call
me a disbeliever adhere to books which mention to this day that when the Awaited Mahdi comes he
will be called a disbeliever and rejected and the clerics of Islam will come very close to killing him.
Thus this is exactly what Mujaddid Alf Thānī writes in one place and the Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn al-
‘Arabi also writes this in one place. So there is no doubt about it that despite the many thousands of
Signs which Almighty God showed for me I have been made the target of extreme hatred and they
distort and change the meanings of my books like the Jews did and add many things from themselves
in order to raise hundreds of objections so that I seem to be claim a continuous prophethood and seem
to swear at prophets of God and blaspheme against them and as if I deny the existence of miracles. So
I present all these complaints before Almighty God and I know for certain that He with his Grace will
decide in my favour because I am oppressed.
(Chashma e Ma’rafat [Fountain of Gnosis]. Anwar e Ahmadiyya Machine Press, 1908. 330,
331, 334).
Professor Clement Lindley Wragge (1852 – 1922) was a renowned meteorologist of his time. He
lived in Australia, but in 1908 was visiting India as part of his world tour during which he gave
lectures on meteorology to very large audiences. In May 1908, he stayed in Lahore for a short
period. There he gave a lecture which was well-attended, especially by many highly-placed
English gentlemen. Mufti Muhammad Sadiq (may Allah be pleased with him), a renowned
disciple of the Promised Messiah (peace be upon him) was also present at this lecture and he
met the professor after the lecture. He briefly explained to Professor Wragge the proofs and
arguments put forward by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad in support of his claim to be the Promised
Messiah of his time. Upon hearing these the Professor wished to meet the Promised Messiah
who gave his permission; the 2 audiences commenced following the noon prayer service on 12th
May 1908. The Mufti acted as the interpreter. One of his questions was that ‘It is written in
The Holy Bible that Adam or one could say the first man was born in Gihon and Pishon [the
Garden of Eden] and that was his country so are the people of other parts of the world such as
Australia and America the progeny of the same Adam?’ 27 In the course of his reply the
Promised Messiah (peace be upon him) said:
27 2 of the 4 tributaries of the river in Paradise from the Book of Genesis, chapter 2. These were the 2 inflowing
rivers seen by the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم during his Night Journey. The other 2 being the Nile and the Euphrates.
There is a saying of Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn e ‘Arabi which is apposite to your query. He
writes that ‘I went to perform the Hajj and met a person there who I thought was Adam. I
asked him if he was that same Adam? At which he replied with a counter-question that
‘Which Adam are you talking about? There has been thousands of Adams.’ 28
(18 May 1908. Lahore – India. Malfoozat v [Discourses]. 675).
One afternoon a person from the outer provinces came to the Promised Messiah (peace be upon
him) and started speaking coarsely. The Promised Messiah (peace be upon him) replied that he
had not stated anything from himself and that whatever he had claimed was on the basis of and
rooted within in the Quran and Hadith:
The person to whom God Almighty reveals things aplenty [as a result of] which he prophecies
repeatedly is called a prophet. The existence of God is recognised through His Almighty
Signs. This is why Saints are sent. It is written in The Masnavi ‘Such is the prophet of the
time O disciple.’ Muhiyudeen ibn-‘Arabi has also written the same. 29 Mujaddid [Alf Thānī]
has also expressed the same opinion so will you call them all infidels? Remember that
the chain of prophethood will continue till Doomsday.
(25 May 1908. Lahore – India. Malfoozat v [Discourses]. 689).
© Rehan Qayoom, 2010.
28 Once I was circuiting the Kaaba. I found some others circuiting it. Their features seemed to suggest that they
were some spiritual party. So I asked the first among them ‘Who are you?’ And he said ‘We are of your
ancient ancestors’ so I said ‘How long ago was your time and age?’ And he said ‘Merely 40000 years’ and I
said ‘But this period is much more than what separates us from Adam.’
‘Then he said ‘Of which Adam are you speaking, the one nearest to you or another?’ And I recollected
the narration of a Tradition of the Prophet of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم that before Allah created the Adam that we know he
created a hundred thousand Adams.’
(Futûhât al-Makkiya).
29 No law will ever abrogate his law … and will not add to his law another law. This is the thing that ceased and
its door was closed, not the [spiritual] rank of prophecy. Prophecy will exist among the people until the Day
of Judgement, though the legislation which had once been associated with it ceased after the revelation of the
Quran.
(Futûhât al-Makkiya).
Bibliography.
Ahmad, Mirza Ghulam. Malfoozat [Discources]. 5 Vols.
Roohani Khazain. (Islam International Publications Ltd, 2010). 23 Vols.
Tadhkirah. Second English Edition. (Islam International Publications Ltd,
2009).
al-‘Arabi, Shaykh Muhiyudeen ibn. ‘Anqâ’ Mughrib [Islamic Sainthood in the Fullness of Time: The Fabulous
Gryphon of the West]. Translated by Gerald Elmore. (Brill, 1998).
Fusûs al-Hikam [The Ringstones of Wisdom]. Translated by Caner Dagli.
(Great Books of the Islamic World, 2004).
Futûhât al-Makkiya [The Meccan Revelations]. 2 Vols. Edited by Michel
Chodkiewicz. (Pir Press 2002, 2004). Selected chapters have also
been translated by Aisha Bewley, published by Great Books of the
Islamic World.
The Holy Bible. Authorised King James Version.
al-Bukhari, Imam abu-Abdullah Muhammad bin-Ismael. Sahih Bukhari.
al-Fazl. Volume 4, number 24. (September 26, 1916).
Ibn-Ishaq, Muhammad ibn-Yasār. Sirat Rasool Allah [The Life of Muhammad]. Translated by Alfred
Guillaume (Oxford University Press, 1955).
Isha’atus Sunnah. Edited by Shaykh abu-Saeed Muhammad Hussein Batalvi.
Khan, Nawab Siddiq Hassan. Hujjujul Karama.
The Holy Quran. Translations by the Author.
Shahid, Maulana Dost Muhammad. Tarikh e Ahmadiyyat. (Nazarat Nashr o Ishaat, Qadian 2007). 18 Vols.
Shi’rani, Imam Abdul Wahhab. Mizanul Qubra.
al-Sindi, Shaykh Muhammad Muin ibn Muhammad Amin. Dirasat al-Labib.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

It seems that Ibn Arabi, in his famous book, Tafsir Ibn Arabi (it is actually Tafsir Kashani by Abd al-Razzaq Kāshānī), wrote that Jesus was raised up in his Ruh from the lower world to the higher world (his body seems to have been discarded on Earth, per Ibn Arabi), and then Jesus will descend in the end times with a different body. This might elude to 56:61 of the Quran. However, this is in total contradiction of the Ahmadiyya position. Ahmadi’s claim that Esa (as) died 90 years after the event of the crucifixion and in India, whereas, Ibn Arabi and all other Muslims claim that Mutawafeeka happened before the event of crucifixion.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

Did Ibn Arabi believe Isa (As) to be a half human and half an angelic spirit, different from the four types of creations: 1) Adam 2) Eve 3) Bani Adam 4) Jesus (half spirit of Gabriel and half son of Mary) – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Did Ibn Arabi believe Isa (As) to be a half human and half an angelic spirit, different from the four types of creations: 1) Adam 2) Eve 3) Bani Adam 4) Jesus (half spirit of Gabriel and half son of Mary)

Imam Al-Ghazzali did Takfir of Ibn Arabi – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Imam Al-Ghazzali did Takfir of Ibn Arabi

Ibn Arabi – Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Arabi

If Ibn Arabi believed that Esa (as) would physically return to Earth with a new body, why do Ahmadi’s quote him? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

If Ibn Arabi believed that Esa (as) would physically return to Earth with a new body, why do Ahmadi’s quote him?

Ibn Arabi wrote that Esa (as) wasn’t killed, it was a phantom image

https://archive.org/details/FTMAKIA/fmakia6/page/%DB%B71/mode/1up

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #mirzaghulamahmad

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Thorough research work on the Ahmadiyya Movement, #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome