Intro
In 1892-1893 (See A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, page 598, online English edition), MGA and his team of writers wrote vs. Batalvi. They alleged that Batalvi was making wild allegations against MGA just like how true prophets like Musa (as) and Eisa (as) were accused. MGA alleged that these allegations were good behavior, however, it was reported as vile behavior. MGA and his team of writers gave the example of Eisa (as) going into a home of an adulteress and allowing her to use perfume on his body, however, this perfume, she had not earned lawfully and Eisa (as) never stopped her too. MGA and his team of writers argued that these were good behaviors in the shape of words and deeds, which are considered utterly absurd and disgraceful in the view of men like Batalvi.
In 1895, MGA alleged that via the Bible, a beautiful prostitute is sitting so close to Jesus as though she is embracing him. Sometimes she massages his head with perfume or holds his feet, and sometimes she lays her beautiful black hair on his feet and plays in his lap. In this situation Mr. Messiah is sitting in ecstasy. If someone rises to object he is scolded. Besides his young age, the habit of alcoholism and being a bachelor, a beautiful prostitute is lying in front of him touching her body with his. Is this the behavior of a virtuous person? And what evidence or proof is there that Jesus did not get sexually aroused by the touch of the prostitute? Alas! Jesus could not even have the facility of sexual intercourse with a wife of his own after passing his glance upon that adulteress. What sexual excitement would have been provoked by the touching of that wretched adulteress and her playfulness! The sexual excitement and arousal would have done its work to the extreme. This is the reason why Jesus could not even open his mouth to say, ‘Oh adulteress! Keep away from me’. It is well established in the Bible that that woman was one of the prostitutes, notorious for adultery in the entire city (See Nur-ul-Quran, Roohani Khazain vol 9 p.449).
In 1897-1898, MGA alleged that Jesus had an inclination for prostitutes, perhaps due to his ancestral relationship with them, otherwise no pious man could allow a young prostitute to touch his head with her filthy hands and massage his head with the unclean perfume purchased with the earnings of adultery and rub his feet with her hair. Let the intelligent judge what sort of character such a person must possess (See Zamimah Anjam Atham, Roohani Khazain Vol 11 p.291).
In the 1899-1902 era (See RK-15, p. 461, Tiryaqul-Qulub), “”in the same way, the enemies of Hadhrat Eisa (As) have objected that he was not bound by piety. so a wicked woman had a perfume on and she brought with the wealth of immorality on his head and her hair on his feet and a young and prostitute touching their bodies and putting forbidden oil on their heads and using their limbs to make their own. It is an act that a pious person can never commit. Also the Messiah allowing his disciples to eat the grain of a strangers field without the owner’s permission indicates that God forbid, Jesus did not care for trust and honesty. These are the objections that the Jews have raised against the Messiah”” (See also Bro Imtiaz, 2:18:51 on 2-3-24 and 1:28:11 on 4-11-26).
In 1902, MGA alleged that Maseeh (Jesus) was not more pious than the righteous people of that period. Rather the Prophet Yahya (John) is superior to Maseeh because he did not drink alcohol and it was never heard that an unchaste woman came and anointed him with perfume of her unchaste earning or touched his body with her hands and hair. Or some non-mahram young women came to his service. That is the reason God called Yahya in Quran as Husoor (chaste) but He did not use such a name for Maseeh as such stories were prohibitive to name him so. Further, Hazrat Isa (AS) repented for his sins at the hands of Yahya who is called John by Christians and was made Elijah later on (See RK-18, page-220, page 3 of the online English edition.
In 1902, after alleging that Eisa (as) was fond of prostitutes in many books (See A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, RK, v5, p597-Urdu)(See Nur-ul-Quran, RK-v9 p.449-Urdu)(Zamimah Anjam Atham, RK, V-11 p.291)(2016 edition of Malfuzat, Volume-3, Page 279-Urdu, Initially Published in Rabwah, 1961, in Urdu, covering the period from November 1901 to October 14, 1902), MGA added the argument that Eisa (as) was getting oil massages from prostitutes while Allah was revealing the injil to him (See Malfuzat, Vol. 3, page 289-Urdu,1903, via Al hakam Jild 6 number 40. 10 Nov 1902 pg 3).
In 1906-1907, via Haqiqatul Wahi (RK-22, page 537)(page 675, online English edition), MGA and his team of writers allege that they came across a book wherein a learned Jew made accusations about Eisa (As), like an illegitimate birth, bad character and prostitutes serving him in an unbecoming manner (See Razi presenting this on Dawah Wise on 2-3-24, 2:19:00 time stamp and Bro Imtiaz on 4-11-26, 1:28:46 time stamp).
In 1908 (Nov-20), after MGA died, via “Jesus in India” (see page 53), MGA and his team of writers alleged that the Gospels were confusing. MGA questioned their authenticity and pointed out their contradictory nature. MGA then gave the story of Jesus and being touched by a prostitute via Luke 7:36-50 as an example of a contradiction.
In 2024 (Feb-3), Bro Imtiaz streamed on Dawah Wise (30:10 time stamp) and explained how MGA made the argument that Eisa (as) was getting oil massages from prostitutes while Allah was revealing the injil to him (See Malfuzat, Vol. 3, page 289-Urdu,1903, via Al hakam Jild 6 number 40. 10 Nov 1902 pg 3).
In 2026 (38:24 timestamp), in response to this, in March-2026, Maulvi Razi alleged that MGA wasn’t quoting the Bible word-for-word when he alleged that “Eisa (as) was getting oil massages from prostitutes while Allah was revealing the injil to him”. Maulvi Razi also called it “ilzami jawab”. However, in all of Razi’s references, there wasn’t a single example of anyone else alleging that “Eisa (as) was getting oil massages from prostitutes while Allah was revealing the injil to him”, that remains unique to MGA. Maulvi Razi also called it “Istadlaal” (Reasoning) via ilzami jawab. Maulvi Razi even blamed Muslim ulema in some commentaries for adding stories (See the clip on Tiktok and Twitter). As far as going into the house of a prostitute, MGA wrote this in A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, page 598, online English edition, however, that is not the case in Luke 7:36-50. In Luke 7:36-50, Jesus was invited to the house of the Pharisees, not some adulteress.
In 2026 (46:50), Bro Imtiaz mentioned how MGA accused Eisa (as) of getting oil massages whilst simultaneously getting the injil revealed by angels, via Allah.
1903, Malfuzat, Vol. 3, page 289
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1892-1893
A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, RK, v5, p597-Urdu
The Mirror of the Excellences of Islam
See page 598, online English edition
In 1892-1893 (See A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, page 598, online English edition), MGA and his team of writers wrote vs. Batalvi. They alleged that Batalvi was making wild allegations against MGA just like how true prophets like Musa (as) and Eisa (as) were accused. They alleged that these allegations were good behavior, however, it was reported as vile behavior. MGA and his team of writers gave the example of Eisa (as) going into a home of an adulteress and allowing her to use perfume on his body, however, this perfume, she had not earned lawfully and Eisa (as) never stopped her too. MGA and his team of writers argued that these were good behaviors in the shape of words and deeds, which are considered utterly absurd and disgraceful in the view of men like Batalvi.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1895
Nur-ul-Quran, Roohani Khazain vol 9 p.449
In 1895, MGA alleged that via the Bible, a beautiful prostitute is sitting so close to Jesus as though she is embracing him. Sometimes she massages his head with perfume or holds his feet, and sometimes she lays her beautiful black hair on his feet and plays in his lap. In this situation Mr. Messiah is sitting in ecstasy. If someone rises to object he is scolded. Besides his young age, the habit of alcoholism and being a bachelor, a beautiful prostitute is lying in front of him touching her body with his. Is this the behavior of a virtuous person? And what evidence or proof is there that Jesus did not get sexually aroused by the touch of the prostitute? Alas! Jesus could not even have the facility of sexual intercourse with a wife of his own after passing his glance upon that adulteress. What sexual excitement would have been provoked by the touching of that wretched adulteress and her playfulness! The sexual excitement and arousal would have done its work to the extreme. This is the reason why Jesus could not even open his mouth to say, ‘Oh adulteress! Keep away from me’. It is well established in the Bible that that woman was one of the prostitutes, notorious for adultery in the entire city.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1897-1898
Zamimah Anjam Atham, Roohani Khazain Vol 11 p.291
“Jesus had an inclination for prostitutes, perhaps due to his ancestral relationship with them, otherwise no pious man could allow a young prostitute to touch his head with her filthy hands and massage his head with the unclean perfume purchased with the earnings of adultery and rub his feet with her hair. Let the intelligent judge what sort of character such a person must possess.”
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1899-1902
RK-15, p. 461, Tiryaqul-Qulub
https://www.youtube.com/live/tYUxfY0N_9E?si=64445IDeNTcqIVSX
“”in the same way, the enemies of Hadhrat Eisa (As) have objected that he was not bound by piety. so a wicked woman had a perfume on and she brought with the wealth of immorality on his head and her hair on his feet and a young and prostitute touching their bodies and putting forbidden oil on their heads and using their limbs to make their own. It is an act that a pious person can never commit. Also the Messiah allowing his disciples to eat the grain of a strangers field without the owner’s permission indicates that God forbid, Jesus did not care for trust and honesty. These are the objections that the Jews have raised against the Messiah”” (See also Bro Imtiaz, 2:18:51 on 2-3-24 and 1:28:11 on 4-11-26).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1902
2016 edition of Malfuzat, Volume-3, Page 279, Initially Published in Rabwah, 1961, in Urdu, covering the period from
November 1901 to October 14, 1902.
Translation
“”The Messiah used to get oil massages from adulterous women, if he had begged allah for forgiveness (istighfar), then he wouldn’t have been as such”
Transliteration
“”Maseeh tho khud kunjereeo say thail malwata rai, agar istighfar karte, to yeh khalat nai hote”
Other editions of Malfuzat
1969 edition
1984 edition
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1902
RK-18, page-220, page 3 of the online English edition
https://files.alislam.cloud/pdf/Defence-Against-Plague.pdf
In 1902, MGA alleged that Maseeh (Jesus) was not more pious than the righteous people of that period. Rather the Prophet Yahya (John) is superior to Maseeh because he did not drink alcohol and it was never heard that an unchaste woman came and anointed him with perfume of her unchaste earning or touched his body with her hands and hair. Or some non-mahram young women came to his service. That is the reason God called Yahya in Quran as Husoor (chaste) but He did not use such a name for Maseeh as such stories were prohibitive to name him so. Further, Hazrat Isa (AS) repented for his sins at the hands of Yahya who is called John by Christians and was made Elijah later on (See RK-18, page-220, page 3 of the online English edition.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1903, Malfuzat, Vol. 3, page 289, Urdu
https://new.alislam.org/library/books/malfuzat-3?option=options&page=300
“”…in a discussion, there is nothing for the Christians, except humiliation and regret. Before attacking others, clean your own house! If they object over Moses (as) killing a man, then that incident is before the revelation of the Torah. But what happened to the Messiah that he was getting an oil massage from a prostitute, and while Gospel was being revealed to him..”
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1906-1907
Haqiqatul Wahi
Haqiqatul-Wahi – Philosophy of Divine Revelation
Click to access Haqiqatul-Wahi.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/live/tYUxfY0N_9E?si=a9PIBV_qdEeSRyzV
In 1906-1907, via Haqiqatul Wahi (RK-22, page 537)(page 675, online English edition), MGA and his team of writers allege that they came across a book wherein a learned Jew made accusations about Eisa (As), like an illegitimate birth, bad character and prostitutes serving him in an unbecoming manner (See Razi presenting this on Dawah Wise on 2-3-24, 2:19:00 time stamp and Bro Imtiaz on 4-11-26, 1:28:46 time stamp).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1908
Nov-20
Jesus in India
Jesus in India
https://files.alislam.cloud/pdf/Jesus-in-India.pdf
See page 53, online English edition
In 1908 (Nov-20), after MGA died, via “Jesus in India” (see page 53), MGA and his team of writers alleged that the Gospels were confusing. MGA questioned their authenticity and pointed out their contradictory nature. MGA then gave the story of Jesus and being touched by a prostitute via Luke 7:36-50 as an example of a contradiction.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
https://new.alislam.org/library/books/malfuzat-3?option=options&page=300
MGA used Christian sources vs. Muslims! That’s not ilzami jawab! – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
MGA used Christian sources vs. Muslims! That’s not ilzami jawab!
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8bVQVTQ/
https://x.com/ahmadiyyafacts/status/2037028128330223766?s=46&t=HTqZKquoOvKbgoBAF2aQcg
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #mirzaghulamahmad
Leave a Reply