ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
We have a found a newspaper report from the famous Pioneer newspaper of British from Thursday, March-29th, 1894 and April 5th and 12th. The March-29th, 1894 edition reported on the lunar eclipse of March 20th, 1894. However, it should be noted that the day would change when the sun went down (not at mid-night), and thus the evening of March 20th, would actually be March 21st in the islamic calendar. This totally contradicts the alleged hadith in Dar-e-Qutni which clearly says that the there would be a lunar eclipse the first night of ramadhan, and this had never happened before in the history of the universe, which is true, lunar eclipses don’t happen on the first night of Ramadhan. It should also be noted that the Lunar eclipse was only visible in Agra and not Qadian.

The solar eclipse is reported in the April 12th, 1894 edition of the Pioneer Mail and happened on the last day of Ramadhan, which was April 6th. This is also in full contradiction with alleged hadith in Dar-e-Qutni which clearly says that the there would be a solar eclipse the middle of ramadhan. MGA and his team have never accepted this, they say it happened on April 5th, or they extend Ramadhan to April 7th.

Furthermore, we have also posted an internal document from the British government for March-April of 1894 wherein the Thanesar Eclipse Fair of 1894 is discussed (from brit library records). These internal documents tell us how 500,000 people showed up for the the event. Many hindu newspapers (and other sources) told Hindus about the impending Solar eclipse on April 6th, 1894 and thus, it happened on the morning of April 6th from 7:20am to 9:50am. Per the report about 75% of the sun was covered by the moon. This report tells us that even 2-3 months before these eclipses happened, hindus had told the railway department that they would have lots of Hindu’s travelling to Thanesar. These reports also tell us that there similar eclipse fairs in 1871, 1872, 1874 and 1887.

In conclusion, after the Thanesar fair and after the Pioneer Mail published all of this info about the eclipses, then, the private letters of Fatih Masih, wherein he urged MGA to connect these eclipses with his claims, then and only then did MGA’s team concoct the entire story of the eclipses. Even in 2019, hindus celebrate the a solar eclipse with a festival.

2 years after the eclipses (1896). MGA claims that the Pioneer called the eclipses a supernatural event and acknowledges that the Pioneer foretold the eclipses. MGA also argues that his enemies changed the dates from the 13th to the 14th and the 28th to the 29th. MGA quotes the Pioneer and Sole Military Gazette.

MGA knew that the eclipses would happen and still didn’t bother to use them as a sign before they happened. He just acknowledged that he knew but after the happened… over a month later on the 11th of May 1894, Padri Fateh Masih trolled MGA, saying people are going crazy in Makkah over the eclipses and advised him to go there and claim to be the Mahdi. About a week later, on May 18 1894 MGA writes Nur al Haq volume 2 and quotes the letter of Fateh Masih. It shows how calculative he was.

But he proves himself to be false because he said that if someone only uses the eclipses after they happen then he’s false… MGA had the opportunity to foretell them using the scientific knowledge he possessed just as Abdul Ghafar Janba did for the 2003 eclipses. But instead, he waited until someone made a big deal (Padri Fateh Masih) and then he later lied saying that he foretold them in Baraheen e Ahmadiyya 12 years prior to them taking place.

This whole narration is totally fabricated. Sunan Darqutni is a Hadith Book where Imam Darqutni collected mostly weak, unreliable und fabricated narrations to highlight which narrations should be thrown in the trash and never taken as part of ones faith.

Continue reading “The Pioneer Mail newspaper of British-India reported on the eclipses before Mirza Ghulam Ahmad” →

Intro
Ahmadi’s went around the world and bragged about the 2 eclipses that were shown for MGA from 1894–1996. Finally, an independent researcher (David McNaughton) came along and destroyed the Ahmadiyya position. The Muslims of India and the World never touched this topic in Ahmadiyya, however, after 1996, the cat was out of the bag.

It should be noted that it was Fatih Masih who urged MGA to make his claim of being the Mahdi based on the double eclipses of March and April 1894. Read our detailed essay on MGA’s claim to be the Mahdi herein.

Continue reading “Eclipses during Ramadan by David L. McNaughton (1996)” →

Intro
The Pioneer Mail newspaper of British-India reported on the eclipses before Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Also read how Fatih Masih told/urged MGA to make his claim of being the Mahdi based on the recent double eclipses in the month of Ramadhan in 1894.

This whole narration is totally fabricated. Sunan Darqutni is a Hadith Book where Imam Darqutni collected mostly weak, unreliable and fabricated narrations to highlight which narrations should be thrown in the trash and never taken as part of one’s faith.

Read our detailed essay on MGA’s claim of being the Mahdi herein. MGA was initially saying that all the hadith on the Mahdi were false. Strangely, in 1893, MGA fabricated a hadith about the Mahdi. In 1897 (via Anjam e Athim), MGA falsely attributed the eclipses story to Muhammad (Saw), and gave no explanation as to how? It was obviously a lie, the hadith is not connected to Muhammad (Saw) at all (see the ref in the below, under Anjam e Athim, page 330). In 1998, an Ahmadi named Saleh Mohammed Alladin misattributed this tradition to Muhammad (saw). Again, this is not a hadeeth from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), rather it was narrated by al-Daaraqutni in his Sunan (2/65) from the words of Muhammad ibn al-Haneefiyyah (the son of ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib). Al-Daaraqutni said: Abu Sa’eed al-Astakhri told us, Muhammad ibn ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Nawfal told us, ‘Ubayd ibn Ya’eesh told us, Yoonus ibn Bakeer told us, from ‘Amr ibn Shamr, from Jaabir, from Muhammad ibn ‘Ali who said:

“Our Mahdi will have two signs, which have never appeared since the heavens and earth were created. The moon will be eclipsed on the first night of Ramadaan and the sun will be eclipsed halfway through, and this has never happened since Allaah created the heavens and the earth.”

This report is mawdoo’ (fabricated) and is falsely attributed to Muhammad ibn ‘Ali (ibn al-Haneefiyyah), may Allaah have mercy on him.

Dr. ‘Abd al-‘Aleem ‘Abd al-‘Azeem al-Bastawi said in his book al-Mawsoo’ah fi Ahaadeeth al-Mahdi al-Da’eefah wa’l-Mawdoo’ah, p. 169:

Continue reading “The Ahmadiyya fraud on Eclipses and the Mahdi” →

Intro
Roughly every 22-23 years, in the month of Ramadhan, there is a Lunar and Solar eclipse. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his team of writers didn’t know this in 1894, thus, they alleged that these double eclipses in Ramadhan had never happened before and quoted a certain fabricated Shia hadith. The Pioneer Mail newspaper of British-India reported on the eclipses before Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Also read how Fatih Masih told/urged MGA to make his claim of being the Mahdi based on the recent double eclipses in the month of Ramadhan in 1894.

Moreover, the fabricated Shia hadith (from Dar-e-Qutni) did mention a unique event, it alleged that “”The moon will be eclipsed on the first night of Ramadaan and the sun will be eclipsed halfway through””. This is a fact! This has never happened in the history of the world. MGA and his team purposely misunderstood the fabricated hadith in the first place. Factually, the double eclipses only happen on roughly Ramadhan-15 (lunar) and Ramadhan-28 (solar), this literally happens every 22-23 years. By roughly 1907, MGA and his team were acknowledging that these eclipses do happen every so often and then they were trying to add a nuance to attach to their false argument (See Haqiqqatul Wahy).

In 2024, we had the lunar eclipse on March-25-2024 (15th night of Ramadhan), and a solar eclipse on April 8-2024 (28th night of Ramadhan). Thus proving that MGA and his silly team of writers twisted even fabricated sources with impunity. They even connected this specific report to the voice of Muhammad (saw)(which is a lie).

Continue reading “The Double eclipse in Ramadhan-2024 and how it disproves MGA” →

Intro
Recently, the famous Qadiani-Ahmadi Maulvi Razi got caught lying as he tried to explain how MGA falsely attributed hadith to Muhammad (saw). In 1908 and via Chashma-e-Ma‘rifat, MGA alleged that Muhammad (saw) allegedly said “that there was a prophet in India with black complexion and his name was Kahin, meaning Kanahya, who is also called Krishan…..”. However, this is a total lie, MGA quoted “Tarikh-i-Hamdani”, however, these words (Kaala Rasoolulah) are not written in the text (See Adnan Rashid explaining this to a Qadiani-Ahmadi Maulvi) and (“Taarikh-i-Hamdaan Dailami” Baab-ul-Kaaf. See Pocket book p: 854 by Malik Abdur Rehman Khadim 6th edition Published in 1952).(Hadis book “firdaus ul akbar”, dailmi hadis written in 407 hijri)(Taarikh-i-Hamdaan Dailami” Baab-ul-Kaaf.page: 854). There is another reference in terms of the Dark Prophet of India in Malfuzat (see herein). However, this isn’t the only instance, MGA was notorious for lying about hadith and falsely attributed hadith to Muhammad (saw), in fact, in 1894-1895, he did exactly that in terms of the eclipses. In 1893, MGA fabricated an entire hadith about the Mahdi.

When the sahaba narrate who do not narrate from the Israeliyyat and narrating that which they cannot say from their own opinions like what is to come in the future then all such narrations are marfoo to the Prophet Muhammad (sa), meaning the sahaba learned them from the Prophet (saw) Ibn Hajr al-Asqalani (rh) makes this clear.

In his powerful book “Fuyudh al-Haramain” Hadrat Shah Waliullah Muhadith Dehlvi (rh) mentions a powerful vision he had of the Prophet Muhammad (sa) He says that It was made to reach me from the Prophet Muhammad (sa) that the Hanafi Madhab is a really great madhab and has the most excellent methodology which is closest to the Sunnah as it was from the time of Imam Bukhari (rh) and those from his time.

Sheikh Abdul Haqq Muhadith Dehlvi also mentions this in his Muqaddima fi usool al-Hadith. 

Continue reading “MGA and disconnected/weak hadith reports” →

Intro
MGA called the paternal grandmothers of Eisa (As) as prostitutes, however, this is impossible, since Eisa (As) didn’t have a father. So why did MGA claim this? MGA argued that some of Eisa (as) maternal grandmothers were also simultaneously his paternal grandmothers (See “Mi‘yarul Madhahib” {The Criterion for Religions}[1895]RK-9, page 480).

Was MGA hinting that Joseph the Carpenter was the biological father of Eisa (As)(Mazala) and the relationship between Maryam and Joseph was haraam (illegitimate). Interestingly, Razi has been deducing information from MGA’s writings, for example, MGA lied and said that Muhammad (Saw) said this hadith (about the black prophet in India as the second coming of Krishna) and that hadith (eclipses), however, it’s a lie, Muhammad (Saw) never uttered these words. Razi deduced that MGA got an ilham which told him that Muhammad (Saw) said so, however, MGA never said this in his entire career. Razi also deduced from the writings of his 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa that Ahmadi’s aren’t allowed to cuss like MGA, however, 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa never made this argument, he was simply giving standards for conduct for those who do Wasiyat.

Continue reading “Why did MGA accuse Eisa (as) of having paternal grandmothers? He had no father!” →

Intro
Every single newspaper in British India reached Qadian and was analyzed by MGA’s team of writers and orators. Thus, on Feb-23, 24th and 25th of 1907, 3+ newspapers reported that Professor Lorenzo Matteucci (who was a scientist) of the Royal Observatory in Vesuvius, Italy was reporting that a Meteor would hit Earth on quite possibly cause the end of the world. Professor Lorenzo Matteucci said that the comet was discovered by Signet Marchetti. Matteucci also said that the tail of the comet was going to ignite with our atmosphere and Earth will be destroyed. Professor Lorenzo Matteucci prophesied that the Comet will land on Earth towards the end of March-1907, this was on Feb-22 and from Rome, Italy.

MGA and his team read these reports and began making a plan to fabricate a prophecy and ascribe it to MGA. They did this with the eclipses too.

Thus, on March 14th, 1907, Ahmadiyya editors alleged that on May 7th, 1907, MGA received a revelation from his God wherein told that in 25 days, a sign would appear (See Al Badr Issue of March 14 1907)(See the scans in the below). However, MGA didn’t specify as to what the sign was.

Haqiqatul Wahy was published about 2 weeks after the Comet burned up in our atmosphere (MGA mentions this sign on page 248). When the Comet landed…the Earth wasn’t even scratched and thus, the entire prediction by Professor Lorenzo Matteucci failed.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his false prophecy of the fiery comet!” →

Intro
Abubakar Zakaria is a victim of Ahmadiyya propaganda. He can’t read Urdu, Arabic or English very well and thus relies on his mullahs like Razi Ullah Noman and blindly accepts their lies. I recently engaged him on the eclipses and I explained the fact that this fabricated hadith doesn’t even go back to Muhammad (Saw), Abubakar Zakaria didn’t know this, and claims that since allegedly it was fulfilled, it goes back to Muhammad (Saw).

Nevertheless, he used an argument by his Mullah Razi Ullah Noman in terms of Jarud comments on 3:144 in a book by Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab. He totally ignores that Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab believed that Eisa (as) was alive when Allah raised him up (4:158), and that Eisa (as) would physically return, and indeed, he (Isa) will descend before the Day of Resurrection, as the authentic narrations have indicated (See Ahadith fi al-Fitan wal-Hawadith 213). He (Isa) will kill the false messiah and break the cross, and he (Isa) will kill the pig. He (Isa) will levy the jizyah – meaning: he (Isa) will not accept it from anyone of the people of religions, but he (Isa) will only accept Islam or the sword. Thus, this noble verse informed that at that time, all the People of the Book will believe in him.

____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

Abubakar Zakaria | All friends | Facebook

The Ahmadiyya fraud on Eclipses and the Mahdi – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab believed that Eisa (as) was alive when Allah raised him up (4:158), and that Eisa (as) would physically return – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Razi lies about Abdul Wahab and Jarud and their comments on Eisa (as) – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

You searched for 3:144 – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism

Intro
In Ahmadiyya literature, they have accepted 13 Mujadid’s. This was written by a Maulvi of Qadiani’s who was also the principal of the Ahmadiyya teacher training (Jamia) in Ghana (in the 1960’s) and by their head Maulvi Ata Ullah Kaleem. In 1907, MGA indirectly accused all of these Muslims of Shirk, since they all believe that Eisa (As) hasn’t died yet. Thus, MGA did Takfir of all Muslims who believed in the physical return of Eisa (as).

1st century Umar Bin Abdul Aziz
2nd century Imam Shafi’i; Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal
3rd century Abu Sharh & Abul Hasan al-Ash’ari
4th century Abu Ubaidullah of Neshapur & Qazi Abu Bakr Baqilani
5th century Imam Al-Ghazali
6th century Al-Sayyid Abdul Qadir Jeelani
7th century Imam Ibn Taimiyyah & Khwaja Mueen-ud Din Chishti
8th century Ibn Hajar Asqalani & Saleh Bin Umar
9th century Imam Suyuti
10th century Muhammad Tahir Gujrati
11th century Al-Sheikh Ahmad of Sirhand, Mujaddid Alf Thani
12th century Shah Wali Allah Muhaddath Dehlavi
13th century Syed Ahmad Barelvi

Continue reading “Do Qadiani’s accept the mujadids of Islam?” →