Intro
Ibn Abbas is the source of information for the substitution theory in Islam. However, Maulvi Razi and company accuse Ibn Abbas of relating tales from Israʼiliyyat (Christian and Jewish stories)(see at the 1:21:54 time stamp). Thus, Qadiani-Ahmadi’s discredit Ibn Abbas, but at the same time, they mis-represent him for the “mumeetuka” argument.
The substitution theory cannot be from a Jew or a Christian because they both claim Jesus was nailed and killed on the cross. Furthermore, the saheeh report of Ibn Abbaas Ra that Jesus PBUH was saved by Allaah when he took him up through an opening in the house, also cannot be a report from any kitaabi because they believe the Jews killed him. Not saved.
In 2000, in this thesis (See “Ibadi Tafsir with Special Reference to the Tafsirs of Hud al-Huwwarl and Sa”d ibn Ahmad al-Kindi” thesis by Sulaiman Ali Amer al-Shuaily, 2000), Ka’b Al-Ahbar was mentioned over 10 times, however, he never related any Israʼiliyyat about Eisa (as) and the cross and nothing about 4:158, 3:55 and all the common verses.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
Ibn Abbas is the main source for the substitution theory – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
What did Ka’b al-Ahbar relate about Eisa (as)? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism
1 Pingback