Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was a raging lunatic. He would issue his death threats randomly and while under British protection. In this specific case, we have caught MGA giving out some rules for his twisted ideas on Mubahila’s. Firstly, Mubahila is not a way for any Muslim to act with another Muslim. In the 1400 years after Muhammad (saw)…there were scarcely any Mubahila’s between Muslims and non-muslims. MGA seems to have opened this topic and deviated from Islam. Nonetheless, enjoy the quote.
The Ahmadi cleric, Rizwan, @Rizwan1770, Rizwan.Khan@Ahmadiyya.us, rizwan1770.blogspot.com
I engaged with him recently, he really has an arrogance problem. Nevertheless, as I tried to get some information out of him, I quickly realized that he was a competitor, he is trained in competitive speech, not honest speech. He asked me what religion I was and then tailored a response based on that. However, that is incorrect, I asked him about what MGA wrote on Mubahila, instead he quoted MGA’s grandson, Mirza Tahir Ahmad, who gave an incomplete answer in Canada in the 90’s. Rizwan wrote: “”””I don’t understand the reason why the fourth Khalifa is not a valid reference for you but the second Khalifa is a valid reference for you. The statement in the audio is the position of Jama’at Ahmadiyya. If you want to know the position of the Jama’at, that is it. If you are a Ghair Mubai’ Ahmadi then I would explain the position of the Promised Messiah (as). If you are a non-Ahmadi Muslim then I would explain the concept from the Qur’an and Ahadith. If you are an atheist then I would explain God’s attribute of accepting prayers.”””
But he doesn’t understand what original research is, since he has never done it.
Izala Auham, p. 637
“Let it be clear to the readers that Mr. Abdul Haqq had asked for a mubahila. But I cannot understand how a mubahila could be permissible regarding those matters of difference which do not make either party into a kafir or an unjust one. It is clear from the Holy Quran that in a mubahila each party must believe that the party opposite is a liar, i.e., is deliberately deviating
from the truth, and is not merely mistaken, so that each side is able to say: ‘May the curse of Allah be upon the liars!’ Now if Mr. Abdul Haqq considers me to be a liar due to his wrong
judgment, I do not call him a liar but believe him to be in error, and it is not allowable to curse a Muslim who is merely in error.”
MGA’s mubahila with Abdul Haqq begins.
The British government orders MGA to stop doing Mubahila’s.
Maulvi Sanaullah refuses to get into a Mubahila vs. MGA, since it is un-islamic.
MGA claims that Muhammad (Saw) had a Mubahila with Abu Jahl.
Mirza Tahir Ahmad’s open Mubahila to any Muslim who opposes Ahmadiyya. Bashir Ahmad Misri responds.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays
Mirza Tahir Ahmad’s open Mubahila to the world world, June 10th, 1988
MUBAHILA WITH MOLVI ABDUL HAQ GHAZNAVI AND ITS IMPACT ON MIRZA QADIYANI
Was there a Mubahila between Muhammad (Saw) and Abu Jahl? MGA says so
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam #mubahila #mubahilainahmadiyya