ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
Saleem Mir aka Mind Roaster Mir has remained anonymous for 7+ years (he seems to be some kind of undercover Qadiani-Ahmadi Maulvi, who has also taught Razi). About 10 days ago, he was on Razi’s live stream and having mini-debates with Adnan in real time (2:18:40 timestamp). In this stream he blurted out that if Adnan wouldn’t call MGA as “Mirza Sahib”, “then get lost”, in a real aggressive way. A few seconds later Saleem Mir blurted out “I will teach you with a big stick (Dunda), and with spices on it” (See the clip on tik tok). In Punjabi/Urdu this is super disrespectful, in fact, even Razi knows it was disrespectful and he immediately removed Saleem Mir. If you listen to the full stream, you can see how Saleem Mir aka Mind Roaster Mir behaves and how Razi allows it. Most of the Qadiani-Ahmadi who cuss at us our anonymous and very strategically by the Maulvi’s. Over the past few years, he has done open blasphemy on Muhammad (saw), the sahaba and Aisha (ra). In fact, in a weird rant, he was calling Hazrat Umar (ra), Ali (ra), Abu Bakr (ra) and Uthman (ra) as thieves (mazala). He even seems to say Muhammad (saw) did devilish things (astagfarullah)(see the combined tiktok herein and twitter).

This wasn’t the first instance of Ahmadi’s cussing at Adnan. Just 9 days ago, an Ahmadi called Adnan as “Rushdie”, he was also anonymous (the clip is also on tiktok). A few months ago, another anonymous Ahmadi named Karamat Bhatti called Adnan a bastard on one of Razi’s live stream and Razi responded that only MGA could cuss at his opponents. Yo yo Khan said that Adnan deserved to be cussed at. In fact, the Qadiani strategy is to attack Muhammad (Saw) if Muslims attack the character of MGA. This was also stated by the 2nd Khalifa who told Christians that if they the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) once in support of Hazrat Essa (Jesus) PBUH, I will attack Prophet Essa (PBUH) twenty times in support of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)”””, (See Tafseer e Kabeer vol,7, page 656).

Continue reading “Saleem Mir aka MindRoaster Mir threatened to rape Adnan with a thick/durable stick with spices on it” →

Intro
There doesn’t seem to be any Ahmadi’s in Bolivia in 2024. Nevertheless, they recently held a book fair. In 2019, the Ahmadiyya Movement in Canada sent Maulvi Ataul Ghalib who began working as the missionary and president of the Bolivia Jamaat of #Qadianis, of which there were none. A visiting missionary, Ataul Manan Sahib (a graduate of Jamia Ahmadiyya Canada) was also there in 2019.

Continue reading “The history of Ahmadiyya in #Bolivia” →

Intro
In a desperate attempt to defend MGA and his blatant disrespect for Muhammad (Saw)(MGA said that Muhammad [saw] was a “messy shitting” and “messy pissing” type of vessel)(See Bro Imtiaz presenting the ref herein, 59:47 time stamp), Saleem Mir and his student Maulvi Razi ullah Noman argued that “Hagnay and Mootnay” (“messy shitting” and “messy pissing”) are not disrespectful, Saleem Mir even used it about his own parents in defense of MGA (2:05:08 time stamp)(see the tik tok herein). Maulvi Razi Ullah then alleged that some Muslim scholar called going to the wash room as a form of “prayer”.

Continue reading “In defense of MGA, Saleem Mir says that even his mother and father went for “Hagnay and Mootnay”” →

Intro
Ahmadi’s cling to the blunders of many Muslims, they are also hellbent on putting words into their opponents mouth. One such blunder is that of Dr. Israr Ahmad. He alleged that MGA was a debater and had debated many Christians. This is totally inaccurate, MGA only had 5 official written debates in his life, and only one was with a Christian (Athim).

Further, Adnan Rashid discussed the blunders of Dr. Israr herein (3:21:06)(and 3:38:22)(and 3:39:50)(and 3:41:20). The clip is also on tik tok and twitter.

Continue reading “The blunders of Dr. Israr (in terms of Ahmadiyya) and others are forgiven in 2024” →

Intro
In 1923, via Seeratul Mahdi (and now in various editions), MGA’s widow (Nusrat Jehan) gave a story to her son (Mirza Bashir Ahmad) about MGA’s paternal cousin, Mirza Nizam ud Din and how he was sick with a fever (in what seems to be 1884-1885) and MGA (who was his neighbor) came and tied a dead chicken to his head and it cured his fever. Maulvi Razi with Ahmadi answers quotes other people in the same era as doing the same thing, and thinks it is equivalent, however, a prophet behaving as such is unexplainable.

“My mother Ummal Mumineen, narrated to me that once Mirza Nizam Ud Din Sahib (The cousin of MGA who was his opponent) had a very high fever which affected his brain as well. At that time there was no doctor around. The relatives of Mirza Nizam Ud Din informed Mirza Sahib. He immediately went there and did gave him proper treatment. The treatment was that he slaughtered a chicken and tied it on his head (Mirza Nizam Ud Din) after which his condition improved. At that time there was mutual opposition with the family of Nizamudin” (Seeratul Mahdi Page 35/316 Narration #51)

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad thought tying a chicken to someone’s head cured high fever” →

Intro
My super jealous/super envious double cousin is named Shazad Shah, he lives in Elk Grove with his parents and doesn’t have a job and has 5 kids. He has been trolling me and obsessed with me since 2015 when I quit Ahmadiyya. His parents are the guilty ones, his mother (Salma Shah) was never home and is known fraudster/scammer and was never home to cook him food or teach him how to read. His father (Abid Shah)(my maternal uncle) went to Jamia-Rabwah in the late 1970’s and famously flunked out. After failing as such, he married my first cousin (Salma Shah), in his attempt to get a job in America, thus, he moved out of Pakistan and arrived in the USA in the early 1980’s.

Shazad Irfan Shah can barely read English, was never a tough guy, however, he was told by his mother that he was everything. This is what caused him to be so arrogant and rude towards anyone who can read and write. He failed high school, his father tried to create a small business for him and that failed. Shazad Shah hates working and can barely get up and down physically (even as a teenager). His father forcibly married him to some woman from Rabwah and planned to support his only son financially, even though he was a total loser and should have never had any kids. Shazad’s sister (Naila Shah) is equally a loser, in 2024, she is unemployed, lives in a trailer park in Sacramento and is otherwise unemployed. She had also married an Ahmadi boy from Rabwah, but got caught with boyfriends in America. The boy divorced her and ran to Canada, he didn’t care, he got a free ticket to America. Naila Shah then had a haraam relationship with a loser Fijian Muslim boy, they had 2 kids together and separated. Naila’s parents pay all of her bills, just like Shazad.

Thus, it seems totally ridiculous for these people to hate me. My parents never helped me, nor have I ever required the help of humans in getting a job or passing a class. Nevertheless, they hate me because I have become a College professor and am doing great by the grace of Allah.

Shazad also hates Khurram, my sisters and my other brother Shahid, it seems that Shahid slapped him around extensively in the early 2000’s. It should also be noted that his parents approve of him and his trolling activities.

Continue reading “Shazad Shah is secretly on twitter as @JcatShahid10992” →

Intro
A few days ago, Qaiser Ahmed Raja released a video wherein he proved how Dr. Abdul Salam copied Sheldon Glashow‘s paper, then delivered an underwhelming speech at a symposium quoting a lecture series (of which there is no documentary evidence) to create a perception that he didn’t copy Weinberg and created a massive network of scientists who nominated him. The network is created by using the ICTP’s resources.

It is interesting that a list of Dr. Salam‘s scientific achievements is usually repeated, but almost no one discusses in detail the peer-reviewed research papers that earned him his Nobel Prize. It’s because they don’t have much to show for it except a transcribed paper and a typical speech! For the first time on Pakistani social media, we are presenting with evidence that his award was not a remarkable scientific achievement, but a mental scheme full of fraud!

In 2011, Norman Dombey wrote: Abdus Salam: “A Reappraisal. PART I. How to Win the Nobel Prize” which more or less seems to argue that Salam didn’t deserve his 1979 Nobel. Part of the argument seems to be that he stole the idea from Weinberg and didn’t even know the importance of what he had stolen, but my impression was that no one, not even Weinberg, thought very much of the unified electroweak theory at the time. A quick look at the paper in his collected papers that I take to be the 1968 one that justified the Nobel to him appears to discuss the crucial points: a gauge theory with Higgs mechanism.

Continue reading “New Data showing that Dr. Abdus Salam lied to get his Nobel Prize” →

Intro
In 1979, Sheldon Glashow won the Nobel Prize with Steven Weinberg and Dr. Abdus Salam. Sheldon Glashow knew that his work had been stolen, however, he remained quiet and accepted the award and even made a general statement (See “Towards a Unified Theory—Threads in a Tapestry”, www.nobelprize.org) which Ahmadi’s and other Desi liberals are misconstruing to use as an argument which proves that Sheldon Glashow vaguely accepted the idea that he did work with Dr. Abdus Salam on this. This is a ridiculous notion! Haven’t these people ever worked jobs and were forced into situations wherein they had to praise underqualified co-workers? Nevertheless, the fraud of Dr. Abdus Salam was exposed in 2011 via another colleague of Salam, Norman Dombey .

A few days ago, Qaiser Ahmed Raja released a video wherein he proved how Dr. Abdul Salam copied Sheldon Glashow‘s paper, then delivered an underwhelming speech at a symposium quoting a lecture series (of which there is no documentary evidence) to create a perception that he didn’t copy Weinberg and created a massive network of scientists who nominated him. The network is created by using the ICTP’s resources.

It is interesting that a list of Dr. Salam‘s scientific achievements is usually repeated, but almost no one discusses in detail the peer-reviewed research papers that earned him his Nobel Prize. It’s because they don’t have much to show for it except a transcribed paper and a typical speech! For the first time on Pakistani social media, we are presenting with evidence that his award was not a remarkable scientific achievement, but a mental scheme full of fraud!

Continue reading “In 2011, Sheldon Glashow told the world that Dr. Abdus Salam was a fraud and stole his work” →

Intro
In this work, Professor Norman Dombey explains how Dr. Abdus Salam fraudulently won the Nobel prize in 1979. What Norman Dombey doesn’t know is that Dr. Abdus Salam was doing this in an attempt to fulfill a sign of the truth of Ahmadiyya, in fact, Professor Hoodbhoy admits to this in his 2016 interview, i.e., that Dr. Abdus Salam wanted to help Ahmadis get in global positions of power.

Professor Norman Dombey knew Dr. Abdus Salam quite well from his time as Professor of Theoretical Physics at Imperial College, London, where he had spent the year 1963-64 before going to Sussex as a Lecturer. When he applied for the position, he asked Salam for a reference. ‘That’s fine’ he replied. ‘You write it and I’ll sign it. You know more about your work than I do’. That’s how I got my first job. Salam was not bound by established convention.

In 2011, Norman Dombey wrote: Abdus Salam: A Reappraisal. PART I. How to Win the Nobel Prize which more or less seems to argue that Salam didn’t deserve his 1979 Nobel. Part of the argument seems to be that he stole the idea from Weinberg and didn’t even know the importance of what he had stolen, but my impression was that no one, not even Weinberg, thought very much of the unified electroweak theory at the time. A quick look at the paper in his collected papers that I take to be the 1968 one that justified the Nobel to him appears to discuss the crucial points: a gauge theory with Higgs mechanism.

Continue reading “Abdus Salam: A Reappraisal PART 1, “How to Win the Nobel Prize” by Norman Dombey (2011)” →