Intro
In 1906-1907, via “Haqiqatul Wahi” (See page 48), MGA scoffed at Muslims for believing in the “substitution-theory“, via 4:157 (4:158 in the Kadiani Koran) and specifically the phrase “Shubbiha Lahum”. MGA alleged that Muslims believe that Eisa (as) used magic and “insane -superstitious-conjectures”. This is how MGA viewed the “substitution-theory“. In 2026, Maulvi Razi mentioned this reference. MGA said that instead of all of this, MGA alleged that Eisa (as) fell into a state of swoon, which lasted 2-3 days, thereafter, his wounds were healed with the “Marham-i-Esa” ointment.

In 1908 (Oct), via Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya V-5, MGA and his team of writers quoted 4:157 of the Quran (4:158 in the Kadiani Koran) 13 times, partially at times too. In one instance, MGA argued that “”according to the Jewish belief, a person who is killed on the cross becomes accursed and is not spiritually exalted towards God; rather, he goes down towards Satan. Now, God Almighty had to settle in the Holy Quran whether Hadrat ‘Isa was spiritually exalted towards God or not. Hence, God first removed this misconception of the Jews that Hadrat ‘Isa was killed on the cross, declaring that it was merely a conjecture which God had cast into their minds. ‘Isa was not killed through crucifixion so he cannot be considered accursed; rather, he was spiritually exalted as other believers are””” (BA-5, online English edition, page 70).

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1906-1907
https://files.alislam.cloud/pdf/Haqiqatul-Wahi.pdf

In 1906-1907, via “Haqiqatul Wahi” (See page 48), MGA scoffed at Muslims for believing in the “substitution-theory“, via 4:157 (4:158 in the Kadiani Koran) and specifically the phrase “Shubbiha Lahum”. MGA alleged that Muslims believe that Eisa (as) used magic and “insane -superstitious-conjectures”. This is how MGA viewed the “substitution-theory“. In 2026, Maulvi Razi mentioned this reference. MGA said that instead of all of this, MGA alleged that Eisa (as) fell into a state of swoon, which lasted 2-3 days, thereafter, his wounds were healed with the “Marham-i-Esa” ointment. 
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1908
Oct

Click to access Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya-Part-5.pdf


In 1908 (Oct), via Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya V-5, MGA and his team of writers quoted 4:157 of the Quran (4:158 in the Kadiani Koran) 13 times, partially at times too.

“Tafseer Maseeh e Maud”, V-3, page 397 BA-5, online English edition, page 70 See also, Al-Hakam of 17 Feb 1901, pages 7-8 “”For, according to the Jewish belief, a person who is killed on the cross becomes accursed and is not spiritually exalted towards God; rather, he goes down towards Satan. Now, God Almighty had to settle in the Holy Quran whether Hadrat ‘Isa was spiritually exalted towards God or not. Hence, God first removed this misconception of the Jews that Hadrat ‘Isa was killed on the cross, declaring that it was merely a conjecture which God had cast into their minds. ‘Isa was not killed through crucifixion so he cannot be considered accursed; rather, he was spiritually exalted as other believers are””” (BA-5, online English edition, page 70).

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his team of writers/readers/editors/researchers/imams – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his team of writers/readers/editors/researchers/imams

Click to access Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya-Part-5.pdf

QTafsir | The Evil Accusation the Jews U—

http://m.qtafsir.com/Surah-An-Nisa/The-Evil-Accusation-the-Jews-U—

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #mirzaghulamahmad