Intro
In 1895, MGA argued that the truth appears to be—and this can be gathered from a
study of the writings that are complementary to the Gospels—that all this was a device of Paul who had recourse to deep cunning like political adventurers. The son of Mary, who is mentioned in the Holy Qur’an, was bound by the eternal guidance that had been prescribed
for mankind from the beginning. Whatever doubts and suspicions the Gospels may raise concerning his Prophethood, the testimony of the Holy Qur’an is enough to establish its truth. Peace be on him who follows the true guidance [Nur-ul-Qur’an, part 1, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 9, pp. 370-372](Via Essence of Islam V-3, page 243)(See Nur-ul-Qur’an, part 1, online English edition, pages 36 and 92).
In 1902, according to MGA, it was Paul the Apostle who introduced the false belief of the Trinity into Christianity (See RK, V-19, p. 65)(See also, “Kishti-e-Nuh, online English edition, page 105), while Eisa (as) was allegedly in Kashmir. Ironically, Ahmadi’s believe that Jesus (as) died after Paul the Apostle had already led Christianity astray. However, this contradicts Eisa (as) via 5:116 (5:117 in the Kadiani Koran). Moreover, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad himself says that: “Prophet Isa (as) will say that his people went astray after his death” (See RK V-8p. 297).
In 1902 (Feb), MGA and his team of writers alleged that Paul and his writings and discourses are the basis on which the divinity of Christ hinges. This is why what we have at present
is not the Christian faith, but rather a Pauline invention (See Al-Hakam, vol. 6, no. 6, dated 14 February 1902, pp. 3-5 and Al-Hakam, vol. 6, no. 7, dated 21 February 1902, pp. 3-5, via Malfuzat-4, online English edition, pages 202-212).
In 1906 (Mar-9), MGA and his team of writers argued that ‘Christianity’ is, in fact, the religion of Paul and not that of Christ, for the latter never taught the doctrine of the Trinity. As long as he lived, he only taught the Oneness of God and His being without partner. After he died, his brother James—who was his successor and a holy man— also taught the Oneness of God. But Paul unjustly opposed him and started preaching contrary to his true teachings and went to the extent of creating a new faith. He set his followers against the Torah and taught them that there was no need for the Law after the Messiah’s Atonement, and Christians did not need to follow the Torah because the Messiah’s blood was enough to wipe away their sins (See “Fountain of Christianity”, Chashma-e-Masihi, online English edition, page 52-55). MGA also argued that Paul is responsible for all the ills that are found in this religion and Paul made him God. MGA also argued that Paul, on the other hand, turned people against the Holy Temple. God’s vengeance
ultimately overtook him and he was crucified by the king, and thus he met his end. But Jesusas was saved from crucifixion because he was true in his claim and he was from God. Paul, on the other hand, was hung from the stake for he had forsaken the truth. MGA also argued that It is also worth noting that as long as Jesusas lived, Paul was his sworn enemy, and, according to Jewish chronicles, he only turned to Christianity after Jesus’ death because he had some selfish desires which the Jews did not fulfil. Therefore, in order to avenge himself, he became
a Christian and pretended that Jesusas had appeared to him in a vision. He first sowed this unholy plant in Damascus, and this is the place where ‘Pauline Trinity’ was born. MGA also argued that Paul gave a teaching that was against the Torah and declared eating the flesh of swine to be lawful, and even abolished the Divine commandment regarding circumcision, although it had been greatly stressed in the Torah and all Prophets—including the Messiah himself—had been circumcised.
In 1906-1907, MGA and his team of writers argued that it is evident from the Bible that St Peter, St Paul and even Jesus Christ himself swore under oath and thus, Athim should have signed an oath (See “Haqiqatul Wahi”, online English edition, pages 269 and 711).
In 1908 (Oct), via “Jesus in India” (See page 40), MGA and his team of writers argued that Jesus appeared to Paul in a vision/dream.
In 1908 (Oct), via Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya V-5 (See page 77), MGA and his team argued that The commandments to eat pork and belief in three gods are nowhere to be found in his teachings in the Gospels. Rather, this is the same idolatrous teaching that was opposed by the Prophets. The Torah contained only two major and eternal commands. First, not to deify a man. Second, not to eat [the flesh of ] swine. Both commandments were violated by the teachings of St. Paul. اِنَّا لِِّٰ وَِانَّا اِلَیْہِ رَاجِعُوْن [Surely, to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return].
In 1922, MGA and his team of writers argued that it is evident from the Bible that St Peter, St Paul and even Jesus Christ himself swore under oath and thus, Athim should have signed an oath (See “Tajalliyat-e-Ilahiyyah”, Divine Manifestations, online English edition, page 19).
In 2011, while on Rah-e-Huda, Ibrahim Noonan authenticated the Gospel of Thomas and the account of Thomas being in India while Jesus (as) was alive and meeting Jesus (as), in roughly 40 C.E., Noonan then argues that St. Thomas travelled to North Pakistan (Taxila)(See the clip on Tiktok and Twitter). Noonan mentioned additional sources too, like from Fida Husnain (a known liar). Noonan even said that Jesus (as) met Paul on the road to Damascus (or in Damascus) just shortly after the event of crucifixion (3:06 time stamp)(See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). Noonan alleged that Paul went in search of early Christians in Damascus too, just shortly after the event of crucifixion.
In 2026 (Jul), Ansar Raza streamed on his own channel and quoted 5:116 (5:117 in the Kadiani Koran) and the recent debate between Sheikh Asrar Rashid vs. Maulvi Razi and alleged that Paul didn’t lead Christians astray. Ansar Raza argued that Paul didn’t create Christianity (13:19 time stamp), Ansar Raza argued that Paul started preaching to other than “Bani Israel”. Ansar Raza alleges that the brother of Eisa (as)(James aka Yaqub) confronted Paul about preaching to other than “Bani Israel”. Ansar Raza alleges that Paul didn’t lead “Bani Israel” astray, instead, Paul led “non-Bani-Israel” people astray. Ansar Raza alleges that Paul only told them one thing, i.e., that Jesus (as) died on the cross for the sins of humans on Earth. Ansar Raza also blamed the council of Nicea for leading Christians astray, however, this is all in contradiction to what MGA argued (See RK, V-19, p. 65)(See also, “Kishti-e-Nuh, online English edition, page 105), that it was Paul the Apostle who introduced the false belief of the Trinity into Christianity. At 16:28, Ansar Raza concluded that the majority of the beliefs of Christianity were not invented by Paul.
In 2026 (Jul), Ibrahim Noonan commented and alleged that Paul introduced polytheism into Christianity, Noonan then admitted that while Eisa (as) was alive, Paul was spreading his brand of Christianity. Noonan kept saying it was a different Christianity, however, we don’t differ on that point. Noonan alleged that the message of Eisa (as) was already corrupted while Eisa (as) was still alive. Noonan alleged that Paul elevated Jesus’ (as) status, however, Noonan would not say to God. A few seconds later, Noonan admitted to it and said that Paul elevated Jesus to a “divine-essence” (an object of worship). In the 2nd video, Ibrahim Noonan and Knowledge is power allege that St. Thomas travelled to India during the life of Eisa (as) and began spreading false Christianity therein. Noonan even alleged that St. Thomas met Jesus (as) in India. Noonan then alleged that St. Thomas was the brother of Jesus (as) was a Jew. Noonan wouldn’t accept that St. Thomas was a Christian, in fact, Noonan alleged that Eisa (as) was also a Jew. Noonan then calls St. Thomas a Jewish follower of Jesus (as). Noonan alleges that Peter, James and Thomas all rejected the teachings of Paul. Noonan alleges that he accidentally said that Thomas rejected Paul’s message. At this point, Noonan had accepted that Christians were in India and Eisa (as) was alive in Kashmir, India and this contradicts 5:116 of the Quran (5:117 in the Kadiani Koran). @Docf61 points out how Ahmadi’s believe that St. Thomas was already spreading the false teachings of Paul. @Docf61 points out how per Noonan, St. Thomas knew about the religion of Paul and rejected it, thus, he met Paul. At the end, Noonan says that maybe all the apostles didn’t reject Paul. @Docf61 points out how Noonan knows that the apostles met Paul and got caught since he couldn’t lie about it. Ahmadi’s even use the ‘Acts of Thomas” as they try to prove that Thomas came to India.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
Noah’s Ark – An Invitation to Faith
Click to access Noahs-Ark-Kashti-Nuh.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_the_Apostle
The Ahmadiyya Movement and 5:116 of the Quran (5:117 in the Qadiani Quran) – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
The Ahmadiyya Movement and 5:116 of the Quran (5:117 in the Qadiani Quran)
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8tywHE1/
https://x.com/ahmadiyyafacts/status/2080341133696344385?s=46&t=HTqZKquoOvKbgoBAF2aQcg
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #mirzaghulamahmad
3 Pingback