We have found Ahmadiyya leadership editing out a certain reference in terms of Takfir in the 2009 online english edition of Tadhkirah. In, fact there were many changes, however, no reasoning is ever given. Ahmadiyya leadership just edits things out as they deem fit. They don’t tell us as to who ordered the removal or why. This is the level of deceit that Ahmadi’s have operated with over the past 100+ years.

You can also listen to Zia Rasul from the Aaqa Ka Ghulam youtube channel explaining this issue in Urdu herein, at the 21:04 mark).

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ In the old version of Tadhkirah (2004 edition) there was an ilham on page 346:

“””God almighty has conveyed it to me that every person to whom my call is conveyed and who does not accept me is not a Muslim and is accountable to God for his defult (Letter addressed to Dr. Abdul Hakeem)(April 1906).”””
In 2006, the Ahmadiyya movement made a PDF version of Tadhkirah, dated as 2006

This is important to note. Just 2 years after mass publishing this new english translation of Tadhkirah, they edited out MGA’s comments of Takfir and wherein MGA calls his cousins widow as a prostitute.
Download the Full 2004 english edition of Tadhkirah here:

Tadhkirah 20046 PDF version
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ In the new version of the Tadhkirah (2009)

This revelation does not exist!!! It seems that Mirza Masroor Ahmad ordered that some controversial revelations be totally deleted.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Who collected Tadhkirah??

“”””The first edition (of Tadhkirah) was compiled by a committee, headed by Mirza Bashir Ahmad, appointed by Khalifatul Masih II and was published in 1935 (see the preface of the current edition).””””

The Ahmadiyya editing team is notorious in their attempts to clean out the controversial writings of MGA. This is how Ahmadis begin to delete data. However, this data is still available on the Ahmadi website under “Essense of Islam” Vol. 4 (see page 87). And it is mentioned in the writings of Mahmud Ahmad. Interestingly enough, this quote was also quoted in 1935, in the Al-Fazl. Thus, this quote was approved by the sons of MGA for over 70 years.


The timeline on Takfir
MGA is called a Kafir by many Muslims of India as he claims to receive divine revelations (Kalim) and as he denies the miracles of Esa (as).
______________________________________________________________________________________________The end of 1890

MGA is openly called a Kafir by the majority of Ulema in India. This is based on MGA claiming to be the Messiah.

MGA declares any Muslim a Kafir who believes in the continuation of prophethood or abrogation.

MGA claims that a Muslim only become a Kafir by rejecting law-bearing prophets, not non-law bearing prophets (see the famous Tiryaq ul Qulub quote).
[RK, v. 17, p. 64; marginal note; Appendix of Tohfa-e-Goldrawiyah](via Nuzhat Haneef).

“””Those who do takfeer [deny Mirza Ghulam Ahmad or call/consider him a kaafir] and those who adopt the path of takzeeb [calling/considering Mirza Ghulam Ahmad a liar] are a perished nation; therefore, they are not worthy [of the status] that any person from my Jama`at perform namaaz behind them [i.e., with one of them leading the namaaz]. Can a living [person] perform namaaz behind a dead [person]? Hence do remember that, as God has informed me, it is forbidden to you and entirely forbidden, that you perform namaaz behind any ‘mukaffar’ [one who calls/considers Mirza Ghulam Ahmad a kaafir] and ‘mukazzab’ [one who calls/considers Mirza Ghulam Ahmad a liar] or ‘mutaraddad’ [one who is hesitant/wavering in accepting Mirza Ghulam Ahmad].”””

MGA writes in a letter to Dr. Khan how any Muslim who rejects him is a Kafir. MGA is also covering a verse of the Quran which states that belief in all prophets isn’t quite necessary for salvation, i.e., Christians/Jews and others can still go to heaven if they do good works.

MGA and his team wrote Haqiqatul Wahy, they wrote some contradicting and confusing things on Takfir.

Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad (MGA’s son) writes a controversial article that the Khalifa holds on to and edits, wherein it is stated that all Muslims who reject MGA are Kafirs. Khwaja Kamaluddin immediately issues a response and claims that the son of MGA is mistaken. Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad quoted MGA’s famous letter of 1906 to Dr. Khan.

The topic of the status of Muslims who deny MGA is suppressed. Noorudin even says that the son of MGA hasn’t understood the topic properly.

The Lahori-Ahmadi refuse to call Muslims as Kafirs, however, the Qadiani-Ahmadi are eager to do so.


The Khalifa’s brother, Mirza Bashir Ahmad does open Takfir on Lahori-Ahmadi’s and all other Muslims.


The Ahmadiyya Khalifa does open Takfir.


Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, the Ahmadi Khalifa ordered Ahmadis to stop doing open Takfir on Muslims.  


MGA’s famous letter to Dr. Khan wherein MGA does open Takfir is quoted in Al-Fazl, see Essence of Islam.

In court, the Ahmadiyya Khalifa, Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad claims that when he did Takfir against Lahori-Ahmadi’s and Muslims, he didn’t really mean it.

Mirza Nasir Ahmad claims that when his grandfather and father used the word Kafir for Muslims they didn’t mean outside of Islam. This was at the 1974 NA, Mirza Nasir Ahmad was cornered, and lied about his father and grandfathers words.


The PDF version of the english tadhkirah is edited to remove the revelation of MGA in terms of Takfir.

The 2009 english version of Tadhkirah is published with massive edits. The revelation of Takfir is edited out.

The arabic only version of Tadhkirah is published. The sentence of Takfir is purposely mis-translated per the order of Mirza Masroor Ahmad.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays

Al-Fazl, September 1917, proves Ahmadiyya Takfir towards all Sunni’s/Shia’s

Ahmadis editing their books on Piggot

Al-Fazl, September 1917, proves Ahmadiyya Takfir towards all Sunni’s/Shia’s

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad says that any Muslim who believes in abrogation, is a Kafir

Muhammad Ali, the eventual Lahori-Ahmadi was always against Takfir, whereas the family of MGA was not (1914)

A fake Ahmadiyya response to our essays which expose Ahmadiyya Takfir from

Mirza Nasir Ahmad discussed his father’s and uncle’s statements on Takfir in 1974 at the National Assembly hearings

Ali Rizvi mentions the lies of Qasim Rashid in his book, in terms of Takfir from Ahmadis to Muslims

Kashif Chaudhry is at it again, he continues to accuse Muslims in America of Takfir and calls them terrorists

Ahmadiyya-Takfir and their cover-up job

“Haqiqat Un Nubuwwat” (1915) by Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, some quotes and data

Mirza Nasir Ahmad discussed his father’s and uncle’s statements on Takfir in 1974 at the National Assembly hearings


#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian