In the January 1927 edition of the ROR, the Ahmadiyya Movement published (and endorsed) an essay by a doctor named M.S. Nawaz, M.B., B.S., (from India), its unclear if this man was an ahmadi or not. The title of the essay is “Parthenogenesis (virgin birth)”. In this essay, it is plainly stated that since animals can reproduce without male sperm, this explains the virgin birth of Eisa (as) (astagfarullah). The Ahmadiyya Movement was thus denying verses of the quran (21:91 and 66:12)(in the qadiani quran it would be 22:92 and 66:13). It was this data which led Mirza Tahir Ahmad to claim that Maryam was a hermaphrodite (astagfarullah). The same arguments were made in the first edition of the Moslem Sunrise (July-1921) by Muftree Muhammad Sadiq. Thus proving that as early as 1921, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s had came up with this ideology. Later on, in the ROR of Jan-1935, they published an article by a european which seems to cast doubt on the concept of the virgin birth. In the Aug-1935 edition of the ROR, there is an article on “Pregnant Virgins”, wherein it is argued Parthenogenesis can happen and has happened in human history. The Sep-Oct-1934 edition of the ROR says that a person must believe that Eisa (As) was born without a father to be a true muslim aka Ahmadi. Even the ROR of Nov-1936 calls the mother of Eisa (as) a hermaphrodite.
Links and Related Essay’s
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism