Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Thorough research work on the Ahmadiyya Movement, #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome

Month

September 2023

Ahmadi’s always praise India and the Modi Government

Intro
Qadiani-Ahmadi’s always praise Modi and the Indian Government, even after one of their Maulvi’s was slapped around at a book fair. Nevertheless, check out this video and we have archived it on tik tok. One of the Qadiani’s is Dr. Tariq, who is living in Australia and the other is Imtiaz Ahmad Naveed. Both of these Qadiani’s can be seen saying that since Modi is the dictator in India, then everything will work out (Modi hai, to mumkin hai). However, the reality is, Muslims are getting persecuted indiscriminately. Nicholas Evan’s also pointed out how the Hindu RSS come to Qadian and have a great relationship with the Qadiani-Ahmadi‘s. Check out this tik tok, you can see the Qadiani-Ahmadi Ameer of Israel (Sharif Odeh) meeting Modi and thanking him for helping the Ahmadiyya Community in India immensely.

This video is from the Vishwa Sadbhawana event organised at Bunjil Palace, Melbourne in Australia on Sunday, several Pakistani Muslims lauded Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s leadership. They highlighted the PM’s efforts to bring all religions on a common platform for peace in the world. One of the Pakistani Muslims said that PM Modi is working very hard. The event was attended by religious leaders, intellectuals, scholars, preachers and researchers. The Sadbhavana event was organised by Indian Minorities Foundation (IMF), NID Foundation, New Delhi and Namdhari Sikh Society, Melbourne in Australia.

Continue reading “Ahmadi’s always praise India and the Modi Government”

Khalid Safir vs. Maulvi Adubofour

Intro
Khalid Safir and most Ahmadi’s believe that Maryam was a hermaphrodite. However, African-Ahmadi’s aren’t told all of this. Case in point, see the testimony of Maulvi Adubofour, he was so confused when I asked about the Qadiani belief that Maryam was a hermaphrodite that he immediately denied it, and his buddy, Suleiman Omipidan couldn’t find it on the online page. Nevertheless, as I showed it to them, they denied that Mirza Tahir Ahmad was asserting that Maryam was a hermaphrodite, this is because Maulvi Adubofour (aka Adubofour Ishmael)is a paid employee and he can never oppose this own mullahs.

A few days later, I asked Khalid Safir and he confirmed that the Qadiani-Ahmadi position is that Maryam was a hermaphrodite.

Continue reading “Khalid Safir vs. Maulvi Adubofour”

Even Muhammad’s (saw) skin color was described sometimes as reddish and sometimes as brown-ish

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad didn’t know that even Muhammad’s (saw) skin color was described sometimes as reddish and sometimes as brown-ish-white-ish. Or, he knew and purposely lied to the masses that Eisa (as) son of Maryam is 2 people because his skin color was described as reddish by some reports and brown-ish in other reports.

The Arabs don’t say a man is white [or: ‘white man,’ rajul abya∙] due to a white complexion. Rather, whiteness [al-abyad] with them means an external appearance that is free from blemish [al-zahir al-naqi min al-uyub]; when they mean a white complexion they say ‘red’ (ahmar)… when the Arabs say, ‘so-and-so is white (abyad – bayda), they [only] mean a noble character (al-karam fi l-akhlaq), not skin color. It is when they say ‘so-and-so is red’ (ahmar- hamra) that they mean white skin. And the Arabs attribute white skin to the slaves.” (See Lisan al-Arab, the well-known Arabic dictionary by Ibn Manzur).

MGA’s skin color was also described differently, in Zikr-e-Habib, Muftree Muhammad Sadiq alleged that the complexion of MGA was wheatish and reddish fair. When he would laugh, his face would turn red. His hair was straight, soft and shiny, hanging down to his ears. His beard was slightly longer than the length of a fist, and he would have any longer hair than this trimmed down (Translated by Al Hakam from the original Urdu in Zikr-e-Habib, pp. 25-29).

Continue reading “Even Muhammad’s (saw) skin color was described sometimes as reddish and sometimes as brown-ish”

Zahid Aziz, the Lahori-Ahmadi EXPOSED!!!

Intro
Zahid Aziz is a Lahori-Ahmadi and a high ranking executive/scholar for the global Lahori-Ahmadi community. He is legally the chairman of the board for the AHMADIYYA ANJUMAN ISHAAT ISLAM LAHORE (UK), located at 15 Stanley Avenue, Wembley, HA0 4JQ. This seems to be the center of Lahori-Ahmadi activity in the UK.

He has managed the Lahori-Ahmadi blog (which is dying in 2024) and has written many translations of Lahori-Ahmadi literature. In 2003-2004, he had a famous debate with Tahir Ijaz.

In 2024, Zahid Aziz published a video wherein he refuted Qadiani beliefs.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

The Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement Blog

Dr. Tahir Ijaz vs. Dr. Zahid Aziz, the famous debate from 2003-2004, Lahori-Ahmadi vs. Qadiani-Ahmadi – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Dr. Tahir Ijaz, A Qadiani-Ahmadi, EXPOSED!!!! – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

An 80+ year old Zahid Aziz returns with Lahori-Ahmadi non-sense-2024 – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism

Who is Dr. Tahir Ijaz?

Intro
Dr. Tahir Ijaz is a Qadiani-Ahmadi and comes from a Lahori-Ahmadi family. He showed up in 2003-2005 via an online debate with Zahid Aziz (email exchanges). He works as a medical doctor in the San Diego area. In 1999, he wrote an essay about Jesus in India in a Qadiani newspaper. 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

Dr. Tahir Ijaz vs. Dr. Zahid Aziz, the famous debate from 2003-2004, Lahori-Ahmadi vs. Qadiani-Ahmadi – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

The Muslim Sunrise (alislam.org)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad used the arguments of Christian missionaries vs. Islam

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad ended up using lots of arguments from the Christian Missionaries vs. Islam. This is ironic since MGA called the Christian missionaries as Dajjal, then backtracked that he only cursed at them and did this to protect them. Nevertheless, in 1835, Pfander said that Eisa (as) was dead and called his physical return a contradiction. It was also the Christian missionaries who made the argument that since Muhammad (Saw) is dead in Islam, his status is lower than Eisa (as)(astagfarullah).

Tuhfa Golarwiya, Ruhani Khaza’in, Volume 17, Page 205

I have written again and again that this great distinction that is given to Jesus, of going up to heaven alive, staying alive for so long, and then returning, is an insult to our Holy Prophet Muhammad from every aspect and it makes Jesus have such a close connection with God as has no limits. For example, the Holy Prophet Muhammad did not reach even the age of a hundred years but Jesus is alive even after almost two thousand years. And God chose such an ignominious place to hide the Holy Prophet that is awfully stinking and dark and cramped and the place of excreta of insects but He took Jesus to heaven which is the location of paradise and the vicinity of the residence of angels. Now tell us: to whom did God show more love, to whom did He accord more respect, to who did He grant a place near to Himself, and to whom did He give the distinction of returning back?” 

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad used the arguments of Christian missionaries vs. Islam”

Did Mirza Ghulam Ahmad steal the arguments of Ibn Saba?

Intro
It seems that a Muslim named Abd Allah ibn Saba’ went around and argued why do Muslims believe in the physical second coming of Eisa (As), while Muhammad (Saw) is dead? He seems to have been a shia (aka ghulāt) and was arguing that Muhammad (saw) would have a second coming and etc. MGA used this line of argumentation in many of his books, we have presented one quote in the below. 


_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tuhfa Golarwiya, Ruhani Khaza’in, Volume 17, Page 205

I have written again and again that this great distinction that is given to Jesus, of going up to heaven alive, staying alive for so long, and then returning, is an insult to our Holy Prophet Muhammad from every aspect and it makes Jesus have such a close connection with God as has no limits. For example, the Holy Prophet Muhammad did not reach even the age of a hundred years but Jesus is alive even after almost two thousand years. And God chose such an ignominious place to hide the Holy Prophet that is awfully stinking and dark and cramped and the place of excreta of insects but He took Jesus to heaven which is the location of paradise and the vicinity of the residence of angels. Now tell us: to whom did God show more love, to whom did He accord more respect, to who did He grant a place near to Himself, and to whom did He give the distinction of returning back?” 
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

Abd Allah ibn Saba’ – Wikipedia

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism

Who is Maulvi Ata Ullah Kaleem?

Intro
He was a Maulvi of the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s, he shows up as a Maulvi working in Ghana in the 1960’s, apparently, he was made the principal of Jamiatul Mubashireen, Or Ahmadiyya Muslim Missionary Training College (AMMTC) Ghana started on 21 March 1966 under the auspices of Maulana Ata-Ullah Kaleem, the then Ameer and Missionary-In-Charge, Ghana. Maulvi Muhammad Saddique Gurdaspuri was appointed as the first Principal with Alhaj Hafiz Jibreel Saeed as the Housemaster.

He wrote many articles in many Qadiani newspapers, they can be found herein.

In 1977, he was transferred to the USA and made the missionary-in-charge for the USA (see the Muslim Sunrise of Nov-1977). He left the USA in Nov-1983 and Sheikh Mubarak Ahmad became the Missionary-in-Charge (See the Moslem Sunrise of April-1984). This photo is at Georgetown, at the Holiday Inn on 11-26-1983, Dr. Khalil Ahmad Nasir can be seen too.

In 2026, the grandson of Maulana Ataul Kaleem showed up on an episode of “This Week with Hujoor” (Jan-2-2026).

Continue reading “Who is Maulvi Ata Ullah Kaleem?”

Do Qadiani’s accept the mujadids of Islam?

Intro
In Ahmadiyya literature, they have accepted 13 Mujadid’s. This was written by a Maulvi of Qadiani’s who was also the principal of the Ahmadiyya teacher training (Jamia) in Ghana (in the 1960’s) and by their head Maulvi Ata Ullah Kaleem. In 1907, MGA indirectly accused all of these Muslims of Shirk, since they all believe that Eisa (As) hasn’t died yet. Thus, MGA did Takfir of all Muslims who believed in the physical return of Eisa (as).

1st century Umar Bin Abdul Aziz
2nd century Imam Shafi’i; Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal
3rd century Abu Sharh & Abul Hasan al-Ash’ari
4th century Abu Ubaidullah of Neshapur & Qazi Abu Bakr Baqilani
5th century Imam Al-Ghazali
6th century Al-Sayyid Abdul Qadir Jeelani
7th century Imam Ibn Taimiyyah & Khwaja Mueen-ud Din Chishti
8th century Ibn Hajar Asqalani & Saleh Bin Umar
9th century Imam Suyuti
10th century Muhammad Tahir Gujrati
11th century Al-Sheikh Ahmad of Sirhand, Mujaddid Alf Thani
12th century Shah Wali Allah Muhaddath Dehlavi
13th century Syed Ahmad Barelvi

Continue reading “Do Qadiani’s accept the mujadids of Islam?”

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑