ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
We have tracked the failed prophecy of Muhammadi Begum in-depth. We have noticed that the announcements are from after MGA died (see “Majmu‘ah Ishtiharat” and “Tabligh e Risalat”, they weren’t published in any local journals (nor is there any evidence of this). Thus, we don’t have the originals and can’t verify that these are authentic. In this re-work, the Qadiani missionaries invented the term suspended destiny (Mu’aliq taqdeer) in terms of the second part of the Muhammadi Begum prophecy. This phrase suspended destiny (Mu’aliq taqdeer) was never uttered by MGA about the Muhammadi Begum prophecy, in fact, MGA called it the opposite, (Taqdeer e Mubram, see Anjam e Athim,Vol. 11, p. 223). Hani Tahir investigated cases of Ahmadiyya “back-dating” references and announcements herein, this is in terms of earthquakes and other prophecies.

We have posted the majority of them that we could find in the below.

Continue reading “All the announcements from the failed prophecy of Muhammadi Begum are later fabrications” →

Intro
The first image is of an interview from ROR of Dr. Abdus Salam’s Son Ahmad Salam which ROR quotes him as being the founder of the Islamic bank of Britain The bottom image is of KM5 speaking to German waqfe Nau boys one of the boys said he was interested in doing PhD in Islamic banking and would like KM5 to advise him on what to research and the image is KM5’s response to that question https://ibb.co/5rrvJKC

Sources https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.reviewofreligions.org/21878/special-interview-with-ahmad-salam-founding-director-of-islamic-bank-of-britain-capitalism-global-crisis-and-the-moral-reckoning-are-we-ready-to-take-the-pain/amp/

Video of KM5 implying it’s non existent: https://streamable.com/aykw0y

Continue reading “KM5 explains how Islamic banking is non existent and hence refutes the role of Abdus Salam’s son” →

Intro
The Qadiani-Ahmadi’s (Razi only) bring a quote from Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhaab’s book “The abbreviated biography of the messenger ﷺ” (see page 361, english edition) from the chapters that detail the events after the death of prophet Muhammad ﷺ and during rule of Abu Bakr Ra. However, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab believed that Eisa (as) was alive when Allah raised him up (4:158), and that Eisa (as) would physically return (See the scans in the below).

The book contains a report attributed to the Bahraini sahabi (Jarud b. Mu’alla) as allegedly saying that Eisa (as) passed away, but there is no reference for the statement, no chain or authenticity provided. And it is not a hadeeth of the prophet Muhammad ﷺ. This is simply Jarud b. Mu’alla (A recent convert from Christianity) saying that Eisa (as) passed like all the other prophets, 3:144 is also quoted. Jarud b. Mu’alla said this to the people of Hajar, who had apostatized from Islam. This had nothing to do with the physical return of Eisa (as).

Continue reading “Razi lies about Abdul Wahab and Jarud and their comments on Eisa (as)” →

Intro
Recently, the Qadiani-Ahmadi Maulvi’s lied on a live stream by the True Islam UK youtube channel. They claimed that MGA was praised before his claim of prophethood. However, this is not true, MGA technically claimed prophethood in 1901. 10 years earlier, he was called a Kafir and totally discredited by the ulema of India. In fact, Nawab Siddiq Hassan Khan tore up the Barahin in roughly 1884 and sent it back to Qadian like that. Since he had invested in it and disliked the product. 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

The Fatwa-e-Kufr vs. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad-1891 – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

The Queen of the Princely state of Bhopal invested heavily (1878) into Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his Braheen–they were disappointed by the product

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism

Intro
The 2018 edition of the official 5 volume commentary of the Quran was published. This was first published in 1988, and the second edition came out in 2018. The author is Malik Ghulam Farid (who died in 1977). In this, Malik Ghulam Farid asserts that MGA is mentioned in 36:20 (36:21 in the Qadiani Quran).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Other Quranic verses that MGA claimed for himself in 1884

——-21:107
——-10:16
——17:8
——18:83
——108:1
——-48:29
——-61:09
——-9:32

Verses that Ahmadi’s allege mention MGA:

—–36:20
—–91:2
—–81:2

____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

Who is Malik Ghulam Farid? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism

Intro
The 2018 edition of the official 5 volume commentary of the Quran was published. This was first published in 1988, and the second edition came out in 2018. The author is Malik Ghulam Farid (who died in 1977). In this, Malik Ghulam Farid asserts that MGA is mentioned in 91:2 (91:3 in the Qadiani Quran). Interestingly, MGA mentioned this verse in “Taudih-e-Maram” or “Elucidation of Objectives” (1891) and didn’t ascribe it to himself.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Other Quranic verses that MGA claimed for himself in 1884

——-21:107
——-10:16
——17:8
——18:83
——108:1
——-48:29
——-61:09
——-9:32

Verses that Ahmadi’s allege mention MGA:

—–36:20
—–91:2
—–81:2
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

Glaring errors in the translation of “Taudih-e-Maram” or “Elucidation of Objectives” (1890) – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Who is Malik Ghulam Farid? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism

Intro
“Risalah Dawat E Qoum” (Invitation to the nation) seems to be a small booklet (27 pages)(Urdu) that was written by MGA and his team and seems to have been inserted into “Anjam-e-Athim” in 1984 as part of the Ruhani Khuzain editing project by Mirza Tahir Ahmad in 1984 and from the UK.

The quotes are in the below. MGA talks about Dajjal, MGA invented the 23-year theory for Prophets, and his opinion on 69:44 herein. Mr. ‘Abd-ul-Haq of Ghazni is discussed too. AS well as the Abdullah Athim prophecy. 

Continue reading “What is “Risalah Dawat E Qoum” a short booklet by MGA and his team” →

Intro
“Khudai Faisla” seems to be a small booklet (9-10 pages)(Urdu) that was written by MGA and his team and seems to have been inserted into “Anjam-e-Athim” in 1984 as part of the Ruhani Khuzain editing project by Mirza Tahir Ahmad in 1984 and from the UK.

In this small booklet, MGA drew a Cartoon of the Trinity. MGA invites one of the following Christian priests: Dr. Martin Clark, Imad-ud-Din, Thakur Das, Hasam-ud-Din, Safdar Ali Bhandara, Thomas Howell, or Fateh Maseeh. MGA says Christians eat pigeons with relish although the pigeon is their God (Holy Spirit). Hindus are better as they do not eat their God, the bull. MGA offered to gather in a field (Mubahila) and let the wrath of God descend on the person opposite. Offers 10,000 rupees (3,000 advance) in case nothing happens to the opposite person within one year. MGA challenged a Mubahila to Muslim scholars, he declares Nazir Hussain of Delhi to be the originator of the declaration of ‘kufr’ against MGA.

Continue reading “What is “Khudai Faisla”? A small book by MGA?” →

Intro
“Maktoob E Arabi Benaam Ulaimaa” seems to be a letter that MGA and his team of editor’s wrote to the Arabic speaking world. It seems to have been added to “Anjam-e-Athim” in 1984 as the 4th Khalifa invented Ruhani Khuzain. It can be found online today as the main part (211 pages out of 347, 60% of the book) of the Ruhani Khuzain Vol. 11. It is unclear how it was published in its original format. We have posted quotes in the below. Muhammadi Begum seems to be covered in detail, in-fact, MGA was claiming, “The actual purport was destruction, and my marriage to the girl would follow their death, and that was only to highlight the greatness of this sign in the eyes of the people”. Thus, this was a new prophecy, adjusted since it has failed.

He also talks about the Musleh Maud prophecy and he boasts about his sons.

MGA posted many of his fake revelations in this letter, the one about his relatives is interesting, MGA’s god told him that he would never win in court against his close family (his prayers wouldnt be accepted vs. his collaterals). This was in terms of MGA’s family winning against MGA’s father (Mirza Ghulam Murtaza) in 1865, the 1870’s and in 1883, which caused the death of MGA’s elder brother, Mirza Ghulam Qadir.

Continue reading “What is Maktoob E Arabi Benaam Ulaimaa?” →