Intro
Ahmadiyya sources allege that Musleh Shanboor was born in Israel and immigrated to Canada to attend Jamia about 10 years ago. He alleges to have grown up in and around Haifa. This might be the first case of the Jamia-Canada giving a scholarship to an Israeli citizen. He talked about if Ahmadi’s are in the IDF, and he said no. He seems to know Urdu enough to understand, conversate briefly and understand the Khalifa’s speeches.

Professor Shanboor is a graduate from the 2017 batch of Jamia Canada and joined the Jamia as a faculty member in Arabic in 2018. He was born and raised in Palestine and since his arrival in Canada after graduation, he has also been serving on the Arab desk of the Canada Jamaat as well as in the Majlis Atfalul Ahmadiyya Canada.

In 2023, he was also working as National Secretary Waqf-e-Arzi in Canada. In 2024, he is labelled as an Ahmadi missionary.

In 2024, he alleged that Ahmadiyya is the fastest growing sect of Islam (59:19 time stamp). However, I had debunked this myth over 10 years ago. Thus, Musleh Shanboor proved that he is no scholar of any repute. He seems to be a general idiot.

In 2024, I emailed Musleh Shanboor about 22:52 of the Quran (22:53 in the Kadiani Koran) and I asked about if MGA’s statements in terms of the qira’at of Ibn-e-‘Abbas’ of the verse was abrogated after 1901. MGA was accusing Ibn Abbas of adding the word “Muhaddath” and called this an accurate reading. Razi tweeted about this too and posted the English edition. The quote is from 1884, Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 4, page 428 of the online english edition. Musleh Shanboor said that report that MGA was referring to was removed from the Bukhari, however, it did exist in previous editons and can be found in Fath-e-Bari. Musleh Shanboor didn’t even answer my question. However, the truth is, it is an abrogated qiraat, it is Ibn-e-‘Abbas’ own tafsir that when he explained, and one of the narrators used the word Ibn Abbas “recited” instead of Ibn Abbas “said”…other narrators recorded Ibn Abbas “said”…..this is not a problem for us as EVEN if it was a qiraat, it is not mutawatir and not acceptable, especially since we don’t have the complete qiraat….we cannot combine words from different Qiraat and make it a belief.

In Dec-2025, Brother Ahmad from “Arise and Warn”, went onto an Ahmadi TikTok livestream wherein Musleh Shanboor was answering questions. Arise and Warn asked about 61:6, however, he specifically asked about the usage of a singular person in grammatic prose, i.e., “wa BiRasulin” (and Rasul). Interestingly, Musleh Shanboor asked “Arise and Warn” if he can read Arabic, “Arise and Warn” tried to respond by Musleh Shanboor misunderstood his response and said that he didn’t ask him to recite anything. This is an example of how Musleh Shanboor misunderstand people whom he deems as hostile. This is a psychological condition. Musleh Shanboor says that this verse if firstly (1:09:05 time stamp) about Muhammad (saw). Musleh Shanboor says that in the first part of the verse, Eisa (as) is telling the Israelites that he is doing Tasdiq (as musadaqin) of (Muhammad, saaw)(1:11:40). Musleh Shanboor says that Muhammad (saw) can’t be directly applied to the second part of 61:6 (specifically “wa mubashirrun wa BiRasulin”), Shanboor translates it as “I am also giving you ‘new’ news” (wa mubashirrun)(1:16:00 time stamp) and Shanboor infers that the second part of 61:6 (specifically “wa mubashirrun wa BiRasulin”) is about MGA (see the clip on TikTok and Twitter). A few days later (Dec-10-2025), after being privately scolded by his supervisors (and Maulvi Razi), Musleh Shanboor was forced to retract his statements, he also admitted to making up his own argument which had nothing to do with MGA (see the clip on Twitter and TikTok).

In 2026, a tiktoker named Free Palestine @freepalestine20252025 engaged @cool_breeze_1889 (aka rodman), on a hadith from the mouth of Muhammad (Saw) wherein it was said that Eisa (As) can be included in the Kalima. The Ahmadi uber driver, @cool_breeze_1889 (aka rodman) alleged that it was kufr to add anyone to the Kalima as such. At that point, @freepalestine20252025 told him that he was accusing Muhammad (Saw) of Kufr. @cool_breeze_1889 (aka rodman) then called his ambulance team and Musleh Shanboor showed up and refused to engage, they then ended the conversation.

In 2026 (Apr), Musleh Shanboor alleged that “Imam-Mahdi” is just an attribute (7:44 time stamp). Musleh Shanboor also explained how Ahmadi’s go against “Hanafi-fiqh”, since they don’t repeat Fatiha when they are reading prayers behind someone else. Musleh Shanboor alleges that MGA wanted Ahmadi’s to repeat Fatiha, sentence by sentence (11:18). Musleh Shanboor says that Muhammad (Saw) wasn’t able to stop oppression in the world and thus, how could anyone else do it in one day? Musleh Shanboor said that ALL prophets are Imam Mahdi.

In 2026 (May-7), Musleh Shanboor streamed with other Ahmadiyya mullahs on the “Ask Islam” youtube channel. At 21:51 timestamp, Musleh Shanboor explains how 22:40 of the Quran (22:41 in the Kadiani Koran) doesn’t apply in MGA’s time and up until 2026. Musleh Shanboor means to say that the conditions to “take-up-arms” against a government haven’t been fulfilled. At 24:57, Musleh Shanboor says that Mirza Masroor Ahmad has allowed Ahmadi’s to call the plight of Muslims in this era (2015 to 2026) as Jihad. Musleh Shanboor called what Muslims are defending in Gaza as a “sort of Jihad“, however, it is not religious (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). Musleh Shanboor then alleges that 100,000+ Muslims have converted to Christanity in India-Pakistan, however, this is a lie, most of the converts came from the choora caste of people, this is totally proven. However, Musleh Shanboor forgets that MGA abrogated (mansukh) 22:40 of the Quran (22:41 in the Kadiani Koran) in his book, “The British government and Jihad” and had it published on May 22, 1900. MGA and his team of writers argued that this commandment (22:40) was specific to the period and time. It was not forever. It applied during the time when those entering the fold of Islam were being slaughtered like sheep and lambs (See pages 6-7). Musleh Shanboor also failed to mention that on page 17, MGA said he came with an order “jihad with the sword has ended from this time forward”. This statement and the context tell us that MGA was alleging that the violent Jihad which is found in 22:40 of the Quran (22:41 in the Kadiani Koran) was stopped on May-22-1900. Musleh Shanboor also didn’t take into consideration how a few months later (Dec-15), MGA said, that in the time of “Maseeh Mau`ood” the command for jihaad was entirely abolished/stopped (see Nuzhat Haneef, page 171)(RK, v. 17, p. 443; marginal note; Arba`een Number 4)(See page 145, online English edition of Arba‘in). Musleh Shanboor also didn’t mention how MGA argued in 1901-1902, that from this day, the human jihaad that was performed with the sword [i.e., martial jihaad], has been stopped by the command of God. Now after this whoever lifts a sword against a kaafir and refers to himself as a ‘ghaazee’ [a jihaad participant who is not martyred], he disobeys that Noble Messenger, the blessings of Allaah and peace be on him, who stated thirteen hundred years ago that upon the coming of the Maseeh Mau`ood the jihaads of the sword will come to an end. So now after my appearance there is no jihaad of the sword. … The one who fights evil with evil is not from among us. Save yourself from attack by the mischievous. But do not yourselves engage in mischievous confrontation.” (See RK, v. 16, pp. 28-29; starts at 5th line from bottom of p. 28; Appendix to Khutbah-e-Ilhaamiyyah, translation by Nuzhat Haneef). Musleh Shanboor didn’t mention how in 1906, MGA and his team of writers alleged that God had nor forbidden the kind of Jihad wherein there is a battle of swords or guns. (See “Fountain of Christianity” (Chashma-e-Masihi), online English edition page 4). MGA said that the type of Jihad wherein swords and guns are used in battle is the final battle between light and darkness. MGA says that the type of Jihad wherein swords and guns are used in battle was destined to be abolished in the time of the Promised Messiah (maseeh-e-maud) as referred to the by the Holy Quran and Sahih Bukhari. Musleh Shanboor also didn’t mention how in 1906, MGA and his team alleged that the famous hadith which talk about the breath of the Messiah killing people (See Sahih Muslim 2937a) is really about the plague and Earthquakes which will happen as a result of the rejection/abuse/denial of MGA as the Messiah (See Divine Manifestations [Tajalliyat-e-illahiyyah], page 9, online English Edition)(published in 1922). On page 9 of the Online English Edition, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s purposely mistranslated “abrogated” (mansookh) as “suspended”, thus proving that MGA did indeed “abrogate” Jihad, however, Ahmadi’s (Lahori and Qadiani) both agreed against MGA and landed on the idea that MGA only “suspended” Jihad in the 1900-1908 era.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
His brother
The Harvest of God’s Blessings | The Review of Religions

He has a brother named Mamoon Shanboor.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
2010

He seems to have moved from Israel to Canada and attended Jamia-Canada, which is a 7-year course (I’m guessing based on his graduation date).
______________________________________________________________________________________________
2014
Letters: May 4, 2014 | Winnipeg Sun

MIDDLE EAST REALITY

Re: Syrian extremists threaten to ‘destroy’ Canada in online video. As a Muslim Israeli citizen studying in the beautiful country Canada, I go home every summer and realize that most Canadians aren’t fully aware of the Middle Eastern reality, and how dangerous the conditions have become. What makes it worse, is that some Muslim Imams are blindly giving teachings to their followers about “Jihad” and are encouraging them to go and fight so that they will enter paradise. Sounds confusing, right? It should be, because that’s not what Islam, or any religion for that matter, teaches.

MUSLEH SHANBOOR

He was also at an Ahmadiyya Science and Religion conference.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
2017
Jamia Ahmadiyya Canada

Professor Shanboor is a graduate from the 2017 batch of Jamia Canada and joined the Jamia as a faculty member in Arabic in 2018. He was born and raised in Palestine and since his arrival in Canada after graduation, he has also been serving on the Arab desk of the Canada Jamaat as well as in the Majlis Atfalul Ahmadiyya Canada.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
2018
Jamia Ahmadiyya Canada

He was offered employment at the Jamia as a faculty member in Arabic in 2018.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
2020
Touseef Ahmad on X: “Members of National Atfal Amla spent countless hours in making sure this event is a success Murabi Musleh Shanboor Sahib originally from Palestine is serving as National Director Department of Spiritual and Moral Training (Secretary Tarbiyat) @AtfalCanada and does an amazing job https://t.co/S45yGCURZm” / X (twitter.com)

In 2020, he was working as National Director Department of Spiritual and Moral Training (Secretary Tarbiyat). ______________________________________________________________________________________________
2023

In 2023, he was also working as National Secretary Waqf-e-Arzi in Canada.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
2024
https://www.youtube.com/live/l7GVWxoo0Bs?si=-RSrLCMk8NOiPmYO

He alleges that Ahmadiyya is the fastest growing sect of Islam (59:19 time stamp).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
2024

In 2024, I emailed Musleh Shanboor about 22:52 of the Quran (22:53 in the Kadiani Koran) and I asked about if MGA’s statements in terms of the qira’at of Ibn-e-‘Abbas’ of the verse was abrogated after 1901. MGA was accusing Ibn Abbas of adding the word “Muhaddath” and called this an accurate reading. Razi tweeted about this too and posted the English edition. The quote is from 1884, Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 4, page 428 of the online english edition. Musleh Shanboor said that report that MGA was referring to was removed from the Bukhari, however, it did exist in previous editons and can be found in Fath-e-Bari. Musleh Shanboor didn’t even answer my question. However, the truth is, it is an abrogated qiraat, it is Ibn-e-‘Abbas’ own tafsir that when he explained, and one of the narrators used the word Ibn Abbas “recited” instead of Ibn Abbas “said”…other narrators recorded Ibn Abbas “said”…..this is not a problem for us as EVEN if it was a qiraat, it is not mutawatir and not acceptable, especially since we don’t have the complete qiraat….we cannot combine words from different Qiraat and make it a belief.

Hajar Asqalani
Fath al-Bari
Fath al-Bari – Wikipedia
Razi on X: “This ignorant individual doesn’t know the difference of Qiraah of Qur’an and those of the sahaba which they had in their copies of the Qur’an and what was transmitted from them Hadrat Ahmad (as) did NOT believe in any abrogation of the Qur’an https://t.co/Blifbrevsk” / X فتح الباري لابن حجر | تراث (turath.io)

Ibn Abbas said: “There is no nabi nor muhaddath,” referring to the verse “And We did not send before you any messenger or prophet except that when he spoke…” Ibn Abbas included the phrase “nor one who is muhaddath.” This was recorded by Sufyan ibn Uyaynah at the end of his collection and by Abdul ibn Humaid through his chain, and its chain of transmission to Ibn Abbas is authentic. The wording from Amr ibn Dinar is: “Ibn Abbas used to recite, ‘And We did not send before you any messenger or prophet nor muhaddath.'”

The reason for specifically mentioning Umar is due to the numerous instances during the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) time where the Quran was revealed in agreement with his views, and he had many correct judgments after the Prophet (peace be upon him).

Scans


Sahih al-Bukhari 4740 – Prophetic Commentary on the Qur’an (Tafseer of the Prophet (pbuh)) – كتاب التفسير – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم)

In the below, you will see a chapter heading in the Arabic only, this is not found in the English.

Scan

The alleged report in Bukhari

Musleh Shanboor sent this to me and alleged that this was removed from Bukhari.

Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
2025

In Dec-2025, Brother Ahmad from “Arise and Warn”, went onto an Ahmadi TikTok livestream wherein Musleh Shanboor was answering questions. Arise and Warn asked about 61:6, however, he specifically asked about the usage of a singular person in grammatic prose, i.e., “wa BiRasulin” (and Rasul).

Interestingly, Musleh Shanboor asked “Arise and Warn” if he can read Arabic, “Arise and Warn” tried to respond by Musleh Shanboor misunderstood his response and said that he didn’t ask him to recite anything. This is an example of Musleh Shanboor misunderstand people whom he deems as hostile. This is a psychological condition.

Musleh Shanboor says that this verse if firstly (1:09:05 time stamp) about Muhammad (saw). Musleh Shanboor says that in the first part of the verse, Eisa (as) is telling the Israelites that he is doing Tasdiq (as musadaqin) of (Muhammad, saaw)(1:11:40). Musleh Shanboor says that Muhammad (saw) can’t be directly applied to the second part of 61:6 (specifically “wa mubashirrun wa BiRasulin”), Shanboor translates it as “I am also giving you ‘new’ news” (wa mubashirrun)(1:16:00 time stamp).

A few days later (Dec-10-2025), after being privately scolded by his supervisors (and Maulvi Razi), Musleh Shanboor was forced to retract his statements, he also admitted to making up his own argument which had nothing to do with MGA (see the clip on Twitter and TikTok).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
2026
Musleh Shanboor and the Ahmadiyya position on 22:40 in the Quran (22:41 in the Kadiani Koran) – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Musleh Shanboor and the Ahmadiyya position on 22:40 in the Quran (22:41 in the Kadiani Koran)


In 2026, a tiktoker named Free Palestine @freepalestine20252025 engaged @cool_breeze_1889 (aka rodman), on a hadith from the mouth of Muhammad (Saw) wherein it was said that Eisa (As) can be included in the Kalima. The Ahmadi uber driver, @cool_breeze_1889 (aka rodman) alleged that it was kufr to add anyone to the Kalima as such. At that point, @freepalestine20252025 told him that he was accusing Muhammad (Saw) of Kufr. @cool_breeze_1889 (aka rodman) then called his ambulance team and Musleh Shanboor showed up and refused to engage, they then ended the conversation.

In 2026 (May-7), Musleh Shanboor streamed with other Ahmadiyya mullahs on the “Ask Islam” youtube channel. At 21:51 timestamp, Musleh Shanboor explains how 22:40 of the Quran (22:41 in the Kadiani Koran) doesn’t apply in MGA’s time and up until 2026. Musleh Shanboor means to say that the conditions to “take-up-arms” against a government haven’t been fulfilled. At 24:57, Musleh Shanboor says that Mirza Masroor Ahmad has allowed Ahmadi’s to call the plight of Muslims in this era (2015 to 2026) as Jihad. Musleh Shanboor called what Muslims are defending in Gaza as a “sort of Jihad“, however, it is not religious (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). Musleh Shanboor then alleges that 100,000+ Muslims have converted to Christanity in India-Pakistan, however, this is a lie, most of the converts came from the choora caste of people, this is totally proven.

However, Musleh Shanboor forgets that MGA abrogated (mansukh) 22:40 of the Quran (22:41 in the Kadiani Koran) in his book, “The British government and Jihad” and had it published on May 22, 1900. MGA and his team of writers argued that this commandment (22:40) was specific to the period and time. It was not forever. It applied during the time when those entering the fold of Islam were being slaughtered like sheep and lambs (See pages 6-7). Musleh Shanboor also failed to mention that on page 17, MGA said he came with an order “jihad with the sword has ended from this time forward”. This statement and the context tell us that MGA was alleging that the violent Jihad which is found in 22:40 of the Quran (22:41 in the Kadiani Koran) was stopped on May-22-1900.

Musleh Shanboor also didn’t take into consideration how a few months later (Dec-15), MGA said, that in the time of “Maseeh Mau`ood” the command for jihaad was entirely abolished/stopped (see Nuzhat Haneef, page 171)(RK, v. 17, p. 443; marginal note; Arba`een Number 4)(See page 145, online English edition of Arba‘in).

Musleh Shanboor also didn’t mention how MGA argued in 1901-1902, that from this day, the human jihaad that was performed with the sword [i.e., martial jihaad], has been stopped by the command of God. Now after this whoever lifts a sword against a kaafir and refers to himself as a ‘ghaazee’ [a jihaad participant who is not martyred], he disobeys that Noble Messenger, the blessings of Allaah and peace be on him, who stated thirteen hundred years ago that upon the coming of the Maseeh Mau`ood the jihaads of the sword will come to an end. So now after my appearance there is no jihaad of the sword. … The one who fights evil with evil is not from among us. Save yourself from attack by the mischievous. But do not yourselves engage in mischievous confrontation.” (See RK, v. 16, pp. 28-29; starts at 5th line from bottom of p. 28; Appendix to Khutbah-e-Ilhaamiyyah, translation by Nuzhat Haneef).

Musleh Shanboor didn’t mention how in 1906, MGA and his team of writers alleged that God had nor forbidden the kind of Jihad wherein there is a battle of swords or guns. (See “Fountain of Christianity” (Chashma-e-Masihi), online English edition page 4). MGA said that the type of Jihad wherein swords and guns are used in battle is the final battle between light and darkness. MGA says that the type of Jihad wherein swords and guns are used in battle was destined to be abolished in the time of the Promised Messiah (maseeh-e-maud) as referred to the by the Holy Quran and Sahih Bukhari.

Musleh Shanboor also didn’t mention how in 1906, MGA and his team alleged that the famous hadith which talk about the breath of the Messiah killing people (See Sahih Muslim 2937a) is really about the plague and Earthquakes which will happen as a result of the rejection/abuse/denial of MGA as the Messiah (See Divine Manifestations [Tajalliyat-e-illahiyyah], page 9, online English Edition)(published in 1922). On page 9 of the Online English Edition, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s purposely mistranslated “abrogated” (mansookh) as “suspended”, thus proving that MGA did indeed “abrogate” Jihad, however, Ahmadi’s (Lahori and Qadiani) both agreed against MGA and landed on the idea that MGA only “suspended” Jihad in the 1900-1908 era.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

The neighborhood of Kababir in Haifa – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Ahmadi missionary confesses to creating Child porn while a student at Jamia Canada – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Ahmadis in the Israeli Military?? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

In Canada, in 2020, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s spent 3.5 million on their Maulvi’s – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Waqf-e-Arzi in Jamaica: An enlightening experience (alhakam.org)

Are Ahmadis the fastest growing Islamic sect? The World Christian Encyclopedia opened and evaluated – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism