Intro
It was translated into English in 2019 by the Qadiani-Ahmadi‘s, MGA and his team published it in 1902. In English the title would be, “The Miracle of Ahmad”. This was an Urdu book and MGA seems to have told the world that a Prophet/Muhaddath/Rasul can never make a mistake in his claims (like that of prophethood), mistakes only happen on smaller issues. This was quoted by Bro Imtiaz in a stream too (2:26:15 time stamp). In this book, MGA famously admitted that he follows his own Wahi/Ilham and throws hadith into the waste paper bin if it opposes his wahi/ilham. In 1902, Via (RK-19-Page 127 – Ijaz-i Ahmadi-Urdu)(see pages 31-32-33, Online English edition), MGA said that that one or two Companions, whose understanding was not perfect, used to believe—as they might have heard the statements made by the local Christians—that Jesus was alive in Heaven. One such person was Abu Hurairah, who was a ghabi. MGA also wrote on page 140, that if there were NO hadith in existence, his claim wouldn’t be affected (See Bro Imtiaz, 2:28:54). This is where MGA famously said that the basis for our claim is not hadith but Quran and that wahi which comes to us. Yes, in support we also quote those hadith which are according to Quran and do not contradict my wahi. As for the rest of the hadiths, I throw them away like waste paper (See RK: vol: 19, pg. 140-Urdu, The Miracle of Ahmad, page 53, Online English Edition).
Maulvi Muhammad Ali quoted “I‘jaz-e-Ahmadi” in his 1915 book “Prophethood in Islam” (See pages 20, 58, 550-551). Which was vs. the Qadiani’s and their claim that MGA misunderstood his own prophethood for 20+ years (See “Haqiqaun Nubuwwat” (1915) and “Qaul al Fasl” (1915). MGA was discussing the alleged failed prophecies of Eisa (as)(naozobillah) and explaining them away as small errors. This was intertwined with MGA’s battle with Sanaullah in 1901. It was actually a debate between some followers of MGA vs. Sanaullah. This debate was to be held on October 29, 30, 1902. Syed Muhammad Sarwar Shah and Maulavi Abdullah Kashmiri were to represent the Ahmadis at the debate, and Maulavi Sanaullah the other party. The debate was held in the open under a banyan tree. There were only three Ahmadis at the debate and over 600 non-Ahmadis were present. Maulavi Sanaullah Amritsari fanned the feelings of the villagers by asserting that the Ahmadis were afraid of debates. When the terms were being settled Maulavi Sanaullah insisted that nobody should speak for more than 20 minutes despite the protest by Syed Sarwar Shah that the time fixed (20 minutes) was woefully inadequate. MGA mentions the debate in Mudh in his book, E’jaz-i-Ahmadi (I‘jāz-e-Ahmadi) roughly 70 times.
At 3:45:27, Bro Imtiaz explains how MGA was responding to Maulavi Sanaullah allegations that none of MGA’s prophecies have ever come true. MGA then alleges that a learned Jew objected to the prophecies of Eisa (as) and there is no answer to any of these (harsh, sakht) objections from our side (See I‘jaz-e-Ahmadi, RK-19, page 111)(See page 7, online English Edition). MGA also said that Maulavi Sanaullah and Maulvi Muhammad Hussain (Batalvi?) are like this Jewish man who objected to Eisa (as). MGA is trying to draw a parallel with deniers of both messiah’s. MGA then said that if anyone can answer the objections of this learned Jew, he would pay them 100 rupees. On July 26-2025, Bro Imtiaz explained (3:51:25) how MGA wrote in I‘jaz-e-Ahmadi, RK-19, page 121(See page 23, Online English Edition) that 3 prophecies of Eisa (as) turned out to be false. MGA also said, “hai hai hai”, which is sarcasm (who should we cry to?).
On July 26-2025, Bro Imtiaz explained (3:51:25) how MGA wrote in I‘jaz-e-Ahmadi, RK-19, page 121(See page 23, Online English Edition) that 3 prophecies of Eisa (as) turned out to be false. MGA also said, “hai hai hai”, which is sarcasm (who should we cry to?)(See I‘jaz-e-Ahmadi, RK-19, page 121-Urdu).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Famous Quotes
______________________________________________________________________________________________1902
Ijaz-e-Ahmadi, online english edition, page 42
See Muhammad Ali, Prophethood in Islam (1915), see pages 550-551
“””There are some who think that if a mistake is made in understanding some revelation then the assurance of safety, security and protection is lost, and a suspicion is created that perhaps that Prophet or Messenger or Muhaddath [a recipient of divine converse] might also be mistaken in his claim. This thought is totally sophistic and those people who are on the verge of insanity are the ones who say precisely such things”””. (See page 42)
“”Hence, in the case of a Prophet, his claim and teachings can be likened to the eye looking at things from very close and does not err in identifying them correctly. And, the misjudgement on their part regarding certain matters can be likened to the eye that at times makes an error in recognizing the objects lying at some distance”” (see pages 44-45).
Scans
_____________________________________________________________________________________________I‘jaz-e-Ahmadi, RK-19, page 111
The Miracle of Ahmad
Click to access Ijaz-e-Ahmadi.pdf
At 3:45:27, Bro Imtiaz explains how MGA was responding to Maulvi Sanaullah allegations that none of MGA’s prophecies have ever come true. MGA then alleges that a learned Jew objected to the prophecies of Eisa (as) and there is no answer to any of these (harsh, sakht) objections from our side (See I‘jaz-e-Ahmadi, RK-19, page 111)(See page 7, online English Edition). MGA also said that Maulvi Sanaullah and Maulvi Muhammad Hussain (Batalvi?) are like this Jewish man who objected to Eisa (as). MGA is trying to draw a parallel with deniers of both messiah’s. MGA then said that if anyone can answer the objections of this learned Jew, he would pay them 100 rupees.
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
I‘jaz-e-Ahmadi, RK-19, page 121
The Miracle of Ahmad
https://files.alislam.cloud/pdf/Ijaz-e-Ahmadi.pdf
On July 26-2025, Bro Imtiaz explained (3:51:25) how MGA wrote in I‘jaz-e-Ahmadi, RK-19, page 121(See page 23, Online English Edition) that 3 prophecies of Eisa (as) turned out to be false. MGA also said, “hai hai hai”, which is sarcasm (who should we cry to?).
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
See RK: vol: 19, pg. 128
The Miracle of Ahmad,
https://www.youtube.com/live/0dGS0-d6L3Y?si=6TGTX6FQX7DiI3Ve
MGA accused the companions of lying, like Abu Hurraira.
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 138
See RK: vol: 19, pg. 138
The Miracle of Ahmad, page 50, Online English Edition
https://www.youtube.com/live/FK8ljwTiWz4?si=a-Slrrqm6vObVfks
“””On the other hand, even if I am highly accommodating, I would bestow only the status of conjecture to these ahadith, and the same viewpoint is held by the Muhaddithin [scholars of the Hadith]. A conjecture is a statement that might have an element of falsehood in it. So what kind of prudence and righteousness would it be to have one’s beliefs based on conjecture and to do away with the authentic and categorical Word of God? I do not say all ahadith should be set aside like mere rubbish; rather, I say that you should accept those from among them to be authentic that do not oppose or contradict the Holy Quran, lest you be ruined.”””
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 139
See RK: vol: 19, pg. 139
The Miracle of Ahmad, page 52, Online English Edition
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 140
See RK: vol: 19, pg. 140
The Miracle of Ahmad, page 53, Online English Edition
“the basis for our claim is not hadith but Quran and that wahi which comes to us. Yes, in support we also quote those hadith which are according to Quran and do not contradict my wahi. As for the rest of the hadiths, i throw them away like waste paper..”
MGA also wrote on page 140, that if there were NO hadith in existence, his claim wouldn’t be affected (See Bro Imtiaz, 2:28:54).
The scan work
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
The Miracle of Ahmad (alislam.cloud)
Click to access Ijaz-e-Ahmadi.pdf
“Prophethood in Islam” by Maulvi Muhammad Ali (1915) – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Who is Maulvi Muhammad Ali in the history of Ahmadiyya? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
“Al-Qaul-ul-Fasl” by the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad-early-1915 – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
“Haqiqat Un Nubuwwat” (1915) by Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, some quotes and data – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
In Ahmadiyya, Islam= the revelations of MGA+the Quran – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism
October 21, 2024 at 8:11 am
Blue Techker There is definately a lot to find out about this subject. I like all the points you made