Intro
In the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya (1879-1884)(See page 212, V-3), MGA quoted a hadith about 62:3. This is the famous hadith by Abu Hurairah wherein Salma Farsi is mentioned as well as the Pleides. MGA didn’t mention that Abu Hurairah was the source.
In 1891, MGA used (62:3) of the Quran to argue that he brought the Quran back to earth after it had left in the 1857 mutiny, this hadith was by Abu Hurairah, it’s the same hadith report, MGA didn’t mention Abu Hurairah.
In 1891-1892, when MGA made his wildest claims, he quoted another hadith by Abu Hurrairah wherein the Messiah was supposed to live an additional 40 years, and thus, MGA made his age-prophecy, which failed miserably. Even the hadith about the two yellow garments is from Abu Hurrairah, and the hadith about the last brick, and the hadith about the Imam Mahdi will be amongst the Muslims (imamukum minkum), and how the Messiah won’t lead prayers, all of these are from Abu Hurrairah.
In 1901, Via (RK-19-Page 127 – Ijaz-i Ahmadi-Urdu)(see pages 31-32-33, Online English edition), MGA said that that one or two Companions, whose understanding was not perfect, used to believe—as they might have heard the statements made by the local Christians—that Jesus was alive in Heaven. One such person was Abu Hurairah, who was a ghabi.
In 1900-1902, via Tuhfa-e-Ghaznaviyyah, that all the companions were fools (nadaan), even Umar (ra)(astagfarullah), and this was because they all believed that Eisa (as) was alive in heaven (see Al-Milal wa al-Nihal) until Abu Bakr made his famous comment.
Again in 1907, via Haqiqatul Wahi, MGA attacked the credibility of Abu Hurrairah (See Haqiqatul Wahy, online english edition, see pages 44-45). MGA alleged that Abu Hurairah initially held this misconception too, and Abu Hurairah frequently used to fall into such errors due to his simplicity and weak intellect.
In 1908 (Oct) after MGA died, Braheen e Ahmadiyya Vol. 5 was published (Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 5, Urdu, pages 284-285), in this book, MGA claimed that the beliefs of Abu Hurraira (ra) would lead Muslims to shirk.
In Dec-2025, Ansar Raza said that he doesn’t care about the path of the sahaba (companions).
______________________________________________________________________________________________Sahih Bukhari on 4:159
Book of the Prophets, Book 60, Hadith 118, Vol. 4, Book 55, Hadith 657
Chapter: The advent (descent) of ‘Isa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary) alayhis-salam
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) said, “By Him in Whose Hands my soul is, surely (Jesus,) the son of Mary will soon descend amongst you and will judge mankind justly (as a Just Ruler); he will break the Cross and kill the pigs and there will be no Jizya (i.e. taxation taken from non Muslims). Money will be in abundance so that nobody will accept it, and a single prostration to Allah (in prayer) will be better than the whole world and whatever is in it.” Abu Huraira added “If you wish, you can recite (this verse of the Holy Book): — ‘And there is none Of the people of the Scriptures (Jews and Christians) But must believe in him (i.e Jesus as an Apostle of Allah and a human being) Before his death. And on the Day of Judgment He will be a witness Against them.” (4.159) (See Fath-ul-Bari, Page 302 Vol 7).
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1894-1895
RK, Vol 8, Nur ul Haq, p3.
The word Ghabi in MGA’s writings
The word Ghabi as used by MGA in Nurul Haq (1894-1895)
MGAQ wrote: [Arabic] ((In their eyes [our opponents] the knowledgeable person is an ignorant and a “Ghabi” غبي)) –
The scan from Nur ul Haq
The scans
______________________________________________________________________________________________1901
Roohani Khazyian 19-Page 127 – Ijaz-i Ahmadi
In the english translation (2019), Ahmadiyya editors have translated it as, see pages 31-32-33:
“””It seems that one or two Companions, whose understanding was not perfect, used to believe—as they might have heard the statements made by the local Christians—that Jesus was alive in Heaven. One such person was Abu Hurairah, who was a man of poor understanding. However, when Hadrat Abu Bakr (ra), whom God had granted knowledge of the Quran, recited the above-mentioned verse, the Companions came to know for a certainty that all Prophets had died. As a result, the Companions were heartened by this verse, and the sense of grief that had overtaken them due to the death of their beloved Prophet was dispelled and they went about happily reciting the aforesaid verse in the streets of Madinah.”””
Transliteration
“””Jasaa ka Abu Hurairah, jo Ghabi tha, aur dhairat achee nay tha rakhta””””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1902
Ruhani Khaza’in,vol. 15, p. 580
Tuhfa Ghaznivia, page 580-581
MGA quotes Al-Milal wa al-Nihal
Mirza reported the saying of Omar Ibn Al-Khatab:
”قال عمر ابن الخطاب من قال ان محمدا قد مات قتلته بسيفي هذا و انما رفع الى السماء كما رفع عيسى ابن مريم عليه السلام.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1907
See Haqiqatul Wahy, online english edition, see pages 44-45
“””Thus, this elegy shows that some of the Companions, who were less sagacious and did not have sound knowledge (such as Abu Hurairah), upon glancing at the prophecy about the coming of the promised ‘Isa, surmised, due to their erroneous judgment, that Hadrat ‘Isa himself would return. Abu Hurairah initially held this misconception too, and Abu Hurairah frequently used to fall into such errors due to his simplicity and weak intellect. For instance, he was mistaken in this same way regarding a prophecy that a Companion would be cast into the fire. And his interpretation of the following verse was also distorted:
‘And there is none among the People of the Book but will believe in it before his death’ (Surah an-Nisa’, 4:160).
His interpretation was comical to anyone who heard it, for he wanted to prove by this verse that all would come to believe in Hadrat ‘Isa before his death, whereas an alternative reading of this verse is قَبْلَ مَوْتِهِمْ ‘before their death’, not قَبْلَ مَوْتِهِ ‘before his death’.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1908
Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 5, Urdu, pages 284-285, and
MGA wrote that all of the sahabas were fools (nadaan) and didn’t know that Eisa (as) had died. MGA then continues to say that Abu Bakr solved this issue and proclaimed that ALL prophets were dead. MGA asserted that the sahaba were ignorant of this, and Abu Bakr was correcting the sahaba.
Urdu transliteration from the urdu edition of Ruhani Khuzain, pages 284-285
“””nadan sahabee, jinko darayat say kooj hiss na ta…”
Roohani Khazyian 21- Page 410 Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya part 5 (english)
In the online english translation (2018), Ahmadiyya editors have translated MGA’s comments on Abu Hurariah as follows, see pages 540-541:
“””””Hence, the correct translation of the above-mentioned verse I quoted is, ‘Every person from among the People of the Book will, before his death, believe in the Holy Prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, or in Hadrat ‘Isa.’ The word مَوِْتهٖ [his death] refers to the People of the Book, and not Hadrat ‘Isa. This is why in another reading of this verse the words are مَوِْتهِمْ [‘their death’]. Why would مَوِْتهِمْ [‘their death’] be present in the other reading if it referred to Hadrat ‘Isa? See Tafsir Thana’i, for it strongly confirms my statement. It also says that Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, gives the same interpretation, though the author qualifies that Abu Hurairah was deficient in his comprehension of the Holy Quran and many muhaddithin [scholars of hadith] have criticized the soundness of his understanding. Abu Hurairah had the aptitude to quote, but he was quite deficient in understanding and discernment. I contend that even if Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, has interpreted it in this way, it has been a mistake on his part, as it has been proven by muhaddithin that in many instances Abu Hurairah ra is mistaken and stumbles in matters that pertain to understanding and discernment. It is an established norm that the opinion of just one Companion cannot be regarded as a valid argument per the law of the Shariah. The valid argument per the law of the Shariah is only the ijma‘ of the Companions ra, and I have already explained, that consensus of the Companions ra occurred concerning the point that all Prophets had died.
Keep in mind that in view of the alternative reading of the verse [‘before his death’], i.e. قَبْلَ مَوْتِهِمْ [‘before their death’]—which, according to the norms held by the scholars of Hadith, is tantamount to an authentic hadith, i.e. it is such a hadith that stands proven to be from the Holy Prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him—the mere opinion of Abu Hurairah is worth rejecting as it is inconsequential and worthless when compared to the words of the Holy Prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. To insist on it can lead one to disbelief. Not only that, the statement of Abu Hurairah necessitates repudiation of the Holy Quran because time and again the Holy Quran says that the Jews and the Christians will continue to exist till the Day of Judgment and they will not be wiped out completely, whereas Abu Hurairah says that the Jews will be wiped out completely, and this is in clear contradiction to the Holy Quran. Anyone who believes in the Holy Quran ought to discard the statement of Abu Hurairah as a thing of little value. In contrast, the alternative reading of the verse, according to the norms held by the scholars of Hadith, holds the status of an authentic hadith—and here the alternative reading of the verse قَبْلَ مَوْتِهٖ does exist, as قَبْلَ مَوْتِهِمْ , which has to be taken as an authentic hadith—so in this case the statement of Abu Hurairah is, in fact, in contravention of both the Holy Quran and Hadith. فلا شكّ اّنہ باطل ومن تبعہ فاّنہ مفسد بطّال۔ [No doubt he is in the wrong, and anyone who follows him is a mischief-maker and a great liar].””””
________________________________________________________________________________________________Mishkat al-Masabih 154
Abu Huraira reported God’s messenger as saying, “In the last days there will be lying dajjals who will bring you traditions of which neither you nor your fathers have heard, so beware of them. They will neither lead you astray nor seduce you.”
Muslim transmitted it.
وَعَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: «يَكُونُ فِي آخِرِ الزَّمَانِ دَجَّالُونَ كَذَّابُونَ يَأْتُونَكُمْ مِنَ الْأَحَادِيثِ بِمَا لَمْ تَسْمَعُوا أَنْتُمْ وَلَا آبَاؤُكُمْ فَإِيَّاكُمْ وَإِيَّاهُمْ لَا يُضِلُّونَكُمْ وَلَا يَفْتِنُونَكُمْ» . . رَوَاهُ مُسلم
Grade:
Sahīh (Zubair `Aliza’i)
صَحِيحٌ (الألباني)
حكم :
صحیح (زبیر علی زئی)
Reference
: Mishkat al-Masabih 154
In-book reference
: Book 1, Hadith 147
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Sahih Muslim 7
Harmalah bin Yahyā bin Abd Allah bin Harmalah bin Imrān at-Tujībī narrated to me, he said Ibn Wahb narrated to us, he said Abū Shurayh narrated to me that he heard Sharāhīl bin Yazīd saying ‘Muslim bin Yasār informed me that he heard Abā Hurayrah saying, the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings of Allah upon him, said:
‘There will be in the end of time charlatan liars coming to you with narrations that you nor your fathers heard, so beware of them lest they misguide you and cause you tribulations’.’
وَحَدَّثَنِي حَرْمَلَةُ بْنُ يَحْيَى بْنِ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ حَرْمَلَةَ بْنِ عِمْرَانَ التُّجِيبِيُّ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ وَهْبٍ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي أَبُو شُرَيْحٍ، أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ شَرَاحِيلَ بْنَ يَزِيدَ، يَقُولُ أَخْبَرَنِي مُسْلِمُ بْنُ يَسَارٍ، أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ أَبَا هُرَيْرَةَ، يَقُولُ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم “ يَكُونُ فِي آخِرِ الزَّمَانِ دَجَّالُونَ كَذَّابُونَ يَأْتُونَكُمْ مِنَ الأَحَادِيثِ بِمَا لَمْ تَسْمَعُوا أَنْتُمْ وَلاَ آبَاؤُكُمْ فَإِيَّاكُمْ وَإِيَّاهُمْ لاَ يُضِلُّونَكُمْ وَلاَ يَفْتِنُونَكُمْ ” .
Reference
: Sahih Muslim 7
In-book reference
: Introduction, Narration 15
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2021/10/30/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-the-imamukum-minkum-hadith/
Per Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the Quran left in 1857 and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad brought it back
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his ghost writers called the sahaba as fools (nadaan)
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 4:159 (4:160 in the Ahmadiyya Quran’s), before the death of Jesus (as)
https://www.livingislam.org/fiqhi/fiqha_e80.html
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 4:159 (4:160 in the Ahmadiyya Quran’s), before the death of Jesus (as)
https://muflihun.com/bukhari/55/657
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Milal_wa_al-Nihal
https://sunnah.com/bukhari/60/118
Who is Syed Maulvi Muhammad Ahsan of Amroha, who worked as an Imam in Bhopal uptil 1891?
MGA lost the debate with MOLVI MUHAMMAD BASHIR BHOPALI (1891)
http://www.islam101.com/quran/yusufAli/
https://www.meetup.com/islam-215/messages/boards/thread/3174688/30
https://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Tafsir/004.159
Click to access Haqiqatul-Wahi.pdf
Nooruddin urged Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to make the claim of being “like the messiah” (1882-1884 era)
MGA explains how he misunderstood his prophethood in 1880 and was confused for 20+ years
Sir Syed was the first Muslim in India to ever say that all hadith on the Mahdi were weak…MGA copied
Sir Syed was the first Muslim in India to ever say that all hadith on the Mahdi were weak…MGA copied
https://www.alislam.org/library/book/heavenly-sign/
Nooruddin urged Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to make the claim of being “like the messiah” (1882-1884 era)
Friedman explains how MGA wrote 3 books in 1889 and was planning his claims
Ahmadiyya leadership lied about the First Bait ceremony in 1889
https://muflihun.com/bukhari/55/657
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/24/tafsir-ibn-kathir-on-4159/
https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Haqiqatul-Wahi.pdf
https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Ijaz-e-Ahmadi.pdf
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/27/sir-syeds-view-on-esa-as/
http://www.islam101.com/quran/yusufAli/
The Quran Discussion Group
New York, NY
870 Personal Growth Seekers
https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Haqiqatul-Wahi.pdf
https://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Tafsir/004.159
https://www.muslim.org/islam/deathj-6.htm
https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Haqiqatul-Wahi.pdf
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/27/sir-syeds-view-on-esa-as/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/12/dard-lied-about-mgas-views-on-esa-as-pre-1891/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/14/what-is-maseel-e-maseeh-the-like-of-the-messiah/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/12/dard-lied-about-mgas-views-on-esa-as-pre-1891/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/24/noorudin-and-abdul-karim-were-influenced-by-sir-syed/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/12/dard-lied-about-mgas-views-on-esa-as-pre-1891/
https://www.alislam.org/library/book/heavenly-sign/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/06/was-noorudin-the-ghost-writer-of-mga/
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s urination problem was bad, 100 times a day!!!
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism
6 Pingback