Intro
In a recent edition of “This Week with Huzoor”, brainwashed Ahmadi’s appeared from the NW Region of the USA, which is San Jose up to Seattle. Khurram’s boyfriend Zaryab Farooq was there (Intihsar Malhi was there too) and he asked a question that was burning at his heart, that is (8:56 time stamp), Why do Ahmadi Khalifa’s have different opinions? However, he was careful to limit this to “fro-ee” (irrelevant oulier) and “tarikhi” (historical). Zaryab Farooq added that even Ulema in the Ahmadiyya Movement hold different opinions as well as regular Ahmadi’s. Thus, is it permissible to hold a position that the Khalifa disagrees with?
Mirza Masroor Ahmad responds in the most ignorant way possible! He says well, some people read a history book and take a certain point of view, however, some people read a few more history books and have a different view. He says thus, there can be differences in this historical “tarikhi” information and “Baaz Nazarayat” (theoretical matters). However, what does that entail? Mirza Masroor Ahmad then says, however, if a Khalifa has given a “faisala” (final decision), and says: “NO, this is right and there is no “ikhtalaf” (disagreement), and he gives proof, these are my arguments/proofs. And explains that this is why I believe it. Then, at that point, it is better to simply accept it.
Mirza Masroor Ahmad continues and says that just the other day, he was giving a Friday sermon and presented varying opinions. I gave one point of view, it was in these books or those books. Then I have another, then he blabbers, he clearly isn’t very intelligent and failed to make a point. He then says, if someone has proof, they should submit it! AS opposed to spreading it in the Jamaat. Telling them that this was your position and Khalifa of the time said wrongly. Because of this, there will be a fitna. Instead, they should write to the Khalifa, present your proofs, and if it is accepted, then Mirza Masroor Ahmad is willing to accept it. However, if the Khalifa says NO, you said wrongly, I have these daleel for you! Then you should quietly accept it!
Mirza Masroor Ahmad continues and mentions Mirza Bashir Ahmad (the son of MGA, an alim and historian). Mirza Masroor Ahmad alleges that Mirza Bashir Ahmad once said (there is no REF, because this is a lie), that he used to hold different opinions and had ikhtilaf (difference) with the 2nd Khalifa, his eldest brother, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad and would write him letters back and forth, until finally the opinion of the 2nd Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad would be fully accepted.
In the end, this was all a lie, Mirza Masroor Ahmad and his team (which includes Razi) developed this new counter-argument as a way to explain-away the comments on Takfir by Mirza Bashir Ahmad in 1916-1917.
Sohaib Younus was there too.
