Intro
On a recent True Islam UK live stream (Jun-20-2025), at 2:07:22, Bro Imtiaz reminds Maulvi Razi that in “Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” (1901)(see page 12), MGA called himself the “Khatam un Nabiyeen” (naozobillah), via Buruz (see the clip on TikTok and Twitter)(see the full explanation in the below).
Intro
On a recent edition of this week with Huzoor (12:12 time stamp), Mirza Masroor Ahmad admitted to not having any knowledge and simply reading newspapers and learning from them (see the clip on TikTok and Twitter).
Intro
MGA approved of his worship according to Qadiani standards. Qadiani’s insist that Muslims worship graves today (See the countless videos by Razi). However, those ignorant ones that have certain unislamic practices like this do exactly what MGA followers did to MGA and Masroor even praised this. Muslim scholars of all persuasions in Pakistan condemn this even if ignorant masses do this. Contrarily, Ahmadiyya it was approved and appreciated, yet Qadiani Maulvis attempt to use this is an argument. It only backfires on them. Moreover, Qadiani’s mock the ignorant villager Pakistanis like themselves and say that Muslims worship graves because they kiss the floor near the graves of Muslim sufis/saints (See the case of Imran Khan kissing the floor at a grave).
On May 11-2012 Masroor praised (15:19 time stamp)(See the clip on TikTok and Twitter) Sahibzada Abdul Latif for committing what Qadiani’s see as shirk today and making sujood, kissing MGA’s feet (just like Imran Khan). Masroor reported that the Afghani Mullah, Sahibzada Abdul Latif kissed MGA feet when he first met him. Masroor did not say that this was wrong and that MGA forbid this. Masroor praised it in his sermon. There is an additional report of the mullah falling in some sort of prostration in MGA’s feet before leaving him.
“The Afghan Martyrs”, by Bashir Ahmad Rafiq, 1995 edition, pages 52-53
Intro
Factually, MGA never used 22:75 (22:76 in the Kadiani Koran) to argue that prophethood was continuance. However, on a recent True Islam UK live stream, the Ahmadiyya Mullah team (Hadi Ali Chaudhary, Maulvi Razi, Maulvi Mansoor Ahmad Zia and the host Maulvi Salman) via Maulvi Mansoor Ahmad Zia argued that prophethood was continuance in the dunya until the Day of Judgement via 22:75 (22:76 in the Kadiani Koran). Interestingly, in the 5-volume official English commentary of the Quran, Malik Ghulam Farid allegedly used 22:76 (22:77 in the Kadiani Koran) as evidence for the continuation of prophethood (however, he was silent on it in his short commentary). Malik Ghulam Farid also hinted at continuation of prophethood by saying “the highest spiritual status to which a man can rise is that of Messenger”. As of now, we are unsure if this verse was commented on in “Tafseer-e-Kabeer” or even “Tafseer-e-Sagheer”.
—At 26:19, Maulvi Mansoor Ahmad Zia presented 22:75 (22:76 in the Kadiani Koran) as evidence for the continuation of prophethood. He then presents 7:35 (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran) as the second verse in support of the continuation of prophethood in the Muslim Ummah. Thus, these are the 2 verses that Maulvi Mansoor Ahmad Zia is presenting as proof (of the continuation of prophethood) that Allah is always choosing Rasul’s (he calls them Nabi’s at times) from among men as well as Angel’s.
Continue reading “The Ahmadiyya Movement and 22:75 (22:76 in the Kadiani Koran)”
Intro
Via Hashmi:
Intro
In a recent Urdu live stream (June-2025), the Ahmadiyya Mullah team at True Islam UK (Hadi Ali Chaudhary, Maulvi Razi, Maulvi Mansoor Ahmad Zia and the host Maulvi Salman) were engaged by Bro Imtiaz. The format of this discussion was that the True Islam UK panel would ask one question of Bro Imtiaz first. Then, they would be open to answering a question by Bro Imtiaz.
Maulvi Mansoor Ahmad Zia presented 22:75 (22:76 in the Kadiani Koran) as evidence for the continuation of prophethood. He then presents 7:35 (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran) as the second verse in support of the continuation of prophethood in the Muslim Ummah. However, and ironically, MGA never quoted these verses to argue for the continuance of prophethood.
Maulvi Mansoor Ahmad Zia kept saying that Muslims are borrowing a prophet from the Jews to defend Islam! Nay putr..Eisa (As) is an Islamic prophet and follow’s Muhammad (Saw) already.
At 2:07:22, Bro Imtiaz reminds Maulvi Razi that in “Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” (1901)(see page 12), MGA called himself the “Khatam un Nabiyeen” (naozobillah), via Buruz (see the clip on TikTok and Twitter).
Bro Imtiaz mentioned the fact that MGA called the alleged death of Eisa (as) as a secret (raaz) that was opened to MGA (2:08:20)(see the clip on TikTok and Twitter). Shams ud Din RB also read a ref on a live stream with Imtiaz (30:24 time stamp)(see the clip on Tiktok and Twitter).
Continue reading “LIVESTREAM: Q&A – Prophethood in Islam – Urdu–review by Dr. Shah, June-2025”
Intro
In this video, there is a clip of Mirza Tahir Ahmad from 1987 wherein he accusing the U.S. government of collusion, in terms of Ahmadiyya persecution (see the clip on twitter and TikTok). Mirza Tahir Ahmad alleges that the U.S. government is controlling Israel and Saudi Arabia and fooling Muslims. Mirza Tahir Ahmad alleges that Ord-XX (1984) could not have been passed without the approval the U.S. Embassy in Pakistan. Mirza Tahir Ahmad then alleges that the Ahmadiyya Movement knew all of this and told the U.S. state Department to stop supporting the Saudi’s and Zia and his martial law (behind the scenes).
The host of this program explains how Ahmadi’s (via Mirza Tahir Ahmad and Qadiani black ops) supported the People’s Party and Bhutto in 1971. The older man in the video alleges that Mirza Tahir Ahmad was his personal friend, and that Mirza Nasir Ahmad was an honest man. However, the older man says that these friends are only called “friends” in the feudal-system. In another clip (in the same video), the same old man alleges that Ahmadi’s were only declared as Non-Muslim because Saudi Arabia wanted to ban them from Umrah or Hajj.
Continue reading “In 1987, Mirza Tahir Ahmad accused the U.S. Government of Ahmadiyya persecution”
Intro
KTV reports how Pervaiz Rashid is supporting Qadiani’s, via a senate budget session on June-18-2025, he mentioned how he essentially wants to abolish Ord-XX (1984) and the 2nd Amendment of the Pakistani constitution wherein Ahmadi’s were declared Non-Muslim in 1974 (See the video clip on twitter). Rabwah times has reported this too. Pervaiz Rashid’s support of the Qadiani’s was also tweeted by Ahmadi’s and appreciated. This news was reported on other outlets too and pro-Qadiani youtube channels herein. 10 years ago (2015), Pervaiz Rashid was accused of being a Qadiani in Pakistani politics and herein. This entire story was also reported on Geo news.
Pervaiz Rashid mentioned the ban of Ahmadi’s on performing the Qurbani. He said sometimes people are killed. “In what state is authority given where an individual has to answer as to where the sacrificial meat in their home came from, and what was the faith of the individual who sent it—or the faith of the one who received it?” Rasheed asked. He described how the woman was reportedly questioned about her belief in the finality of prophethood, the source of the meat in her home, and whether her son-in-law was an Ahmadi. She was further asked if she had given or received meat from an Ahmadi family and was made to recite the Kalima under oath to prove her truthfulness.
“Yet here we question the faith instead of looking into giving the sacrificial meat to the poor and needy,” Rasheed stated. He criticized the hardships faced by religious minorities, saying:
“The individuals who have different beliefs and are in the minority, whose beliefs differ from the majority, go through all these hardships. Their worship places are not safe, their homes are not safe, they are in danger, they are falsely implicated and spend years in prison, and sometimes they are killed.”
Rasheed called on Parliament to take decisive action to protect the rights of all citizens.
“We should take an oath today that this Parliament abolish all the laws which are used as an excuse to limit the freedoms of Pakistanis. Let’s strive for a Pakistan where each citizen living in this country would consider it their own—where they won’t be defined by their language, geography, or faith but only as a Pakistani citizen. They should belong to Pakistan, and Pakistan should belong to them,” he declared.
Pervaiz Rashid (Urdu: پرويز رشيد) is a Pakistani politician who served as the Federal Minister of Information, Broadcasting, and National Heritage and Minister for Law, Justice and Human Rights in the Third Sharif ministry. A member of Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz), Rashid has been a member of the Senate of Pakistan since 2009 and previously served as the Chairman of the Pakistan Television Corporation from 1997 to 1999 during the Sharif’s government in 1997. Considered a representative of the left-wing of the PML-N, he has previously described himself as a Marxist and as an admirer of Che Guevara and Meraj Muhammad Khan.
Intro
Mansoor Zia sahib seems to have been born in Pakistan (based on accent) roughly 55 years ago (1970, based on appearance).
In 2016, he was working at Jamia-UK as a teacher.
In 2021, he gave lectures at different Ahmadiyya temples and on different celebrations.
In 2025, he was part of a team of Qadiani Mullah’s on the True Islam UK Urdu stream in June of 2025 who were engaged by Bro Imtiaz.
In Nov-2025, he was on a panel that streamed on the True Islam UK channel, see my review herein. At 34:50, Mansoor Ahmad Zia starts barking about “La Nabiya Badi”. At 37:02, he says that did Muhammad (Saw) predict the coming of another prophet? Mansoor Ahmad Zia alleges that Aisha (ra) told people to not call Muhammad (Saw) as “La Nabiya Badi”. At 40:24, he presents the famous hadith about Ali (ra) and the prophethood of Harun (as). At 41:55, he argues that baadi only means while Muhammad (saw) is gone and also right after Muhammad (saw)’s death. At 43:13, what verse of the Quran is this? At 45:10, he argues that baadi means vs. or against? At 46:56, he argues that baadi means directly after Muhammad (Saw) only and no prophets between him and the Messiah (46:49). At 1:32:30, Mansoor Ahmad Zia starts barking, he says that Muhammad (Saw) is not the finisher of the prophets. Ahmadi’s don’t believe that Muhammad (Saw) finished the cycle of prophets. He argues that prophethood is a good thing, why was it ended? Good things are never ended…1:36:30, he says that to say that NO MORE good (naik) people will come is wrong (See MGA in Tiryaq ul Qulub). At 1:46:45, Mansoor Ahmad Zia begins to allege that Ahmadiyya is growing. At 1:47:14, Mansoor Ahmad Zia argues that all Muslim firqa’s have come together and are trying to stop the growth of Ahmadiyya. Mansoor Ahmad Zia says that this is another piece of evidence, whenever the truth (Ahmadiyya) comes, there are always some people objecting to it.
