According to MGA,if an Ayah has dual implication.....

Intro
In 1903, via Mawahibur-Rahman (page 117), MGA and his team of writers argued that if an Ayah (verse of the Quran) has dual implication (not Kuttee), the meaning presented by MGA is worthier of acceptance. Anything opposed to this is transgression/falsehood and imposture. MGA also said something similar about hadith, since he was Hakam and Adl, only MGA could choose which hadith were authentic or not. MGA was talking about the meaning of Tawaffi in relation to ’Isa ﷺ. He was saying that for the sake of argument even if both meanings (the Muslims’ interpretation and the Qadiani interpretation) are contextually possible, his interpretation takes precedence since he is the arbiter

However, many years later, via Tafseer-e-Kabeer and Tafseer-e-Sagheer” there are multiple examples of MGA’s son, the Musleh Maud, Mirza Basheer uddin Mahmud Ahmad, the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa rejecting MGA’s interpretation, even saying it contradicts Qur’an. See also the case of MGA and his writings on the Ashab-e-Kahf. See also, 27:40 (27:41 in the Kadiani Koran). See also 18:65 (18:66 in the Kadiani Koran), the case of MGA and Al-Khidr.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
https://x.com/_Ibnul_Khattab_/status/1944084443402064168
The Arabic version of Malfuzat [vol.4 page no. 311] (21st of March 1903)

– MGA interpreted the forbidden tree of Adam ﷺ as a physical tree, probably a grapevine.

– MBM interpreted it as a metaphor for evil doings and bad companions and said that interpreting it as a physical tree contradicts the Qur’an. (2/5)

Scans

______________________________________________________________________________________________27:40 (27:41 in the Kadiani Koran)
https://x.com/_Ibnul_Khattab_/status/1944084447164240361

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, throne of Bilqis and 27:40 in the Quran (27:41 in the Kadiani Koran)

– MGA described those who do Ta’weel of the throne of Bilqis materializing in a moment in Ayah 27:40 as (the people who don’t fully believe in the powers of God Almighty).

– MBM did Ta’weel of it interpreting it as making a replica of the throne of Bilqis in a short time. (3/5)

Scans
______________________________________________________________________________________________
18:65 (18: 66 in the Kadiani Koran)
https://x.com/_Ibnul_Khattab_/status/1944084452600086597

-MGA stated that the person mentioned in Ayah 18:65 is Khadirﷺ,that damaging the ship, killing the boy, and repairing the wall were actual events.

-MBM stated that the person mentioned in the Ayah is Muhammadﷺ, the events mentioned were part of a Kashf not actual events. (4/5)

Scans
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
People of the Cave, Ashab e Kahf
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2021/07/06/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-called-the-story-the-story-of-ashab-e-kahf-as-a-miracle-ahmadis-rejected-it-nevertheless/
https://x.com/_Ibnul_Khattab_/status/1944084456718917862

-MGA stated that the People of the Cave are one of Allah’sﷻ wonders.

-MBM considered it funny yet sad that Allahﷻ stated that the People of the Cave are not a wonder, they were rather a sign like any other sign of Allahﷻ, yet Muslims present them as one of the wonders. (5/5)

Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s