Intro
On yesterday’s livestream, Imtiaz proved that no Muslim (before Sir Syed in the 1870’s) ever wrote that Eisa (as) was on the cross. Razi was cornered and immediately lied about a Muslim scholar from the past, this time he chose Abdul Majid Dariyabadi, who was a modernist and thus didn’t even fall into the category that Razi was being pressed on. The truth is that Abdul Majid Dariyabadi was an Atheist in 1918-1920 (he was barely 28 years old) and he read the English commentary (1917) of the Quran by a Lahori-Ahmadi (Maulvi Muhammad Ali) and was impressed. Thus, it is proven, that Abdul Majid Dariyabadi praised the Lahori-Ahmadi Maulvi Muhammad Ali and his version of who MGA was, not the Qadiani version. Nevertheless, he called Lahori-Ahmadi’s as “Qadiani’s”.
Nevertheless, Razi to argue that in the early-to-mid 1900’s, Abdul Majid Dariyabadi also said that Eisa (as) was on the cross. However, as Al-Yemeni, Adnan and Imtiaz saw the scan work, they quickly realized how Razi was lying. Al-Yemeni, Adnan and Imtiaz pointed out how in the commentary of 4:157 (that Razi showed), Abdul Majid Dariyabadi said that Eisa (as) was never even “sent to be on the cross” (1:46:00 time stamp). In fact, Abdul Majid Dariyabadi even quoted Shah Wali Ullah and Abdul Qadir Jilani and Ghulam Athanvi who also believed that Eisa (as) was never on the cross.
Razi was proved to be a liar, it was so bad that he admitted that he made a mistake, which he has never done in his life. Razi was quoting a different page wherein Abdul Majid Dariyabadi was explaining how crucifixtion is done by death on the cross. However, Abdul Majid Dariyabadi was only explaining what crucifixiton is. Where did Razi learn this level of lying?? From MGA!!! MGA lied on Bukhari, Ibn Taymiyyah, Imam Malik, Ibn Qayyim and many others.
In the past, Qadiani-Ahmadi’s have also tried to quote Abdul Majid Dariyabadi in terms of Muslims who refrained from calling Ahmadi’s as Kafir‘s.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1925
Are Ahmadis Not True Muslims (alislam.org)
(Al-Fazl, 21 March 1925, p. 7, no. 104, vol. 12)
“”The type of prophethood that the late Mirza Sahib ascribes towards himself is the same as every Muslim’s belief about the expected Messiah. This is clearly a belief which is not
against the concept of Khatm-e-Nubuwwat. Thus, if Ahmadiyyat is the same as is evident from the writings of the late Mirza Sahib, the Founder of the Community, then to declare them apostates would be a great wrong.””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1934
Chapter 3: Later Translations: Abdul Majid Daryabadi rescued from agnosticism – Islam Ahmadiyya – alahmadiyya.org
1934, in the Urdu newspaper, Such (‘Truth’)
Newspaper Such, Lucknow, 25 June 1934; see Paigham Sulh, 3 August 1934, p. 3, col. 2.
“To deny the excellence of Maulvi Muhammad Ali’s translation, the influence it has exercised and its proselytising utility, would be to deny the light of the sun. The translation certainly helped in bringing thousands of non-Muslims to the Muslim fold and hundreds of thousands of unbelievers much nearer Islam. Speaking of my own self, I gladly admit that this translation was one of the few books which brought me towards Islam fifteen or sixteen years ago when I was groping in darkness, atheism and scepticism. Even Maulana Muhammad Ali [Jauhar] of the Comrade was greatly enthralled by this translation and had nothing but praise for it.”
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1952
ahmadiyya-case.pdf
“Recently, by co-incidence, I found an example of it in the poetry of Maulana Rumi. And that too, not in some apocryphal work, but in the renowned and famous, authentic book Masnawi. Regarding the status and excellence of the spiritual guide it is written:
‘When you give your hand into the hand of a spiritual guide, you seek to imbibe wisdom as the mentor is the knowing and discerning. O disciple, he is a prophet of his time, as his person radiates the light of the Prophet.’
“It is clearly stated here that the perfect spiritual guide is the prophet of the time because he reflects the light of prophethood. Great theologians, philosophers, and spiritual men have written commentaries on the Masnawi, but none of them took exception to this form of expression. Rumi’s own son, Sultan Walad, has made the following comment:
‘The exaggeration in likening a saint to a prophet refers to the penetrating effect of his guidance; otherwise, at no time was prophethood thinkable after the Holy Prophet Muhammad.’ — Masnawi, vol. v, p. 67, footnote 13, printed at Kanpur.
“Obviously we will still call it lacking in due caution, but it is equally obvious that instances of such lack of caution are to be found in the writings of the great religious leaders of classical times.” (Newspaper Sidq Jadeed, 8 August 1952).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1975
Ahmadiyya authors quote him in the Muslim Sunrise of Jan-1975. They then repost a letter from Daryabadi’s newspaper, “Sidqe Jadid” on 10-25-74. This writing seems to be a response to a 3-page letter that he got (from what seems to be an Ahmadi) and has to do with Qadiani’s and Lahori’s Ahmadi’s getting declared Non-Muslim. The quote seems to be incomplete.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1979
Aap Beti, Shadab Book Centre, Lahore, 1979, pp. 254 – 255
Chapter 3: Later Translations: Abdul Majid Daryabadi rescued from agnosticism – Islam Ahmadiyya – alahmadiyya.org
“By these gradual inner changes, I was slowly returning to Islam. In fact, I had become more than fifty percent Muslim when in October 1920 during a journey to the Deccan I had occasion to stay with a relative Nazir Yar Jang, a judge, at Orangabad. In his English library my eye fell on the English translation and commentary of the Holy Quran by Muhammad Ali of Lahore, the Ahmadi (Qadiani in common parlance). Feeling restless, I took it from the cupboard and started to read it. As I read through it, praise be to Allah, my faith kept on increasing. The necessary result of the Westernised mentality which dominated over my mind at that time was that the very same explanations which, when expressed in Urdu, had no effect on me and seemed uninspiring, in English garb they became effective and life-giving. Whether this be self-delusion or not, in my case it was a reality.
When I finished reading this English Quran, on searching my soul I found myself to be a Muslim. Now I was able to recite the Kalima unhesitatingly, without deceiving my conscience. May Allah grant this Muhammad Ali paradise in every way! I am not concerned with the question whether his belief about Mirza [Ghulam Ahmad] sahib was right or wrong. Whatever the case, what should I do about my personal experience? He was the one who put the last nail in the coffin of my unbelief and apostasy.””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
2024
https://youtu.be/iDj07T7j4mY?si=pRhAk5m9CMDYrhCM
Scans
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
Did some Deobandi Scholars refuse to call MGA a Kafir?? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Sir Syed Ahmad Khan and the Ahmadiyya Movement – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Did some Deobandi Scholars refuse to call MGA a Kafir?? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
aaiil.org/Files/Literatures/Books/101/muhammadalienglishholyquran1917.pdf
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism
4 Pingback