Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Thorough research work on the Ahmadiyya Movement, #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome

Search results

"tash"

The first 27 pages of the 1923 edition of Seeratul Mahdi in ENGLISH

Intro
My team and I have translated the first 27 pages of the 1923 edition of Seerat ul Mahdi, which includes the first 48 narrations. These are hilarious stories of MGA. The most damning story thus far is about MGA’s death (See narration #11). In 1923, Mirza Bashir Ahmad and his mother told the world that MGA was too weak to go the bathroom and pooped diarrhea on the floor next to his own bed. This was changed in the 1935 edition of Seeratul Mahdi and stated that MGA’s widow (Nusrat Jehan) made arrangements by the side of the bed for MGA to poop diarrhea, which was a lie.

Continue reading “The first 27 pages of the 1923 edition of Seeratul Mahdi in ENGLISH”

A Not Very Well Known Part of the Prophecy of Musleh Maud, i.e. the Case of the Pious Beauty

Intro
Points to note from the letter:

  1. Less than two years after marrying Nusrat Jahan Sahiba (marriage November 1884), Allah has decreed that the promised Messiah should marry again to a perfect woman

2. It has been settled in the understanding of the promised Messiah that the blessed son who was prophecied a few months earlier, will be born to this third wife, who would be beautiful and pious at the same time.

3. Based on this, the promised Messiah has already started seeking matrimonial proposals and has already rejected two proposals based on God’s intervention through Istikhara. God has told him that the first one is not qualified to be his wife because she would bring disrespect and misery, whereas the second one is not pretty. As such she is not going to be able to bear a perfect, handsome son.

4. He is being bombarded by revelation in this regard which means to him that the time has likely come for the third marriage.

5. We know from relevant history that he continues the search for this ‘pious beauty’ until february 1888 when Muhammadi Begum’s poor father knocks on the promised Messiah’s door and requests him to sign a property off to them.

My questions on these points.

  1. Why would God send his only prophet in modern times, on a wild goose chase of a third marriage when the promised Messiah had just married according to God’s will? This is especially concerning because in the end, decades later, God was to tell him that the wife he already had was enough for him.

2. Was Nusrat Jahan Sahiba not pretty or not pious as she was not expected to be able to bear a son of perfect inward and outward qualities? But then, how did she become perfect by April of 1888, (21 months after the prophecy of third marriage and 9 months before the birth of Musleh Maud) that eventually she became the mother of that very, glorious son?

3. If Nusrat Jahan Sahiba had transformed by early 1888, why did the promised Messiah keep pursuing the hand of Muhammadi Begum for a third wife for another decade? Should the search not have been stopped right then and there as the promised son was already conceived? Why did God keep pushing the promised Messiah to keep pressurizing Muhammadi and her family?

4. In February 1888, he made the prophecy that he would marry Muhammadi Begum, no matter what may happen, as it had been decreed by God. We understand that Muhammadi was God’s choice instead of Nusrat Jahan Sahiba, as she was chosen after an istikhara, and she must have been prettier and holier than Nusrat Jahan Sahiba to presumably be the mother of the promised glorious son. But only three months later the glorious son was already conceived with Nusrat Jahan Sahiba. Yet God who decreed the son, who selected the genes to create perfection in that birth, and who delivered this baby unblemished, did not realize that he was supposed to deliver this son to the future mom who had already been decreed and ordered and whose Nikah had been solemnized in heavens because of her being prettier and holier than the existing wife?

5. God selects Muhammadi Begum for the promised Messiah specifically because A. she is prettier, and B. She is piouser than Nusrat Jahan Sahiba and more deserving of bearing the fruit of the other world. At the same time, the Promised Messiah also attests to the piety of Muhammadi’s father in the first letter of proposal of marriage. In a separate letter, he also attests to the piety of the husband of the auntie of Muhammadi Begum whose daughter is married with the promised Messiah’s son. This tells us that both God and the promised Messiah are totally convinced that the immediate family and extended family of Muhammadi Begum, as well as she herself are excellent people and pious muslims at the time when proposal of marriage is made in February 1888. Yet when years later the promised Messiah has failed to marry Muhammadi Begum, God tells him that this was a corrupt and anti-Islamic family and eventually they repented after the death of Muhammadi’s father and hence the decreed marriage of Muhammadi was averted. Why would God go back on his own assessment of the piety of the family?

6. Notice that as per the letter, two glad tidings have being given to the promised Messiah, one (the birth of the glorious son) which, he has already shared with his friends. The second which he has not yet shared with his friends and he is excited to do now with this letter is the third marriage with a pretty and pious lady. Also note that under direct intervention by God, one proposal was rejected because it would be the cause of sorrow and the other because she was not pretty. We know also that Muhammadi’s hand was also sought after the claim that God had approved her. My question is, why was God’s judgement so poor that he forced the promised Messiah to suffer for decades chasing a rainbow? Recall that in this process, the promised Messiah had to divorce his first wife, had his son divorce the cousin of Muhammadi and had to disown his other son. In addition he was a subject of public mockery for a decade. What kind of glad tidings end up in such bitterness?

7. Is there any way at all, to justify the fulfillment of the prophecy of this letter which is that he was to marry a perfect lady and a perfect son among other children was to be born to her? There are no conditions attached to this. There are no if this and if that. There is no repentance clause which can be invoked.

8. Is it possible that since the Musleh Maud was not born to the pious beauty, that he also was not all-powerful, perfect in outward appearance and inner qualities?

I am at a complete loss to make sense out of this prophecy and its details. Perhaps one of our trusted apologists can help make some sense out of it for all of us. While I invite my ahmadi apologist brothers to kindly answer these questions, I also appeal to their sensibilities, to avoid attacking this post with spam.

Continue reading “A Not Very Well Known Part of the Prophecy of Musleh Maud, i.e. the Case of the Pious Beauty”

Imam Al-Ghazzali did Takfir of Ibn Arabi

Intro
Watch Bro Haji’s explanation herein. Ibn Arabi was a total deviant and shouldn’t be read for Islam, some Sufi’s might have quoted him without knowing his full aqida. In the below, I have copied and pasted the data. Ghazzali is also mentioned in the ROR of Feb-1942.

Continue reading “Imam Al-Ghazzali did Takfir of Ibn Arabi”

Who is Zafrullah Domun? The ex-ahmadi from Mauritius

Intro
Zafrullah Domun was the Amir of the entire Mauritius jamaat from 1988 to 1998. He was elected as Qaed Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya for Rose-Hill in the 1980’s, President of the Rose-Hill Jamaat, and member of the national Majlis-e-amla until he became national Amir in 1988 at the age of only thirty five, an office which he held until 1998. During his tenure of office, be it qaed/president or amir, he was known to show a strong inclination in favor of religious practices against worldly engagements. Several times he would clash with young members concerning carom or domino tournaments. His argument would be the verse of chapter 23 of the Holy Quran where the believer is required to avoid everything useless (laghav) and instead be constant in his salaat.

Zafrullah Domun was ex-communicated in 2001 by the 4th Khalifa along with Munir Ahmad Azim. By 2003, these characters had started their own religious community in Mauritius called, “Jamaat Ahmadiyya Muslimeen”. Both of these guys were members of the Ahmadiyya Community at Mauritius. However, by 2007, Zafrullah Domun was calling Munir Ahmad Azim as a liar and charlatan.

Continue reading “Who is Zafrullah Domun? The ex-ahmadi from Mauritius”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad couldn’t differentiate between the right and left shoe

Intro
MGA was sooo high on opium, he was normally in a drug-induced-stooper. There are many stories of MGA not being able to tell if he was even wearing any shoes and he still walked for miles. There is another story how MGA couldn’t differentiate between the left and right shoe. Enjoy…

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad couldn’t differentiate between the right and left shoe”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Freemasons

Intro
In 1899, MGA and his team of writers wrote a book entitled, “Sitara-e-Qaisarah”. This is lesser known pamphlet that MGA and his team wrote. The cover page of this book (posted in the below) seems to have free mason symbols on it. Just 2 years later, MGA saw a letter about Free Masons and fabricated a revelation wherein he would be protected against them (see the ref in the below). By 1907, via the Al-Badr, MGA was accusing the King of Afghanistan of being a Free mason and thus the reason for his downfall. Also, check out “The Star of the Empress” (Tuhfa-e- Qaisariyyah) by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1899).

In 1991, via a book by Fritz Springmeier, “Be Wise as Serpents”, he mentions Ahmadiyya. By 2018, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s tried to spin these mason symbols, in a desperate way, they claimed that MGA wanted all the religions in the British Empire to unite.

They had initially written “Sitara-e-Qaisarah” (also spelled Tuhfa-e- Qaisariyyah) in English as “The Star of Victoria”, however, the queen of England never even responded to MGA’s flattery. So MGA and his team wrote another pamphlet entitled, “The Star of the Empress” by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1899), this seems to have been in english. In 2013, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s published a new english translation of this book.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Freemasons”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Surah Al-Kahf, protection against Dajjal and the Ahmadiyya Movement

Intro
We have covered MGA and all of his utterances in terms of Dajjal and posted them herein, it doesn’t seem like MGA ever commented on the first 10 verses of Al-Kahf. However, he did comment on the last 10 and the last 20. In 1879, in the BA2, MGA quoted 18:109 (18:110, in the Ahmadi quran) and thus using this verse for his own prophethood. MGA didn’t mention any hadith at this point, nor did he connect the last 10 verses with protection against the Dajjal. In BA-3 (See page 108), MGA quoted one of the first 10 verses of Al-Kahf, however, he didn’t connect it with the Dajjal, Christian missionaries and etc. In BA-4 (see pages 316, 327 and 439), MGA quotes one of the last 10 verses of Al-Kahf, however, he didn’t connect it with the Dajjal, Christian missionaries and etc. By 1891–1893, MGA made his wild claims and argued that Dajjal was the Christian missionaries, and the British and Russian governments.

Just before MGA died, via MGA’s book “Chasma-e-Marifat”, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that the blowing of the trumpet in the Quran, is about the coming of the Messiah (18:100). In BA-5, which was published after MGA died, it is written that MGA=Dhul Qarnain, this falls into the last 20 verses of Sura Al-Kahf. In the 1960’s at Rabwah, the 2nd Khalifa published Malfuzat and it is written therein that MGA did believe that the first 10 verses related to the Anti-Christ (aka Dajjal) (See Malfuzat-3, online english edition, pages 99-100).

After MGA died, and via Malfuzat(see pages 99-100), MGA made the connection, however, this was in the 1960’s in Rabwah.

Thus, in 1917, the Lahori-Ahmadi, Muhammad Ali published his famous english commentary and called the authentic hadith of Muhammad (Saw) in terms of Al-Kahf and Dajjal as true, however, he said, “the first 10 or the last 10”.

In 1988, via the famous 5-volume commentary of the Quran by Malik Ghulam Farid, the Ahmadiyya Movement called the famous authentic hadith which was related by Abu Hurraira and in terms of Dajjal and how Muhammad (Saw) specifically told Muslims to recite the first 10 verses of Sura-Al-Kahf (Chapter 18) to get protection from Dajjal as fake hadith. However, he acknowledged the last 10 (most likely since MGA quoted it).

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Surah Al-Kahf, protection against Dajjal and the Ahmadiyya Movement”

MN and others (Ahmadis – country conditions – risk)

Intro
Per Akber Chaudhry, “”MN and others (Ahmadis – country conditions – risk)”” is a ruling from the UK in 2012 wherein the persecution of Ahmadi’s and relgious freedom were discussed. In this video, Akber Chaudhry claims that this study proves that religious freedom doesn’t equal the ability to prostelize.

Continue reading “MN and others (Ahmadis – country conditions – risk)”

The history of Ahmadiyya in Iran

Intro
By 2022, there are NO #Ahmadis in all of Iran. In 1906, in response to the Persian Constitutional Revolution of 1905, MGA and his team of writers fabricated a revelations to the effect that there has been a shaking in the house of the Shah (Urdu ROR of Jan-1906 and Badr and Hakam). 3 years later, and after MGA’s death, in response to the escape of Mohammad Ali Shah Qajar to Russia, Ahmadiyya editors argued in the ROR of July-1909 that MGA was revealed half of the Quranic verse 21:30 (21:31 in the Qadiani Quran) as a prophecy about Iran. However, this alleged revelation isn’t found in any of MGA’s books (only the ROR of 1909). In 1919, the 2nd Khalifa began making statements about setting up missionaries in Bukhara (Bokhara), Iran, Afghanistan and other Arab countries (See the 2nd Khalifa’s address on 3-17-1919, page 104)(see Ahmadiyya British-Jewish connections, page 87). In 1922, the 2nd Khalifa sent Maulvi Muhammad Amin through Mashhad, Iran and into Russia. In 1926, in the Khalifa’s famous letter/book to the King of Afghanistan (Invitation to Ahmadiyya), he mentions the fabricated revelation of MGA about the Palace of Khosroes being shaken (see pages 335).

Continue reading “The history of Ahmadiyya in Iran”

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑