Intro
Ahmadis are desperately altering texts, conducting academic dishonesty, presenting false translations, and openly lying and never admitting to facts and never answering the pertinent questions in any topic. Watch my video explanation here (on periscope) and here on youtube. Some Muslim scholars in the past, like Ibn Abbas and a few others were of the opinion that Esa (As) was caused to die by Allah in 3:55 and 5:117 and then physically lifted to heaven (Ghamidi believes this also). #Ahmadis know this, however, they have purposely twisted this data and put it forward as as argument for the idea that Esa (as) died. However, they purposely leave out the fact that #Ahmadis believe that Esa (As) died 90 years after the incident of crucifixtion as described in 4:157–159, 3:55 and 5:117, and thus totally against the belief of Ibn Abbas and Imam Malik. Further, this quotation is from a Shia collection of hadith, and thus another case of Ahmadiyya cherry picking. #ahmadis also use a Shia hadith book as they argue about the eclipses.
Imam Malik believed that Eisa (As) died at age 33 and was physically lifted to heaven, this was the death of sleep. This is what Imam Malik meant. We have also created a twitter thread herein.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________The quote from Majma’ Bihar al-Anwar
See Majma’ Bihar al-Anwar, vol. i, p. 286.
At some point in MGA’s career, he seems to have quoted Imam Malik (probably 1891), Muhammad Ali used the same quote later on. Nonetheless the quote is posted in the below:
“While most people believe that Jesus (As) did not die, Malik said that he died.”
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Al bayanul tasee by Ibn Rushd
At the 1:13:59 mark, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwltAp7qP2A
Commentary
Ibn Rushd mentions that this is disputed. In this ref, Imam Malik says that Eisa (as) died at age 33. Ibn Rushd commentates on this and says that it means that Eisa (as) left this dunya and was physically raised to Allah. Ibn Rushd goes to explain that Imam Malik means that Eisa (as) was lifted alive. He goes on to quote Imam Malik and agree that Eisa (as) will make Hajj or Umrah or both per Imam Malik. Furthermore, in terms of the physical descent of Eisa (as), people will hear a cloud and it will be Eisa (As) and Eisa (As) was not killed, Allah raised him to himself and he will physically descend at the end of times.
Scans
______________________________________________________________________________________________What is this book Majma Bihar al-Anwar? Imam Malik didnt write it!!!!
Imam Malik never wrote about Esa (As), the Mahdi, or anything of this nature. He wrote his famous hadith collection, and nothing was mentioned on any of these topics. We have no idea where Ahmadis got this book from, its a total mystery. Bihar al-Anwar (Arabic: بِحَار ٱلْأَنْوَار, meaning “Seas of Lights”) is a comprehensive collection of traditions (ahadith) compiled by Shia scholar Mohammad-Baqer Majlesi (d. 1110/1698), known as Allama Majlisi. It is a hadith collection as the secondary source used beside the four books. Bihar al-Anwar which a compendium of Hadiths, historical subjects and commentaries on many Qur’anic verses, completed between 1106 AH (1694 AD) and 1110 AH (1698 AD).[1]
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bihar_al-Anwar
MGA lied about the context of the Ibn Abbas hadith on Esa (as) from Bukhari
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Averroes
39:42 of the Quran disproves all #ahmadi arguments on the death of Esa (as)
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/28/tanwir-al-miqbas-min-tafsir-ibn-abbas/
The “Tanwir al-miqbas” Tafsir and the “substitution-theory of Esa (As)”
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/09/20/tawaffa-in-242-and-415/
Even Tafsir al-Tustari tells us that WAFFA for Esa (as) means a physical ascension
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 4:159 (4:160 in the Ahmadiyya Quran’s), before the death of Jesus (as)
39:42 of the Quran disproves all #ahmadi arguments on the death of Esa (as)
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 4:159 (4:160 in the Ahmadiyya Quran’s), before the death of Jesus (as)
Mujahid ibn Jabr (Arabic: مُجَاهِدْ بِنْ جَبْر) (645-722 CE) Tafsir on 4:157 to 4:159
St John of Damascus and his tract ‘Heresy of Ishmaelites’ confirms the substitution theory (749)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swoon_hypothesis
Salaaboo in 20:71 proves the Substitution theory for Esa (As)
http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=587&Itemid=59#3
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Abu-al-Qasim-Mahmud-ibn-Umar-al-Zamakhshari
Qadianis love to quote "Majma' Bihar an Anwar" but as you would have noticed it's a Shi'a source filled with fabricated reports.
So, what was Imam Malik's رحم الله view on Eesa Ibn Maryam عليه السلام?#QC13 pic.twitter.com/sNdvcJrbzH
— ⚔️ Aslan Bey |Y| ⚔️ (@Aslan_Bey_1) October 1, 2022
https://www.google.com/search?q=Who+is+Todd+Lawson&oq=Who+is+Todd+Lawson&aqs=chrome..69i57.5047j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
MGA lied about the context of the Ibn Abbas hadith on Esa (as) from Bukhari
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/18/mgas-strange-beliefs-on-the-birth-of-adam-as/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanwir_al-Miqbas
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #Mumeetuka #ibnabbas #mutawafeeka #messiahhascome
4 Pingback