MGA got Braheen e Ahmadiyya vol. 4 published in the winter of 1884. In this book, MGA was slowly and cleverly laying the seeds for his future claims. He was already twisting verses of the Quran like 17:8. You can also see the same trend in MGA’s commentary on 3:55 in Braheen e Ahmadiyya Vol. 4. In this same era, MGA claimed to be “Maseel e Maseeh”, in english as, ‘The like of the Messiah”. In reality, MGA was copying the positions of Sir Syed and passing them off as his own in deceit. Muslims in India weren’t impressed by MGA’s Braheen e Ahmadiyya series, which culminated with Vol. 4’s publishing. The leaders of the Ahl-e-Hadith sect of Muslims in North India tore of the Braheen e Ahmadiyya and sent it back to Qadian in that condition, which angered MGA. MGA was called a Kafir, since he was claiming divine communion in his Braheen series, but Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi gave MGA the benefit of the doubt and remained friendly with MGA. However, by later 1889, Batalvi had turned MGA, since MGA had claimed to be the Messiah.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1882–Braheen e Ahmadiyya, Vol. 3, pages 229 and 233, online english edition

MGA denies the miracles of Esa (as) as mentioned in the Bible and Quran 3:49. However, MGA totally avoided 5:110.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1884–Braheen e Ahmadiyya, Vol. 4, pages 31-35, online english edition

MGA quotes the Bible, John Verses 2-5 (make sure you read John, verses 1-15 to properly understand the context), as he denies the miracles of Jesus in the bible. However, MGA forgets to mention that the Quran, 3:49 had already confirmed the many miracles of Esa (as) and it specifically spoke of the instance in John wherein Esa (as) healed the blind, the sick, the lepers and brought a man back to life. In fact, in MGA’s first 10 books, he never mentioned the Quran, Chapter 3 verses 45-51.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1884–Braheen e Ahmadiyya, Vol. 4, Page 34, online english edition

MGA scoffs at how some insects can be brought back to life with salt. MGA is making a mockery of the miracles of Esa (as), specifically, as they relate to bringing dead people back to life, which is also mentioned in the Quran, 3:49.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1890 in Izala Auham

MGA goes into depth as totally denies the Quranic verse, 3:49 [See Izala-e-Auham, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 3, pp. 251-263, footnote].(See also Essence of Islam, vol-3, pages 218–226).

Scan of Izala Auham

Zamima Anjam-e-Atham, Roohani Khazain vol 11 p.290. See also,, retrieved on 6-11-19.
Watch the video by these imams herein:

“The Christians have written about many miracles of (Jesus) but the fact is that he did not perform any miracle.”


Links and Related Essays

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad quoted and commented on 17:8 in 1884 in the Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, vol. 4, he then connected 17:8 with the return of the Messiah

During the writing of Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, MGA masked his beliefs, he was already asserting that Esa (as) died

What is Maseel-e-Maseeh? The like of the Messiah?

Sir Syed’s view on Esa (as)–1882

The Queen of the Princely state of Bhopal invested heavily (1878) into Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his Braheen–they were disappointed by the product

Friedman errs on Ishaat us Sunnah volume numbers and the corresponding year

Nusrat Jehan Begum and other women didn’t get into to MGA’s bait in 1889 and after–were they illiterate?

Ahmadiyya leadership lied about the First Bait ceremony in 1889

Click to access reviewreligionsenglish1908.pdf

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was accused of claiming prophethood in the 1879–1884 era

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam