Intro
MGA had a famous Delhi debate in 1891. A year later in 1892, MGA allegedly prayed with Khwaja Kamaluddin in the Chaniyan mosque in Lahore behind Maulvi Rahim Bakhsh who had declared him a kafir, see Khawaja Kamaluddin, “Causes of Internal Dissensions in Ahmadiyya, Dec-1914). We should also remember that MGA had claimed prophethood already from 1880 to 1891, that’s 11 years, he was accused again in 1891. MGA responded by denying prophethood over and over again in 1891. Further, in Delhi, MGA cursed any claimant to prophethood and called them Kafir.
Continue reading “In 1891 in Delhi and in 1892, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad read his prayers behind Muslims who called him Kafir”
Intro
I bumped into an #ahmadi on twitter who claims that Tuwaffa and Tawaffa mean different things in the quran. This is incorrect, zairs and zubbers don’t drastically change the meanings of any Quranic words, it is the context which changes meanings, not pronunciation. MGA never made this argument, nor did any Ahmadi scholar, or we haven’t found those references yet. Also read here how Imam Malik and Ibn Abbas may have believed that Esa (As) died and then was physically lifted to heaven and will physically return, Ghamidi also seems to agree with this view. The Ahmadi view is that Esa (as) died 90 years after the event of crucifixtion and thus doesn’t fit.
Continue reading “Is there a difference between Tuwaffa and Tawaffa in the Quran? Or are they just diacritical marks?”
Intro
The Lahori-Ahmadi’s have always accused the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s of not properly understanding the prophethood of MGA. Well, the reason was, it was a new type of prophethood which had never existed before, since the Quran indirectly told us that all prophethood was law-bearing only. In fact, MGA argued over and over from 1891 to 1901 that an Ummati could never become a Nabi, he said that they were anithetical. However, after “Correction of an Error” (Eik Ghalti Ka Izala)(published in Nov. 1901 as an announcement), MGA began asserting that he discovered that an Ummati can become a Nabi. However, this is against the Quran.
In 1890-91, in Izala Auham (see the refs in the below), MGA argued over and over again that a prophet could never be a follower of another prophet. MGA and his team of writers quoted the Quran, 4:64 (4:65 in the Ahmadi Quran) as evidence. In fact, in the same book, MGA claims that his God called him an Ummati and Nabi in the Barahin i Ahmadiyya (about 7-10 years earlier), however, he didn’t give the exact reference. In the same year (1891 in Delhi, see the announcement here), MGA published an announcement to the effect that anyone who claims to be a prophet is a Kafir, obviously, MGA only meant a prophet like all the prophets mentioned in the Quran (independent-prophets).
However, 10 years later, after the publishing of ‘Eik Ghalti Ka Izala”, Nov. 1901, MGA and his team totally abandoned this view. They claim that MGA discovered that an Ummati can become a Prophet (see Haqiqatun Nubuwwat by Mirza Mahmud Ahmad and Qaul al Fasl {1915}, see also Qazi Muhammad Nazeer, 1966, “Truth Prevails”), he also claimed to be greater and better than Esa (as) in this exact time frame. The other important fact to understand here is that all 124,000 prophets that were mentioned in the Quran were “independent” prophets, in others words, Allah made them prophets and they only followed the will of Allah and they all had the ability to create new laws and abrogate old ones. The prophethood that MGA discovered in 1901, never existed in the Quran, Torah or Bible, since all of those prophets were “independent”.
By 1903, MGA said that only he was allowed this title of Nabi in the entire Ummah (See RK, v. 20, p. 45; starts at approximately middle of the page; Tadhkirah-tush-Shahaadatayn; published 1903).
At the end of 1905, in “The Will”, MGA claims that some Muslims (he was only speaking about himself) have been able to become Ummati and Nabi (see English ROR of Jan. 1906).
In 1906-07, in Haqiqatul Wahy, MGA again asserted that he was both an Ummati and a Nabi, and he was the only one the entire ummah of Muhammad to achieve this. After MGA died (Ocotober of 1908), in the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 5, Noorudin wrote that MGA was always an Ummati and had become a Nabi. After the split of March 1914, Muhammad Ali wrote “Prophethood in Islam” (March 1915) and ripped the Qadiani belief that MGA was an Ummati-Nabi.
Continue reading “The Pagham-e-Sulh of July 1914 proves that even the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s were unsure how to categorize MGA’s prophethood immediately after the split”
Intro
This was the first Jalsa of the Qadiani branch of Ahmadiyya after Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad became Khalifa. Not much is known of this Jalsa, we only know that 600 converts to Ahmadiyya were reported (which was a lie). The 2nd Khalifa’s lectures during this Jalsa seem to be recorded and available in english, see here. The 2nd Khalifa mentioned the building of the minaret, which had been stopped after 1903, since all the money had went missing. It seems to have been re-started after this Jalsa. The ROR of June-1915 alleges that 400 Ahmadi women also attended and they had their own sessions. The ROR of Jan-1915 claims that between 3000-4000 people attended. Mufti Muhammad Sadiq allegedly gave a speech, as did Sarwar Shah, Hafiz Roshan Ali, Mir Hamid Shah, Shaikh Yaqub Ali Irfani, Munshi Farzand Ali and Hakim Khalil Ahmad. During the Jalsa, on Christmas day (12-25-1914), Sayyal cabled some news from the UK, it was about the conversion of Mr. Corio to Qadianism (See ROR of Jan-1915). He is dubbed as the first ever convert to Qadianism in England.
The Lahori-Ahmadi’s and Khwaja Kamaluddin wrote their famous “Ikhtalayfaat-e-Silsilaa-e-Ahmadiyya kay Usbaab” (The Causes of Internal Dissensions in the Ahmadiyya Movement) and had it published by 12-24-1914 and available for all Qadiani’s to purchase from Lahore it seems. Interestingly, the census of 1911 reported 18,965 Ahmadi’s just in the Punjab, however, many illiterate Muslims of India must have accidentally checked the wrong box. Furthermore, the census of 1901 reported 10,000 Ahmadi in the Bombay area only, which was manifestly inaccurate.
Continue reading “The 1914 Qadiani-Ahmadi Jalsa at Qadian”
Intro
Another silly claim of MGA, in that the majority of Kashmiri’s are of Hebrew origin, this is obviously a lie that MGA and his team of writers concocted as they worked backwards to connect Jesus (as) with Kashmir (See Jesus in India). We have a recent study which proves the opposite. We have pasted it into the below, more to come on this.
Intro
Another person who claimed to be the Messiah and lived a long life. More to come on this soon. Sun Myung Moon (Korean 문선명 Mun Seon-myeong; born Mun Yong-myeong; 6 January 1920 – 3 September 2012) was a Korean religious leader, also known for his business ventures and support for political causes.[1][2] A messiah claimant, he was the founder of the Unification movement (members of which considered him and his wife Hak Ja Han to be their “True Parents“),[3] and of its widely noted “Blessing” or mass wedding ceremony, and the author of its unique theology the Divine Principle.[4][5][6]
Links and Related Essay’s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Myung_Moon
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog