ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
Khutbah ilhamiya is a strange book, we haven’t been able to properly investigate even in 2020. Watch Akber Chaudhry and Ak Shaikh investigate it here. In the below, we have posted a strange statement by MGA which means further investigation, it seems like MGA is claiming in this famous Arabic only book that he was given the same abilities that Esa (as) was given, raising the dead. However, in the Barahin era (1879-1884), MGA had denied all the miracles of Esa (as).

In 1915, MGA is quoted in a story about the raising of the dead (Hyat-e-Ahmad, V-1, Part-2, page 288)(see scan in the below).
Continue reading “In Khutbah Ilhamiya, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that he was given the ability by Allah to raise people from the dead” →

Intro
Just like his father (MGA), Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad never wrote anything. Ahmadiyya sources claim that he wrote a huge commentary on the Quran called “Tafseer-e-Kabeer”, sometimes spelled as “Tafsir-i-Kabir”. They also claim that he wrote a shorter Tafsir entitled, “Tafseer-e-Sagheer” also spelled as “Tafsir-i-Saghir”. These Tafseer were most likely written by the paid Mullahs who worked directly for the Khalifa. The Khalifa didn’t have a full commentary written on the Quran, only about half, per the Introduction of the 1988 edition of the 5 volume commentary by Malik Ghulam Farid (died in 1977), Mirza Basheer ud Din’s “Tafsir-e-Kabir” only covered Chapters 1, 2, 10-29 and 78–114, he missed Chapters 3-9 and 30-77, he missed 53 chapters and purposely, since most of the controversial verses about Jesus and prophethood were contained therein. Ahmadi sources tell us that the first volume (Most likely Chapters 1-2 only) were published in 1940 and it took 20 years to complete just 2 chapters.

Per 5 Malik Ghulam Farid’s commentary, the first volume comprising the first nine chapters along with an introduction appeared in 147. The book was found to be too voluminous to be easily handled and, therefore, for the convenience of the readers, it was split into two parts. Volume 1 part I, containing the introduction & the first two chapters (now Vol. 1), was reprinted in 1964, and volume 1 part II, dealing with the next seven chapters (now Vol. 2) was reprinted in 1965 in Pakistan. Further research shows that the 5-volume commentary was first published in 1963 and then in 1968. In terms of 43:63, we are unsure what MGA wrote about it, however, in 1917, Muhammad Ali didn’t even give it a comment in his famous commentary. In 1988, Malik Ghulam Farid also connected this verse with the second coming of Esa (as).

Watch our video on 43:61 for the proper context herein.
Continue reading “Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad’s comments on 43:63 in Tafsir-i-Saghir” →

Intro
On 10-2-1891, MGA was in Delhi and was cornered. He seems to have published an announcement full of lies from the house wherein he was staying. It is unknown as to what newspaper this announcement was published. Nevertheless, MGA had already denied prophethood in 4 books, Victory of Islam, Elucidation of Objectives, Izala Auham Part-1&2. However, MGA denied the physicality of the Miraaj in Izala Auham Part-1 and denied it via this announcement. MGA also claimed to believe in all of the creed of Ahl-e-Sunnah-wa-Jamaa, which was a lie, since MGA denied the physical descent of Esa (as), MGA also denied a claim of being Esa (as) the son of Mary. 10 years later, MGA claimed to be a prophet, in a sneaky way. MGA quoted 48:29 and claimed that this verse was about him. Later on, MGA would claim that an ummati can be a nabi, thus, contradicting himself and inventing the Ummati Nabi.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s famous announcement of 10-2-1891 from Delhi, British-India” →

Intro
#Muslims should never discuss #hadith with #Ahmadis. The reason is quite simple, #ahmadis are taught to follow the revelations of MGA first, then they approach hadith and the Quran. #Ahmadis are essentially working backwards. The #wahabi approach to hadith seems to be the same. It seems that MGA was also a #wahabi (called #ahlehadith in British India), and thus took this from them. Sir Syed was also a Muslims of a #ahlehadith background, however, by 1875, he turned into a Quranist, which is totally fine, we don’t care, we allow Muslims to be adventerous in their beliefs, by 1877, Sir Syed denied the concept of the Mahdi. Nevertheless, this is what the British wanted in India. The British wanted to break Muslims reliance on Hanafi Fiqh, which was used by the #mughalempire as well as the #ottomanempire. In Saudia Arabia, the British created #wahabism and had them do a Jihad against the last Muslim empire, the Ottomans. The Ottomans controlled the oil in Iraq (al-basra) and had to be eliminated, thus they were taken out systematically and a puppet government was installed in Turkey in roughly 1924.

In the below, we have posted the reference from the 1900-1902 era wherein MGA confirms to #Ahmadis (and the world) that his revelations are above any and all hadith and any hadith which don’t match MGA’s revelations should be immediately discarded. We have also posted a reference from 7 years earlier, wherein MGA admits that after the Quran, Bukhari is the most authentic book. We have also posted scans from the English-ROR, which also prove the same.

Furthermore, in terms of hadith, especially when it comes to the Mahdi. #ahmadis cherry pick only 2 hadith, since the other 20+ hadith prove MGA to be a liar. Those 2 hadith are the famous one wherein it is claimed that “No Mahdi, except Esa” (which has been listed by the scholars are a lie) and the shia hadith on the eclipses. These are some classic cases wherein #ahmadis cherry pick as they work backwards to prove that MGA was true. As we all know, initially, from 1880–1891, MGA never mentioned the Mahdi at all. Then, in 1891, as he made his claims of being a Messiah, he was silent on the concept of the Mahdi. In 1892, MGA began to write that all the hadith on the Mahdi were faulty. By 1894, after reading about the pending eclipses, he fraudulently authenticated a Shia hadith that wasn’t even fulfilled properly. After MGA died, in the BA-5 (ocotober-1908), MGA’s ghost writers again wrote that all hadith about the Mahdi were wrong.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
See RK: vol: 19, pg. 140, 1902-1902 era.  “””Ijaz e ahmadi”””

“the basis for our claim is not hadith but Quran and that wahi which comes to us. Yes, in support we also quote those hadith which are according to Quran and do not contradict my wahi.  As for the rest of the hadiths, i throw them away like waste paper..” 

The scan work
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1895
In 1895, MGA wrote some different things on his formula of what Islam is
Arya Dharam, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 10, pp. 86-87

“Of the other books that are accepted by us the Sahih of Bukhari ranks as the first. All its Ahadith which are not opposed to the Holy Qur’an are in our view authoritative. Next comes Sahih Muslim. We accept its authority subject to the condition that it should not be opposed to the Holy Qur’an and Sahih Bukhari. Next to them are the compilations of Tirmidhi, Ibn-e-Majah, Muattah of Imam Malik, Nassa’i, Abu Da’ud and Dar Qutni, which we regard as authoritative so long as they are not opposed to the Holy Qur’an and Bukhari and Muslim. These are our religious books and these are the conditions under which we accept them….(…)”
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1924
Khutbatay Mahmoud (page 457)

Maseeh maoud(Mirza qadyani) use too say that ahadees is a work of a juggler, and juggler brings out from the box whatever he wants

Scan 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Scan from the ROR of May-1903, which also prove the same

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/25/in-ahmadiyya-islam-the-revelations-of-mgathe-quran/

Sir Syed was the first Muslim in India to ever say that all hadith on the Mahdi were weak…MGA copied

The Ahmadiyya fraud on Eclipses and the Mahdi

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/16/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-called-muhammad-saw-as-the-perfect-mahdi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/16/imam-suyuti-on-tawaffa/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/11/initially-mga-was-downgrading-all-hadith-on-the-mahdi-1890-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/25/the-ahmadiyya-fraud-on-eclipses-and-the-mahdi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/09/some-hadith-that-prove-that-the-mahdi-and-esa-as-are-two-separate-people/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/09/hadith-on-the-mahdi-scans-and-etc/

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
Watch my video explanation on this here. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad never commented on 5:111 to 5:115. Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad never commented on it either in his Tafseer-i-Kabeer, since he skipped Chapter 5 of the Quran altogether. Historically, chapter 5 was revealed in the last year of Muhammad’s (saw) life (see Malik Ghulam Farid’s famous 5-volume Qadiani commentary). Nevertheless, chapter 5 of the Quran has always been called Maida (food), or the table with the food on it. This entire chapter was named after the miraculous event which is described in these specific verses, specifically 5:115 wherein Allah agrees to send down from the cosmos (samaa) a table with food on it so that Esa (as) and his 12 disciples could eat, Allah Nuzul’ed the food, which is a physical descending. Some Christian sources have listed more than 12 disciples, nevertheless, the Quran 5:111 to 115 is referring to the last supper story as told from the Bible.

This miraculous event was such a fact in the Muslim world that the title of the Chapter was named after these specific verses. In these verses, Allah essentially teleports a table with food on it from heaven (jannah), through the cosmos (samaa) and to Earth (ardh) for the Esa (as) and his disciples to eat, which is a huge miracle. Even Mirza Ghulam Ahmad believed in the substitution theory for 50 years of his life. MGA claimed that his god told him that Esa (as) was dead, MGA and his team of writers then began to work backwards and deny all phenomenon of humans/food traveling from heaven thru the samaa (cosmos) and finally to Earth. In fact, Chapter 3:133 and 57:21, explain how heaven (janaa) is bigger than the Samaa (Cosmos) and the universe wherein the Earth is located (see Suyuti).  They also denied the the fact that Adam (as) was created by Allah in heaven, and Eve. Allah then physically sent them both from heaven (janna) through the cosmos (samaa) and finally to Earth, they also denied the physicality of the Miraaj of Muhammad (saw) and all other supernatural phenomenon in the Abrahamic religions. Finally, #ahmadis and other Muslims have failed to understand how these verses are actually explaining that the core of the substitution theory. In fact, in 5:115, Allah says specifically that he will punish anyone who disbelieves in Esa (as) after the food and table (Maida) are delivered. As we all know, in the Bible, Judas Iscariot disbelieved in Esa (as) and even informed the authorities of his whereabouts. Thus, 5:115 is explaining how how Allah caused the face of Judas (or maybe some other disciple) to look like Esa (as) and then in a split second, caused Esa (as) to exit Earth (ardh), through the cosmos (samaa) and into heaven (Janah). Thus, Judas Iscariot (or some other disciple) was given a punishment that was never given to any people before and thus explaining how 74:38 (74:39 in the Qadiani Quran)(and 4:110-112, 4:111-113 in the Qadiani Quran) does not apply to this situation. 74:38 is a general rule in Islam, which opposes Christianity in this regard, in Islam, as a general rule, every man/woman, is held for their own sins, no one else’s, however, in the case of Esa (as) an exception was allowed. Just like Muhammad (saw) was given an exception in terms of the 4 wives rule (see 33:50 in Suyuti). Furthermore, 5:115 will forever be linked with 4:147 since it explains as to who was really put on the cross, and how Esa (as) was never hung on any cross. Lastly, Samaa means the cosmos, the 7 paraellel universes between Earth (ardh) and Heaven (Jannah). One more thing, Allah is master of the Earth and the 7 cosmos and all that is between the two (see 38:66). At the very bottom we write how Ahmadi commentators weren’t able to differentiate between Samaa and Jannah, since the concept of parallel universes didn’t exist in their lives.

In 1901, MGA alleged that it was revealed to him that Eisa (as) fell into a state of swoon and was not actually dead (See Malfuzat-3, page-27, Al-Hakam, vol. 5, no. 6, dated 17 February 1901, pp. 7-8, as narrated by Sahibzadah Miyan Mahmud Ahmad Sahib in Tashhidh-ul-Adhhan). MGA also denigrated the “substitution theory” and said that Allah doesn’t make deals with criminals (inferring 5:115 of the Quran).
Continue reading “5:111 to 5:115 of the Quran prove the physical ascent/descent of Esa (as) and the substitution theory” →

Intro
After 1896, MGA and his team of writers began to assert that Esa (as) was buried in Kashmir and was Yuz Asaf. However, when MGA claimed to be the Messiah in 1891, he was claiming that Esa (as) died in Galilee (Al-Khaleeli)(See Izala Auham, Roohani Khazain vol.3 p.353-354), which is modern day Israel.

A few years later in Itmam ul Hujjah (1894), MGA claims to have evidence that the tomb of Jesus is in  Syria (modern day Lebanon), MGA claims that a man named Maulvi Mohammad Al-Saeedi Trablisi, who is a resident of Tripoli, Syria (modern day Lebanon) has written a letter to MGA, which is posted in the book. However, in the letter, Maulvi Mohammad Al-Saeedi Trablisi, who is a resident of Tripoli says that the grave of Eisa (as) is in the Country of Quds (modern day Jerusalem), and is present till now, and there is a Church built on it, and that church is the largest church of all churches, and inside it is the Grave of Hazrat Eisa and in the same church is the Grave of Maryam, the truthful. And both graves are separate. This contradicted MGA prior comments on the topic, MGA had previously alleged in Izala Auham (1891) that the grave was in Galilee (Al-Khaleeli). Molvi Mohammad Al-Saeedi Trablisi, who is a resident of Tripoli was never heard of ever again in the history of Ahmadiyya, nor was he mentioned in the famous list of 313 Ahmadi’s in 1896, which would have been 2 years after “Itmamul-Hujjah” means “The Final Argument” was published.
Continue reading “From 1891 to 1894, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was claiming that Esa (as) died in either Syria, Lebanon or Israel and at age 33” →

Intro
Qadiani and Lahori-Ahmadi’s both deny 3:46 of the Quran. 3:46 of the Quran and 5:110 prove that Esa (As) will physically descend close to the Day of Judgment (see 43:61). In both verses, the same phraseology and words are used to explain how Esa (as) spoke in the cradle (fil maahdi) and will speak at manhood (wakahalan)(upon his second coming). The phrase wakala or wakalan only appears in the Quran twice, and both times in reference to Esa (as), thus proving that Esa (as) will physically descend and give wisdom via his speech. 5:110 also proves that Eisa (as) was never harmed by any Jews or Romans and thus never hung on the cross (salaboo-hoo). It seems like MGA never wrote about Eisa (as) in the cradle, which includes these verses: 3:46, 19:29, 19:30, 19:31, 19:32, 19:33 or 5:110. MGA did make a mockery of Islam in this case, since he said he heard his son (Mirza Mubarak Ahmad, 1899-1907) speaking while in his mother’s womb. Tafsir ibn Kathir confirms this. In fact, Ibn Kathir presented a hadith from Abu Hurraira, wherein he relates that Muhammad (saw) said that Eisa (as) spoke in the cradle.

In 1891, via MGA’s written debate with Muhammad Bhopali in Delhi (see Al-Haq Mubahathah Dehli {1891}), MGA argued that “Wakahlan” (See 5:110 and 3:46) means the prime of youth (age 20-32) and Eisa (as) spoke when he was 2-4 years old (described by MGA as “Khorud Salee”) and defended his mom to the Jews.

In 1899-1902, via the publishing of “Tiryaq ul Qulub” (See page 40), under the 25th sign, MGA writes that he considers the birth of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad as a divine promise, there are other comments too. In the 1960’s, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s, via Mumtaz Ahmad Faruqi (See Truth Triumphs, page 31) alleged that Mirza Mubarak Ahmad was named the Musleh Maud (see refs in the below). MGA also alleged that Mubarak Ahmad spoke twice in his mother’s womb (Tiryaqul-Qulub Page 119 (arabic edition), Tiryaqul-Qulub Page 80 (Lahori-Ahmadi version online), Ruhani Khazain, Volume-15, page 217, Tiryaq ul Quloob page 41). MGA was calling Mirza Mubarak Ahmad as “Spark in the light of Allah” and claimed that he would cure people and his fame would spread throughout the world.

In 1907, via Al Hakam March 31, 1907, page 11 (4:24:38 time stamp), it is written about Hazrat Isa that he began to speak in Mahd, it does not mean that he began to speak at the time of birth or at the age of two or four months, but it means that when he was two or four years old, because this is the time when children play in cribs. It happens and it is not surprising for such a child to talk, my girl Ummat al-Hafiz also talks a lot.

In the 1960’s, the “Promised Son” totally contradicted MGA and alleged that Eisa (as) was 30 years old when he defended his mother to the Jews (See scans in the below). Thus, Ahmadi’s officially believe that Maryam (as) and Eisa (as) were in hiding for 30 years and finally came and faced the Jewish clergy/elders (see 19:29-30). These people were already old and thus, they would have been dead in 30 years, thus, the entire theory collapses. Furthermore, the 2nd Khalifa (the promised son) said that anyone who disagrees with Eisa (as)’s age being 30 is crazy. Thus, MGA’s own son called him crazy for alleging that Eisa (As) was “Khorud Salee” (2-4 years old). Factually, a child of 2-4 can speak, however, an infant of just a few months can’t, and this was when Eisa (as) spoke (fil mahdee), and this was the miracle of Allah (See Tafseer-e-Kabeer, Part-7, Maryam, Chapter 19, page 229, page 233, pages 244-245, see scans in the below).

In 1988, in terms of 3;36, in the 1988 edition of this 5-volume commentary, Farid claims that in Lane’s Lexicon, wakala means middle age (see page 396), he then quotes Thalabi’s famous commentary on the Quran wherein this scholar writes that this phrase wakala means between the ages of 40-55.

In 2026 (Mar), Bro Imtiaz showed how Maulvi Razi admitted to closing his eyes and following the beliefs of the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din in terms of if Eisa (As) spoke in the cradle (mahd) or not (See 3:46 and 5:110 of the Quran)(See the clip on TikTok and Twitter).

Continue reading “3:46 of the Quran proves that Esa (as) will physically return and speak at the age of manhood (wakala)” →