Intro
After MGA died, Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya vol. 5 was published and in it is a strange comparison that MGA made with ejaculation and prayers. Read my full review on BA5 herein.

In this specific reference, MGA and his team of writers specifically compare the pleasure of ejaculation with prayers.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Urdu scan of BA5, Rk, page

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
The quote from the online english edition of BA5, see pages 274-275

“””Yet another similarity between the sperm and the state of humility and fervour in Prayer is that just as a man’s sperm enters the body of his wife or another woman, at the time of ejaculation it flows freely just like the flowing of tears in a state of fervour and anguished supplication. And just as the sperm ejaculates spontaneously, so do tears flow from the eyes of a person at the height of anguished prayer. And just as the pleasure of ejaculations is at times lawful when experienced with one’s wife, and at times unlawful when experienced with a prostitute, the same is the case with the state of anguish and fervour, which at times is only for the sake of the One and Peerless God, with no contamination of idolatry or innovation. This is lawful pleasure. But at times such pleasure is experienced in the passion and fervour of worship that has the element of innovations, creature worship, and the worship of idols and goddesses, and then it is like the pleasure experienced during intercourse with a prostitute.”””

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya Part 5–A full review and analysis

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad promised 300 arguments for his Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, but only delivered one argument

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad didn’t write Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya; vol. 5

Announcements about Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya 1879–1882

Barahin-e- Ahmadiyyah volume 5, was re-published in 1914, it was the second edition

The Queen of the Princely state of Bhopal invested heavily (1878) into Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his Braheen–they were disappointed by the product

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was considered a Kafir in 1884, before his wildest claims

In 1882-1884, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was indirectly denying Quran 3:49, as he denied the miracles of Esa (as)

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad quoted and commented on 17:8 in 1884 in the Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, vol. 4, he then connected 17:8 with the return of the Messiah

In 1880, before the publishing of the Barahin i Ahmadiyya series, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad already knew that he was the second coming of Esa (as)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim  #ahmadiyyatrueislam