ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
In Sep-2025, Khuddam from the USA (led by Waqar Ahmad Bajwa) visited Tilford and met Mirza Masroor Ahmad. In the question and answer session, Mirza Masroor Ahmad admitted that Ahmadi’s are known to lie on reports and thus the winners of many awards like “Alam e In’ami” are predetermined based on corruption (See on TikTok and Twitter). Mirza Masroor Ahmad also told Ahmadi chanda collectors to stop asking Ahmadi’s to tell how much money they make, it could be a privacy issue and the Jamaat could get sued. Mirza Masroor Ahmad even mentioned the new GDPR rule (General Data Protection Regulation) and how if there was ever a data leak from the Ahmadiyya Jamaat, the jamaat could get sued (See on TikTok and Twitter).

Mirza Masroor Ahmad mentioned the operation of Jamia-Germany and spoke to some of the teachers. It was explained how students are taught the Persian poetry of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and not Persian in general. As of Sep-2025, staff members are 17 and students are 85. Mirza Masroor Ahmad told the teachers to use new methods of teaching, not the old “Pakistani-style” of beating up students. As of Sep-2025, only Ahmadi teachers and presenters have been allowed into Jamia-Germany to give speeches. Mirza Masroor Ahmad said employees of the Jamaat should be grateful that they are in Germany and not in Pakistan and thus should work non-stop. Mirza Masroor Ahmad wants employees of the Ahmadiyya Movement to work even in their off time.

Mirza Masroor Ahmad says that Christians don’t want any debate with Ahmadi’s but “Ghair-Ahmadi-Musalman” (aka Muslims) are still objecting. Mirza Masroor Ahmad also mentioned how he wants a new pocketbook made for new Murrabi’s working in the field (27:01), so when they come across innocent Muslims, they can try to get the upper hand (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). Some Ahmadi Maulvi says that there are already 8 arguments setup in the German language. Mirza Masroor Ahmad says to follow up with Ahmadi Maulvi’s and make sure they are actually reading it.

Mirza Masroor Ahmad also spoke to an Ahmadi who was working in the “Dar ul Qaza” (Court) of Ahmadiyya, however, the specific country was not given. Mirza Masroor Ahmad said that the younger generation has more problems than previous generations. Mirza Masroor Ahmad then asks the questioner if he has read all of the “faisalas” (decisions) of the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa? The questioner stumbles and says that he has only read some of them. Mirza Masroor Ahmad immediately scolds him and says that he should have read all of them. Mirza Masroor Ahmad says that he has lots of free time and should have read it! Emphatically! Mirza Masroor Ahmad then says that if Ahmadi employees audited their work hours, then it would be proven that no one has ever worked a 14-hour day (this seems to be the Ahmadi day, 14 hours!). Mirza Masroor Ahmad emphatically says that 6 hours are enough for sleep! Right! Mirza Masroor Ahmad says to add 3 hours to it for talking to family, eating and etc. Mirza Masroor Ahmad also says that prayers aren’t enough!

At 30:20, Mirza Masroor Ahmad says that Ahmadi’s are not getting treated as bad as the Palestinians and in a disrespectful way. Mirza Masroor Ahmad had also mentioned that things are getting better for Ahmadi’s in Pakistan. Mirza Masroor Ahmad admitted that there are some Officers (in the Pakistan military) who’s hearts have warmed up to Ahmadi’s (secretly). Mirza Masroor Ahmad then told the Ahmadi’s in Pakistan that if they pray earnestly, things in Pakistan will change in the favor of Ahmadi’s (see the clip on TikTok and Twitter).

Continue reading “In 2025, Mirza Masroor Ahmad is afraid of being sued and he knows how Ahmadi’s lie in their official reports” →

Intro
In 2025, Ahmadi’s use 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran) to argue that a “Masaduq-Rasul” would come after Muhammad (Saw), i.e., MGA (See the Qadiani-Ahmadi argument on 3:81 [3:82 in the Kadiani Koran]). It should be noted that MGA seems to be totally silent on 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran). In 1988, via the official 5-volume commentary of the Quran by Malik Ghulam Farid, it is not mentioned at all that 33:7 means that after Muhammad (Saw) a “Musadiq Rasul” would appear, i.e., MGA.

In Sep-2024, Bro Imtiaz showed (4:13:26 timestamp and at 20:55) how Ahmadi’s in 2025 are openly disagreeing with MGA on 3:81 of the Quran (3:82 in the Qadiani Quran)(see via Ibn Kathir). Modern day Ahmadi’s like Fathe Islam and Ansar Raza allege that MGA is the final “Musadaq-Rasul” and that MGA didn’t bring any new Kitab or Hikmah. They also didn’t mention the implications of a Jalali Nabi in the future, would this Jalali Nabi then be the last “Musadaq-Rasul”? Nevertheless, Qadiani’s also connect 33:7 (33:8 in the Kadiani Koran) and make non-sensical arguments and infer that Muhammad (Saw) also promised to follow a “Musadaq-Rasul” in the future, with MGA being the inference (naozobillah). At 26:30, Mirza Tahir Ahmad presents 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran). In 1989, (Time stamp 29:38) Mirza Tahir Ahmad questioned why the Muslim scholars never quoted 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran) and asked themselves as to why Muhammad (Saw) also took the covenant (this is a blasphemous question). It should be noted that on the night of the famous Miraj of Muhammad (saw), ALL the prophets were present and prayed behind Muhammad (saw) and thus agreed to the “Covenant of the Prophets” (See Sahih Muslim-172). Qadiani’s will totally avoid this fact, in fact, on the same night, Muhammad (Saw) met Eisa (As) and Eisa (as) said that he had some tasks remaining.

In 1989, Mirza Tahir Ahmad commented on 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran). At 0:14, Mirza Tahir Ahmad begins reciting 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran). At 1:45, Mirza Tahir Ahmad gives the translation. At 4:10, Mirza Tahir Ahmad starts talking about the Ahmadiyya concept of Hell. At 11:30, Mirza Tahir Ahmad starts on 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran). At 12:24, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that the covenant of the prophets (as mentioned in 3:81 and 33:7) was taken before any of the prophets were even born. Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that this was an “in-born” teaching in nature. Mirza Tahir Ahmad infers that all the prophets agreed to this while they were subconscious. Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that prophets come from a class wherein it is in their nature to submit, to such a degree, that they will believe anyone sent from God, as long as they fulfil certain conditions. Mirza Tahir Ahmad scoffs at the scholars and says that they have said that this “Covenant of the Prophets” happened somewhere, like a physical location and time and Allah held them all as witnesses. At 14:57, Mirza Tahir Ahmad explains how the “Covenant of the Prophets” was made between God and the Prophets. At 21:54, Mirza Tahir Ahmad explains why every prophet has been included in the “Covenant of the Prophets”. Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that prophets aren’t against each other, they all believe in each other, they are bound by duty. At 24:41, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) means that prophets can’t call themselves as the last, this verse implies more (naozobillah). At 26:30, Mirza Tahir Ahmad presents 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran). At 29:38, Mirza Tahir Ahmad questions why the Muslim scholars never quoted 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran) and asked themselves as to why Muhammad (Saw) also took the covenant. At 31:35, Mirza Tahir Ahmad mentioned that the followers of all the prophets are “kept in mind” in terms of understanding this verse. At 33:12, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that the prophets agreed to this covenant like the leaders of nations and their followers are all ultimately held responsible. Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that it is the responsibility of the Muslim Ummah to keep this covenant. At 35:00, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that Muslim scholars were afraid to comment on 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran) because it would imply new prophets after Muhammad (Saw). At 35:31, Mirza Tahir Ahmad quotes Maudoodi, and alleges that Maudoodi wrote this “covenant” was taken by every single prophet. Mirza Tahir Ahmad alleges that Maudoodi denied the idea that Muhammad (Saw) also promised to follow a Rasul after him. At 38:28, Mirza Tahir Ahmad quotes “Allama Razi” (Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (1149–1209) and alleged that he wrote in favor of the Ahmadiyya position that “followers of prophets” were the real people who held the “Covenant of the Prophets”. At 42:25, Mirza Tahir Ahmad said that even Muhammad (saw) agreed that after him a Rasul would come. Mirza Tahir Ahmad argues that this verse 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran) proves the theory that a “subordinate-prophet” (Ummati Nabi) can be born. At 46:08, Mirza Tahir Ahmad argues that since Muhammad (saw) was mentioned as a “party” to 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran), this makes it mandatory that a Rasul come after Muhammad (saw). At 52:05 Mirza Tahir Ahmad again alleges that per (Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (1149–1209), 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran) and 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) is about the followers of prophets (just like MGA wrote in Haqiqatul Wahi). At 56:20, Mirza Tahir Ahmad alleges that some Pakistan scholar also said that Muhammad (Saw) was a party to “The Covenant of the Prophets”. At 58:17, Mirza Tahir Ahmad quoted Wherry’s comments on 3:81, Wherry accused Muhammad (Saw) of fabricating the entire story from the Talmud.

In Oct-2021, Ansar Raza debated Muhammad Shaikh (deviant) and Ansar Raza said that he considers MGA as the “Musadaq Rasul” as mentioned in 3:81. Starts at 2:26, at 7:03, Ansar Raza says that MGA is the “Musadaq Rasul”. At 4:52, Ansar Raza says that the Quran refers to Eisa (as) also as the “Musadaq Rasul”, via 33:7-8 of the Quran (33:8-9 in the Kadiani Koran).

In Dec-2025 (13:27 time stamp)(54:40 too), Maulvi Razi alleged that that Muhammad (Saw) said that the Messiah will do tasdiq of Muhammad (Saw) by being his musadiq (via 3:81, 3:82 in the Kadiani Koran). 33:7 of the Quran (33:8 in the Kadiani Koran) is also discussed.

Continue reading “33:7 in the Quran and the Qadiani-Ahmadi position (33:8 in the Kadiani Koran)” →

Intro
Something called “Mission Noor” is being talked about on twitter as a Qadiani-Ahmadi function/celebration which happens on Sep-20 every year. Check out Shams ud Din RB’s explanation of “Mission Noor”. #نور_نہیں_فتور. People on twitter are also pointing out how an Ahmadi politician in the USA named Dr. Asif Mahmood (on twitter as @DrMahmood40) is also involved in promoting Imran Khan. Check out another video on The Secret of Mission Noor and Rabwah? | The Blue Truth. #خام_النبین_محمد_رسول_اللہ

Listen from the mouth of Molana Muhammad Ilyas Chinioti about the connection between Mission Noor and Qadian, and why Youm-e-Rabwah is celebrated on 20th September?

In conclusion, “Mission Noor” seems to be a political stunt.

Continue reading “What is “Mission Noor”?” →

Intro
A few weeks ago, Mirza Masroor Ahmad taunted Muslims that none of them had the balls to face an Ahmadi Muslim in a real debate. This sent so much mockery across X. It makes one think, which ivory tower does this man live in? Does he avoid Ahmadis like the plague? Is he not up-to-date with the movements of his people?

In reality, it is Ahmadis who are finding all sorts of ways of escaping debates with Muslims. When non-Ahmadi Muslims go to Ahmadi streams, they are first silenced, if their arguments debunk Ahmadis. Then, they are removed and then blocked, if they continue to make valid arguments. Then, when the non-Ahmadi Muslims complains that this is unfair because on their streams Ahmadi Muslims are given ample time to speak, they are accused of all sorts of things, just to justify not allowing them to talk.

After this type of back and forth was leading to nowhere, MTA channel took up the challenge and invited the whole of the Muslim world to come and speak to them with “civility.” When Muslims showed up, again, they were not allowed to come on stream and if they were allowed in, they were not allowed to speak their full arguments. They were cut off before being able to make their points. After two streams, MTA stopped their challenged. LOL

After MTA’s failure and major flop, Razi was supposed to have a debate, but last minute he pulled out. The same happened with Dr Yahya. Then, yesterday, Ansar Raza was supposed to have a debate with Muslims, but he pulled out last minute.

So, it’s funny that no Ahmadi dared to tell their Khalifa that it is the Ahmadis who do not show up for the debates, not the other way around. But, Ahmadis are not brought up with any moral yard-stick or standards to see their own flaws. They truly lack self-awareness because of this deficiency. They are brought up with the mindset that one must defend the Jama’at at the expense of everything, even one’s family and loved ones.

A side note about yesterday’s debate. Ansar Raza told the Muslim debater, Imtiaz, that when they debate that they will only argue from the Quran. Imtiaz agreed. Then, after some thought, Ansar Raza said that Imtiaz was not allowed to quote MGA. Imtiaz agreed. Then, Ansar Raza, said that Imtiaz was not allowed to quote ahadith. Imtiaz agreed. Then, Ansar Raza said that Imtiaz was not allowed to use any tafsir. Imtiaz agreed. Then, Ansar Raza said that Imtiaz was not allowed to us any Arabic lexicon. Imtiaz agreed. This even shocked Imtiaz’s teachers and their teachers. They asked Imtiaz, why did he agree to such a dishonest and manipulated debate? Imtiaz said that he wanted to make sure that Ansar Raza does not run away.

Finally, when it was time for the debate, Ansar Raza pulled out literally last minute. However, and here is the dishonest catch: Ahmadis were hoping that Imtiaz would find an excuse and not show up, so they can blame it on Imtiaz.

They were all chatting among themselves on the livestream and wilfully lying, saying that Imtiaz pulled out and got scared. They did not know, but Imtiaz happen to be there when they said this and heard them and scolded them for being such shameless liars. Further, Imtiaz said that it was Ansar Raza who had set the date for the debate, even though Imtiaz said that the 19th of September was not good for him because he would be on the road and would be fatigued. Ansar Raza gave him an ultimatum to either show up or concede.

So, it appears that Ansar Raza pulled every single trick in the book to avoid this debate; and, in the end, he pulled the last trick under his sleeve and said that he was caught up at the office at 6pm and did not show up. LOL 6pm? For those who don’t know. Ansar Raza lives in the very mosque he leads. His office is literally in the same building as his domicile and mosque is. He is literally a 30 seconds walk to his office.

This is how shameless Ahmadis are. Their Khalifa blames non Ahmadi Muslims for their own incompetencies and ineptitudes.

So, how will Ahmadis spin this wrongful accusation of their Khalifa? They will say that the Khalifa is not getting the right report about how Ahmadis are the ones who are avoiding the debates like the plague. They will never blame their own Khalifa for spreading misinformation. In the end, Ahmadis will say, that Muslims are bunch of shameless pigs and monkeys and are like Jews, and that there is no point in debating them.

Moral of the story: You can NEVER win an argument with an Ahmadis. They are shamelessly proud of all the tricks they employ to win every single argument.

Continue reading “Ansar Raza backs out of his debate with Bro Imtiaz, last minute too” →

Intro
In Sep-2025, Ansar Raza debated a Shia person, #ShamsuddinShigri seems to be hosting this debate. In his opening statement, Ansar Raza used 1:6, 4:69 and 7:35 as his main arguments that prophethood has not end and never ends. At 19:03, Ansar Raza added 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) and alleged that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is inferred herein as that “Musadaq-Rasul” (See the clip on Tiktok and Twitter). Again, Ansar Raza says that per 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran), a Rasul will come who will authenticate (tasdiq) the Kitab and Rasul which was given to a previous Nabi (Ansar Raza was indirectly referring to MGA). At 21:41, Ansar Raza says it is lazmi (mandatory) that a “Musadaq-Rasul” was to appear after Muhammad (Saw) and it is lazmi (mandatory) for Muslims to accept him (see my article on Ahmadiyya Takfir). In conclusion, Ansar Raza argued that 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) includes Eisa (as) and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad only as the “Musadaq-Rasuls”. However, in reality, Muslims believe that only Muhammad (Saw) is the “Musadaq-Rasul” as mentioned in 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran). This is why Muhammad led the Prophets in prayer during the night of Isra’ when they gathered in Bayt Al-Maqdis (Jerusalem)(See Ibn Kathir).

Furthermore, Ansar Raza’s arguments seem to be at odds with the official Ahmadiyya position as stated in the 5-volume English Commentary of the Quran (1988) by Malik Ghulam Farid, which told the world that this verse is considered to apply to other Prophets in general and to the Holy Prophet in particular. Both applications are correct. However, Ansar Raza said that it only includes Eisa (as) and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. It should be noted that in the “short commentary” by Malik Ghulam Farid, it is stated that the expression Mithaqun-Nabiyyin may either signify the covenant of the Prophets with God or the covenant which God took from the people through their Prophets. The expression has been used here in the latter sense because another reading of the expression as supported by Ubayy bin Ka‘b and ‘Abdullah bin Mas‘ud is Mithaqalladhina ’utul-Kitab meaning, the covenant of those who were given the Book (Muhit). This rendering is also supported by the words that follow, i.e. and then there comes to you a Messenger fulfilling that which is with you, because it was to the people and not to their Prophets that the Messengers of God came.

In this debate, the Shia debater told Ansar Raza that all of the verses that Qadiani’s present are 1:6, 4:69 and 7:35 are abrogated by 33:40. To this, Ansar Raza said that the Quran has contradictions in it.

Continue reading “Ansar Raza vs. Shia’s in Sep-2025, Ansar Raza used 1:6, 4:69 and 7:35, then used 3:81 and alleged that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is inferred herein as that “Musadaq-Rasul”” →

Intro
On 25th July 2025, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s invited Prince Edward to #BaitulFutuh and kissed up to him thoroughly.

Continue reading “On 25th July 2025, Prince Edward visited #BaitulFutuh” →

Intro
In Sep-2025, the Ahmadiyya Movement has commented on the murder of Charlie Kirk via Al-Hakam. The Jama’at has no principles. It just panders to whomsoever will give it support. For example, while MMA has said that one cannot love the LGBTQ community, Ahmadis had no problems when the gay community was supporting Ahmadis. Mirza Masroor Ahmad called Trump an insane man before the 2016 elections but did not have any problems sending Ahmadis to the White House to beg Trump to help them out with their plight. Ahmadis have no official stance on anything. In the end, they will be happy with whatever sticks and gives them traction, and then say that Allah is with them. Al Hakam here is okay with Kirk blaspheming the Prophet and that his actions did not invite Divine wrath, but whenever Muslims suffer a loss, Ahmadis are quick to remind Muslims that their suffering and losses are due to them rejecting MGA. Do you see the hypocrisy? Al Hakam is simply pandering to the Trump establishment, because the Jama’at needs Trump. The hypocrisy. Imam Clarke proved what Ahmadis really think and feel. This is what is meant that there is no standard in Ahmadi theology. Also, Imam Clarke’s statement go against “love for all”.

Further, it seems that Maulvi Mansoor Clarke has weighed in and he seems to have said that Charlie Kirk deserved what he got. Which is the Ahmadiyya sentiment, in fact, Ahmadi’s believe that Muslims are being punished all around the world for simply rejecting Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Here is one example of Ahmadis rejoicing at the suffering of Muslims. If you do you research, social media is filled with Ahmadis taunting Muslims for their suffering. Furthermore,
Imam Clarke is the “unofficial” unwritten Talmud, whereas Al Hakam is the “official” Torah available to the public – it is used to deflect from any libel and defamation.

Continue reading “Maulvi Mansoor Ahmad Clark vs. Charlie Kirk vs. Al-Hakam!–did Allah make Charlie Kirk face a wrath?” →

Intro
Rabwah Times is reporting about the Ahmadiyya Community and how they held their 28th annual convention on Friday, September 12, 2025, at its center in the Kababir neighborhood of Haifa, Israel. However, the local Muslim Community didn’t attend at all, mostly Jewish people and Druze can be seen in the photo’s. Ahmadiyya sources claim that 450 pious Jews attended the 2025 Jalsa Salana in Israel.

Muhammad Sharif Odeh, the National President of the Ahmadiyya Community spoke at length.

In Israel and the Palestinian territories, the Ahmadiyya population is estimated at over 2,000 individuals, according to the Palestinian news agency WAFA (via Rabwah Times). Of these, approximately 1,500 reside in Kababir, 30 in the West Bank, and 50 in the Gaza Strip.

In 2005, Sheikh Ahmed Shubash, the grand mufti of Palestine, issued a fatwa declaring the Ahmadiyya faith un-Islamic, describing its beliefs as “misguided” and “corrupt.”

Continue reading “Ahmadiyya Community Holds 28th Annual Convention in Israel–2025” →

Intro
A new petition by Ahmadi’s to Mirza Masroor Ahmad has been started by an Ahmadi named Muhammad Shah (he also posted it on his facebook page).

Continue reading “Open letter from Ahmadi’s to Mirza Masroor Ahmad—sign the petition!” →