Intro
After Nooruddin died in March of 1914, the argument on the nature of the prophethood of MGA intensified. The Lahori-Ahmadi’s and the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s differed on the exact nature of MGA’s prophethood. However, as soon as Khwaja Kamaluddin returned from England (Nov-1914) he gave a speech which was turned into the an urdu-only book, “Ikhtalayfaat-e-Silsilaa-e-Ahmadiyya kay Usbaab”. Khwaja Kamaluddin’s quotes “Tuhfatul-Muluk” (A Present to Kings) by the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad which seems to have been written in the summer of 1914. This book was published on Dec 24th, 1914, during the Qadiani Jalsa. It was the first ever book about the split in the Ahmadiyya Movement, in it, Kwaja Kamaluddin emphatically died the prophethood of MGA and takfir against non-Ahmadi’s. The Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad wrote Qaul al-Fasl in January of 1915 and Haqiqatun Nubuwwat in March of 1915, wherein he quoted 7:35, 4:69, 2:5 and 61:6 as verses from the Quran wherein MGA was explained as a prophet to come. MGA had never used these verse to argue pro-prophethood. Nevertheless, Muhammad Ali responded in (December of 1915) and wrote “Prophethood in Islam” and ripped the Qadiani belief that MGA was an Ummati-Nabi. These conversations would continue uptil 1923, then they died off for about 10 years. With that being said, we have found an early and rare english translation and commentary of the Quran from 1915, published by the Qadiani branch of Ahmadis. In this commentary, they assert that the Messiah was promised in 1:7, which is a total lie. Later on, all Ahmadi commentaries wrote the same. In this english commentary of the Quran, the Khalifa connected 2:4 with 1:6 and 62:3, it was published in 1915. english-translation-mirza-mahmood-1915.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1901
Even MGA was connecting 1:6 (1:7 in the Qadiani Quran), with 4:69 and the continuation of prophethood (see “Correction of an Error” [1901]).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
The scan work
Download it here—https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/english-translation-mirza-mahmood-1.pdf
english-translation-mirza-mahmood-1915
Tafsir Ibn Kathir on 1:7
http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=63&Itemid=35
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
Barahin-e- Ahmadiyyah volume 5, was re-published in 1914, it was the second edition
“Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” aka “Correction of an Error” was re-published on March-1-1914
Are Ahmadis the fastest growing Islamic sect? The World Christian Encyclopedia opened and evaluated
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fateh_Muhammad_Sial
“My beliefs about non-Ahmadi Muslims”, dated 18 August 1911 by Khwaja Kamal-uddin
http://alhafeez.org/rashid/abuse/abuse.htm
“Haqiqat Un Nubuwwat” (1915) by Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, some quotes and data
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad lost his court case vs. Karam din 1904, but won on appeal
“My beliefs about non-Ahmadi Muslims”, dated 18 August 1911 by Khwaja Kamal-uddin
Tashhiz al-Azhan was a Magazine founded by Mahmud Ahmad in 1906, quotes and background info
The Causes of Internal Dissensions in the Ahmadiyya Movement, By Khwaja Kamaluddin, 1914
Tashhiz al-Azhan was a Magazine founded by Mahmud Ahmad in 1906, quotes and background info
Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad had 20+ children with 7 wives
Click to access A-Misconception-Removed.pdf
Muhammad (saw) is prophet #124,000, Esa (as) is prophet number #123,999
“Haqiqat Un Nubuwwat” (1915) by Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, some quotes and data
“Al-Qaul-ul-Fasl” by the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad–early-1915
Maulvi Sanuallah acknowledges that MGA claimed prophethood in Nov 1901
MGA explains how he misunderstood his prophethood in 1880 and was confused for 20+ years
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/03/ahmadiyya-scholars-wrote-about-469-in-1908/
Maulvi Sanuallah acknowledges that MGA claimed prophethood in Nov 1901
The Causes of Internal Dissensions in the Ahmadiyya Movement, By Khwaja Kamaluddin, 1914
Maulvi Abdul Karim claims Prophethood per MGA, Maulvi Amrohi disagrees
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/13/what-is-arbain-a-book-by-mga-and-his-team-of-writers/
In 1891, when MGA made his big claims, he denied prophethood–Mufti Sadiq was heavily involved
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was accused of claiming prophethood in the 1879–1884 era
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was considered a Kafir in 1884, before his wildest claims
Some rare books from the 1901-1902 era, which refute MGA’s claim to prophethood
Maulvi Sanuallah acknowledges that MGA claimed prophethood in Nov 1901
Mirza Sultan Ahmad, Son Of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, On Finality Of Prophethood
“Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” aka “Correction of an Error” was re-published on March-1-1914
A few months after becoming Khalifa, Mirza Mahmud Ahmad waffled on his father’s prophethood
MGA explains how he misunderstood his prophethood in 1880 and was confused for 20+ years
Noorudin didn’t care if Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed even law-bearing prophethood
______________________________________________________________________________________________Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
5 Pingback