Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Thorough research work on the Ahmadiyya Movement, #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome

Month

January 2026

Who is the Qadiani-Ahmadi tiktoker Nur ul Haq (@Ahmadi_Muslim) aka Basel Khalifa (@basel.khalifa0) ?

Intro
A few years ago, I bumped into Qadiani-Ahmadi-Israeli TikToker Nur ul Haq (@Ahmadi_Muslim) aka Basel Khalifa (@basel.khalifa0). He is clearly a citizen of Israel and told me that he was in-fact the son of Maulvi Shams ud Din Malabari? Maulvi-in-charge at Kababir, Haifa, Israel. However, in 2026, he has totally denied it. Maybe it was a language issue?

In Aug-2025, Nur ul Haq spoke to Brother Omar, Arise and Warn, Sher-e-Khuda and Ibn Hajar. Full review in the below. At 3:14, Sher-e-Khuda asked Nur where and when he lied. Nur said that Sher-e-Khuda lied when he said that Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad wrote in his Tafsir that it wasn’t a real fire, it was metaphoric (in terms of the fire and Ibrahim [as])(See 21:69, 21:70 in the Kadiani Koran). At 55:55, Ibn Hajr proves that Nur is lying since MGA wrote in 1893, via “Barakatud Du‘a” aka “Blessings of Prayer” (see online English edition, page 45)(Arabic edition, page 30), MGA argued that the same word (يتصرف) in the Arabic version of the book (Barakatud-Dua’) corresponds to (Exercise control) “Tasurruf”. Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani is mentioned in this book and MGA was arguing that Godly affairs are known only to godly persons (like the Sufi saints)(See page 25). In this book, MGA clearly stated more than once that it’s not just about du’a’ being answered. He even stated that besides du’a’, a Wali can control the world using his mind. He can disable the burning property of fire and walk on water.

In Nov-2025, Qadiani-Ahmadi-Israeli TikToker Nur ul Haq (@Ahmadi_Muslim) aka Basel Khalifa (@basel.khalifa0) alleged that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was the “Khatam un Nabiyeen” for “Zilli-Nubuwwat” (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). This was on the live stream of Free Palestine and sister Meem. However, it should be noted that Ahmadi’s believe that “Khatam un Nabiyeen” means one who does “Tasdiq” of the next prophet (naozobillah). Thus, Qadiani-Ahmadi-Israeli TikToker Nur ul Haq (@Ahmadi_Muslim) aka Basel Khalifa (basel.khalifa0) was indirectly alleging that MGA has already done Tasdiq of the next “Zilli-Nabi” (See 33:7, 33:8 in the Kadiani Koran). However, he didn’t give a proper reference to MGA, but we know, it is via the concept of the 3rd Messiah (See page 403 of the online English edition)(See RK-5, page 346)(Listen to Bro Imtiaz, 4:47:12 time stamp)(The Jalalee Nabi) in Ahmadiyya which Mirza Tahir Ahmad revitalized in 1984 when he moved to the UK on asylum (See also Tafseer-e-Sagheer on 3:82 and 33:7).

 

Continue reading “Who is the Qadiani-Ahmadi tiktoker Nur ul Haq (@Ahmadi_Muslim) aka Basel Khalifa (@basel.khalifa0) ?”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Taqiyya

Intro
In 1893, MGA mentioned Taqiyya in a letter to Sir Syed Ahmad Khan (See “Ainah Kamalate Islam, online English edition, page 296) and accused him of hiding his beliefs.

In 1901, MGA and his team of writers argued that since Shias do Taqiyyah, very few God-fearing people exist amongst them (See Malfuzat-1, online English edition, page 183, via Al-Hakam, vol. 5, no. 28, dated 31 July 1901, pp. 1-3).

In 1905 (Oct), MGA alleges that some weak cowardly Ahmadi’s do Taqiyya, this is wrong (See Malfuzat-7, online English edition, pages 167-169, via Al-Hakam, vol. 9, no. 35, p. 5–12, dated 10 October 1905).

In 1908 (Feb), MGA was talking about the Shias and how they exaggerate their beliefs and mentions Taqiyya and how it is wrong. MGA criticizes Ali (ra) for not being able to handle his Khilafat (See Malfuzat-10, online English edition, pages 167-169, via Badr, vol. 7, no. 10, p. 4, dated 12 March 1908).

In 1908 (Mar), MGA was asked about Ali (ra) and whether he did Taqiyya or not. Firstly, MGA argued that Shias incorrectly accuse Sunni’s of altering the Quran, MGA says that this isn’t possible. MGA infers that the Shias accuse Ali (ra) of disingenuously praying behind 3 Khalifa’s and called it Taqiyya, MGA says this is not possible. MGA then says that his own followers are thus not allowed to pray behind non-Ahmadi’s (See the Ahmadiyya Takfir timeline)(See Malfuzat-10, online English edition, pages 215-221, via Al-Hakam, vol. 12, no. 20, p. 7–8, dated 18 March 1908). MGA compared Taqiyya with Ahmadi’s praying behind non-Ahmadi’s. 

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Taqiyya”

Farhan Ahmad Butta, Maulvi Asrar Ahmad talk about the plight of Ahmadi’s in Malaysia (Oct-2025)

Intro
In Oct-2025, disgruntled semi-Ahmadi Maulvi Asrar Ahmad posted a video on Tiktok wherein he interviewed an Ahmadi in Malaysia named Farhan Ahmad Butta. Maulvi Asrar Ahmad tells the world that Farhan Ahmad Butta is the “Refugee Committee Co-Ordinator for the UNHCR” in Malaysia, he has also worked as “Secretary of the Refugee Committee” and as “External Affairs” in Malaysia. Maulvi Asrar Ahmad reports that Farhan Ahmad Butta has been in Malaysia for a long time and was there when the Ahmadiyya Movement was officially registered with the UNHCR of Malaysia. Maulvi Asrar Ahmad reports that there are Ahmadiyya schools and its employees who are working under the UNHCR of Malaysia.

Maulvi Asrar Ahmad reports that he has been in Malaysia since 2013 and Farhan Ahmad Butta has also been there with him. Maulvi Asrar Ahmad reports that when he first started questioning the Ahmadiyya operation, Farhan Ahmad Butta was also involved.
These are eyewitnesses.

In this video, Farhan Ahmad Butta says that he and Maulvi Asrar Ahmad are still Ahmadi. He still believes in MGA as a prophet and still loves the Khalifa, Mirza Masroor Ahmad. Nevertheless, Farhan Ahmad Butta says that Maulvi Asrar Ahmad has told the truth, he has never lied. Farhan Ahmad Butta says that Ahmadi women are willing to come forward and talk about the crimes of Ahmadiyya elders in Malaysia like rape and forced divorce. Farhan Ahmad Butta says he has never charged any Ahmadi any money for help.

Continue reading “Farhan Ahmad Butta, Maulvi Asrar Ahmad talk about the plight of Ahmadi’s in Malaysia (Oct-2025)”

Who is Lorenzo Russel Webb?

Intro
Lorenzo Russel Webb was the son of the famous Alexander Russell Muhammad Webb. His sister was

In 1954, his eldest sibling, his sister Mrs. Elizabeth Hallam. She was allegedly 83 years old which means she was born in 1874. Mrs. Elizabeth Hallam was a Christian and a member of the Episcopal church (See the Orlando Evening Star of Sat, Jan 09, 1954 ·Page 11).

Continue reading “Who is Lorenzo Russel Webb?”

Ahmadiyya tabligh at airports vs. @johnjeetsinghsurrey

Intro
Ahmadiyya tabligh work is so desperate, so weird, so embarrassing and so uninspiring. Recently, in 2025, we saw a trend of Ahmadi’s at airports inside baggage claim holding their stupid tabligh signs. This seems to be in Canada, there was a recent incident vs. @johnjeetsinghsurrey on instagram, the clip is also on facebook.

Continue reading “Ahmadiyya tabligh at airports vs. @johnjeetsinghsurrey”

1894, Nafeesa (M.T. Keep) vs. Muhammad Webb and the Theosophical Society

Intro
In 1894, via the Evening World of Fri, Jul 13, 1894 ·Page 2 and the Algona Courier of Fri, Aug 24, 1894 ·Page 2 (and roughly 100 newspapers in America) a woman named Nafeesa (aka M.T. Keep) has completely exposed Muhammed Webb as a fraudster. Nafeesa (aka M.T. Keep)(editor of the Voice of Islam newspaper) has been at war with Muhammed Webb for about 6 weeks. She even wrote a letter to the Sultan of Turkey about Muhammed Webb being a fraudster. Nafeesa (aka M.T. Keep) called Webb a monster. In July, Mrs. Keep locked herself in the business office of The Voice of Islam newspaper (also called the Moslem World).

Nafeesa (aka M.T. Keep) alleged that Muhammed Webb was using the Theosophical society against her and have hired Judge Hawes a lawyer vs. her. It seems that the Theosophical society (and American Muslim Brotherhood) was accusing her of theft. Nafeesa (aka Mrs. Keep) alleges that Webb was lying about a lack of funds, she says that she saw a check for $500 from Osman Nauri Effendi (Osman Nuri Pasha?). In the end, Mrs. Keep called Muhammed Webb a fake prophet who was in reality raising money to spend on himself.

Somewhat surprisingly, Quilliam’s Institute continued to have a small American presence for a few years, even after the departure of Lant, Nabakoff, and Keep. It seems, judging by the number of appearances of Americans in Quilliam’s journal, the Crescent, by 1895 it had become the main competitor for Webb’s Islamic newspaper. That year, Quilliam’s magazine published
numerous stories and news briefs concerning Nabakoff, Lant, and Keep, as well as several letters from Americans—including converts, Muslim immigrants, and non-Muslim sympathizers—known to be associates of the three Webb dissenters (See Bowen, A History of Conversion to Islam in the United States, Volume 1, White American Muslims before 1975).

Continue reading “1894, Nafeesa (M.T. Keep) vs. Muhammad Webb and the Theosophical Society”

Who is Mary Caroline Alyea (nee Webb)? Daughter of Alexander Webb

Intro
In 1885, Mary Caroline Webb was born in St. Louis, Missouri, the daughter of the famous ex-Qadiani and “public Muslim”, Alexander Russell Webb.

In 1898, her family moved her to Rutherford, New Jersey. When they arrived in Rutherford in the late 1890s, Alexander and Ella, his wife, settled on Orient Way in a property owned by Martha “Maddie” Brinkerhoff Alyea, who was married to the senior Garrabrant Alyea. By 1909, both Mary and her sister had become teachers. At the time, they were residing at 391 Orient Way. On April 10, 1915, Mary was married to Garrabrant R. Alyea, Jr.

In 1915, she married into the Alyea family in 1915 and become a music teacher of considerable reputation, ultimately succeeding to manage her own music studio in a stately Victorian home on Sylvan Street. Her new name was Mary Caroline Alyea. The Alyea School of Music, located at 150 Sylvan Street, offered lessons in piano, violin, viola, and voice culture. Mrs. Mary W, Alyea was its director. Records indicate that Jean W. Dawley owned this property in the 1920s and that Garry Alyea, aka Garabrant R. Alyea Jr, was a tenant. Mary subsequently located her studio at 120 Ridge Road. Mary Alyea, whose nickname was “Mammie” to her beloved children and grandchildren, was a descendant of two of Rutherford’s significant families. Her grandfather-in-law, Garrabrant Ryerson Alyea, was a teacher at the historic Meadow Road School, opened in 1850 on land deeded by Daniel Van Winkle. His son, Mary’s husband, known as Garry Alyea, became a Vice-Principal with the East Rutherford school district.

In 1916, Alexander Webb (her father) died on Oct. 1st and is buried at the Hillside Cemetery, Lyndhurst New Jersey. A few months before this, the ROR of July-1916 alleges that Webb sent them an article from the USA wherein Islam was set to be attacked. This was also quoted in Fanusie (see page 228)(St. Joseph Gazette of Tue, Oct 03, 1916 ·Page 2). It should be noted that Alexander Webb had been active in the Knights of Pythias, serving that non-denominational society as Chancellor. He had owned the Rutherford News and had a popular following for his Commuters Column. Webb’s memorial service was held at the Unitarian Church, conducted by Reverend Elizabeth Padgham (See The Light of April, 8, 1944)(See The Light (16 April 1944) — www.alahmadiyya.org).

In 1944, she was mentioned on page 7 as someone who helped Nadirah Osman write her biography of Alexander Muhammad Russell Webb (See The Light of April, 8, 1944)(See The Light (16 April 1944) — www.alahmadiyya.org).

In 1975, she died. Mary W. Alyea was buried at Hillside Cemetery.

Continue reading “Who is Mary Caroline Alyea (nee Webb)? Daughter of Alexander Webb”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Astrology

Intro
In 1894, MGA was accused of using astrology. In this context, MGA defended his own usage by quoteing Fuyud Haramain of Shah Dehlawi (See Hamamatul Bushra, 1894, older edition, page 292).

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Astrology”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 17:72 of the Quran (17:73 in the Kadiani Koran)

Intro
In 1905, MGA and his team of writers quoted 17:72 of the Quran (17:73 in the Kadiani Koran) and argued that it is necessary that the preparation is made here [in this world] and man takes the eyes needed for this with him from this very world. The one who goes without making the preparation here, he will remain deprived there (in heaven). This verse does not mean that those who are blind and sightless here will also be blind there. No, it means that one should take the senses and the eyes needed to behold God from here, and what is needed for these eyes is tabattul [detachment from the world], tazkiya-e-nafs [purification of the self] and holding God Almighty supreme over everything; and to see, hear and speak through God Almighty. The name of this is fana fillah [self annihilation into Allah]. Until this station and rank is attained, there is no salvation. They then argue that the bounties of heaven are unimaginable (inferring 32:17 of the Quran, 32:18 in the Kadiani Koran)(See Malfuzat-7, online English edition, page 403-404, via Al-Hakam, vol. 9, no. 35, p. 5–12, dated 10 October 1905). 

In 1905, while in Delhi on allegedly Oct-27-1905, MGA quoted 17:72 of the Quran (17:73 in the Kadiani Koran) and argued that the Quran told us that if someone is blind in the world, they will be blind in the next (See Malfuzat-8, online English edition, page 59, al-Badr, vol. 1, no. 33, p. 2–4, dated 6 November 1905).

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 17:72 of the Quran (17:73 in the Kadiani Koran)”

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑