Intro
In this video, Bro Imtiaz proved that in Ahmadiyya ideology, words have no meanings. This was mostly about the prophethood of MGA.
Continue reading “Ahmadiyya Absurd Ideology Words Have No Meanings!!! | The Dialogue With imtiaz”
Intro
I have covered this story before (mostly via Qasim Rashid), Ahmadi’s have been ordered by their Khalifa to join U.S. politics and help Ahmadi’s get asylum (and other perks).
Thus, on 11-14-2024, Qasim Rashid ,Raaheela Ahmed of Bowie, Maryland and Rabia Chaudhary (former Chief of Staff, Santa Clara County, CA Board of Supervisors) held a seminar for members of the Ahmadiyya cult to learn what it takes to run for office and get support from the Ahmadiyya Movement in the USA.
It should be noted, to date, not a single Ahmadi has ever been elected to Congress or the Senate in any state of the USA. In fact, none of these three have ever won any election.
Continue reading “Ahmadi’s have been ordered to get involved with U.S. politics”
Intro
He seems to be the top Qadiani-Ahmadi politician in Qadian. He recently commented on the ongoing trash problem in Qadian. He seems to be working as a Councillor of the Ahmadiyya Mohalla.
Intro
We covered this story a few years ago, Qadian is full of trash, the town doesn’t have the proper infrastructure in-place to dispose of trash and sewage. The Punjab Gazette recently published a new video wherein it highlights the ongoing trash problem. It is also mentioned how the Government built 3-washroom areas a few years ago, however, these are sick, filled with mosquito’s and in total disrepair. This was reported by Maqbool Ahmed, a Qadiani-Ahmadi reporter out of Qadian (his phone number is +91 99884 89365).
Why doesn’t the Ahmadiyya Movement spend money on this? A Qadiani-Ahmadi named Chaudhry Abdul Wasay was also interviewed, he seems to be working as the Councillor of the Ahmadiyya Mohalla. Wasay says that he is concerned with this trash and that Jalsa Qadian 2025 is approaching.
Continue reading “The City of Qadian still has loads of trash everywhere!!”
Intro
10th and 11th-century Ismaili Shia scholars Ja’far ibn Mansur al-Yaman, Abu Hatim Ahmad ibn Hamdan al-Razi, Abu Yaqub al-Sijistani, Mu’ayyad fi’l-Din al-Shirazi and the group Ikhwan al-Safa allege that Jesus (as) was crucified and not substituted by another man as maintained by many other popular Qur’anic commentators and Tafsir (See Lawson 2009, see the index under Ikhwan al-Safa, “
Continue reading “Ismaili Shias believe that Eisa (as) was nailed to the cross and died”
Intro
In this video, Maulvi Iftekhar Ahmed (working out of Germany) defends MGA for cussing at people, he argues that it was part of MGA’s “immense spiritual burden” of his revivalist mission (check out my video explanation). Thus, MGA was forced to curse, however, he then accused Muhammad (Saw) of the same (naozobillah) and thus nullified the entire argument. Further, he didn’t give the exact reference for Muhammad (Saw) speaking harshly and left it as unknown (see the accusations here on twitter and tiktok). It should also be noted that Maulvi Razi says that only MGA was allowed to cuss at people, call them harami and etc., #Ahmadis are not allowed to do so. For months and months, Ahmadi’s had argued that MGA didn’t cuss at people who rejected him (see the very first debate with Adnan and Noonan). They argued that MGA used these cuss words metaphorically. However, just a few days ago, Razi totally changed his position and admitted that MGA did cuss at people and call them “bastard”, “harami” and “children of prostitutes” (time stamp 1:50:50). Maulvi Razi was rebuking an Ahmadi for cussing at Adnan (see herein). Maulvi Razi quoted the 2nd Qadiani-Khalifa and his book, “Minhaj ul Talibeen” (1925)(“The Way of The Seekers”), however, he didn’t give the page number (we think it’s 76). Interestingly, in this book, the 2nd Qadiani-Khalifa admits that he would see kids in the Punjab cussing for sport (See page 76). He also admits that he had an old friend who was an opium addict (see page 75). This is strange since he lived in Qadian, which was supposed to be a religious environment, however, he still had friends that were addicted to opium and loved to see punjabi kids cussing in public.
Video Review
He starts off the video accusing opponents of Ahmadiyya of not understanding the context of the quotes that they represent. However, in his entire video, Maulvi Iftekhar Ahmed never contextualized any quote.
–Muslims were painted as idolator’s by Hindu’s? However, what is he referring to? He doesn’t say? Is he referring to the Satarya Prakash? And these were Arya Samaj Hindu’s who believed in one God and were against the British. In fact, in MGA’s response to the Arya Samaj, MGA attacked the Gods of the Hindus and forced them to respond in kind (see the testimony of Lekh Ram). In May of 1879, MGA announced that he was writing “Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya” vs. Pundit Dayananda and the Arya Samaj sect, of which Dayananda was the founder. In 1875, Pundit Dayananda had published “Satyarth Prakash” (The Light of Truth), this seems to be MGA’s response. Nevertheless, MGA began attacking the Arya Samaj and their leader Dayananda in his Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya, Part 1 and 2 (search the book for Hindus). The Barahin 1-4 was nothing more than a vicious attack on the God of the Hindu‘s. The led to the publishing of “Rangila Rasul”.
–His first quote is from Izala Auham, Part-1 (1890, page 109). However, he doesn’t give the context, he didn’t mention that this was written in 1890. How ironic is that? In this quote, MGA is saying that the entire Quran is filled with abuses.
–He then pivots to the Islamic injunctions on Qisas. He quotes 42:40 (42:41 in the Qadiani Quran), however, he doesn’t give any context. He doesn’t even quote MGA or any scholars of Ahmadiyya. MGA did quote it in Kitab ul Barriya (see the full quote in the below). He accuses opponents of MGA of having used harsh speech vs. MGA. However, he doesn’t give any quotes or any dates. He alleges that MGA was defending himself. This is a lie. Technically, MGA began cussed after he lost to Athim in 1893, marking a turning point. Maulvi Iftekhar Ahmed quotes the Quran, 2:65 (2:66 in the Qadiani Quran), 5:60 (5:61 in the Qadiani Quran), 8:55 (8:56 in the Qadiani Quran) and 68:13 (68:14 in the Qadiani Quran) in his attempt to say that even the Quran uses harsh language. He alleges that MGA was simply following this Quranic tradition of employing harsh metaphors and language to condemn spiritual states? Huh? He seems unintelligible herein.
–Maulvi Iftekhar Ahmed alleges that Muhammad (Saw) used harsh words (naozobillah). He quotes Mishkat Al-Masabih and alleges that Muhammad (Saw) compared “”corrupt religious scholars to apes and swine”” and accused them of being “The Worst Creatures Under the Canopy of the Heavens”. Maulvi Iftekhar Ahmed also explained how this was a “statement of fact”. However, he didn’t even give a proper reference so that we can double check it, he seems to have presented 2 quotes into one. We have only found this one in terms of apes (from Sunnah.com) and “worst creatures”.
–He then quotes Kitab ul Barriya and MGA’s admission that he did indeed use harsh language, however, in defense. Which is a lie! After MGA lost to Athim, MGA was raging! You need the quotes?
–He then quotes Mawahibur-Rahman (1903), page 16, Online English Edition. MGA was alleging that he was cursed at firstly, and he (MGA) remained silent. However, this is not exactly true. It was after the Athim debacle (1893).
–He then mentions “Righteous Opponents that MGA considered worthy of honor”? Who are they? We have never heard of any. Maulvi Iftekhar Ahmed alleged that MGA made a distinction between “righteous opponents” vs. “Outright Wicked Ones”, whose stubbornness and harsh words had to be confronted head on. Maulvi Iftekhar Ahmed also alleged that the harsh words by MGA were only directed at those specific opponents of MGA (the wicked ones). He quotes Al-Huda (see in the below).
–Maulvi Iftekhar Ahmed then alleges that MGA gave explicit instructions to Ahmadi’s to refrain from using harsh language vs. opponents. However, he gave no references at all. He then alleges that MGA’s forceful language was specific to the “immense spiritual burden” of his revivalist mission. Not a blanketed permission for Ahmadi’s to also do so.
–As he ends the video, Maulvi Iftekhar Ahmed quotes MGA from 1890 (this is from before MGA began openly cursing). It’s from Izala Auham, page-109 (see in the below). Maulvi Iftekhar Ahmed showed this at the end to give the viewer the impression that MGA never insulted anyone. This contradicts all the other arguments in this video.
–In conclusion, he summarized MGA’s language as “undoubtably blunt, confrontational,… calculated strikes…under divine direction”.
In 2024, Mirza Masroor Ahmad quoted 42:41 in a Friday Sermon in Dec (the 6th) and alleged that it was OK to also cut the food supply of that country in response.
Intro
MGA mentioned Musailimah Kadhdhab (also spelled as Musaylima ibn Ḥabīb) 6 times in 1906-1907 via “Haqiqatul Wahi”. We have also posted quotes to Malfuzat.
In one instance (see page 148, Online English Edition), MGA refers to Musailimah as a murtad (apostate), which infers that MGA believed him to be a Muslim at one point (this is Kufr). The quote is on twitter and tiktok.
Intro
It seems that a man named Sir Sheikh Abdul Qadir was always pro-Qadiani and one of his fast friends was Allama Iqbal. Check out Agha Wasim’s video on this topic herein.
Sir Sheikh Abdul Qadir knew most of the famous Ahmadi’s very well, since he helped create the Anjuman-i-Himayat-i-Islam in 1884.
Continue reading “Sir Sheikh Abdul Qadir, Allama Iqbal and their Qadiani connections”
Intro
In a 1902 khutba delivered by Maulvi Abdul Karim, commenting on verse 9:128, “surely a Messenger has come unto you from among yourselves’, he stated: “in 1300 years (i.e since death of Holy Prophet ﷺ), no one has had the opportunity to recite (this verse 9:128) before a congregation and God’s Rasul and mamur is actually sitting in front of him. Praise be to Allah, we are blessed”. However, the official 5-volume English Commentary of the Quran by the Qadiani’s doesn’t give this explanation. Do Qadiani’s still use this verse as an argument pro-prophethood?
Maulvi Abdul Karim took MGA as an actual Rasul, and the last time this blessed phenomenon occurred was when the companions were with the Holy Prophet ﷺ. It should also be noted that in the 1900-1902 era, Maulavi ‘Abdul Karim, the preacher of the Friday sermon, gave a sermon in which he, used the words Nabi (Prophet) and Rasul (Messenger) for the Mirza. This caused great irritation to Maulavi Sayyid Muhammad Ahsan Amrohawi. When Maulavi ‘Abdul Karim came to know of this, he gave another Friday sermon in which be addressed the Mirza, requesting him to contradict his belief, if he was wrong in considering him to be a prophet and Messenger of God. After the Friday prayers were over, Maulavi ‘Abdul Karim caught hold of the skirt of the Mirza’s apparel and requested him to correct him in his beliefs if they were erroneous. The Mirza turned around and said that he, too, held the same belief. Meanwhile, Maulavi Muhammad Ahsan had been greatly agitated by the sermon and in anger was pacing the floor of the mosque. On Maulavi ‘Abdul Karim’s return, he began to quarrel with him. When their voices rose very high, the Mirza came out of his house and recited the Qur’anic verse: “O ye who believe! Don’t raise your Voice above the voice of the Prophet.” (See Haqiqat al- Nubuwat (1915), p 124 This event is based on the report of a speech of Sayyid Sarwar Shah Qadiani at an annual conference held in Qadian, and published in al- Fadhl, Vol. X, No. 51, dated january.4,1923).
Continue reading “Ahmadiyya and 9:128 of the Quran (9:129 in the Qadiani Quran)”