Intro
The ROR of Sep-1917 reports that MGA made a prophecy that the Arya Samaj would be finished in 100 years. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his team of writers had been beefing with the Arya Samaj of Qadian and all of India since 1879. L. Sharampat Rai was the secretary of the Arya Samaj at Qadian in the 1870’s and 1880’s (See the ROR of Aug-1939), MGA began beefing with them which resulted in MGA vs. Dayananda. MGA also alleges that he prophecied the assassination of Dayanand, and Lalah Sharampat was the witness. MGA mentioned Lalah Sharampat indirectly as a witness of his signs in 1880-1882 via his book Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 3 (see online english edition, pages 218, 220 and 224). The English editors added the name Lalah Sharampat in the new English translation in 2014, it was never in the original Urdu. MGA also mentioned Lala Bisambar Das, who was the brother of Lalah Sharampat. MGA also claims to have told Sharampat before hand about Duleep Singh. Lala Malawamal was a close friend of Lala Sharampat, they were both from Qadian, these are the 2 Hindu’s that MGA mentions in Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya 1-4, the 3rd is Bishandas Brahman (See Haqiqatul Wahy). MGA also claims that Lalah Sharampat and Lala Malawamal were the witnesses in this famous revelation, that became a ring that All Ahmadi’s wear, “Is Allah not sufficient for his servant”. MGA also claims that he prophecied the death of his father (Mirza Ghulam Murtaza) and these 2 were the witnesses. (See “Qadian Kei Aryah Aur Hamm”, in english it would be “The Aryas of Qadian”). MGA also alleges that he prophecied the assassination of Dayanand, and Lalah Sharampat was the witness.
However, Lalah Sharampat was illiterate and barely understood what MGA was saying, thus, MGA used them in a deceptive and thought that no one would try to audit these witnesses. As soon as the prophecy was announced by him, Sharampat whom he had quoted as a witness, declared: “Ghulam Ahmad is a liar and an anti -Christ. I never heard this prophecy from him (See Anthology of Pandit Lakhram Takzib·i· Baraheen-i Ahmadiyya, via “Qadiyaniat: an analytical survey” by Ehsan Elahi Zaheer (1984) 21st edition free download – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog). This was done specifically via MGA’s beef with Lekh Ram in the mid-1880‘s. MGA then forced Lekh Ram to write vs. Islam. MGA’s prophecies had expired by 1893-ish, however, he recycled his own prophecy at that point. This culminated in the murder of Lekh Ram in 1897.
In 1903, MGA and his team of writers wrote Nasim-e-Da‘wat, it was published in mid-February 1903 just before the annual gathering of the Aryah Samaj scheduled for February 28, 1903, in Qadian. In this book, MGA seems to be beefing with the Arya Samaj of Qadian. Ironically, MGA’s family collected tax on behalf of the British government from these same hindus. The Arya Samaj were openly anti-British and Lekh Ram had already been dead for 6 years.
By 1904, the Arya Samaj set up a school called Dyanand Jubilee School as a parallel institution to “Ta‘limul Islam Madrasah” and also founded a journal in Qadian under the name of Shubh Chantak. Somraj was its editor and the prime object of this journal was to publish all filthy and vulgar attacks against MGA (See Hidden Treasures). In 1906 the Aryah Samaj opened up a loud speaker blaring at the Masjid Aqsa and made highly obscene and vulgar attacks against on MGA. All this had happened in the presence of a Police Inspector, who had come from Batala for the maintenance of peace (See Hidden Treasures). The next day the Aryah Samaj organ Shubh Chantak made a violent attack on MGA and stated that none of the Aryah Samajists named by MGA’s had witnessed anything(see “Ahmadi’s and the Arya’s of Qadian” [1907]).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1875–1884
MGA alleges that there are Arya Samaj Hindu’s from Qadian who have witnessed his signs, he gives the name of Lalah Sharampat and his friend Lala Malawamal.
MGA mentioned Lalah Sharampat indirectly as a witness of his signs in 1880-1882 via his book Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 3 (see online english edition, pages 218, 220 and 224). The english editors added the name Lalah Sharampat in the new english translation in 2014, it was never in the original Urdu. However, Lalah Sharampat was illiterate and barely understood what MGA was saying, thus, MGA used them in a deceptive and thought that no one would try to audit these witnesses. As soon as the prophecy was announced by him, Sharampat whom he had quoted as a witness, declared: “Ghulam Ahmad is a liar and an anti -Christ. I never heard this prophecy from him (See Anthology of Pandit Lakhram Takzib·i· Baraheen-i Ahmadiyya, via “Qadiyaniat: an analytical survey” by Ehsan Elahi Zaheer (1984) 21st edition free download – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog). Interestingly, in 1923, in Seeratul Mahdi, an anonymous Hindu is quoted over and over again. MGA also claims to have told Sharampat before hand about Duleep Singh. Lala Malawamal was a close friend of Lala Sharampat, they were both from Qadian, these are the 2 Hindu’s that MGA mentions in Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya 1-4, the 3rd is Bishandas Brahman (See Haqiqatul Wahy). MGA also claims that Lalah Sharampat and Lala Malawamal were the witnesses in this famous revelation, that became a ring that All Ahmadi’s wear, “Is Allah not sufficient for his servant”. MGA also claims that he prophecied the death of his father (Mirza Ghulam Murtaza) and these 2 were the witnesses. (See “Qadian Kei Aryah Aur Hamm”, in english it would be “The Aryas of Qadian”). MGA also alleges that he prophecied the assassination of Dayanand, and Lalah Sharampat was the witness.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1885
Lekh Ram stumped MGA in his Face-to-Face discussion in 1885 – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Lekh Ram came to Qadian and seems to have been hosted by the local hindu’s of the Arya Samaj branch.
MGA also alleges that he prophecied the assassination of Dayanand, and Lalah Sharampat was the witness. MGA mentioned Lalah Sharampat indirectly as a witness of his signs in 1880-1882 via his book Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 3 (see online english edition, pages 218, 220 and 224). The English editors added the name Lalah Sharampat in the new English translation in 2014, it was never in the original Urdu. MGA also mentioned Lala Bisambar Das, who was the brother of Lalah Sharampat. MGA also claims to have told Sharampat before hand about Duleep Singh. Lala Malawamal was a close friend of Lala Sharampat, they were both from Qadian, these are the 2 Hindu’s that MGA mentions in Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya 1-4, the 3rd is Bishandas Brahman (See Haqiqatul Wahy). MGA also claims that Lalah Sharampat and Lala Malawamal were the witnesses in this famous revelation, that became a ring that All Ahmadi’s wear, “Is Allah not sufficient for his servant”. MGA also claims that he prophecied the death of his father (Mirza Ghulam Murtaza) and these 2 were the witnesses. (See “Qadian Kei Aryah Aur Hamm”, in english it would be “The Aryas of Qadian”). MGA also alleges that he prophecied the assassination of Dayanand, and Lalah Sharampat was the witness.
However, Lalah Sharampat was illiterate and barely understood what MGA was saying, thus, MGA used them in a deceptive and thought that no one would try to audit these witnesses. As soon as the prophecy was announced by him, Sharampat whom he had quoted as a witness, declared: “Ghulam Ahmad is a liar and an anti -Christ. I never heard this prophecy from him (See Anthology of Pandit Lakhram Takzib·i· Baraheen-i Ahmadiyya, via “Qadiyaniat: an analytical survey” by Ehsan Elahi Zaheer (1984) 21st edition free download – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog). This was done specifically via MGA’s beef with Lekh Ram in the mid-1880‘s.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1896-1897
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1903
“Sanatan Dharam” (1903), quotes and background information – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
In 1903, MGA and his team of writers wrote Nasim-e-Da‘wat, it was published in mid-February 1903 just before the annual gathering of the Aryah Samaj scheduled for February 28, 1903, in Qadian. In this book, MGA seems to be beefing with the Arya Samaj of Qadian. Ironically, MGA’s family collected tax on behalf of the British government from these same hindus. The Arya Samaj were openly anti-British and Lekh Ram had already been dead for 6 years.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1906-1907
“Qadian Kei Aryah Aur Hamm” (1907), quotes and background information – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
On February 20, 1907, MGA and his team of writers published “Qadian Kei Aryah Aur Hamm”, in English it would be “The Aryas of Qadian”, it was published from Qadian from the Magazine Press, Qadian, it is barely 40 pages (See Hidden Treasures). In 2023, this book was published in english for the first time ever, however, many lies were told, for example, Ahmadi editor’s allege that MGA was leading Zuhr prayers when Hindu’s started yelling and etc., however, this is a lie, MGA never led the prayers and even on that day he admitted to being engaged in prayer, not leading it.
Lalah Sharampat Ra’i and Malawamal (these guys were also mentioned in Haqiqatul Wahy, 1906-1907) were the leaders from the Arya Samaj of Qadian (see Hidden Treasures). In 1906, he said that MGA had never shown any signs to the locals of Qadian. The Arya Samaj of Qadian set up a school called “Dyanand Jubilee School” as a parallel institution to “Ta‘limul Islam Madrasah” and also founded a journal in Qadian under the name of “Shubh Chantak”. Somraj was its editor and the prime object of this journal was to publish polemics against Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.
It seems that during the 1906 Qadian Jalsa, the Arya Samaj of Qadian and the Ahmadi’s of Qadian had an altercation. Just a few years ago (1903), MGA and Ahmadi’s also clashed with the Arya Samaj hindus of Qadian, see here. Ahmadiyya sources claim that during the Jalsa, the Arya Samah also held a rally/meeting and bothered the Ahmadi’s at their Jalsa. It seems that there was a police inspector onsite, who was against the Arya Samaj because they were anti-British. The police inspector doesn’t seem to have made any arrests. The “Shubh Chantak” published a summary of the alteration in their newspaper the next day.
Ahmadiyya sources claim that another journal, “Achar” had a debate/beef with Sheikh Yacub Ali Irfani, editor of the Al-Hakam. Chand seems to be the name of the editor of the “Achar”. Soon thereafter, the sons of Somraj and Bhagat Ram died of the plague (its unclear who these people are). Then Bhagat, Achar Chand and Somraj approached a local Hakim for medical treatment, MGA allowed the medical treatment.
MGA and his team of writers lie about converts to Ahmadiyya in Egypt in this book also. The ROR of May-1918 gives a partial english translation of this book by Chaudhry Ghulam Muhammad (B.A.).
By 1906-1907, the beef was on again in Qadian between the Arya Samaj of Qadian and MGA. While MGA and his team were writing “Haqiqatul Wahy”, they mentioned Sharampat 27 times and repeated all of the old info and added a new prophecy, i.e., that MGA told Sharampat that Mirza Ghulam Qadir (MGA’s brother) would die in 1883. In the same book “Haqiqatul Wahy”, MGA admitted that Sharampat and Malawamal had published advertisements against MGA and called MGA a liar and a fake. After MGA died, BA-5 was published and MGA alleged that Sharampat was his close friend in the 1870’s and even went with MGA to get the “Barahin” published.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1909
The ROR of Aug-1909 has an essay entitled, “The Tenets of the Arya Samaj”.
The ROR of Oct-1909 has an essay entitled, “The Attitude of the Arya Samaj towards other Religions”.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1917
The ROR of Sep-1917 reports that MGA made a prophecy that the Arya Samaj would be finished in 100 years.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1921
https://www.reviewofreligions.org/21834/review-of-religions-november-1921-edition/
An essay appeared in the ROR of Nov-1921 wherein the Arya Samaj were called a political identity.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1932
The Arya Samaj were mentioned in the ROR of June-1932.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1933
The Lekh Ram and Arya Samaj stories are given in the ROR of June-1933.
The Arya Samaj are mentioned in the ROR of Nov-1933.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1934
The Arya Samaj were mentioned in the ROR of April 1934, as well as in the June-1934 edition of the ROR.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1937
The Arya Samaj were mentioned in the ROR of Oct-1937.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1939
The Arya Samaj were mentioned in the ROR of Sep-1939, Oct-1939 and Nov-1939.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1941
The Arya Samaj and Lekh Ram were mentioned in the ROR of May-1941.
The Arya Samaj were mentioned in the ROR of Sep-1941.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1942
The Arya Samaj were mentioned in the ROR of Apr-1942.
The Arya Samaj were mentioned in the ROR of Nov-1942.
The Arya Samaj were mentioned in the ROR of Dec-1942.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1946
Lekh Ram and the Arya Samaj are mentioned in the ROR of Oct-1946 and Nov-1946.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1947
Lekh Ram and the Arya Samaj are mentioned in the ROR of Feb-1947.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2021/08/21/nasim-e-dawat-1903-quotes-and-background-information/
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #ahmadiyyatrueislam #mirzaghulamahmad #qadian #qadianism
4 Pingback