Intro
As we all know, MGA insulted Jesus Christ of the bible and Esa (as) of the Quran. He insulted Esa (as) in many other books also and in many ways. In Malfuzat, MGA accused Esa (as) of getting oil massages by adulterous women. There was no limit to what MGA said and did. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad even disputed the status of Esa (as)’s mother as “Siqqidah” in english as “truthful”. Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed to be greater than Esa (as)(astagfarullah)(naozobillah)”
Intro
In 1897-1898 (See Kitab ul Barriya), MGA and his team of writers, alleged that Ibn Arabi had written that Jesus will descend but in the sense that he will be associated with a different body (See page 19, Lahori-Ahmadi abridged translation), and that he died (see page 34, Lahori-Ahmadi abridged translation) MGA and his team referenced page 262 (see a document by the Qadiani’s) of a commentary written by Ibn Arabi, however, this seems to be Tafsir-i-Kashani by Abd al-Razzaq Kāshānī. Tafsir Kashani can also be found online at Al-Tafsir.com. Tafsir Kashani was also printed under the title “Tafseer ibn Arabi” (see online herein).
Intro
Ahmadi’s are academically dishonest, that much is obvious, they lie about the Quran, hadith and the books of MGA. They give interpretations which try to prove that MGA was an honest man, in fact, that is their entire motivation.
Nevertheless, they also quote Ibn Hazm, and assert that Ibn Hazm believed that Esa (as) died. However, they don’t show the full beliefs of Ibn Hazm. They fail to show that Muslims only believed that Esa (As) will die in terms of his second coming or that Eisa (as) had died for a few hours and was then RAFFA (lifted) towards Allah. Even Imam Malik claimed that Eisa (as) had died for just a few hours. Furthermore, Muslims like Ibn Abbas and Shah Wali Ullah opined that 3:55 of the Quran and specifically the word Mutawafeeka could be out of sequence, and could* mean death, however, only in terms of how Esa (as) would die after his second coming. Finally, Ibn Hazm considered #Ahmadis as Kafirs (Wajib ul Qatl), since they believe that Eisa (as) was partially crucified.
Continue reading “Ibn Hazm believed in the physical return of Esa (as) and the substitution theory, and NO NEW PROPHETS”