ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
There are 181 Paid employees in Ahmadiyya.  They collected 30 million pounds in 2016.

Live Link
http://apps.charitycommission.gov.uk/Showcharity/RegisterOfCharities/CharityWithPartB.aspx?RegisteredCharityNumber=1102949&SubsidiaryNumber=0

Intro
We have intercepted an official Ahmadiyya email wherein it is written that Ahmadi women are not allowed to wear jeans.  We have 5-6 other essays on this very topic, see here.  Realistically, humans only started wearing jeans since they were needed to work outside and protect men from the environment.  Wearing jeans ended up turning into fashion.  Even in the USA, traditional men were against women wearing jeans, however, in the 1970’s, that changed.

The letter

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/05/29/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-said-that-women-should-be-unquestionably-obedient-to-their-husbands/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/06/04/in-1925-as-the-ahmadiyya-khalifa-married-for-a-4th-time-he-said-that-women-should-not-work/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/03/13/the-mirza-family-sees-independent-and-working-women-as-a-curse/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/17/can-ahmadi-women-vote-for-the-khalifa/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/17/can-ahmadi-women-vote-for-the-khalifa/

The Establishment of Lajna Ima’illah and the Sacrifices of Early Ahmadi Muslim Women

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/19/the-ahmadi-shura-process-is-a-sham/

https://www.alislam.org/library/book/ahmadiyyat-renaissance-islam/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/10/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-said-that-womens-freedoms-is-the-cause-of-all-evil-and-disobedience-in-the-world/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/22/ahmadi-women-are-not-allowed-to-wear-jeans/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam #MGAonwomen

Intro
It has come to our attention that our fellow Ex-Ahmadis hate us here at this blog.  Reason on Faith and his friends are Atheist, and they hate Islam, they consider Ahmadiyya to be good and Muslims to be bad.  This is the issue.  Reason on Faith refuses to discuss Ahmadiyya properly, what we mean is, he refuses to delve into the personality of MGA and his sons, he hasn’t had many conversations with Ahmadis and has only been on the internet for a few years.  We forgive him for his virtual attacks on us.  Hopefully, he will grow up and realize his mistakes.

His posting about us
http://reasononfaith.com/no-relation-to-ahmadiyya-fact-check-blog/

Intro
Noorudin was bed-ridden after his fall from his pony in the late 1909-1910 era. He then had his leg amputated. He died a miserable and painful death. We only bring this up because Ahmadis always predict the death of others and pray for the deaths of all of their critics. Nooruddin wasn’t in his right mind after his fall and was taken advantage of in many ways. In fact, in the early part of 1914, Mahmud Ahmad even spoke ill of Nooruddin and later claimed that Noorudin was vacillating. There are 2 references from this story, both from Ahmadiyya newspapers. One from Al-Hakam in 1912 and another from Tashishzul Adhan of November 1914.
Continue reading “The Ahmadi-cleric, Maulvi Nooruddin wanted to kill all Ahmadis who ask that he step down as Khalifa” →

Intro
During the Khilafat of Maulana Nur-ud-Din, when Mirza Mahmud Ahmad returned from performing the Hajj to Makkah, some welcome meetings were held for him in Qadian. One such meeting, attended by the Hazrat Maulana, was held on 14th January 1913, and was organized by the pupils of the Ahmadiyya religious school. At the request of the gathering Mirza Mahmud Ahmad made a speech about his journey (See the quote and scan in the below). In this speech he mentioned various questions and objections that he encountered from people during the journey and his answers to them. He then explains how Ahmadi’s don’t believe Muslim’s to be Kafir simply on the score that they believe Eisa (As) to be alive, Ahmadi’s consider Muslim’s as Kafir’s per the famous hadith of Sahih Bukhari, wherein any Muslim who calls another Muslim a Kafir, has the Takfir come back onto himself. However, this is a non-sensical argument since Ahmadi’s are confirmed Kafir’s in the first place. MGA made exactly the same argument in 1906-1907 via Haqiqatul Wahy (see pages 143-144, online english edition). We have posted this hadith in the below.

It should be noted that this speech was, of course, made almost two years after his well-known article of April 1911, in which he declared all other Muslims to be kafir, all those who “decline to accept his claims”, “even if they called him a righteous person with their tongues”.
Continue reading “Mirza Mahmud Ahmad’s Speech In January 1913 Saying Only Those Are Kafir Who Brand Ahmadis As Kafir” →

Intro
In early 1911, the 1st Khalifa, Maulvi Nur ud Din was bed ridden (his leg was amputated) and Mian Mahmud Ahmad (Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad, before he was Khalifa) wrote a controversial essay in the Tashhidhul Adhan of April 1911 (see page 91).

Mian Mahmud Ahmad (Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad, before he was Khalifa) alleges that the reason why in March 1911, I wrote an article on the subject of the Kufr of those who did not accept the Promised Messiah, was that at that time some Ahmadis, under the influence of non-Ahmadis, had begun to write in some non-Ahmadi papers that there was no material difference between Ahmadis and non-Ahmadis, both being Muslims. I was afraid lest this erroneous view should find currency in the Ahmadiyya Community (see page 137).

It was also published in the Badr of 4th May 1911, and Al-Hakam of 14th May 1911. This is the essay that solidified the “AhmadiyyaTakfir”. Moreover, the word “true-muslim” doesn’t exist in this essay, in Urdu it would have been “Sacha Musalman”.

In 1917-1918, Maulvi Muhammad Ali famously quoted the words of Mian Mahmud Ahmad (Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad, before he was Khalifa) from Tashhidhul Adhan of 1911, page 141:

“even he, who from his heart believes in him (MGA) to be true and does not deny him with his tongue, but he postpones bai’t, is looked upon as a Kafir” (See Split in the Ahmadiyya Movement by Maulvi Muhammad Ali, 1918, pages 136-137).

After 1923, the Khalifa would claim that these statements of Kufr were only in terms of other Muslims not being “true muslims”.
Continue reading ““A Muslim is only he who accepts all those appointed by God” by Mirza Bashir-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, April 1911″ →

Intro
This was the essay that was written by Khwaja Kamaluddin in the summer of 1911. It was in response to Mirza Bashir-uddin Mahmud Ahmad’s essay, “A Muslim is one who accepts all those appointed by God” which was published in April of 1911(See “Dr. Sir Muhammad Iqbal and the Ahmadiyya Movement” by Maulana Hafiz Sher Muhammad, 1995, page 13). The essay by Khwaja Kamaluddin had Maulana Nur-ud-Din’s endorsement in the words: I approve it, you may publish it.

You can read the full Ahmadiyya Takfir timeline herein.
Continue reading ““My beliefs about non-Ahmadi Muslims”, dated 18 August 1911 by Khwaja Kamal-uddin” →