Intro
17 October 1817 – 27 March 1898), commonly known as Sir Syed Ahmad Khan (also Sayyid Ahmad Khan). He seems to have been a member of the growing Ahl-e-hadith movement in Northern India. However, by the 1860’s, he was a hybrid version of a Quranist. 

The Tafseer (commentary) was originally published, probably in parts, in the 1880’s. It does not cover the entire Quraan; it only goes up to Chapter 17, Soorah Banee Israa-eel. Sir Sayyad died
before he was able to complete the work. Chiragh Ali was a student or colleague of Sir Syed and was publishing similar material from Aligarh. Read a thorough review on this Tafsir herein, they claim that an english version is available at the Khuda Baksh Library.

The order of publishing is as follows:

Vol. I Aligarh, 1880.
Vol. II Aligarh, 1882, Agra, 1903.
Vol. III Aligarh, 1885.
Vol. IV Aligarh, 1888.
Vol. V Aligarh, 1892.
Vol. VI Aligarh, 1895.
Vol. VII Agra, 1904.

In this Tafseer, Sir Syed Ahmad Khan denied the physicality of the Miraaj, the concept of the Mahdi, the death of Eisa (as), the denial of Jinn, the denial that Adam (As) was the first human and etc etc.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________Scans from Sir Syed’s Tafsir

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Nuzhat Haneef

Now I provide my English translation of Sir Sayyad’s Urdu translation of Quraan 3:56 and some excerpts from his commentary on this verse, shown in the original Urdu text in the page images above.

[Quraan 3:56, numbered by Sir Sayyad as verse 48] When God said: O `Eesaa [Jesus], indeed I am going to kill you [‘mayn tujh koe maarnay waalaa hoon’] and am going to raise you to Myself and am going to purify you, from those people who became disbelievers, and am going to make those who followed you superior to those who became disbelievers, till the Day of Resurrection. Then you have to come to Me again. Then I will made a decision/judgment in the matter in which you differed. [SIR-SAYYAD, Part 2, p. 403] …

[Commentary on 3:56:] …
A person does not die due to being put on a cross because only the palms of his hands, and sometimes the palms and feet, got wounded. The reason for death used to be that [the person] was kept hanging on the cross for four or five days and [due to] the holes in his hands and feet and by suffering the impact of hunger and thirst and the heat and glare of the sun, [he] used to die in several days. … [SIR-SAYYAD, Part 2, p. 424] …

Upon the end of the day of the Fasah festival [the Pesach or Passover festival96], the Jewish Sabbath was about to begin and, according to the Jewish religion, it was necessary that the corpse of the killed or crucified person be buried prior to the end of the day, that is, prior to the start of the Sabbath. But a person cannot die so soon on the cross. Therefore, the Jews requested that Hadrat Maseeh’s legs be broken so that he would die immediately but Hadrat `Eesaa’s legs were not broken and people thought that he died within that much time [i.e., within the short time]. …

When people erroneously thought that Hadrat `Eesaa has actually died, then Yoosuf [Joseph of
Arimathea] requested the governor [Pilate] to have him buried; he [Pilate] was very astonished that he [Jesus] had died so quickly. The report of [Jesus] having died so quickly not only caused astonishment to the governor but the Christians too used to consider it impossible and, therefore, in the 3rd Christian century [i.e., 3rd century AD] the Christian scholars [of that period] eventually declared Hadrat `Eesaa’s swift death on the cross to be a miracle. [SIR-SAYYAD, Part 2, p. 425] ……

Upon taking a historical view of this whole incident [of Jesus’ crucifixion] it clearly becomes
obvious that Hadrat `Eesaa had not died on the cross; rather, he went into a condition such that people thought him to be dead. … Hadrat `Eesaa was taken down from the cross after three or four hours and one can be sure in every respect that he was alive. At night he was taken out of the grave and he stayed hidden in the protection of his disciples. The disciples saw him and met him and then, at some [later] time, [he] died a natural death. Without a doubt, due to fear of the enmity of the Jews, he must have been buried, in extreme secrecy, at some unknown location, which is unknown up till now and it became publicized [i.e., the word spread] that he had gone to the heavens [or the sky]. [SIR-SAYYAD, Part 2, pp. 426-427]

As you can see, Sir Sayyad presents the theory, later adopted by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, that Jesus did not die on the cross but rather was taken down alive and died a natural death later on. He also provides the same explanation that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad later provided for why Jesus was able to survive, viz., that he was taken down from the cross within a few hours.
Now that you have read a part of Sir Sayyad’s explanation of the crucifixion incident which was published in the early 1880’s97, I present below a few excerpts from Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s book Maseeh Hindustaan Mayn (whose preface is dated 1899 but which was published in 1908) which he wrote after declaring in 1891 that God had told him that Jesus was dead. Instead of translating myself from Urdu, I have used the Ahmadiyya Movement’s translation available in the book Jesus in India but I have provided the corresponding Urdu reference as well. In this quotation, see if you can notice the similarities between Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s writing and Sir Sayyad’s explanation of how Jesus could have come down alive from the cross (see Jesus in India).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Sir Syed Ahmad Khan scans and data from 5:117

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syed_Ahmad_Khan

https://kblibrary.bih.nic.in/

file:///C:/Users/xobas/Desktop/T%207541.pdf

http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/10603/55315

Nooruddin urged Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to make the claim of being “like the messiah” (1882-1884 era)

During the writing of Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, MGA masked his beliefs, he was already asserting that Esa (as) died

Dard lied about MGA’s views on Esa (as) pre-1891

What is Maseel-e-Maseeh? The like of the Messiah?

MGA explains how he misunderstood his prophethood in 1880 and was confused for 20+ years

Dard lied about MGA’s views on Esa (as) pre-1891

Noorudin and Abdul Karim were influenced by Sir Syed

Dard lied about MGA’s views on Esa (as) pre-1891

Sir Syed was the first Muslim in India to ever say that all hadith on the Mahdi were weak…MGA copied

Sir Syed was the first Muslim in India to ever say that all hadith on the Mahdi were weak…MGA copied

https://www.alislam.org/library/book/heavenly-sign/

Nooruddin urged Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to make the claim of being “like the messiah” (1882-1884 era)

Was Noorudin the Ghost-writer of MGA?

During the writing of Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, MGA masked his beliefs, he was already asserting that Esa (as) died

Friedman errs on Ishaat us Sunnah volume numbers and the corresponding year

Sir Syed’s books about Islam (1857–1870)

Sir Syed’s books about Islam (1857–1870)

Sir Syed was the first Muslim in India to ever say that all hadith on the Mahdi were weak…MGA copied

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#sirsyed #sirsyedahmadkhan #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat