ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
In what seems to be the late 1980’s, Mirza Tahir Ahmad was asked by a woman about why prophets are not appearing nowadays. Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that via 4:69 (4:70 in the Kadiani Koran), there is a possibility of subordinate prophets (Ummati Nabi’s). However, Mirza Tahir Ahmad carefully says that this verse only discusses the possibility. Mirza Tahir Ahmad argues that 4:69 (4:70 in the Kadiani Koran) talks about the rewards given to Muslims for attentively following Muhammad (saw) and these rewards should be greater than what was given to previous generations (Jews). Mirza Tahir Ahmad said the rewards aren’t equal, they are more!

In Part-2 of the same video, Mirza Tahir Ahmad argues that the rewards in 4:69 (4:70 in the Kadiani Koran) are only for those who obey Muhammad (Saw) and Allah. Again, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says the rewards will be more than what people previously got (the Jews). At 2:22, he quotes the famous hadith about Muslims being “the like of prophets”. Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that Muslims are not less than any prophets of Israel (naozobillah) and can reach that status. However, they won’t be called prophets. Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that the prophets of Israel were not for the whole world, they were limited in their approach. Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that “the like of prophets” can come in large numbers and they are not prophets at all. Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that a prophet “Like Muhammad (saw)” isn’t covered in 4:69 (4:70 in the Kadiani Koran), since this is a prophet for the entire world. Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that only prophet will come who is “Like Muhammad (saw)” and that is MGA. Mirza Tahir Ahmad then quotes the famous hadith from Sahih-Muslim Hadith 2937a, The Book of Tribulations and Portents of the Last Hour wherein Eisa (as) was called “Nabi-Ullah” 4 times.

Continue reading “In the late 1980’s, Mirza Tahir Ahmad quoted 4:69 (4:70 in the Kadiani Koran) and alleged that subordinate prophets can come” →

Intro
It seems that before the pandemic (based on the lack of face masks), Mirza Masroor Ahmad was asked about the possibility of prophethood after MGA.

The questioner says that NO prophets can come after the Promised Messiah (MGA). Mirza Masroor Ahmad disagrees and says it’s wide open, a prophet can come, however, he doesn’t know the details. Mirza Masroor Ahmad mentioned 4:69 (4:70 in the Kadiani Koran) as evidence that prophets can come. Mirza Masroor Ahmas says that the rank of a Khalifa is higher than a mujadid.

The questioner than says that Mirza Masroor Ahmad called MGA as the “Khatamul Khulafa” earlier, to which Mirza Masroor Ahmad responds with, well, I didn’t say Khatamul Anbiya. MIrza Masroor Ahmad says that Muhammad (Saw) is the Khatamul Anbiya. Mirza Masroor Ahmad says that if a prophet comes, he will be under MGA and will accept MGA as a Nabi and as “Khatamul Khulafa”.

Continue reading “Mirza Masroor Ahmad said that prophets can come, but he doesn’t know the details” →

Intro
It seems that on 3-12-1996, Mirza Tahir Ahmad had some type of discussion with an Arab-Egyptian on the famous Ahmadiyya program, “Liqaa Ma’al Arab”. The famous translator from the Odeh family is also in this video.

It starts off with the Arab man asking about the famous hadith wherein Ali (ra) was called the Khatam-ul Auliya. The Arab man said that he asked people at Al-Azhar University about it and they told him that this hadith is inauthentic. At 3:16, Mirza Tahir Ahmad admits that this hadith is not in the Sahih-Sitta (the 6 authentic books). Mirza Tahir Ahmad then keeps saying that Muslims have quoted it, however (3:52), Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that it occurred in Tafsir Al-Safi (full name: al-Safi fi Tafsir Kalam Allah al-Wafi) is an exegesis of the Qur’an written by 17th century Shia scholar Mohsen Fayz Kashani. At 4:32, Mirza Tahir Ahmad admits that the wording is different in other sources, for example, Ali (ra) is called “Khatam ul Asfiya” instead. At 7:40, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that this isn’t the only argument that he presented, why isn’t this Arab man discussing the other pieces of evidence. At 8:13, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that other Muslims scholars have defined Khatam-un-Nabiyeen as the “greatest”, not the last. The Arab man responds by saying that normally in Arabic the word “Azim” is used to connotate “greatest”. In a funny way, at 9:30, Mirza Tahir Ahmad pulls out his “purchee” (scrap paper with notes, like a pocketbook). Mirza Tahir Ahmad then gives 10+ refs without giving proper evidence.

At 13:25, the Arab-Egyptian asks Mirza Tahir Ahmad to go back to the issue with about the famous hadith wherein Ali (ra) was called the Khatam-ul Auliya.

At 19:00, Mirza Tahir Ahmad alleges that he had an Arabic teacher and had a conflict over the word Khatam (a total lie). Mirza Tahir Ahmad alleges that his Arabic teacher asked him to translate “Last of the Caliphs of the Ummayad’s”, and Mirza Tahir Ahmad used “ilzami jawab” and used the phrase “Khatam ul Khulafa of Bani Ummaya” (20:10), like purposely to create a stir. The Egyptian-Arab then tells Mirza Tahir Ahmad that he was wrong for this translation (20:17). The Egyptian-Arab says that Hazrat Umar (ra) was in fact, the LAST Khalifa from the Ummayad’s. At this point, Mirza Tahir Ahmad alleged that Ismail was a Khalifa later on from Banu Ummaya and even sent an expedition to India.

At 22:00, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that the LAST king (of any dynasty) can never be called Khatam. Mirza Tahir Ahmad alleges that Arab’s only use the word “Khatam” to give compliment.

At 22:52, Mirza Tahir Ahmad alleges that per the Sunni belief, Allah forgot about how he ended prophethood and told us via 4:69 (4:70 in the Kadiani Koran) that other prophets can come.

At 23:01, Mirza Tahir Ahmad is visibly frustrated that this Egyptian-Arab has rejected the famous hadith wherein Ali (ra) was called the Khatam-ul Auliya since it is a weak source.

At 23:10, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that per 7:35 of the Quran (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran), propehthood is wide open.

At 24:12, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that Khatam only means the last of the law-bearing prophets. Mirza Tahir Ahmad argued that per 7:35 of the Quran (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran) and 4:69 (4:70 in the Kadiani Koran), subordinate prophets can come.

At 24:50, Mirza Tahir Ahmad admits to being upset. Mirza Tahir Ahmad says go ahead and reject all of my sources, let’s go to the Quran.

At 26:55, Mirza Tahir Ahmad argues that everyone cannot be a Nabi per 4:69 (4:70 in the Kadiani Koran). In conclusion, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that anyone who follows Muhammad (Saw) can be given the “title” of nubuwwat.

Continue reading “Mirza Tahir Ahmad vs. an Arab on “Liqaa Ma’al Arab” from March-12-1996, If Muhammad Mustafa is not the Last Prophet, prove it from The Quran, Challenge the Qadiani Caliph..” →

Intro
In July-2025, Dr. John Andrew Morrow and Bilal Muhammad published “W. D. Fard: The Man, Mystery, and Myth Behind the Nation of Islam”. In this new book, research by Dr. Bashir Ahmad Shah is noted on pages 10, 171 and 406. They interviewed on blogging theology and mentioned me at the 1:12:18.

Continue reading “Dr. Bashir Ahmad Shah and #Ahmadiyyafactcheckblog mentioned in “W. D. Fard: The Man, Mystery, and Myth Behind the Nation of Islam” (2025) by John Andrew Morrow (Author), Bilal Muhammad (Author)” →

Intro
On July-26-2025, Bro Imtiaz explained (1:34:27) how MGA wrote in “Tiryaq ul Qulub” (1899-1902)(page 478), that per the pattern of prophethood (minhaj ul nubuwwat) and hadith of Muhammad (Saw)(see the hadith about the 3 generations, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 6429, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2533), people on Earth who would come after the time of the Messiah, would not be considered as his part of his Ummah. It should be noted, in the same book, roughly the same page, MGA says he is last Mahdi and no other competent person would be born from a woman.

MGA then says that the time of the Messiah is only (3 generations):

1–Those that saw MGA
2–Those who saw the ones that saw MGA
3–Or those who saw the second generation

However, in 1903 (just a year later), MGA said that in 300 years, people would forget about the physical return of Eisa (as)(See, English-ROR-November of 1903, page 456, see also “Tadhkiratush-Shahadatain”) and Ahmadiyya would be dominant in the world.

In the late 1950’s and early 1960’s, Mirza Bashir Ahmad wrote that the khilafat in their Jama‘at will not remain in its pure form forever but will degenerate into a hereditary institution after the first four khalifas.

In 1982, Mirza Tahir Ahmad that the Ahmadiyya Khilafat would last 1000 years.

In roughly 2022-2024, Mirza Masroor Ahmad says that MGA’s era is 1000 years, 1000 year’s of Khilafat, the final 1000 years of life on Earth (see on tiktok and twitter).

Continue reading “In 1902, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad said that only 3 generations of humans will remain, the end is near” →

Intro
Check out my video on this herein.

Mirza Masroor Ahmad lied about converts to Ahmadiyya in 2024-2025 at like 250k (youtube, 35:36)(see the clip on TikTok, instagram and Twitter). In the original converts announcement via MTA, the camera switched to Kiribati, and the Ahmadi Maulvi quickly nudged his fake converts in Kiribati and had them pretend like they were paying attention (See on TikTok).

Mirza Masroor Ahmad also lied about the attendance at the #UKJalsa2025 and alleged that 46k people attended, whereas in reality we have to divide by 3, so that makes it roughly 15k. Then half men and half women, so roughly 7000 men attended and this was from the around the world, with most likely like 2000 international guests.

There is also a clip of Mirza Masroor Ahmad struggling to read 15:9 of the Quran (15:10 in the Kadiani Koran)(see the clip on TikTok and Twitter, see here for the video in real time on twitter and TikTok). In fact, it seems that Masroor added 79:1 to 15:9, mistakes upon mistakes! At 16:58 of the original video and 17:52.

At 4:44, Mirza Masroor Ahmad starts talking about Ahmadiyya in African countries and mentions how work is done via free labor (Waqar-e-Amal), and 440,000+ free labor hours were used which saved the Ahmadiyya Jamaat 8 billion (5:32 timestamp). This is in 113 countries.

Check out Mirza Masroor waddling into the Lajna tent herein too. Dr. @Aziz_Hafiz, Chairman of @HumanityFirstUK, who is leading tabligh in Gaza was there too and Kashif Chaudhary took a photo with him.

They even staged Quranic knowledge via questions about finishing a verse.

Continue reading “The #UKJalsa2025, 249k fake converts reported, #UkJalsa #Jalsa #Jalsauk #UKJalsa2025 #JalsaSalanaUK #JalsaUK2025” →

Intro
A few days ago, someone asked me about the prevalence of “Hafiz” in Ahmadiyya, I quickly responded by saying that there are barely any of those, in fact, the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa lied about his own son (Mirza Nasir Ahmad) being a Hafiz back in the 1922 (See Muslim Sunrise, July 1922, see page 110).

Furthermore, I remember about 15 years ago, in the USA, there was a strange Ahmadi named Hafiz Samiullah Chaudhary, who was on a National Tarbiyyat team and was presented as a scholar of Ahmadiyya. In 2014, he was working as National Secretary of “Waqf-e-Nau”. In 2017, he seems to have been the chapter of the Ahmadiyya Movement in President in North New Jersey. However, was he a Hafiz?

Continue reading “Who is Hafiz Samiullah Chaudhary?” →

Intro
In 1879, MGA and his team wrote a poem wherein it acknowledged the orbit of the sun and moon (See “Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya” V-1+2, page 20).

In roughly 1880-1882 (See Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya V-3 (See page 154), Mirza Ghulam Ahmad got an ilham/wahi wherein he alleged that via 41:53 (41:54 in the Kadiani Koran), and via the word “Al-Afaqee” (MGA translated it as corners), MGA’s message would spread to the corners of the Earth. Does this imply that MGA believed in flat Earth theory? MGA repeated this “corners of the Earth” many times across many books. However, per Ibn Kathir, the word “Al-Afaqee” means universe, not corners. Further, per Suyuti the word “Al-Afaqee” means “horizons”, which is also used by Quran.com. Lastly, in the Bible, the corners of the Earth were discussed (See Isaiah 11:12 and Revelation 7:1).

In 1891, MGA and his team argued against the Bible Matthew 24:29, they argued that it was nonsensical for the stars to fall to Earth, since Earth has an Orbit (See “Three Questions by a Christian and their Answers”, see page -50).

In 1894, MGA and his team argued that it is a necessary condition for both lunar and solar eclipses that the moon and the sun return to their customary positions and resume their primary orbits—and this implication is contained within the defining characteristics of both eclipses (See “The Light of Truth, Parts 1 & 2, Online English translation of Nurul-Haqq, see page 349).

In 1896, MGA and his team argued that via 36:40 of the Quran (36:41 in the Kadiani Koran), the sun and moon travel in an orbit (See “Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam”, online English edition, page 89).

In 1906-1907, MGA was arguing about ranks that are achievable by humans and how they are limited by 21:33 of the Quran (21:34 in the Kadiani Koran)(See “Haqiqatul Wahi, online English edition, page 35).

In 1908, MGA and his team of writers quoted 57:2 of the Quran (57:3 of the Kadiani Koran) and 25:2 (25:3 of the Kadiani Koran) and argued that the moon and sun run in an orbit. MGA never discussed the movements of the Earth (See Chashma-e-Ma‘rifat, Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 23, pp. 17-1, via Essence of Islam, V-1, page 116).

In 1909 via “Nuzul ul Maseeh“, MGA used the phrase “corners of the Earth” many times.

In 1917, in his famous English commentary on the Quran, Maulvi Muhammad Ali translated “Al-Afaqee” as “remote regions”.

However, Allah told us in the Quran that he made the Earth like a bed (spread out):

13:3 (muda, spread out the Earth), 15:19 (mudadanaha, we spread it out), 2:22 (the Earth is a resting place), 20:53 (the Earth is like a bed), 43:10 (the Earth is like a bed), 50:7 (mudadanaha), 78:6 (Mihada, like a bed), 79:30 (dahaha, spread out, some have said like an egg), 51:48 (farashnaha, spread it out), 88:20 (sotihat, spread out).

—39:5 (The Arabic for “He rolls” (Yukawwir / يُكَوِّرُ ) is derived from the Arabic word for “ball” (kurah / كرة ). This verse clearly informs us that the earth is round. Since the Earth is not exactly round

Verses quoted, 13:3 (13:4 in the Kadiani Koran), 15:19 (15:20 in the Kadiani Koran), 2:22 (2:23 in the Kadiani Koran), 20:53 (20:54 in the Kadiani Koran), 43:10 (43:11 in the Kadiani Koran), 50:7 (50:8 in the Kadiani Koran), 78:6 (78:7 in the Kadiani Koran), 79:30 (79:31 in the Kadiani Koran), 51:48 (51:49 in the Kadiani Koran), 88:20 (88:21 in the Kadiani Koran). 39:5 (39:6 in the Kadiani Koran).

There are many hadith on this too.

Lastly, it should be noted that the Quran talks about the canopy (Saqo mafuda) which covers Earth, see 21:32 (21:33 in the Kadiani Koran), 2:22 (2:23 in the Kadiani Koran), 22:65 (22:66 in the Kadiani Koran), 40:64 (binnaaaa-un)(40:65 in the Kadiani Koran), 52:5 (52:6 in the Kadiani Koran)(the word is Al-Maufuri), 7:171 (7:172 in the Kadian Koran)(the word is “Zul-latun”) and 79:28 (79:29 in the Kadiani Koran)(the phrase is “sum-ka-ha”).

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, 41:53 (41:54 in the Kadiani Koran) and Flat Earth theory” →

Intro
In 1921 (Jan-26), the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa (Mirza Basheer Ud Din Mahmoud Ahmad), 
gave a speech i nfront of students of Madrisah Ahmadia (Jamia at Qadian?), which was later on written in form of a booklet by title of “Haddayat Zaryein”. On page 11 he says that Ahmadi Mullahs are “zilli”, their prophethood is Zilli and everything is zilli (shadow).

In 1944, as the 2nd Khalifa claimed to be the “Musleh Maud”, he also announced himself as the “Masil-i-Masih” and as the “zilli” messiah, however, he meant like MGA, not like Jesus (as)(See ROR of March-1944). Also read about MGA’s concept about “Maseel e Maseeh”.

Continue reading “In Ahmadiyya, everything is “Zilli”” →