ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
KTV reports how Pervaiz Rashid is supporting Qadiani’s, via a senate budget session on June-18-2025, he mentioned how he essentially wants to abolish Ord-XX (1984) and the 2nd Amendment of the Pakistani constitution wherein Ahmadi’s were declared Non-Muslim in 1974 (See the video clip on twitter). Rabwah times has reported this too. Pervaiz Rashid’s support of the Qadiani’s was also tweeted by Ahmadi’s and appreciated. This news was reported on other outlets too and pro-Qadiani youtube channels herein. 10 years ago (2015), Pervaiz Rashid was accused of being a Qadiani in Pakistani politics and herein. This entire story was also reported on Geo news.

Pervaiz Rashid mentioned the ban of Ahmadi’s on performing the Qurbani. He said sometimes people are killed. “In what state is authority given where an individual has to answer as to where the sacrificial meat in their home came from, and what was the faith of the individual who sent it—or the faith of the one who received it?” Rasheed asked. He described how the woman was reportedly questioned about her belief in the finality of prophethood, the source of the meat in her home, and whether her son-in-law was an Ahmadi. She was further asked if she had given or received meat from an Ahmadi family and was made to recite the Kalima under oath to prove her truthfulness.

“Yet here we question the faith instead of looking into giving the sacrificial meat to the poor and needy,” Rasheed stated. He criticized the hardships faced by religious minorities, saying:

“The individuals who have different beliefs and are in the minority, whose beliefs differ from the majority, go through all these hardships. Their worship places are not safe, their homes are not safe, they are in danger, they are falsely implicated and spend years in prison, and sometimes they are killed.”

Rasheed called on Parliament to take decisive action to protect the rights of all citizens.

“We should take an oath today that this Parliament abolish all the laws which are used as an excuse to limit the freedoms of Pakistanis. Let’s strive for a Pakistan where each citizen living in this country would consider it their own—where they won’t be defined by their language, geography, or faith but only as a Pakistani citizen. They should belong to Pakistan, and Pakistan should belong to them,” he declared.

Pervaiz Rashid (Urdu: پرويز رشيد) is a Pakistani politician who served as the Federal Minister of Information, Broadcasting, and National Heritage and Minister for Law, Justice and Human Rights in the Third Sharif ministry. A member of Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz), Rashid has been a member of the Senate of Pakistan since 2009 and previously served as the Chairman of the Pakistan Television Corporation from 1997 to 1999 during the Sharif’s government in 1997. Considered a representative of the left-wing of the PML-N, he has previously described himself as a Marxist and as an admirer of Che Guevara and Meraj Muhammad Khan.

Continue reading “KTV reports how Pervaiz Rashid is supporting Qadiani’s and essentially wants to abolish Ord-XX and the 2nd Amendment of the Pakistani constitution” →

Intro
Mansoor Zia sahib seems to have been born in Pakistan (based on accent) roughly 55 years ago (1970, based on appearance).

In 2016, he was working at Jamia-UK as a teacher.

In 2021, he gave lectures at different Ahmadiyya temples and on different celebrations.

In 2025, he was part of a team of Qadiani Mullah’s on the True Islam UK Urdu stream in June of 2025 who were engaged by Bro Imtiaz.

In Nov-2025, he was on a panel that streamed on the True Islam UK channel, see my review herein. At 34:50, Mansoor Ahmad Zia starts barking about “La Nabiya Badi”. At 37:02, he says that did Muhammad (Saw) predict the coming of another prophet? Mansoor Ahmad Zia alleges that Aisha (ra) told people to not call Muhammad (Saw) as “La Nabiya Badi”. At 40:24, he presents the famous hadith about Ali (ra) and the prophethood of Harun (as). At 41:55, he argues that baadi only means while Muhammad (saw) is gone and also right after Muhammad (saw)’s death. At 43:13, what verse of the Quran is this? At 45:10, he argues that baadi means vs. or against? At 46:56, he argues that baadi means directly after Muhammad (Saw) only and no prophets between him and the Messiah (46:49). At 1:32:30, Mansoor Ahmad Zia starts barking, he says that Muhammad (Saw) is not the finisher of the prophets. Ahmadi’s don’t believe that Muhammad (Saw) finished the cycle of prophets. He argues that prophethood is a good thing, why was it ended? Good things are never ended…1:36:30, he says that to say that NO MORE good (naik) people will come is wrong (See MGA in Tiryaq ul Qulub). At 1:46:45, Mansoor Ahmad Zia begins to allege that Ahmadiyya is growing. At 1:47:14, Mansoor Ahmad Zia argues that all Muslim firqa’s have come together and are trying to stop the growth of Ahmadiyya. Mansoor Ahmad Zia says that this is another piece of evidence, whenever the truth (Ahmadiyya) comes, there are always some people objecting to it.

Continue reading “Who is Mansoor Zia sahib?” →

Intro
In the below, we have created a page wherein we posted all the times that MGA referred to Ibn Arabi. We have also posted a document from alislam.org wherein MGA refers to Ibn Arabi in his books. It should be noted that his name is written as Ibn al-‘Arabi in some of MGA’s books.

In 1885-1886, via Surma Chashmay Arya (RK-2, pages 175-181, via Essence of Islam, V-2, page 35), MGA said that a Wali possessing the capacity for vision, using his mind, can appear to another person, at a distance of hundreds of miles in a state of complete wakefulness without his body moving from its place. MGA alleged that the author of Futuhat and Fusus (ibn Arabi)(and other great Sufi’s also experienced this, however, MGA alleges they he didn’t need their testimony, he has his own experience which taught him about this phenomenon.

In 1897-1898 (See Kitab ul Barriya), MGA and his team of writers, alleged that Ibn Arabi had written that Jesus will descend but in the sense that he will be associated with a different body (See page 19, Lahori-Ahmadi abridged translation), and that he died (see page 34, Lahori-Ahmadi abridged translation) MGA and his team referenced page 262 (see a document by the Qadiani’s) of a commentary written by Ibn Arabi, however, this seems to be Tafsir-i-Kashani by Abd al-Razzaq Kāshānī. Tafsir Kashani can also be found online at Al-Tafsir.com. Tafsir Kashani was also printed under the title “Tafseer ibn Arabi” (see online herein).

In 1902, MGA and his team quoted Nawab Siddiq Hassan Khan‘s book, “Hujaj al Kiramah” and alleged that that Ibn Arabi wrote that the Messiah would be called a Kafir (See Al-Hakam, vol. 6, no. 44, dated 10 December 1902, pp. 1-2, Via Malfuzat-4, online English edition, pages 143 and 145).

In Oct-1908, BA-5 (see page 386), after MGA died, MGA’s team of writers alleged that Ibn al-‘Arabi wrote in one of his books—which is his last book—that ‘Isa would indeed come but only in a new manifestation; that is, that some other person of this Ummah would appear in the spirit of ‘Isa. However, MGA didn’t give the name of the book.

Did Ibn Arabi believe Isa (As) to be a half human and half an angelic spirit, different from the four types of creations: 1) Adam 2) Eve 3) Bani Adam 4) Jesus (half spirit of Gabriel and half son of Mary).? Did Imam Al-Ghazzali do Takfir of Ibn Arabi? Watch Bro Haji’s explanation herein, he alleges that Ibn Arabi was a total deviant and shouldn’t be read for Islam, some Sufi’s might have quoted him without knowing his full Aqida.

“Buruz means that the nature of some saints resembles the nature of a particular prophet. Many saints are made to travel through the achievements of the great prophets and the saints are coloured with the colour of the prophets. In other words, the image of the achievements of the prophets is transferred to them. One could also say that the special qualities of the prophets are manifested and projected (buruz) through them. But after the journey is completed, each of them remains in their original position of natural belonging. For example, the saint who supports the cause of faith is referred to as one who has the nature of Noah(as) or who stands in the footsteps of Noah(as), or as one who manifests Noah(as), or as the buruz of Noah(as). The saint who accepts the will of God is called someone who has the nature of Moses(as), the one of sincerity and self-annihilation is called someone who has the nature of Jesus(as), and the one who is a perfect servant who combines all these qualities is called someone who has the nature of Muhammad(sa). Sometimes it is said that this or that saint is the buruz of this or that prophet, just as the moon is the buruz of the sun. In short, the Prophet is the original and the saint is his copy and the original of the Prophets is Muhammad(sa).” (Muhyi d-Din ibn ‘Arabi, Urdu translation of Fusus al-Hikam , ed./trans. Muhammad ‘Abd al-Qadir Siddiqi, Hyderabad, Dar at-Tab‘-i Jami ‘ah-i ‘Uthmaniyyah, 1942, p. 24).

In 1984, Mirza Tahir Ahmad called Ibn Arabi as no less than a prophet, i.e., the like of prophets, and via 4:69 (4:70 in the Kadiani Koran). 

In June of 2025, Ahmadi’s discussed Ibn Arabi on the True Islam Uk Urdu stream vs. Bro Imtiaz.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Ibn Arabi” →

Intro
Via Hashmi, Maulana Tosif Ahmad of Alamai Majlis Tahaffuze Khatme Nabuwwat has stated that Qadianis may be made to respect the constitution and law of the country. He said Jamaat Ahmadiyyah is allegedly about to encroach upon the four acres of land of Pakistan Railways in Rabwah. They have parked their Tractors here and tree plantation is going on by them. Neither Railways department nor any other government authorities know anything of such illegal activities by Jamaat. He said Jamaat occupy the land in the name of green belts and then get it registered to their names by courts of law. He said there were about 15 houses of Muslims by 2010 they were removed after an operation of by the authorities. Molana Tosif said government should take serious action against these illegal activities of Qadiani Jamaat. Ghulam Muhammad, the Station Master of Rabwah Railways may be included in the investigations.

It should be noted that Rabwah seems to be on a 99-year lease and was totally illegal.

Continue reading “In 2025, did the Ahmadiyya Movement in Rabwah steal land from the Pakistani Government?” →

Intro
On Aug-12, 1984, at the Fazl Mosque in London, Mirza Tahir Ahmad seems to have held a lengthy semi-open pre-planned Question and Answer session. It starts off with an Ahmadi questioner who is perplexed over the Ahmadiyya argument on the possibility of prophets after MGA (Hazrat Maseeh-e-Maud). The questioner says that many Ahmadi’s in his circle of friends are also perplexed. The questioner tells Mirza Tahir Ahmad that the Ahmadi argument is that prophethood is a “rahmat” (blessing) and this can’t be stopped. The questioner said that Ahmadi’s are feeling like this in 1984 too, i.e., that after MGA, there will be no prophets. On the same day, Mirza Tahir Ahmad said that Nabiyeena in 4:69 only promises the like-of-prophets.

Mirza Tahir Ahmad then answered by saying that the “like of prophets are NO less than prophets” (1:42 time stamp). Mirza Tahir Ahmad argued that this is an inferiority complex that Muslims are suffering from. Mirza Tahir Ahmad argues that Muslims are the best ummah and thus, their station is much higher than anyone who passed before (this includes prophets, nauozoillah). He argues that only Ahmadi’s know about the high status of Muhammad (Saw). He argued that Ibne Arabi, Shah Wali Ullah and Abdul Qadir Jilani were better than some of the prophets of Israel (naozobillah). He argued that even Bilal was no less than a prophet. Mirza Tahir Ahmad argues that these types of prophets Ibn Arabi, Shah Wali Ullah, Abdul Qadir Jilani and Abu Bakr (ra), Uthman (ra), Ali (ra) Umar (ra) Bilal (ra) will all continue to come (see this clip on TikTok and Twitter). Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that you pick any of the great saints of Islam, and truly and honestly, if you compare them with the prophets of Israel, the older (Israeli-prophets) they look like “pick-me’s” (did he say pygmy? 6:44 time stamp)(this is great disrespect of the previous prophets by Mirza Tahir).

At 11:38, Mirza Tahir Ahmad argues that NO ONE says that NO prophet can come, and a prophet in the fashion of Muhammad (Saw) can also come (like the Buruzi, Zilli and second coming of Muhammad [saw}), however, there is no prophecy about it (see on TikTok and twitter).

Continue reading “In Aug-1984, Mirza Tahir Ahmad argued that NO ONE says that NO prophet can come, and a prophet in the fashion of Muhammad (Saw) can also come” →

Intro
On Aug-12-1984, Mirza Tahir Ahmad held a Question/Answer session at the Fazl Mosque in London. The Ahmadi questioner said that Allah revealed that prophets would come. Mirza Tahir Ahmad immediately said NO! At 1:28, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that MGA claimed to be that prophet who was predicted by Muhammad (Saw) and addressed as Nabi by Muhammad (saw) (only). On the same day, Mirza Tahir Ahmad argued that NO ONE says that NO prophet can come, and a prophet in the fashion of Muhammad (Saw) can also come.

At 1:53, Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that if anyone repeats the claim of MGA, it would be their duty to prove where Muhammad (Saw) has referred to another one and gave this other prediction of a “prophet”.

Mirza Tahir Ahmad eventually discussed 4:69 (4:70 in the Kadiani Koran) and alleged that the verse says “nabiyeen”, which doesn’t mean plural would come, it’s a way of expression, instead, they would become the “the like of prophets”.

At 12:06, Mirza Tahir Ahmad defended Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as the last prophet, and alleged it was accidental and etc. And someone has to be last, it doesn’t mean superiority. More often then not, the last are the not the best (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter).

At 12:44, Mirza Tahir Ahmad argues that being Last is not a matter of pride at all, Mirza Tahir Ahmad suggests that Non-Ahmadi’s believe in this as a matter of pride. Mirza Tahir Ahmad argues that they don’t say that Maseeh e Maud (MGA) is the Last prophet and thus the greatest.  Mirza Tahir Ahmad argues that each chain of prophets, always had someone who was last, and that person was never the Best. This is wrong! The best came before him (referring to Muhammad, saw, coming before MGA). Mirza Tahir Ahmad then clarifies that not never “the best”, but, more often than not, they were never “the best”. Mirza Tahir Ahmad argued that maybe accidentally a few of them were the better than previous people (prophets). Mirza Tahir Ahmad says it’s not a rule, it’s pure chance.

Continue reading “In 1984, Mirza Tahir Ahmad said that Nabiyeena in 4:69 only promises the like-of-prophets” →

Intro
The AMJI (aka Mirza family) knows that the Ahmadiyya chanda is running out. Thus, they are begging for asylum from Bangladesh. They can be seen begging Mr. Jamie Staley, Foreign Aff. Officer, Intern’l Religious Freedom, U.S State Dept., Mr. Metthew Beh, Dty. Political/Economic Counselor and Mr. Hermanoschy Bernard, Human Rights Officer, US Embassy, Dhaka at the Ahmadiyya Nat’l HQ. On the Qadiani-Ahmadi side, Ahmad Tabshir Choudhury (Director External & Public Affairs, Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at, Bangladesh) and Maulana Abdul Awwal Khan Chaudhry (wokring as missionary-in-charge since 1988) can be noticed (not sure of the other two).

Just recently, in Germany, the Ahmadiyya Movement has met with 124 government officials and begged for asylum. Thus we see a trend and uptick in the Ahmadiyya Movement begging for more asylum.

Continue reading “Bengali Ahmadi’s are begging the USA to take Ahmadi asylee’s from Bangladesh” →

Intro
Maulana Abdul Awwal Khan Chaudhry has been the missionary-in-charge for Ahmadiyya in Bangladesh since 1988. He participates in Shotter Shondhane, a bi-monthly live phone-in program on Muslim Television Ahmadiyya (MTA) International. A vocal activist against religious fanaticism, he has represented the Ahmadiyya community in numerous international conferences and has visited the United States under the International Visitors Leadership Program. During the anti-Ahmadiyya uprising in Bangladesh, he spoke out boldly and persuasively against radicalism using love, logic, and prayer.

Maulana Abdul Awwal Khan Chaudhry received a Shahid degree in 1988 from Jamia Ahmadiyya International University of Theology and Modern Languages in Rabwah, Pakistan. He has also served as head of local missionary training courses and as the chief editor and producer of MTA. Along with numerous translations, he has authored two books aimed at countering radicalism in Bangladeshi society: Under the Garb of Religious Edicts and Challenging the Utter Lies of Mufti Noorani.

The AMJI (aka Mirza family) knows that the Ahmadiyya chanda is running out. Thus, they are begging for asylum from Bangladesh. They can be seen begging Mr. Jamie Staley, Foreign Aff. Officer, Intern’l Religious Freedom, U.S State Dept., Mr. Metthew Beh, Dty. Political/Economic Counselor and Mr. Hermanoschy Bernard, Human Rights Officer, US Embassy, Dhaka at the Ahmadiyya Nat’l HQ. On the Qadiani-Ahmadi side, Ahmad Tabshir Choudhury (Director External & Public Affairs, Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at, Bangladesh) and Maulana Abdul Awwal Khan Chaudhry (wokring as missionary-in-charge since 1988) can be noticed (not sure of the other two).

Continue reading “Who is Maulana Abdul Awwal Khan Chaudhry?” →

Intro
In June of 2025, Maulvi Razi and his team of paid Maulvi’s got caught lying by Adnan Rashid (2:44:40 timestamp) and Bro Imtiaz about many things (see the clips on TikTok and twitter). Maulvi Razi got caught mispresenting Ahmad Reza Khan, Shah Wali Ullah and many others. Bro Imtiaz made Maulvi Razi confess that Ahmadi’s never argue that scholars like Qurtubi, Shah Wali Ullah, Mujadid Suyuti and anyone else (See on TikTok and Twitter) said that the second coming of Muhammad (Saw) would happen via 62:3 (62:4 in the Kadiani Koran). Bro Imtiaz reviewed this entire debate herein and tweeted about it and made a shorter video. Bro Imtiaz proved how all the arguments that the Ahmadiyya clergy made in this video were also denied by Razi when he was cornered by Bro Imtiaz.

Firstly, Ibrahim Ikhtalaf lied about a quote from Qurtubi (10:26 time stamp)(Read other quotes to from Qurtubi from Ahmadi’s herein). The book is Al-Jami’ li Ahkam al-Qur’an (The General Judgments of the Qur’an) aka Tafsir al-Qurtubi. Ibrahim Ikhtalaf alleged that Qurtubi quoted 62:3 and argued that Qurtubi meant that Muhammad (saw) will be raised twice (naozobillah)(this is a total misinterpretation of Qurtubi).

Secondly, Ibrahim Ikhtalaf lied about a quote from Shah Wali Ullah wherein he alleged that Shah Wali Ullah supported the concept of Buruz in the form of a second coming of Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah). However, this is not a book by Shah Wali Ullah, it is a commentary via Mufti Muhammad Amin Palanpuri (from the Deoband school). Furthermore, the book is in either Urdu or Persian, which Ibrahim Ikhtalaf can’t read, nor has he had read this book from cover to cover.
Ibrahim Ikhtalaf seems to be reading an Arabic translation, he didn’t give his source. Ibrahim Ikhtalaf noticed that the word “Khatim” was used. Ibrahim Ikhtalaf then accused Shah Wali Ullah via Mufti Muhammad Amin Palanpuri (from the Deoband school) of arguing that the Buruz (clear copy, like a clone)) of Muhammad (Saw) would come again as Eisa (As)(Naozobillah). These are all lies! However, Ibrahim Ikhtalaf makes a huge blunder and reveals that this quote is about Eisa (as) the son of Mary (as) and how his physical return as a prophet doesn’t contradict Khatme Nubuwwat. In conclusion, Mansoor Ahmad Clarke argued that Shah Wali Ullah and Qurtubi promoted the concept of Buruz and the second coming of Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah).

After that, Maulvi Razi used 47:38 (47:39 in the Kadiani Koran) and argued that this has the same meanings as 62:3 (62:4 in the Kadiani Koran). Razi then quoted A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 5, page 220 and explained how MGA addressed the issue that Muslims say “Akhireena Minhum is plural” in terms of 62:3 (62:4 in the Kadiani Koran). MGA then falsely argues that Muhammad (Saw) applied it to only one person (this is a lie), Salman Farsi. MGA then argues that this “one person” will be born in an era wherein there are philosophical differences. People would be in a state of extreme weakness. MGA then argues that the Quran called “Abraham” (as) as ummah (many people), however, Abraham (as) was only one person. Razi says further that a great Ummah will be raised, not just one person.

Maulvi Razi alleges that the famous Mujadid Suyuti said that 62:3 (62:4 in the Kadiani Koran) is about Imam Abu Hanifa. However, Razi hides the fact that Suyuti didn’t say ONLY Imam Abu Hanifa, he simply included him in this verse, as one among others. Furthermore, Razi hid the fact that Imam Suyuti believed in the physical second coming of Eisa (as).

Maulvi Razi then alleges that Imam Ibn Abidin said in Radd al Muhtar that 62:3 (62:4 in the Kadiani Koran) is about Imam Abu Hanifa. However, Razi hides the fact that Ahmad Raza Khan did Takfir on Ahmadi’s.

Maulvi Raheel Ahmad said that denial of MGA (the promised messiah) is Kufr (see on Tiktok and Twitter).

Bro Imtiaz came on at 3:08:19 and discussed the fact that MGA said that Muhammad (Saw) didn’t finish his mission and MGA was here to complete it.

Continue reading “LIVESTREAM: Q&A – Prophethood in Islam – Part 4–Review by Dr. Shah” →