January 2017

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s missing biographies

Intro
Ahmadis have been deleting and editing their books for over 100 years. Its a non-stop cycle. I recently came across 4 early biographies of MGA that seem to have gone missing.

The Titles
Sheikh Yaqub Ali Irfani (also called Sheikh Yacub Ali Torab) books Sirat-ul-Nabi, Sirat Ahmad, and Sirat Masih Maoud, which were published in (1915).

Pir Siraj ul Haq’s book Tazkirat-ul-Mahdi

Why are they missing?
These are the original sources of information on the life of MGA, in-fact, the famous pension story is quoted here and many other stories.

Naeem Osman Memon quoted Irfani’s book
There are a few quotations in this book. Which is a terribly written book. Feel free to surf it. https://www.alislam.org/books/3in1/index.html

January 25, 2017 2

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his team went back and forth in terms of if Jesus had a biological father or not

Intro
Noorudin and his team (Maulvi Abdul Kareem and Mufti Sadiq) believed that Esa (as) had a biological father before they had ever met Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, they took this new belief from Sir Syed, who wrote it in 1880. They all worked together in Jammu, with Noorudin being the boss. Nevertheless, Noorudin and his team held the belief that Esa (as) had a biological father until 1903, wherein it is reported by Noorudin himself that he was forced to change his position on the order of MGA. However, after MGA died, per Lahori-Ahmadi sources, Noorudin ordered Muhammad Ali to write in his commentary of the Quran that Esa (As) had a biological father. The Qadiani branch went on to call the miraculous birth of Esa (as) as less then a miracle and some sort of rationally explained phenomenon. Obviously, the classic islamic view is that Esa (as) was born miraculously, just like Adam (as). By the will of Allah. Interestingly, in 1902, the English ROR discussed the possibility of a biological father of Esa (as). In the same year, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that Maryam got a Nikkah while 6-7 months pregnant with Eisa (as) (astagfarullah) and that Maryam was married when the angel blew into her (see 21:91). By 1908, MGA and his team of writers alleged that Maryam impregnated herself (see the quote in the below).

However, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s via Muhammad Ali and his famous 1918 commentary used MGA’s argument. In 1918, via the ROR of May, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s objected to the Lahori-Ahmadi belief that Eisa (As) had a biological father, which was clearly written in Muhammad Ali’s 1917 english commentary of the Quran. The secretary of the “Anjuman Taraqi-e-Islam” called this specific belief of the Lahori-Ahmadi’s as running counter to Islam. However, this was stolen from Sir Syed and by MGA himself. In 1927, the Ahmadiyya Movement claimed that Parthenogenesis created Eisa (as), not Allah. The same arguments were made in the first edition of the Moslem Sunrise (July-1921) by Muftree Muhammad Sadiq. Thus proving that as early as 1921, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s had came up with this ideology.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his team went back and forth in terms of if Jesus had a biological father or not” →

January 25, 2017 43

A hadith that Ahmadis use to define what is a Muslim?

Intro
Nowadays, Ahmadis have been posting this hadith all over social media. They are trying to argue that anyone can be a Muslim and etc.

The Hadith

Narrated Maimun bin Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 393
In-book reference : Book 8, Hadith 45

http://sunnah.com/bukhari/8/45

Implications
The Prophet said, “….prays like us…”. What does this mean? Does this mean praying 5 times per day? If Ahmadis agree then Aga Khani Shias are not Muslim per the Ahmadiyya implication. Also, the Nation of Islam doesn’t fall into this category either.

Ahmadis need to explain
Ahmadis need to go back to the drawing board and re-think another argument, this one has crashed.

January 17, 2017 0

Mirza Nasir Ahmad at the 1974, National Assembly testifying on oath about the number of Ahmadis

Intro
Ahmadis lie about their census all the time, we have created a master file of Ahmadiyya census numbers herein. They do this as a marketing ploy, they try to keep their flock of adherents paying and volunteering, this way, the money keeps rolling in. In the subsequent scans, Mirza Nasir Ahmad claims that there are 10 million Ahmadi’s in the world by 1974 at the National assembly, with 3.5-4 million in Pakistan. Which is a blatant lie, and a continuation of his lie in 1969/1970, which is the first indication of the 10 million number.

Continue reading “Mirza Nasir Ahmad at the 1974, National Assembly testifying on oath about the number of Ahmadis” →

January 17, 2017 14

Hyat e Nasir (1927) 1st edition vs. 2nd edition

Intro
Ahmadis are fond of editing their books. They do it all the time. Their team of mullahs sits around all day editing and inventing new arguments to keep their flock in line. In 1927, a scholar of Ahmadiyya, Sheikh Yacoob Ali Irfani published the biography of the father-in-law of MGA, Mir Nasir Nawab. Irfani was the editor of the Al-Hakam and lived in Qadian. By 2019, a new online edition appeared. We have to assume that this book is on its 3rd edition, it can be found online herein. Hani Tahir speaks about it also (see in the below). Listen to the explanation on Aaqa ka Ghulam (at the 57:16 mark). It seems that with Mirza Tahir Ahmad a revision was undertaken. Hayat-e Nasir was first published in 1927. The copy available online is a new edition, but the new publication date is not mentioned. Here is a video clip of Mirza Tahir Ahmad echoing the same point. Hayat-e Nasir page 13, last paragraph, plus footnote 1 made by publisher).

“Hyat e Nasir” was most likely written in 1924-25, since Mir Nasir Nawab died in 1925. Nevertheless, Mir Nasir Nawab gave an explanation of the death of MGA. He claimed that MGA spoke out, as he was suffering from the pangs of death, “Mir sahib, I have contracted Cholera”. After this book was published, the critics of Ahmadiyya seem to have noticed this fact and began arguing with Ahmadis that MGA did in-fact die of Cholera. However, in 1908, on May 30th, the Valik newspaper reported that MGA died of cholera. On June 14th, 1908, the new Khalifa, Maulvi Noorudin even admitted that MGA died of cholera. Even Farquhar had wrote in 1915, that MGA died of Cholera, these allegations were nothing new. Further, MGA was sitting on a mobile toilet (chowkee) just minutes before he died, he died on Brandereth Road in Lahore. You can read MGA’s death story here from Ahmadi sources only. In 1918, Ahmadi’s told Walter that MGA had died of intestine trouble, which is proof that Ahmadi’s lie openly and are willingly ordered to cover-up the truth and thus, the story was changed in Ahmadiyya history. Nowadays, Ahmadi’s are willfully ignoring the full facts of what Maulana Abu Kalamazad wrote about MGA.

They even gave MGA an unknown injection at roughly midnight. MGA fell-out after that. IMHO, MGA died right before the injection, and Ahmadis have lied about the rest of the story. And what was in this injection that he got? And did they stab him in the heart with it? All of these details are missing.
Continue reading “Hyat e Nasir (1927) 1st edition vs. 2nd edition” →

January 16, 2017 22

Mirza Masroor Ahmad provoked all the Muslims in the world

Intro
Ahmadis have been crying persecution for many many years, however, it is the Mirza family who kept provoking Muslims all around the world with their various challenges and death-threats. Here is a video from 2010, wherein Mirza Masroor Ahmad is aggressively challenging all Muslims in the world.

January 15, 2017 0

Are Ahmadis the fastest growing Islamic sect? The World Christian Encyclopedia opened and evaluated

Intro
Watch my video, wherein I open the World Christian Encyclopedia and show how Ahmadi’s lie and are academically dishonest. Also check out my essay on the Ahmadiyya population broken down per country, IMHO, there are barely 145k Ahmadi’s in the entire world, of which 70% are desi.

This encyclopedia is extremely biased, it gives little to NO references at all. There is a section about Pakistan wherein Ahmadis are mentioned, feel free to view that, there isn’t any significant data there that is of use in this essay.

1. This book reports 70k Ahmadis in 1900. That is not true, no Ahmadi source ever reported that. In fact, the 1901 British-India census came back at roughly 11,000 Ahmadis in British India. MGA had Ahmadis as a separate column on the census, hence, he wanted to be separate from Islam. There were additional censuses in 1911, 1921, and 1931 Ahmadis were never more then 60k.

Feel free to read Mirza Nasir Ahmad’s legal testimony in 1974, wherein the census of the Ahmadis was ripped to shreds. 1.

2. 2.6 million Ahmadi’s in 1970??? The book then asserts that there was 2.6 million Ahmadis by 1970, however, there is no reference at all.

3. 5.7 million Ahmadi’s in he mid-1990’s??? The book then reports that there were 5.7 million Ahmadis by the mid-1990’s. This is another lie, in fact, in 1984 and 1989, Mirza tahir Ahmad was reporting 10 million worldwide, which was an inflated number. So even per Ahmadiyya records, this is wrong.

4. The book then goes on to explain in terms of how many Ahmadis were born in 1990-2000, it gives the number at 156k. However, this is a lie, Ahmadiyya records have never published this at all. Where did they get this number from?? Obviously, the scholarship of this book is in question. It also claims 60k converts in this same period, another claim without a shred of evidence. It then reports 200k new Ahmadis from 1990-2000, that is totally at odds with the official Ahmadiyya reporting on this topic (see in the above). In fact, this is where the growth rate is listed, and they seem to indicate that Ahmadiyya grew at a rate of 3.25, however, just underneath, the same book reports that “Other sectarian Muslims” grew at a rate of 3.46. So even per the book, Ahmadiyya was not the fastest growing group of Muslims.

5. The book itself never claims that Ahmadiyya is the fastest growing sect of any type. It simply gives a graph of figured on the first few pages, and thus, any inference can be made from the data. In this case, the data given is inaccurate to begin with, thus the conclusions are erroneous and academically dishonest.

In the below, I give you a chronological list of the Ahmadi census reports since 1889. I will also cover the data that was given by the World Christian Encyclopedia (WCE). You will also find the comments of overzealous Ahmadi’s after 2006 who were academically dishonest. You will also see how as soon as Mirza Nasir Ahmad took over, he began to spread the rumor that there were 10 million Ahmadis, aka 1-crore. Almost all Ahmadi publications and utterances since 1965 have reported 10 million Ahmadis in the whole world. You will then see how Mirza Tahir Ahmad took over in 1982 and continued to peddle the 10 million number, all the way to 1989. Then, in the second 100-years of Ahmadiyya, he lied about the number of converts and specifically in 2001 he was claiming 40 million converts alone from India to Ahmadiyya. In 2003, when the new Khalifa took over, he slowly lowered the number of Ahmadi’s in the world and refused to address the issue. By 2020, he lied and claimed 120,000 people converted to Ahmadiyya, of which 80% were from Africa, and none from Pakistan.