Intro
In 1884, in the BA-4 (see page 398), MGA translated RAFFA as a physical lifting towards Allah.
In 1891, MGA didn’t directly approach 4:158 (4:159 in the Qadiani Quran) and what Raf’a meant therein, however, MGA gives many hints in Izala Auham, in fact, MGA argued that humans being can’t each reach the top of mountains, since there is no oxygen, and even leaving the upper atmosphere for a human is impossible (See RK, Izala Auham, Vol. 3, page 126). In the same book, MGA also denied the physicality of the Miraaj.
By 1907, MGA was arguing that it was simply ignorant to think a human being could leave Earth and go to the heavens (see the Haqiqatul Wahy quote). Ironically, there are 5 quotes wherein MGA alleged that Eisa (as) was in fact, in the skies.
In 1908 (Oct), MGA argued that spiritual exaltation (Rafa’a in 4:158, 4:159 in the Kadiani Koran) is a result of natural death only (See Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya, V-5, Online English edition, page 509).
After MGA died (we haven’t found anything to date from MGA about Eisa [as] being raised in rank), the Ahmadiyya began claiming that Raf’a in 4:158 meant raising Eisa (as) in rank, instead of Allah physically lifting Eisa (As) to the Samaa Wattay and out of trouble (See Tafsir Qurtubi, Ibn Taymiyya and Fakhr al-Din al-Razi). Ironically, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad used 3:39 (3:40 in the Qadiani Quran) of the Quran to lower the status of Eisa (as), after arguing that Allah raised the status of Eisa (as) in 4:158.
Furthermore, Rafa-hoo (4:158) is a masculine pro-noun and proves that Eisa (as) was lifted with his body (Via Sheikh Ibn Hazm). Even, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab believed that Eisa (as) was alive when Allah raised him up (4:158), and that Eisa (as) would physically return. Even Mark 16:19 of the Bible confirms 4:158 of the Quran.
Al-Tabari said: ‘Mutawaffīka’ and ‘Rāfi‘uka’ are one and the same. He said: “He (ʿĪsā) has not yet died; he will kill the Dajjāl and then die.” He recited Allah’s saying: ‘He will speak to the people in the cradle and in maturity (kahlān)’ (Q 3:46). He said: “Allah raised him to Himself before he became mature, and he will descend as a mature man.” This is the view that “mutawaffīka” means taking (qabḍ), not death, and that ʿĪsā (Jesus) is alive and will return before dying. Muḥammad ibn Sinān narrated to us, from Abū Bakr al-Ḥanafī, from ʿAbbād, from al-Ḥasan (al-Baṣrī), about Allah’s saying “O Jesus, I will take you and raise you to Myself.” He said: “Allah raised him to Himself, and he is with Him in the heaven.” This is another narration confirming that “tawaffī” here means taking up bodily, not causing death. Ibn Ḥumayd narrated to us, from Salamah, from Ibn Isḥāq, from someone he does not suspect (in narrating), from Wahb ibn Munabbih al-Yamānī, that he said: “Allah caused ʿĪsā ibn Maryam to die for three hours of the day, then He raised him to Himself.” This third narration harmonizes both views: that ʿĪsā experienced a brief form of “death” (a temporary tawaffī) before being raised alive. Hence Imam Tabari رحمة الله عليه himself supported the opinion saying that he was raised bodily. Plus none of those opinions said Isa عليه السلام was raised in ranks.
In 2026 (Jun), Maulvi Razi quoted “Shams ul Hiday” by Pir Mehr Ali Shah and mentioned how the Pir Mehr Ali Shah had argued that 4:158 had full ijma of physical lifting of Eisa (as) to Allah (43:13 timestamp).
In 2026, it was discovered that even a deviant like ibn ‘Ashūr al-Mālikī believed that 4:158 was a physical lifting towards Allah.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad on 4:158 of the Quran (4:159 in the Qadiani Quran)” →